search
Back to results

BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron

Primary Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Granisetron Transdermal Patch
Intravenous Dexamethasone
Ondansetron
Sponsored by
University of Illinois at Chicago
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75 years at time of enrollment receiving either a preparative regimen and either an autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant.
  • No vomiting ≤ 24 hours prior to registration
  • No treatment with an antipsychotic agent such as risperidone, quetiapine, clozapine, phenothiazine or butyrophenone for ≤ 30 days' prior registration or planned during protocol therapy. No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes.
  • No chronic phenothiazine administration as an antipsychotic agent (patients may receive prochlorperazine and other phenothiazines as rescue antiemetic therapy). No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes.
  • No known hypersensitivity to granisetron

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent use of amifostine
  • Known hypersensitivity to granisetron patch or ondansetron
  • Patients with a history of long QT syndrome or Torsade de Pointes

Sites / Locations

  • University of Illinois Cancer CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1

ARM 2

Arm Description

ARM 1 -transdermal granisetron plus intravenous dexamethasone

ARM 2 -intravenous ondansetron plus intravenous dexamethasone

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy/Safety of Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the acute period (0-24 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the delayed (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) and overall periods (0-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the overall period (0-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare between the two study arms, the use of rescue anti-emetic medications (during and for 7 days after the preparative regimen) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare between the two study arms the occurrence of CINV complete protection, defined as no emetic episode, no use of rescue medications and no nausea, during the acute, delayed, and overall phases for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) between patients receiving transdermal granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron.
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
To compare quality of life using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Core Items-Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) scale throughout the course of HSCT 7 days after stem cell infusion, between patients receiving transdermal granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron

Full Information

First Posted
October 31, 2019
Last Updated
June 16, 2023
Sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04150614
Brief Title
BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron
Official Title
BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron in the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Preparative Chemotherapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 14, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients undergoing either an autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and receiving preparative chemotherapy experience a considerable amount of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Current strategies at reducing CINV in this patient population are suboptimal due to lack of efficacy and supportive evidence, potential for increased adverse events, and drug-drug and drug-disease contraindications.
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing either an autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and receiving preparative chemotherapy experience a considerable amount of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Current strategies at reducing CINV in this patient population are suboptimal due to lack of efficacy and supportive evidence, potential for increased adverse events, and drug-drug and drug-disease contraindications. This study will be an open-label, prospective trial randomizing patients at a 1:1 ratio, to either one of two 5-hydroxytrytamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonists, transdermal granisetron or intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron, in combination with other standard, routinely administered anti-emetic drugs (dexamethasone). Rescue antiemetics will be administered at any time during the study period for vomiting or severe nausea at the request of the patients or as recommended by the attending physicians. For the granisetron treatment arm, patients will be educated and instructed to self-administer a single transdermal granisetron patch one-two days (approximately 24-48 hours) prior to start of the preparative regimen. An additional dose of transdermal granisetron will be administered 7 days after the initial granisetron dose. For the ondansetron treatment arm, patients will receive the standard dose and schedule of intravenous ondansetron that is routinely administered for each respective preparative regimen. Use of rescue medications will be assessed daily during chemotherapy, and for 7 days after the last chemotherapy drug administration (delayed phase). Nausea, vomiting, and treatment-related side effects will be documented and followed during this same time period. A quality of life questionnaire (MDASI-BMT) will be administered at Day + 7 (7 days after day of infusion). All other aspects of patient care (i.e., chemotherapy administration, supportive care, etc.) and laboratory monitoring will adhere to the routine standard of care operating procedures for stem cell transplant patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized 1:1 to either Arm 1 transdermal granisetron OR Arm 2 intravenous ondansetron
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ARM 1 -transdermal granisetron plus intravenous dexamethasone
Arm Title
ARM 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ARM 2 -intravenous ondansetron plus intravenous dexamethasone
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Granisetron Transdermal Patch
Intervention Description
Antiemetic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intravenous Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
Antiemetic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ondansetron
Intervention Description
ondansetron
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the acute period (0-24 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the delayed (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy) and overall periods (0-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare between the two study arms the number of patients achieving complete response (CR, no vomiting and no use of rescue medications during the overall period (0-120 hours post-chemotherapy) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare between the two study arms, the use of rescue anti-emetic medications (during and for 7 days after the preparative regimen) for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare between the two study arms the occurrence of CINV complete protection, defined as no emetic episode, no use of rescue medications and no nausea, during the acute, delayed, and overall phases for patients receiving preparative chemotherapy and HSCT.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (AE) between patients receiving transdermal granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Efficacy/Safety of Ondansetron and Transdermal Granisetron for Prevention of CINV
Description
To compare quality of life using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Core Items-Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) scale throughout the course of HSCT 7 days after stem cell infusion, between patients receiving transdermal granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-75 years at time of enrollment receiving either a preparative regimen and either an autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant. No vomiting ≤ 24 hours prior to registration No treatment with an antipsychotic agent such as risperidone, quetiapine, clozapine, phenothiazine or butyrophenone for ≤ 30 days' prior registration or planned during protocol therapy. No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes. No chronic phenothiazine administration as an antipsychotic agent (patients may receive prochlorperazine and other phenothiazines as rescue antiemetic therapy). No patients will be removed from these treatments for study enrollment purposes. No known hypersensitivity to granisetron Exclusion Criteria: Concurrent use of amifostine Known hypersensitivity to granisetron patch or ondansetron Patients with a history of long QT syndrome or Torsade de Pointes
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Karen Sweiss, PharmD
Phone
312-996-0875
Email
ksweis2@uic.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Annette R Kinsella, RN
Phone
312-996-5931
Email
annettek@uic.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Sweiss, PharmD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Illinois at Chicago
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Illinois Cancer Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Sweiss, PharmD
Phone
312-996-0875
Email
ksweis2@uic.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annette R Kinsella, RN
Phone
312-996-5931
Email
annettek@uic.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs