search
Back to results

Brief Behavioral Intervention for Comorbid Migraine and Depression (ACT-IM)

Primary Purpose

Migraine, Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ACT-IM
Sponsored by
Lilian N. Dindo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Migraine focused on measuring Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Depression, Illness Management, Behavioral treatment, Impairment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75
  • 4 to 12 migraines in the previous month
  • Major or Minor Depression
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other major psychiatric disorders such as bipolor disorder, schizophrenia, and current illicit drug use.
  • Patients with major head injuries.
  • Patients with serious medical illnesses.
  • Patients who have started a new medication in previous 4 weeks or plan on starting a new medication in the next 4 weeks.
  • Patients expressing significant suicidal ideation.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

ACT-IM

Waitlist/Treatment as Usual

Arm Description

The ACT-IM arm is a brief, one-day intervention that includes two components: 1) Illness Management for Migraine and, 2) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for emotional difficulties that go along with, or are exacerbated by migraine.

The Waitlist/Treatment as Usual (WL/TAU)condition completes the same assessments as the active treatment group but does not undergo the active treatment (workshop) until after the 12-week follow-up visit. At that point, the WL/TAU participants are given the opportunity to join a treatment workshop.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) From Baseline to 12 Week Follow-up
The HAM-D is a structured clinical interview for assessing depression severity. Outcome measure will be change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 12 week (3 month) follow-up from baseline. Measure is scored by adding individual items and attaining an overall severity score. Scores range from 0 to 53, with higher values signifying a higher level of depression severity (and thus a worse outcome). A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher (indicating at least moderate severity) is usually required for entry into a clinical trial.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Change Score in HDI (Headache Disability Inventory) From Baseline to 12 Weeks.
The HDI is useful in assessing the impact of headache, and its treatment, on daily living. 25 self-report items are rated with answers as "Yes" (4 points), "Sometimes" (2 Points), and "No" (0 points). All items are then added together to create an overall score which can range from 0 (no impact), to 100 (severe impact) of headache on daily life. A 29 point change (95% confidence interval) or greater in the total score from test to retest must occur before the change can be attributed to treatment effects.
Mean Change on Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) From Baseline to 12 Week Follow-up.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Mean Change of World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHO-DAS) From Baseline to 12-week Follow up.
The WHODAS contains 36 items on functioning and disability with a recall period of 30 days covering 7 domains: Understanding and Communicating (6 items), Getting around (5 items), Self-care (4 items), Getting along with others (5 items), Life activities: household (4 items), Life activities: work/school (4 items), and Participation in society (8 items). Response options go from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (extreme difficulty or can not do). WHODAS domain scores are computed for each domain by adding the item responses together. A global score is then computed by summing all domains together, and transforming them into a range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of disability (0= no disability, 100= full disability).

Full Information

First Posted
January 9, 2012
Last Updated
January 24, 2018
Sponsor
Lilian N. Dindo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01775852
Brief Title
Brief Behavioral Intervention for Comorbid Migraine and Depression
Acronym
ACT-IM
Official Title
Brief, Behavioral Intervention of ACT & Illness Management for Comorbid Migraine and Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Lilian N. Dindo

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to examine whether a one-day group workshop, integrating principles from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with Migraine Education, will result in improvements in depressive symptoms and functioning impairment in patients with comorbid migraine and depression.
Detailed Description
Migraine affects approximately 35 million US residents (Bigal & Lipton, 2009) and is associated with excruciating headache and marked functional impairment. Epidemiological and clinical research has shown that people with migraine suffer from psychiatric disorders at a disproportionately higher rate than individuals without. Depression, in particular, is 3-5 times more common in migraine patients than in non-migraineurs. The comorbidity of depression and migraine is a major health concern as it results in poorer prognosis, remission rate, and response to treatment. In addition, an increase in the severity of migraine is associated with a parallel rise in the severity and treatment resistance of comorbid depression. Recent research in behavioral medicine suggests that the pain experience per se does not necessarily lead to depression or impairment. Instead, it is the preoccupation with avoiding aversive stimuli associated with pain (i.e., activities, places, movements) that results in depression and disability (e.g., McCracken et al., 2005). Therefore, given that patients with migraine and/or depression exhibit more avoidance behaviors and lower activity levels than healthy controls (e.g., Stronks et al., 2004), an intervention aimed at optimizing willingness and acceptance and minimizing behavioral avoidance may be beneficial at improving both their depression and migraine and, consequently, their daily functioning. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an empirically based behavioral therapy that incorporates acceptance and mindfulness strategies with behavioral change strategies. ACT (in group and in individual settings) is effective in treating psychiatric disorders commonly associated with migraine, including depression, anxiety, and stress (e.g., Hayes, 2001) as well as chronic illnesses like pain and diabetes (Dahl et al, 2004; Gregg et al., 2006). Importantly, ACT resulted in positive long-term outcomes even when presented in brief form. For example, a two-day ACT workshop, in a group setting, led to improvements in depression and distress experienced by parents of children diagnosed with autism and these gains were retained 3 months later. Parents also exhibited a reduction in avoidance behaviors (Blackledge & Hayes, 2006).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Migraine, Depression
Keywords
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Depression, Illness Management, Behavioral treatment, Impairment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ACT-IM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The ACT-IM arm is a brief, one-day intervention that includes two components: 1) Illness Management for Migraine and, 2) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for emotional difficulties that go along with, or are exacerbated by migraine.
Arm Title
Waitlist/Treatment as Usual
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The Waitlist/Treatment as Usual (WL/TAU)condition completes the same assessments as the active treatment group but does not undergo the active treatment (workshop) until after the 12-week follow-up visit. At that point, the WL/TAU participants are given the opportunity to join a treatment workshop.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
ACT-IM
Other Intervention Name(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Illness Management
Intervention Description
1 hour discussion about migraine management (IM) and 5 hours of group therapy based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). IM covers symptoms and triggers for worsening of migraine symptoms, how to use migraine medications, medication overuse headache, etc. The ACT intervention includes: 1) Behavioral Change Training and; 2) Mindfulness and Acceptance Training emphasizing new ways of managing troubling thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) From Baseline to 12 Week Follow-up
Description
The HAM-D is a structured clinical interview for assessing depression severity. Outcome measure will be change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 12 week (3 month) follow-up from baseline. Measure is scored by adding individual items and attaining an overall severity score. Scores range from 0 to 53, with higher values signifying a higher level of depression severity (and thus a worse outcome). A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher (indicating at least moderate severity) is usually required for entry into a clinical trial.
Time Frame
12 week change from baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change Score in HDI (Headache Disability Inventory) From Baseline to 12 Weeks.
Description
The HDI is useful in assessing the impact of headache, and its treatment, on daily living. 25 self-report items are rated with answers as "Yes" (4 points), "Sometimes" (2 Points), and "No" (0 points). All items are then added together to create an overall score which can range from 0 (no impact), to 100 (severe impact) of headache on daily life. A 29 point change (95% confidence interval) or greater in the total score from test to retest must occur before the change can be attributed to treatment effects.
Time Frame
12 week change from baseline
Title
Mean Change on Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) From Baseline to 12 Week Follow-up.
Description
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
Change at 12 week follow-up from baseline
Title
Mean Change of World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHO-DAS) From Baseline to 12-week Follow up.
Description
The WHODAS contains 36 items on functioning and disability with a recall period of 30 days covering 7 domains: Understanding and Communicating (6 items), Getting around (5 items), Self-care (4 items), Getting along with others (5 items), Life activities: household (4 items), Life activities: work/school (4 items), and Participation in society (8 items). Response options go from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (extreme difficulty or can not do). WHODAS domain scores are computed for each domain by adding the item responses together. A global score is then computed by summing all domains together, and transforming them into a range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of disability (0= no disability, 100= full disability).
Time Frame
Change at 12 week follow-up from baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-75 4 to 12 migraines in the previous month Major or Minor Depression English-speaking Exclusion Criteria: Patients with other major psychiatric disorders such as bipolor disorder, schizophrenia, and current illicit drug use. Patients with major head injuries. Patients with serious medical illnesses. Patients who have started a new medication in previous 4 weeks or plan on starting a new medication in the next 4 weeks. Patients expressing significant suicidal ideation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lilian Dindo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19289218
Citation
Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The epidemiology, burden, and comorbidities of migraine. Neurol Clin. 2009 May;27(2):321-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2008.11.011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12707434
Citation
Breslau N, Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Schultz LR, Welch KM. Comorbidity of migraine and depression: investigating potential etiology and prognosis. Neurology. 2003 Apr 22;60(8):1308-12. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000058907.41080.54.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Blackledge, J.T. & Hayes, S.C. Using Acceptance and Commitment Training in the support of parents of children diagnosed with Autism. Child and Family Behavior Therapy. 2006;28(1):1-18.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Dahl, J., Wilson, K.G., Nilsson, A. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy. 2004;35:785-801.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17469891
Citation
Gregg JA, Callaghan GM, Hayes SC, Glenn-Lawson JL. Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;75(2):336-43. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.336.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27993338
Citation
Hayes SC. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies - Republished Article. Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15953266
Citation
Lake AE 3rd, Rains JC, Penzien DB, Lipchik GL. Headache and psychiatric comorbidity: historical context, clinical implications, and research relevance. Headache. 2005 May;45(5):493-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05101.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17201719
Citation
Lundgren T, Dahl J, Melin L, Kies B. Evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for drug refractory epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial in South Africa--a pilot study. Epilepsia. 2006 Dec;47(12):2173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00892.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16086984
Citation
McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behav Res Ther. 2005 Oct;43(10):1335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.003. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15030535
Citation
Stronks DL, Tulen JH, Bussmann JB, Mulder LJ, Passchier J. Interictal daily functioning in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004 Apr;24(4):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00661.x.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://goo.gl/FFged
Description
Online, screening survey.
URL
http://uihealthcare.org
Description
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics

Learn more about this trial

Brief Behavioral Intervention for Comorbid Migraine and Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs