search
Back to results

Botulinum Toxin Type A (BT-A) in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Versus Steroid

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Hemiparesis, Shoulder Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BT-A (Dysport 500U), Triamcinolone acetonide
Sponsored by
The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Hemiplegic shoulder pain, Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A), Steroid, Intra-articular injection, Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm VAS, Duration of HSP for at least one month, Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hemiparesis and shoulder pain due to first stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) admitted in a rehabilitative department to carry out a standard post-acute rehabilitative program
  • Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain)
  • Duration of HSP for at least one month
  • Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment i.e. common analgesics (such as paracetamol and NSAIDs), slings, strapping and handling of the arm, functional electrical stimulation of shoulder muscles

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant spasticity in the upper shoulder joint, defined as a score of 2 or more at the modified Ashworth scale
  • History of shoulder pain or shoulder diseases.
  • History of neurological diseases (i.e. Parkinson disease, dystonia).
  • History of botulinum toxin treatment

Sites / Locations

  • Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele G. Giglio di Cefalù

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

BT-A (Dysport 500U)

Triamcinolone acetonide

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Therapeutic superiority of BTA respect steroid in HSP, in patients with hemiparesis and shoulder pain due to stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic).
The primary efficacy outcome will be the reduction in pain severity, measured by VAS score after 4 weeks of treatment, with respect to baseline evaluation. A difference of about 10 mm between treatments, in the reduction of pain severity, as measured by a VAS scale after 4 weeks, will be considered as clinically significant.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Improvement of upper limb functions and activity
The secondary efficacy outcome will include the following measures: VAS score at the other time points of the study (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale (FMAS), NIH Stroke Scale index (NISS), Functional Independent Measure (FIM), quality of life on short-form (SF)-36 subscales (SF-36).
Improvement of quality of life
The secondary efficacy outcome will include the following measures: VAS score at the other time points of the study (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale (FMAS), NIH Stroke Scale index (NISS), Functional Independent Measure (FIM), quality of life on short-form (SF)-36 subscales (SF-36).
Safety Variables
Safety will be assessed through the collection of adverse events (AEs) and changes in the strength of the deltoid, trapezium, biceps and triceps muscles. All treated patients, no matter the duration of treatment, will be considered for the safety analysis. Adverse events will be fully described and presented in frequency tables whereas changes in the strength of abovementioned muscles will be summarised by descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum), for the two treatment groups.

Full Information

First Posted
November 7, 2011
Last Updated
November 14, 2011
Sponsor
The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù
Collaborators
Ospedale di Brunico, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana, Università degli Studi di Ferrara
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01473277
Brief Title
Botulinum Toxin Type A (BT-A) in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Versus Steroid
Official Title
Intra-articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: a Multicentric, Double Blind Randomised, Versus Steroid Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù
Collaborators
Ospedale di Brunico, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana, Università degli Studi di Ferrara

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to confirm the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular injection of BT-A in a multicentric double blind randomised study. For this purpose intra-articular injection of BT-A will be compared with the intra-articular steroid injection that is the current "gold standard" for the treatment of HSP.
Detailed Description
Shoulder pain is one of the most common complications of stroke. In fact, it occurs up to 70% of stroke victims. Post-stroke shoulder pain impacts negatively on daily activities. Moreover, it interferes with the rehabilitation process, is related to poor quality of life and has been associated to a worse outcome and to prolonged hospitalization.The aetiology of post-stroke HSP is uncertain, although it has been associated with various factors: joint disorders, capsulitis adhesive, subluxation of the head of the humerus, rotator cuff tendons injuries and spasticity of surrounding muscles. Clinicians use a wide variety of approaches to treat post-stroke HSP, although none has yet been proven effective. Correct positioning and careful handling of the hemiplegic limb are believed to prevent HSP. Physiotherapy alone does not seem to be effective for this complication. Capsulitis adhesive can be successfully treated with corticosteroid injections in the shoulder. However, despite many randomized controlled trials of corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain, their effects remain controversial. The large number of interventions and the lack of consensus about their effectiveness suggest that the aetiology is poorly understood and hence its treatment remains to be established. Intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) have also been demonstrated to reduce HSP. The mechanism whereby intramuscular inoculation of BT-A reduces pain may include a muscle relaxant effect and inhibition of the release of neurotransmitters by sensory neurons. Nevertheless, this approach has some limitations: it is probably more effective in muscular than in articular pain and it may be influenced by the muscles affected and site of injection. Intra-articular injection of BT-A has recently proven safe and effective in the treatment of refractory joint shoulder pain caused by chronic arthritis. The mechanisms by which it exerts this effect are not known, but could include inhibition of the release of pain peptides from nerve terminals and sensory ganglia, and anti-inflammatory and anti-glutaminergic effects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Hemiparesis, Shoulder Pain
Keywords
Hemiplegic shoulder pain, Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A), Steroid, Intra-articular injection, Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm VAS, Duration of HSP for at least one month, Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
52 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BT-A (Dysport 500U)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Triamcinolone acetonide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
BT-A (Dysport 500U), Triamcinolone acetonide
Intervention Description
All patients will be randomize to receive an intra-articular injection of BT-A (Dysport 500U) or triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). Both drugs will be reconstituted with 2.0 ml of saline. Both drugs will be injected in the glenohumeral joint with a standard posterior approach. The time of the intra-articular injection od BT-A or steroid will be considered the "time zero" for each patient. The primary and secondary efficacy variables will be evaluated in all patients at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Therapeutic superiority of BTA respect steroid in HSP, in patients with hemiparesis and shoulder pain due to stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic).
Description
The primary efficacy outcome will be the reduction in pain severity, measured by VAS score after 4 weeks of treatment, with respect to baseline evaluation. A difference of about 10 mm between treatments, in the reduction of pain severity, as measured by a VAS scale after 4 weeks, will be considered as clinically significant.
Time Frame
one year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement of upper limb functions and activity
Description
The secondary efficacy outcome will include the following measures: VAS score at the other time points of the study (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale (FMAS), NIH Stroke Scale index (NISS), Functional Independent Measure (FIM), quality of life on short-form (SF)-36 subscales (SF-36).
Time Frame
one year
Title
Improvement of quality of life
Description
The secondary efficacy outcome will include the following measures: VAS score at the other time points of the study (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale (FMAS), NIH Stroke Scale index (NISS), Functional Independent Measure (FIM), quality of life on short-form (SF)-36 subscales (SF-36).
Time Frame
one year
Title
Safety Variables
Description
Safety will be assessed through the collection of adverse events (AEs) and changes in the strength of the deltoid, trapezium, biceps and triceps muscles. All treated patients, no matter the duration of treatment, will be considered for the safety analysis. Adverse events will be fully described and presented in frequency tables whereas changes in the strength of abovementioned muscles will be summarised by descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum), for the two treatment groups.
Time Frame
one year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with hemiparesis and shoulder pain due to first stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) admitted in a rehabilitative department to carry out a standard post-acute rehabilitative program Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain) Duration of HSP for at least one month Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment i.e. common analgesics (such as paracetamol and NSAIDs), slings, strapping and handling of the arm, functional electrical stimulation of shoulder muscles Exclusion Criteria: Significant spasticity in the upper shoulder joint, defined as a score of 2 or more at the modified Ashworth scale History of shoulder pain or shoulder diseases. History of neurological diseases (i.e. Parkinson disease, dystonia). History of botulinum toxin treatment
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Giuseppe Galardi, Dr
Phone
+39 0921 920357
Email
giuseppe.galardi@hsrgiglio.it
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giuseppe Galardi, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
San Raffaele-Giglio Foundation
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele G. Giglio di Cefalù
City
Cefalù
State/Province
Palermo
ZIP/Postal Code
90015
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Botulinum Toxin Type A (BT-A) in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Versus Steroid

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs