search
Back to results

Breathing Effort in Covid-19 Pneumonia: Effects of Positive Pressure, Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Decubitus

Primary Purpose

COVID-19 Pneumonia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Esophageal catheter
Sponsored by
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for COVID-19 Pneumonia focused on measuring COVID-19 Pneumonia, Esophageal Pressure, Respiratory Drive

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Group 1 (Covid-19 early pneumonia)

  • Age > 18
  • Positive Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab
  • interstitial pneumonia at either CT scan or chest X-ray
  • Respiratory failure requiring CPAP for less than 48 hours
  • FiO2 ≤0.5 and CPAP≤10 cmH2O

Group 2 (Covid-19 severe pneumonia)

  • Age > 18
  • Positive Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab
  • interstitial pneumonia at either CT scan or chest X-ray
  • Respiratory failure requiring CPAP
  • Signs of severity with CPAP 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5: pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≤ 93% associated to either:

    • Dyspnea
    • Two or more signs of increased respiratory effort (respiratory rate ≥25 bpm, use of accessory inspiratory muscles , tirage, intercostal space depression, nasal flaring, expiratory abdominal efforts, PaCO2 < 35)

Group 3 (Non Covid-19 pneumonia)

  • Age > 18
  • Negative Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab
  • CT scan or chest X-ray non compatible with Covid-19 associated pneumonia
  • Respiratory failure requiring CPAP

Exclusion Criteria:

Group 1 (Covid-19 early pneumonia)

  • Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease
  • Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) 3-4
  • Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Signs of severity with CPAP 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5: SpO2≤ 93% associated to either:

    • Dyspnea
    • Two or more signs of increased respiratory effort (respiratory rate ≥25 bpm, use of accessory inspiratory muscles , tirage, intercostal space depression, nasal flaring, expiratory abdominal efforts, PaCO2 < 35)
  • At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration)

Group 2 (Covid-19 severe pneumonia)

  • Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease
  • Chronic heart failure NYHA 3-4
  • Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration)

Group 3 (Non Covid-19 pneumonia)

  • Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease
  • Chronic heart failure NYHA 3-4
  • Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration)

Sites / Locations

  • A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga Di OrbassanoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm 8

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Spontaneous breathing, Venturi Mask FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus

Spontaneous breathing, Non Rebreathing Mask, seated decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, supine decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, prone decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 1, seated decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 12 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 12 cmH2O, FiO2 1, seated decubitus

Arm Description

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of spontaneous breathing, with FiO2 0.5 (Venturi Mask), during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of spontaneous breathing, with FiO2 1 (Non Rebreathing Mask), during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during supine decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during prone decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 1.0, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (12 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 1.0, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Esophageal pressure swings at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
The main outcome of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the three levels of end expiratory pressure applied (0-7-12 cmH2O)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Esophageal pressure swings at different levels of inspired oxygen fraction
One of the secondary outcomes of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the two levels of FiO2 applied (0.5-1)
Esophageal pressure swings at different decubiti
One of the secondary outcomes of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the three decubiti applied (seated, supine, prone)

Full Information

First Posted
May 11, 2021
Last Updated
May 12, 2021
Sponsor
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04885517
Brief Title
Breathing Effort in Covid-19 Pneumonia: Effects of Positive Pressure, Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Decubitus
Official Title
Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure in Covid-19 Pneumonia: Effects of Positive Pressure, Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Decubitus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study investigates the role of positive pressure, inspired oxygen fraction and different decubiti (seated, supine, prone) on breathing effort (as assessed by esophageal pressure swings) in Covid-19 pneumonia (at different disease stages) and in other causes of respiratory failure. The hypothesis is that positive pressure might be deleterious in terms of breathing effort if the main pathological mechanism associated with Sars-CoV-2 infection in the lung is not alveolar damage (as in other causes of respiratory failure) but vascular impairment as previously reported. The effects of high inspired oxygen fractions and decubiti might also be different with respect to other causes of respiratory failure.
Detailed Description
In spite of the overwhelming numbers of the current pandemic, many questions remain open regarding the pathophysiology of Covid-19 associated pneumonia. While some features of the disease (such as the oxygenation improvement associated with proning and/or continuous positive airway pressure) seem to line up with other causes of pneumonia characterized by primary alveolar damage, specific characteristics have been reported about Sars-CoV-2 lung infection which suggest a certain degree of parenchymal preservation and a predominant role of vascular impairment: the dissociation between lung volume and gas exchange, and the so called "happy hypoxemia" both evoke the possibility of mechanisms other than the loss of aeration as causes of hypoxia. Accordingly, evidence are now growing on the role of vascular dysregulation in this regard. It is probable, as previously put forward, that different stages exist in the disease which may account for the discordant findings of previous studies seeking to either associate or separate Covid-19 pneumonia and other causes of respiratory failure. In the present study we will compare the effects of three currently used approaches to improve gas exchange (continuous positive airway pressure, external oxygen administration and decubiti variations) in three different populations (1) early Covid-19 pneumonia, 2) severe late Covid-19 pneumonia and 3) non-Covid-19 pneumonia) in terms of breathing effort as assessed by esophageal pressure swings: our aim is to evaluate, in these populations, the real benefits (beyond the previously reported ones on gas exchange) of such strategies on lung rest. Our hypothesis is that, at least in the early stages of Covid-19 (and as opposed to other causes of respiratory failure), the application of positive pressure might be deleterious if no potential for recruitment, but rather a primary vascular impairment, is associated with hypoxia. If this will be the case the same (or a similar) degree of oxygenation improvement and a safer pattern of ventilation might be attained with the simple administration of oxygen or decubiti variations without the application of positive pressure, thus completely changing the current standards for the treatment of Covid-19 pneumonia.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
COVID-19 Pneumonia
Keywords
COVID-19 Pneumonia, Esophageal Pressure, Respiratory Drive

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Spontaneous breathing, Venturi Mask FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of spontaneous breathing, with FiO2 0.5 (Venturi Mask), during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Spontaneous breathing, Non Rebreathing Mask, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of spontaneous breathing, with FiO2 1 (Non Rebreathing Mask), during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, supine decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during supine decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, prone decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during prone decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 7 cmH2O, FiO2 1, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 1.0, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 12 cmH2O, FiO2 0.5, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (12 cmH2O), with FiO2 0.5, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Arm Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 12 cmH2O, FiO2 1, seated decubitus
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient will be evaluated after 20 minutes of CPAP (7 cmH2O), with FiO2 1.0, during seated decubitus. Respiratory, haemodynamics, and data on blood gas analysis will be obtained.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Esophageal catheter
Intervention Description
Patients are equipped with an esophageal catheter: positioning is performed after accurate nasopharyngeal anesthesia with lidocaine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Esophageal pressure swings at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
Description
The main outcome of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the three levels of end expiratory pressure applied (0-7-12 cmH2O)
Time Frame
160 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Esophageal pressure swings at different levels of inspired oxygen fraction
Description
One of the secondary outcomes of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the two levels of FiO2 applied (0.5-1)
Time Frame
160 minutes
Title
Esophageal pressure swings at different decubiti
Description
One of the secondary outcomes of the study is represented by the difference in esophageal pressure swings (expiratory minus inspiratory) between the three decubiti applied (seated, supine, prone)
Time Frame
160 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Group 1 (Covid-19 early pneumonia) Age > 18 Positive Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab interstitial pneumonia at either CT scan or chest X-ray Respiratory failure requiring CPAP for less than 48 hours FiO2 ≤0.5 and CPAP≤10 cmH2O Group 2 (Covid-19 severe pneumonia) Age > 18 Positive Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab interstitial pneumonia at either CT scan or chest X-ray Respiratory failure requiring CPAP Signs of severity with CPAP 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5: pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≤ 93% associated to either: Dyspnea Two or more signs of increased respiratory effort (respiratory rate ≥25 bpm, use of accessory inspiratory muscles , tirage, intercostal space depression, nasal flaring, expiratory abdominal efforts, PaCO2 < 35) Group 3 (Non Covid-19 pneumonia) Age > 18 Negative Sars-CoV 2 nasal swab CT scan or chest X-ray non compatible with Covid-19 associated pneumonia Respiratory failure requiring CPAP Exclusion Criteria: Group 1 (Covid-19 early pneumonia) Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) 3-4 Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected) Pulmonary embolism Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema Signs of severity with CPAP 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5: SpO2≤ 93% associated to either: Dyspnea Two or more signs of increased respiratory effort (respiratory rate ≥25 bpm, use of accessory inspiratory muscles , tirage, intercostal space depression, nasal flaring, expiratory abdominal efforts, PaCO2 < 35) At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration) Group 2 (Covid-19 severe pneumonia) Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease Chronic heart failure NYHA 3-4 Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected) Pulmonary embolism Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration) Group 3 (Non Covid-19 pneumonia) Concomitant chronic pulmonary disease Chronic heart failure NYHA 3-4 Bacterial pulmonary associated infection (diagnosed or suspected) Pulmonary embolism Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema At least one sign of respiratory fatigue/decompensation (pH<7.30 with PaCO2 >45, respiratory rate <15 bpm, paradoxal abdominal breathing, mental status alteration)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Pietro Caironi, Pr
Phone
+390119026386
Email
pietro.caironi@unito.it
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pietro Caironi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lorenzo Giosa, MD
Organizational Affiliation
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga Di Orbassano
City
Orbassano
State/Province
Italy/Turin
ZIP/Postal Code
10043
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pietro Caironi, Pr
Phone
+390119026386
Email
pietro.caironi@unito.it

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32228035
Citation
Gattinoni L, Coppola S, Cressoni M, Busana M, Rossi S, Chiumello D. COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a "Typical" Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 15;201(10):1299-1300. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0817LE. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32355007
Citation
Couzin-Frankel J. The mystery of the pandemic's 'happy hypoxia'. Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):455-456. doi: 10.1126/science.368.6490.455. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32747395
Citation
Aliberti S, Radovanovic D, Billi F, Sotgiu G, Costanzo M, Pilocane T, Saderi L, Gramegna A, Rovellini A, Perotto L, Monzani V, Santus P, Blasi F. Helmet CPAP treatment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020 Oct 15;56(4):2001935. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01935-2020. Print 2020 Oct.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32412581
Citation
Elharrar X, Trigui Y, Dols AM, Touchon F, Martinez S, Prud'homme E, Papazian L. Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2336-2338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8255.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33089348
Citation
Chiumello D, Busana M, Coppola S, Romitti F, Formenti P, Bonifazi M, Pozzi T, Palumbo MM, Cressoni M, Herrmann P, Meissner K, Quintel M, Camporota L, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Physiological and quantitative CT-scan characterization of COVID-19 and typical ARDS: a matched cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2187-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06281-2. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32329799
Citation
Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2329-2330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6825. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32215647
Citation
Poston JT, Patel BK, Davis AM. Management of Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1839-1841. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4914. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31274034
Citation
Gattinoni L, Giosa L, Bonifazi M, Pasticci I, Busana M, Macri M, Romitti F, Vassalli F, Quintel M. Targeting transpulmonary pressure to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2019 Aug;13(8):737-746. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1638767. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27626833
Citation
Brochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical Ventilation to Minimize Progression of Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32325004
Citation
Tonelli R, Fantini R, Tabbi L, Castaniere I, Pisani L, Pellegrino MR, Della Casa G, D'Amico R, Girardis M, Nava S, Clini EM, Marchioni A. Early Inspiratory Effort Assessment by Esophageal Manometry Predicts Noninvasive Ventilation Outcome in De Novo Respiratory Failure. A Pilot Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):558-567. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2512OC.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33140181
Citation
Goligher EC, Jonkman AH, Dianti J, Vaporidi K, Beitler JR, Patel BK, Yoshida T, Jaber S, Dres M, Mauri T, Bellani G, Demoule A, Brochard L, Heunks L. Clinical strategies for implementing lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation: avoiding insufficient and excessive effort. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2314-2326. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06288-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32736637
Citation
Apigo M, Schechtman J, Dhliwayo N, Al Tameemi M, Gazmuri RJ. Development of a work of breathing scale and monitoring need of intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia. Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03176-y. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31437406
Citation
Vaporidi K, Akoumianaki E, Telias I, Goligher EC, Brochard L, Georgopoulos D. Respiratory Drive in Critically Ill Patients. Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan 1;201(1):20-32. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0596SO.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32291463
Citation
Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, Camporota L. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1099-1102. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2. Epub 2020 Apr 14. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Breathing Effort in Covid-19 Pneumonia: Effects of Positive Pressure, Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Decubitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs