search
Back to results

Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy

Primary Purpose

Cardiac Arrest

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
fixed versus escalating biphasic defibrillation
Sponsored by
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiac Arrest focused on measuring defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, heart arrest

Eligibility Criteria

8 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Witnessed cardiac arrest out-of-hospital requiring defibrillation and given by first responder using an automated external defibrillator Exclusion Criteria: Terminal illness or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status No cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) x 10 minutes Acute trauma Exsanguination Cardiac arrest experienced while in hospital

Sites / Locations

  • Ottawa Hospital

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Successful conversion to an organized heart rhythm

Secondary Outcome Measures

Survival to hospital discharge
Resuscitation for survival to one hour
Neurologic function
Removal of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 5 seconds
Return of spontaneous circulation
Survival to 24 hours

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2005
Last Updated
January 23, 2017
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00212992
Brief Title
Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy
Official Title
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy Regimens for Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2001 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will compare the effect of constant low-level energy [150 joules] to an escalating energy [200-300-360 joules] regimen of biphasic waveform defibrillation on multiple patient outcomes.
Detailed Description
This pilot, which will enroll 200 subjects, will allow a reasonable estimate of effect size and this will, in turn, allow for the accurate design and planning of a definitive randomized controlled trial. The following outcomes will be evaluated: Important Clinical Outcomes: Successful conversion, Resuscitation to one hour, Survival to hospital discharge, Neurological function, and Quality of life. Process Outcomes: Number of shocks required, Recurrences of VF, and Responsiveness to varying periods of pulselessness. Adverse Outcomes: Myocardial damage.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiac Arrest
Keywords
defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, heart arrest

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Double
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
fixed versus escalating biphasic defibrillation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Successful conversion to an organized heart rhythm
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival to hospital discharge
Title
Resuscitation for survival to one hour
Title
Neurologic function
Title
Removal of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 5 seconds
Title
Return of spontaneous circulation
Title
Survival to 24 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Witnessed cardiac arrest out-of-hospital requiring defibrillation and given by first responder using an automated external defibrillator Exclusion Criteria: Terminal illness or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status No cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) x 10 minutes Acute trauma Exsanguination Cardiac arrest experienced while in hospital
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ian Stiell, MD
Organizational Affiliation
OHRI
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y 4E9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17353443
Citation
Stiell IG, Walker RG, Nesbitt LP, Chapman FW, Cousineau D, Christenson J, Bradford P, Sookram S, Berringer R, Lank P, Wells GA. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1511-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.648204. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs