search
Back to results

Black Health Identification Program (B-HIP)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Chronic Conditions, Family Members

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
"My Health Priorities" Identification Program
Sponsored by
University of Alabama at Birmingham
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Multiple Chronic Conditions

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for Patients

  • African American (AA)
  • ≥ 65 years
  • has at least two of the following chronic conditions: cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease
  • English-speaking
  • cognitively able to participate in decision-making discussions
  • reliable internet and telephone access
  • FCG willing to participate in study

Inclusion Criteria for FCG

  • AA

    • 18 years
  • identified by patient as his/her primary FCG
  • English-speaking; and 5) reliable internet and telephone access.

Exclusion Criteria for Patients and FCG

  • Axis I psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), dementia
  • active substance use disorder
  • living in a nursing home or assisted living facility residence.

Sites / Locations

  • The Whitaker Clinic at the University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

"My Health Priorities" Identification Program

Arm Description

The intervention, the "My Health Priorities" Identification Program consists of four self-directed, web-based modules intended to guide patients with MCCs in identifying their own health priorities. These priorities can then be used to guide discussions with family caregivers and clinicians regarding specific goals and preferences that they wish to guide future treatment decisions. Most models of palliative care have been developed based on white middle-class populations and may not apply to African Americans (AA) who have a very different cultural value set.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

A single arm formative evaluation (qualitative interviews) exploring acceptability of the program
Semi-structured interview of patients with multiple chronic illness (MCC)
A single arm formative evaluation (qualitative interviews) exploring acceptability of program
Semi-structured interview of family caregivers (FCG) of patients with MCC
System Usability Scale (ISUS)
Measures usability of web-based applications and programs in both patients and FCG,. subscales evaluate how learnable and usable the tested program is; 10 items, 5 items are scored positively and 5 items are scored negatively using a 5 point likert scale with 5 indicating strongly agree and 1 indicating strongly disagree
Program Completion Statistics
Usability statistics will be obtained about the length of time the participant engaged with the program, and module completion rates
Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC)
Questionnaire of perception of care among patients with MCC. The questionnaire consists of 10 items scored on a 5 point likert scale with 5 indicating "almost always" and 1 indicating "almost never". Higher scores thus reflect patients' perception of better care.
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Patients with MCC perception of QOL and treatment burden related to chronic illness; 15 items rated on a ten point scale with 0 indicating that the item "is not a problem" and 10 indicating that the item reflects a "big problem".
Clinical Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (CollaboRATE)
Patients with MCC-reported measure of clinical shared decision-making; 3 items requiring open-ended responses (no scale)
Bakas Caregiver Outcomes (BCOS)
Measures FCG social function, subjective well-being, and somatic health; 10 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with -3 reflecting "changed for the worst" and +3 indicating "changed for the better".
Shared Care Instrument (SCI)
PT and FCG's perception of communication exchange regarding illness experience, subscales include communication, decision making, and reciprocity; 19 items divided into 3 summary scales, each item is scored in likert format from 0 to 5 with 0 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". On the communication subscale a higher score indicates better communication. For the patient decision making subscale, higher scores indicate better patient decision making. For the patient reciprocity scale, higher scores indicate more reciprocity between patient and caregiver.
Change in Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC)
Measure of older patient perception of primary care delivery; 10 items scored on a 5 point likert scale with 1 indicating "almost never" and 5 indicating "almost always". Higher scores reflect that patients have a more positive feeling about their care.
Change in Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Patients with MCC perception of QOL and treatment burden related to chronic illness; 15 items rated on a ten point scale with 0 indicating that the item "is not a problem" and 10 indicating that the item reflects a "big problem".
Change in Clinical Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (CollaboRATE)
Patients with MCC-reported measure of clinical shared decision-making; 3 items requiring open-ended responses (no scale)
Change in Bakas Caregiver Outcomes (BCOS)
Measures FCG social function, subjective well-being, and somatic health; 10 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with -3 reflecting "changed for the worst" and +3 indicating "changed for the better".
Change in Shared Care Instrument (SCI)
PT perception of communication exchange regarding illness experience, subscales include communication, decision making, and reciprocity; 19 items divided into 3 summary scales, each item is scored in likert format from 0 to 5 with 0 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". On the communication subscale a higher score indicates better communication. For the patient decision making subscale, higher scores indicate better patient decision making. For the patient reciprocity scale, higher scores indicate more reciprocity between patient and caregiver.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 28, 2021
Last Updated
January 9, 2023
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05129709
Brief Title
Black Health Identification Program (B-HIP)
Official Title
Addressing Communication Challenges Confronting Older African Americans With Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Family Caregivers
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Nearly 69% of African American (AA) Medicare beneficiaries have multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) such as cancer and cardiopulmonary diseases. Older age and MCCs are guideline-recommended indications for referral to early palliative care to assist with effective communication and value-solicitation surrounding treatment decision-making. Studies have shown that early palliative care participation achieves beneficial goals of care communication, quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, and mood in older adults with cancer and heart failure as well as among their family caregivers. However, older AAs with MCCs, especially those living in the Deep South, are less likely to have access to early palliative care, even though they generally experience higher symptom burden, healthcare use, and poorer communication around goals of care. This disparity in palliative care use may be, in part, to a lack of culturally-responsive care practices that effectively activate AAs with MCCs to identify their own values and priorities for end-of-life care. While efficacious communication models exist, few have been tested in culturally-diverse samples. Guided by the theory of Social Cognitive Theory and Health Behavior Model, this study's purpose is to conduct a formative evaluation of a Self-directed "My Health Priorities" Identification Program to determine cultural acceptability and feasibility of use in among AAs with MCCs in a primary care setting. The 2-phase study specific aims are to: Aim 1. (Phase 1) Conduct a single-arm formative evaluation trial of Self-directed "My Health Priorities" Identification Program to determine acceptability and feasibility with a sample of 20 AA patients with MCCs and FCGs and adapt for future efficacy testing. Aim 2. (Phase 2) To examine the ability of the dyads to complete pre- and post-test measures of perception of care, treatment burden, shared decision-making, and communication exchange. The findings from the research will directly inform a small-scale pilot grant that will assess acceptability, feasibility, and potential efficacy of a values solicitation and operationalization intervention for AAs with MCCs and caregivers.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Chronic Conditions, Family Members

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the Health Belief Model (HBM) inform this proposal. The SCT posits that human behavior is determined by expectancies- of culture, potential outcomes, and self-efficacy- and incentives. The HBM holds that health-related behavior depends on motivation, the belief that one is susceptible to serious illness, and the belief that following provider advice will reduce the threat. Concepts of health beliefs, self-efficacy, and culture must be considered when developing effective interventions for value solicitations and behavior change. This is especially true for older AAs in the Deep South, who report different lived experiences and experiences with medical icare than Whites. Patient-centered care cannot be realized for AAs without reshaping interventions to consider factors important to seriously ill older AAs with MCCs. Reframing discussion in a culturally-responsive manner is necessary to establish patient and FCG preferences prior to a health crisis.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
"My Health Priorities" Identification Program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention, the "My Health Priorities" Identification Program consists of four self-directed, web-based modules intended to guide patients with MCCs in identifying their own health priorities. These priorities can then be used to guide discussions with family caregivers and clinicians regarding specific goals and preferences that they wish to guide future treatment decisions. Most models of palliative care have been developed based on white middle-class populations and may not apply to African Americans (AA) who have a very different cultural value set.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
"My Health Priorities" Identification Program
Intervention Description
The web-based "My Health Priorities" Identification Program may improve values solicitation and operationalization skills in primary care, but has not been optimized for AAs with MCCs and their FCGs. The Program is a facilitator-led evidence- and values-based care communication model for patients, clinicians, and caregivers that has reduced patient-reported treatment burden by aligning value-based priorities with treatment. The web-based program assists patients in identifying their health priorities as they complete t four online modules that help them to identify specific and actionable health goals and preferences. The final result can be printed and brought to the clinic or uploaded to the Electronic Medical Record to inform subsequent healthcare decision making. Unrecognized cultural preferences of AAs, including the important role of R/S beliefs and family-centered values, can interfere with adequate healthcare communication resulting in healthcare disparities and inequities.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
A single arm formative evaluation (qualitative interviews) exploring acceptability of the program
Description
Semi-structured interview of patients with multiple chronic illness (MCC)
Time Frame
one-time interview six weeks following baseline questionnaires
Title
A single arm formative evaluation (qualitative interviews) exploring acceptability of program
Description
Semi-structured interview of family caregivers (FCG) of patients with MCC
Time Frame
one-time interview six weeks following baseline questionnaires
Title
System Usability Scale (ISUS)
Description
Measures usability of web-based applications and programs in both patients and FCG,. subscales evaluate how learnable and usable the tested program is; 10 items, 5 items are scored positively and 5 items are scored negatively using a 5 point likert scale with 5 indicating strongly agree and 1 indicating strongly disagree
Time Frame
one-time interview six weeks following baseline questionnaires
Title
Program Completion Statistics
Description
Usability statistics will be obtained about the length of time the participant engaged with the program, and module completion rates
Time Frame
one-time interview six weeks following baseline questionnaires
Title
Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC)
Description
Questionnaire of perception of care among patients with MCC. The questionnaire consists of 10 items scored on a 5 point likert scale with 5 indicating "almost always" and 1 indicating "almost never". Higher scores thus reflect patients' perception of better care.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Description
Patients with MCC perception of QOL and treatment burden related to chronic illness; 15 items rated on a ten point scale with 0 indicating that the item "is not a problem" and 10 indicating that the item reflects a "big problem".
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Clinical Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (CollaboRATE)
Description
Patients with MCC-reported measure of clinical shared decision-making; 3 items requiring open-ended responses (no scale)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Bakas Caregiver Outcomes (BCOS)
Description
Measures FCG social function, subjective well-being, and somatic health; 10 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with -3 reflecting "changed for the worst" and +3 indicating "changed for the better".
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Shared Care Instrument (SCI)
Description
PT and FCG's perception of communication exchange regarding illness experience, subscales include communication, decision making, and reciprocity; 19 items divided into 3 summary scales, each item is scored in likert format from 0 to 5 with 0 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". On the communication subscale a higher score indicates better communication. For the patient decision making subscale, higher scores indicate better patient decision making. For the patient reciprocity scale, higher scores indicate more reciprocity between patient and caregiver.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC)
Description
Measure of older patient perception of primary care delivery; 10 items scored on a 5 point likert scale with 1 indicating "almost never" and 5 indicating "almost always". Higher scores reflect that patients have a more positive feeling about their care.
Time Frame
18 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Description
Patients with MCC perception of QOL and treatment burden related to chronic illness; 15 items rated on a ten point scale with 0 indicating that the item "is not a problem" and 10 indicating that the item reflects a "big problem".
Time Frame
18 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in Clinical Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (CollaboRATE)
Description
Patients with MCC-reported measure of clinical shared decision-making; 3 items requiring open-ended responses (no scale)
Time Frame
18 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in Bakas Caregiver Outcomes (BCOS)
Description
Measures FCG social function, subjective well-being, and somatic health; 10 items rated on a 7 point likert scale with -3 reflecting "changed for the worst" and +3 indicating "changed for the better".
Time Frame
18 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in Shared Care Instrument (SCI)
Description
PT perception of communication exchange regarding illness experience, subscales include communication, decision making, and reciprocity; 19 items divided into 3 summary scales, each item is scored in likert format from 0 to 5 with 0 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". On the communication subscale a higher score indicates better communication. For the patient decision making subscale, higher scores indicate better patient decision making. For the patient reciprocity scale, higher scores indicate more reciprocity between patient and caregiver.
Time Frame
18 weeks post-baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Patients African American (AA) ≥ 65 years has at least two of the following chronic conditions: cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease English-speaking cognitively able to participate in decision-making discussions reliable internet and telephone access FCG willing to participate in study Inclusion Criteria for FCG AA 18 years identified by patient as his/her primary FCG English-speaking; and 5) reliable internet and telephone access. Exclusion Criteria for Patients and FCG Axis I psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), dementia active substance use disorder living in a nursing home or assisted living facility residence.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jennifer Frank, PhD
Phone
205-966-0377
Email
jfranf@uab.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah Ejem, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Whitaker Clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raegan Durant, MD
Phone
205-934-7608
Email
rdurant@uabmc.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Black Health Identification Program (B-HIP)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs