Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain (BAHSP)
Primary Purpose
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bobath treatment approach
Conventional physiotherapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain focused on measuring Hemiplegia, hemiplegic shoulder pain, neurodevelopmental treatment, spasticity, stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages of 40 and 65
- Patients who had a stroke for the first time and had a disease duration of at least four weeks
- Patients who were diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Patients who had Brunnstrom stage 3, 4 or 5 and had hemiplegic shoulder pain were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with severe cognitive impairment who could not understand simple verbal commands
- Those who had severe dysarthria to prevent verbal communication
- Those with unilateral neglect syndrome
- Those with loss of sensation in the upper extremity of the hemiplegic side
- Those with botulinum toxin-A injected to the hemiplegic upper extremity muscles
- Those with previous shoulder-related trauma or pain history
- Those with other accompanying neurological disease were excluded from the study.
Sites / Locations
- University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Bobath group
Conventional physiotherapy group
Arm Description
A conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group. Additionally, Bobath treatment approach was applied for 10 repetitions during a 30-min session in the experimental group, in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program.
Only conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment score at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Upper extremity functionality, min-max: 0-66, "0" indicates no function of upper extremity, "66" indicates the highest functionality of upper extremity as possible.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale (horizontal) value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Hemiplegic shoulder pain, 0-10 cm scale, "0" shows no pain at hemiplegic shoulder, "10" shows unbearable pain intensity at hemiplegic shoulder
Change from baseline modified Ashworth scale value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Upper extremity spasticity, 0: No increase in tone, 1: slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension.
1+: slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM )
2: more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed
3: considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult
4: limb rigid in flexion or extension
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04768140
First Posted
February 19, 2021
Last Updated
February 22, 2021
Sponsor
Istanbul Arel University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04768140
Brief Title
Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Acronym
BAHSP
Official Title
The Effect Of Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain, Spasticity And Upper Extremity Functionality In Stroke Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled And Single-Blind Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 10, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 17, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 12, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Istanbul Arel University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study, it is investigated that whether Bobath approach is superior to conventional physiotherapy in terms of improving hemiplegic shoulder pain, spasticity and upper extremity functionality in stroke patients.
Detailed Description
Objective: This study aims to determine the effect of Bobath approach on hemiplegic shoulder pain, spasticity and upper extremity functionality in stroke patients.
Patients and Methods: For this prospective, randomized, controlled and single-blind trial, 30 stroke patients aged 40-65 years with hemiplegic shoulder pain were included. Patients were divided into two groups and randomized into these groups. Only conventional physiotherapy was applied to the control group, whereas both conventional physiotherapy and Bobath exercises were also applied to the experimental group. Visual analog scale (horizontal) for shoulder pain, modified Ashworth scale for spasticity and Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity for functionality were used for both pre-test and post-test.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
Keywords
Hemiplegia, hemiplegic shoulder pain, neurodevelopmental treatment, spasticity, stroke
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED AND SINGLE-BLIND TRIAL
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
SINGLE-BLIND TRIAL The patients were blinded to their group allocation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bobath group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group. Additionally, Bobath treatment approach was applied for 10 repetitions during a 30-min session in the experimental group, in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program.
Arm Title
Conventional physiotherapy group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Only conventional physiotherapy program was applied to this group.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bobath treatment approach
Other Intervention Name(s)
Neurodevelopmental treatment
Intervention Description
scapulothoracic mobilization exercise, reaching in different directions in the supine position and upper extremity weight transfer exercise.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional physiotherapy
Intervention Description
range of motion, stretching, strengthening exercises, electrotherapy, thermotherapy, balance and mobility exercises and exercises for daily living activities.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment score at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Description
Upper extremity functionality, min-max: 0-66, "0" indicates no function of upper extremity, "66" indicates the highest functionality of upper extremity as possible.
Time Frame
First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale (horizontal) value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Description
Hemiplegic shoulder pain, 0-10 cm scale, "0" shows no pain at hemiplegic shoulder, "10" shows unbearable pain intensity at hemiplegic shoulder
Time Frame
First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks
Title
Change from baseline modified Ashworth scale value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Description
Upper extremity spasticity, 0: No increase in tone, 1: slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension.
1+: slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM )
2: more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed
3: considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult
4: limb rigid in flexion or extension
Time Frame
First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change from baseline Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Staging value at 30 sessions, 6 weeks
Description
Upper extremity motor evaluation,
Time Frame
First evaluation: immediately before starting the treatment; the last evaluation: at the end of the treatment of 6 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients between the ages of 40 and 65
Patients who had a stroke for the first time and had a disease duration of at least four weeks
Patients who were diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
Patients who had Brunnstrom stage 3, 4 or 5 and had hemiplegic shoulder pain were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with severe cognitive impairment who could not understand simple verbal commands
Those who had severe dysarthria to prevent verbal communication
Those with unilateral neglect syndrome
Those with loss of sensation in the upper extremity of the hemiplegic side
Those with botulinum toxin-A injected to the hemiplegic upper extremity muscles
Those with previous shoulder-related trauma or pain history
Those with other accompanying neurological disease were excluded from the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
NAZLI GÜNGÖR, PT,MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Istanbul Arel University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
City
Istanbul
State/Province
Bahçelievler
ZIP/Postal Code
34186
Country
Turkey
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22257503
Citation
Huseyinsinoglu BE, Ozdincler AR, Krespi Y. Bobath Concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm functional recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Aug;26(8):705-15. doi: 10.1177/0269215511431903. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16180951
Citation
Tang QP, Yang QD, Wu YH, Wang GQ, Huang ZL, Liu ZJ, Huang XS, Zhou L, Yang PM, Fan ZY. Effects of problem-oriented willed-movement therapy on motor abilities for people with poststroke cognitive deficits. Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;85(10):1020-33.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10945420
Citation
Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):361-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr338oa.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15822545
Citation
Suputtitada A, Suwanwela NC, Tumvitee S. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Dec;87(12):1482-90.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16250190
Citation
Platz T, Eickhof C, van Kaick S, Engel U, Pinkowski C, Kalok S, Pause M. Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Oct;19(7):714-24. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr904oa.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17896054
Citation
Hafsteinsdottir TB, Kappelle J, Grypdonck MH, Algra A. Effects of Bobath-based therapy on depression, shoulder pain and health-related quality of life in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007 Oct;39(8):627-32. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0097.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17724559
Citation
Fazekas G, Horvath M, Troznai T, Toth A. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. J Rehabil Med. 2007 Sep;39(7):580-2. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0087.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15774435
Citation
van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;76(4):503-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.040436.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10548673
Citation
van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2369-75. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.11.2369.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22668675
Citation
Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK, Sharma VP, Agarwal M, Aggarwal GG. Meaningful task-specific training (MTST) for stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):193-211. doi: 10.1310/tsr1903-193.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15759530
Citation
Wang RY, Chen HI, Chen CY, Yang YR. Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Mar;19(2):155-64. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr850oa.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs