search
Back to results

Blood-Based Biomarkers to Inform Treatment and Radiation Therapy Decisions for HPV Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers

Primary Purpose

Oropharyngeal Human Papillomavirus-Positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biospecimen Collection
Cisplatin
Computed Tomography
Diffusing Alpha-emitter Radiation Therapy
Docetaxel
Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Modified Barium Swallow
Observation
Positron Emission Tomography
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Questionnaire
Sponsored by
Mayo Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Oropharyngeal Human Papillomavirus-Positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PRE-REGISTRATION (optional): Provide written informed consent
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Histological confirmation of p16+ OPSCC or HPV(+) OPSCC
  • Plan for gross total surgical resection via trans oral surgery with curative intent and at least unilateral neck dissection OR chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin
  • Absence of distant metastases on standard diagnostic work-up =< 16 weeks prior to registration. (Chest CT or PET/CT)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) =< 1
  • Negative pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
  • Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study)
  • Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research purposes, including anonymous shipment of samples to for NavDx testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following:

    • Pregnant women
    • Nursing women
    • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
  • Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
  • Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
  • Other active malignancy =< 5 years prior to registration. EXCEPTIONS: Nonmelanotic skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, or prostate or localized endometrioid endometrial cancer. NOTE: If there is a history or prior malignancy, they must not be receiving other specific treatment for their cancer
  • Prior history of radiation therapy to the affected site
  • Prior systemic chemotherapy in the last 5 years
  • History of connective tissue disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or Sjogren's disease
  • History of allergic reaction to docetaxel
  • Receiving any medications or substances which in the opinion of the investigators would interfere with treatment. Examples could include strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) at oncologist discretion
  • Severe pre-existing ototoxicity or neuropathy that would, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the use of cisplatin chemotherapy
  • cT4 primary tumor

    • NOTE: Patients with no intermediate risk factors after surgery, low risk patients, as defined by T1, T2, tumors with lymph node less than 3cm, no intermediate or high risk factors such as lymphatic invasion (LVSI), ENE, perineural invasion (PNI), positive margin, will go off study and be observed per current clinical standard of care
    • Patients found to have HPV non 16 type, or HPV detectability in blood less than <50 tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV) will not be candidates for de-escalation in Groups 1 and 2 and will be treated in Group 3. They will receive 60 Gy +/- cisplatin. If treated primarily with chemoradiation (chemoRT) (Group 4), these patients will not be candidates for de-escalation but can remain on study receiving 70 Gy with all corresponding correlative studies applying
    • Patients with unknown (radiologic/clinically occult) primaries but p16+ or HPV+ neck adenopathy can be registered to go on study. Should after primary resection, no primary tumor be identified, the patient will go off study and be treated per institutional standard of care
    • All treatment primarily, including surgery and chemotherapy will be performed at the enrolling institution

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in ArizonaRecruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida
  • Mayo Clinic in RochesterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1 (observation)

Group 2 (DART, docetaxel)

Group 3 (IMRT/IMPT, with/without cisplatin)

Group 4 (IMRT/IMPT, cisplatin)

Arm Description

Patients undergo observation following standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 months follow-up. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or magnetic MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.

Patients undergo DART with/without mucosal sparing BID on days 1-12 Monday-Friday for a total of 20 fractions within 8 weeks of standard of care surgery. Patients receive concurrent docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (Mondays preferred). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.

Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for a total of 30 fractions within 6 weeks of standard of care surgery. Depending on risk status, patients may also receive concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours once a week QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.

Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT therapy QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for 28 or 35 fractions based on biomarker response along with concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS prior to RT and at 3 and 12 months post RT. Patients undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing pre-RT, 4 weeks into RT, anticipated fraction 20, end of RT, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS), the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening. PFS at specific timepoints will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS) follow-up
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response versus (vs.) no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Disease-free survival (DFS) is the measure of time after treatment during which no sign of cancer is found. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the duration of patient survival from the time of treatment initiation. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Incidence of adverse events
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Patterns of recurrence and rate of salvage therapy for Low Intermediate Risk (GROUP 1) and multiple segment radiation therapy (MSRT) + de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART)
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Functional outcomes - MBBS
Measured by modified barium swallow (MBSS). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Functional outcomes - PROs
Measure by patient reported outcomes (PROs). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - PROs
Assessed by PROs. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - MBSS
Assessed by MBSS. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - dosimetric differences
Assessed by dosimetric differences including to organs at risk and the primary tumor bed in the case of mucosal sparing. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Costs of return visits for surveillance
Presented descriptively and ANOVA models with tukey's adjustment for pairwise comparison will be utilized to test difference in arms.
Assessment of surveillance circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) preceding clinical or radiologic detection of recurrence
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Matched analysis of patients by clinical and pathologic risk factor to MC1273 and MC1675 de-escalation arms to overall GROUP 1 and GROUP 2 cohorts including 2-year PFS
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Evaluation of return to work
Will be assessed by by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Evaluation of end of treatment treatment circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) detectability as a marker of risk of progression
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Functional outcomes of DART alone vs. DART + MSRT
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Feasibility of DART regimen outside of Mayo Clinic
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2022
Last Updated
October 16, 2023
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05541016
Brief Title
Blood-Based Biomarkers to Inform Treatment and Radiation Therapy Decisions for HPV Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers
Official Title
DART 2.0: ctHPV-DNA Informed De-Escalated Adjuvant and Definitive Radiation Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 21, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2029 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase II trial examines the use of blood-based biomarkers is to help inform decision making for treatment and radiation therapy for patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers. The standard treatments for head and neck cancers are radiation therapy with chemotherapy or surgery potentially followed by radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Radiation therapy uses high energy rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Giving chemotherapy along with radiation may kill more tumor cells. However, the cancer can recur or can spread to other parts of the body and all treatments can be associated with side effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a blood-based biomarker, using the NavDx testing device, for head and neck cancers in order to see if it can help improve selection of the intensity of treatment in order to best balance the side effects of treatment with the goal of decreasing cancer recurrence. This test could aid in early detection of recurrence and salvage therapy.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To prospectively incorporate circulating tumor human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) in combination with clinical and pathologic factors to appropriately select patients for treatment intensity. II. To demonstrate patients traditionally offered adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) but at low risk of treatment failure based on clinical pathologic and post op ctHPVDNA risk factors have an acceptable 1-year progression free survival (PFS) warranting further study. (Favorable Intermediate Risk [GROUP 1]) III. To demonstrate based on clinical, pathologic, and ctHPVDNA risk factors a select population receiving diffusing alpha-emitter radiation therapy (DART) (+ multiple segment radiation therapy [MSRT] where applicable) is associated with acceptable 2 year PFS. (Unfavorable Intermediate Risk [GROUP 2]) IV. To quantify the rate of recurrence as defined by the 2 year PFS in an identified high risk population using the incorporation of ctHPVDNA. (High Risk [GROUP 3]) V. To prospectively use week 4 ctHPVDNA to guide treatment intensity of 56 versus (vs) 70 Gy with concurrent cisplatin to demonstrate 56 Gy with sufficient ctHPVDNA clearance results in an acceptable 2 year PFS. (Chemoradiation Cohort [GROUP 4]) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare PFS by treatment arm including at landmark timepoints II. To assess the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients that are disease-free post-treatment. III. To compare overall survival (OS) by treatment arm including at landmark timepoints. IV. To compare patient reported outcomes (PROS) by treatment arm and modality. V. To evaluate treatment toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria as rated by providers across treatment arms. VI. To define patterns of recurrence by treatment arm. VII. To describe salvage therapy by treatment arm, including the rate, type, and success of salvage treatment. VIII. To compare functional outcomes by treatment arm based on modified barium swallow study (MBSS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) by treatment arm. IX. To return to work parameters by treatment arm as assess by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). X. To quantify the costs of return visits for surveillance. XI. To assess end of treatment ctHPVDNA detectability and its association with PFS by comparing patients with detectable versus undetectable end of treatment ctHPVDNA within treatment arms. XII. To compare outcomes by institution. XIII. To evaluate rates of post operative bleeding, tracheostomy, and readmission with 6 weeks of resection. XIV. To compare methods of surveillance in diagnosis of recurrence including clinical evaluation, ctHPVDNA testing, and imaging. XV. To investigate the impact of tobacco and smoking history on recurrence, PFS, and OS. XVI. To perform a matched analysis of patients by clinical and pathologic risk factors to MC1273, MC1675, and MC Mucosal Sparing (NCT02736786). CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: I. Will investigate post-op Day 1 or 2 ctHPVDNA detectability as a surrogate for detectability for later post-op timepoints including risk of recurrence rates. II. Will analyze salivary samples pre-treatment, post-op, and at the time of recurrence to determine whether salivary ctHPVDNA may further inform recurrence risk and surveillance in HPV(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). III. Will characterize post-operative drain fluid and compare rates of detectability to blood and saliva in order with the aim to determine whether the regional drain represents a separate regional compartment for analysis. IV. Will prospectively quantify pretreatment imaging for number of involved nodes, radiographic extranodal extension (rENE) as it relates to pathologic findings and risk of recurrence. V. Will analyze within category of low intermediate, high intermediate, and high-risk patients the percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and association with recurrence as well as differences across treatment groups. VI. Will assess whether HPV is integrated vs episomal for each patient and the relationship of ctHPVDNA detectability and outcomes. VII. Will investigate molecular markers on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from primary surgical specimens. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 4 groups. GROUP I: Patients undergo observation following standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-operative (pre-op), 2 weeks post-operative (post-op), and 3 months follow-up. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months. GROUP II: Patients undergo DART with/without mucosal sparing twice daily (BID) on days 1-12 Monday-Friday for a total of 20 fractions within 8 weeks of standard of care surgery. Patients receive concurrent docetaxel intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (Mondays preferred). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months. GROUP III: Patients undergo intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) once daily (QD) on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for a total of 30 fractions within 6 weeks of standard of care surgery. Depending on risk status, patients may also receive concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours once a week (QW) on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months. GROUP IV: Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT therapy QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for 28 or 35 fractions based on biomarker response along with concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS prior to RT and at 3 and 12 months post RT. Patients undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing pre-RT, 4 weeks into RT, anticipated fraction 20, end of RT, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 4-6 weeks post treatment, every 3 months post-treatment for 2 years, every 6 months for year 3, and annually for years 4 and 5.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Oropharyngeal Human Papillomavirus-Positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Clinical Stage I HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
320 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1 (observation)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergo observation following standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 months follow-up. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or magnetic MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.
Arm Title
Group 2 (DART, docetaxel)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo DART with/without mucosal sparing BID on days 1-12 Monday-Friday for a total of 20 fractions within 8 weeks of standard of care surgery. Patients receive concurrent docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 (Mondays preferred). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.
Arm Title
Group 3 (IMRT/IMPT, with/without cisplatin)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for a total of 30 fractions within 6 weeks of standard of care surgery. Depending on risk status, patients may also receive concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours once a week QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS at pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, and 3 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients also undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing at pre-op, 1-2 days post-op, 2 weeks post-op, end of RT, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.
Arm Title
Group 4 (IMRT/IMPT, cisplatin)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo IMRT or IMPT therapy QD on days 1-40 Monday-Friday for 28 or 35 fractions based on biomarker response along with concurrent cisplatin IV over 1-2 hours QW on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or once every 3 weeks for 6 doses (or accepted alternate regimen when drug shortage applies per physician discretion). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MBSS prior to RT and at 3 and 12 months post RT. Patients undergo CT, PET/CT, or MRI at baseline and 3 months and 1, 2 and 5 years post treatment. Patients undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing pre-RT, 4 weeks into RT, anticipated fraction 20, end of RT, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48, and 60 months.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Biospecimen Collection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Intervention Description
Undergo blood specimen collection for NavDx testing
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Abiplatin, Blastolem, Briplatin, CDDP, Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloro Platinum (II), Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, Cis-dichloroammine Platinum (II), Cis-platinous Diamine Dichloride, Cis-platinum, Cis-platinum II, Cis-platinum II Diamine Dichloride, Cismaplat, Cisplatina, Cisplatinum, Cisplatyl, Citoplatino, Citosin, Cysplatyna, DDP, Lederplatin, Metaplatin, Neoplatin, Peyrone's Chloride, Peyrone's Salt, Placis, Plastistil, Platamine, Platiblastin, Platiblastin-S, Platinex, Platinol, Platinol- AQ, Platinol-AQ, Platinol-AQ VHA Plus, Platinoxan, Platinum, Platinum Diamminodichloride, Platiran, Platistin, Platosin
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Computed Tomography
Other Intervention Name(s)
CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized Tomography, CT, CT Scan, tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure)
Intervention Description
Undergo CT scan
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Diffusing Alpha-emitter Radiation Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
DaRT
Intervention Description
Undergo DART
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Docetaxel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Docecad, RP56976, Taxotere, Taxotere Injection Concentrate, RP 56976
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
IMPT
Intervention Description
Undergo IMPT
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
IMRT, Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Radiation, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure)
Intervention Description
Undergo IMRT
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Other Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure)
Intervention Description
Undergo MRI
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Modified Barium Swallow
Other Intervention Name(s)
MBS, VFSS, Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study
Intervention Description
Undergo MBSS
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Observation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inspection, Visual Inspection
Intervention Description
Undergo observation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Positron Emission Tomography
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, Positron emission tomography (procedure)
Intervention Description
Undergo PET scan
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire
Other Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS), the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening. PFS at specific timepoints will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
From registration to the first of either disease progression/recurrence or death, assessed up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival (PFS) follow-up
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or worsening. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response versus (vs.) no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Title
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Description
Disease-free survival (DFS) is the measure of time after treatment during which no sign of cancer is found. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
From time of surgery and also from end of all treatment across all the groups, assessed up to 5 years
Title
Overall survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the duration of patient survival from the time of treatment initiation. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
At years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Title
Patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Incidence of adverse events
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Patterns of recurrence and rate of salvage therapy for Low Intermediate Risk (GROUP 1) and multiple segment radiation therapy (MSRT) + de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART)
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Functional outcomes - MBBS
Description
Measured by modified barium swallow (MBSS). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Functional outcomes - PROs
Description
Measure by patient reported outcomes (PROs). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - PROs
Description
Assessed by PROs. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - MBSS
Description
Assessed by MBSS. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Proton vs photon treatment toxicity - dosimetric differences
Description
Assessed by dosimetric differences including to organs at risk and the primary tumor bed in the case of mucosal sparing. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Costs of return visits for surveillance
Description
Presented descriptively and ANOVA models with tukey's adjustment for pairwise comparison will be utilized to test difference in arms.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Assessment of surveillance circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) preceding clinical or radiologic detection of recurrence
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Matched analysis of patients by clinical and pathologic risk factor to MC1273 and MC1675 de-escalation arms to overall GROUP 1 and GROUP 2 cohorts including 2-year PFS
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Evaluation of return to work
Description
Will be assessed by by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Evaluation of end of treatment treatment circulating human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid (ctHPVDNA) detectability as a marker of risk of progression
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Functional outcomes of DART alone vs. DART + MSRT
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Feasibility of DART regimen outside of Mayo Clinic
Description
Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
ctHPVDNA detectability
Description
Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
At post-operative day 1 or 2
Title
Salivary ctHPVDNA analysis for recurrence risk and surveillance
Description
Salivary samples will be analyzed pre-treatment, post-op, and at the time of recurrence to determine whether salivary ctHPVDNA may further inform recurrence risk and surveillance in HPV(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Characterization of post-operative drain fluid
Description
We will characterize post-operative drain fluid and compare rates of detectability to blood and saliva in order with the aim to determine whether the regional drain represents a separate regional compartment for analysis. Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Quantification of pre-treatment imaging
Description
We will prospectively quantify pretreatment imaging for number of involved nodes, radiographic extranodal extension as it relates to pathologic findings and risk of recurrence. Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)
Description
We will analyze within category of low intermediate, high intermediate, and high-risk patients the percentage of TILs and association with recurrence as well as differences across treatment groups. Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Assessment of integrated vs episomal HPV
Description
Comparison of methods of surveillance as defined by the date of diagnosis of recurrence by ctHPVDNA testing as compared to clinical examination and imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of each will be reported. Measure whether HPV is integrated vs episomal for each patient and the relationship of ctHPVDNA detectability and outcomes. These analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Assess Molecular Markers Using FFPE
Description
We will investigate molecular markers on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from primary surgical specimens. Due to the limited sample size, these analyses will be hypothesis generating and descriptive in nature. Descriptive statistics will be summarized and the exploratory data will be correlated with clinical endpoints (PFS, time-to-progression, etc.). For time-to-event data, the Kaplan-Meier method will be used. For categorical data, we'll use the Fisher's exact test. For biomarker data used to predict binary outcomes (i.e. response vs. no response), we'll use logistic regression models.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PRE-REGISTRATION (optional): Provide written informed consent Age >= 18 years Histological confirmation of p16+ OPSCC or HPV(+) OPSCC Plan for gross total surgical resection via trans oral surgery with curative intent and at least unilateral neck dissection OR chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin. Note: The patient must be cisplatin eligible even if an alternate is used due to drug shortage Absence of distant metastases on standard diagnostic work-up =< 16 weeks prior to registration. (Chest CT or PET/CT) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) =< 1 Negative pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance Provide written informed consent Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study) Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research purposes, including anonymous shipment of samples to for NavDx testing Exclusion Criteria: Any of the following: Pregnant women Nursing women Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+ Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm Other active malignancy =< 5 years prior to registration. EXCEPTIONS: Nonmelanotic skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, or prostate or localized endometrioid endometrial cancer. NOTE: If there is a history or prior malignancy, they must not be receiving other specific treatment for their cancer Prior history of radiation therapy to the affected site Prior systemic chemotherapy in the last 5 years Contraindication to radiation therapy as determined by the treating team History of allergic reaction to docetaxel Receiving any medications or substances which in the opinion of the investigators would interfere with treatment. Examples could include strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) at oncologist discretion Severe pre-existing ototoxicity or neuropathy that would, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the use of cisplatin chemotherapy cT4 primary tumor NOTE: Patients with no intermediate risk factors after surgery, low risk patients, as defined by T1, T2, tumors with lymph node less than 3cm, no intermediate or high risk factors such as lymphatic invasion (LVSI), ENE, perineural invasion (PNI), positive margin, will go off study and be observed per current clinical standard of care Patients found to have HPV non 16 type, or HPV detectability in blood less than <20tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV) will not be candidates for de-escalation in Groups 1 and 2 and will be treated in Group 3. They will receive 60 Gy +/- cisplatin or acceptable alternate regimen when drug shortages of cisplatin exist. If treated primarily with chemoradiation (chemoRT) (Group 4), these patients will not be candidates for de-escalation if TTMV is < 50 TTMV but can remain on study receiving 70 Gy with all corresponding correlative studies applying Patients with unknown (radiologic/clinically occult) primaries but p16+ or HPV+ neck adenopathy can be registered to go on study. Should after primary resection, no primary tumor be identified, the patient will go off study and be treated per institutional standard of care All treatment primarily, including surgery and chemotherapy will be performed at the enrolling institution
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David M, Routman, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85259
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials Referral Office
Phone
855-776-0015
Email
mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samir H. Patel, M.D.
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Florida
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224-9980
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials Referral Office
Phone
855-776-0015
Email
mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey R. Janus, M.D.
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials Referral Office
Phone
855-776-0015
Email
mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David M. Routman, M.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Blood-Based Biomarkers to Inform Treatment and Radiation Therapy Decisions for HPV Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs