Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation for Prevention of Shoulder Dysfunction After Oncologic Neck Dissection (ESSAN)
Primary Purpose
Shoulder Pain, Head Neck Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Grass SD9 Stimulator
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Shoulder Pain focused on measuring nerve regeneration, spinal accessory nerve, shoulder function, head neck cancer, electrical stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-55 years
- New adult head and neck cancer patients
- Undergoing major resection and reconstruction surgery including oncologic neck dissection including Level IIb
- Undergoing adjuvant therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Oncologic resection necessitating unilateral or bilateral resection of the sternocleidomastoid, SAN, partial resection of trapezius muscle, hypoglossal nerve, skin, carotid resection, or deep muscle resection
- Previous surgery or radiation therapy to the head and/or neck
- Recurrent head and neck cancer
- Preoperative, pre-existing shoulder dysfunction or weakness, including myopathy, neuropathy, or arthropathy
- Presence of existing implanted electrical device (eg. pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, vagal nerve stimulator
- Previous or current neurological disease which may adversely affect shoulder dysfunction
- Unable to read, write, and speak English
- Lacking capacity to give consent
- Unwilling to present for follow-up appointments or follow-up objective shoulder assessment
Sites / Locations
- University of Alberta
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
Grass SD9 Stimulator
No Stimulation
Arm Description
Brief intraoperative electrical stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve (ESSAN) continuously at 20 Hz, 10-15V for 60 minutes immediately following neck dissection.
No stimulation will be performed in this group, and patients will simply have the neck dissection as planned. No sham stimulation is required, as all outcome measures are performed by individuals not present in the operating room, and therefore, blinded to the treatment arm.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Constant-Murley Score
The Constant-Murley score is a 100-point scale composed of a number of individual parameters, detailing the level of shoulder pain and the ability to carry out normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley Score is a 100-point scale composed of a number of individual parameters, designed to determine functionality after shoulder treatment. It includes includes 4 subscales that assess pain, activities of daily living, strength, and range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, abduction, and internal rotation of the shoulder). A higher score indicates higher quality of function.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
The OSS is a 12-item, multi-dimensional, self-report questionnaire regarding shoulder-specific daily activity in the previous 4 weeks.
Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII)
The Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), is a 10-item self-report questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale for assessment of shoulder impairment after neck dissection.
Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)
This will include conduction velocity and amplitude as it relates to nerve injury during oncologic neck dissection.
Electromyographic (EMG) studies
This will pertain to electrophysiologic thresholds necessary to evoke a motor response from the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid, to evaluate nerve function.
University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire
This instrument will be used to asses quality of life (QOL) differences between the study and placebo groups following treatment.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02268344
Brief Title
Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation for Prevention of Shoulder Dysfunction After Oncologic Neck Dissection
Acronym
ESSAN
Official Title
Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation for Prevention of Shoulder Dysfunction After Oncologic Neck Dissection (ESSAN): a Double-blinded, Randomized Control Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 6, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 6, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 6, 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Alberta
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Introduction: Shoulder pain and dysfunction is common after oncologic neck dissection for head and neck cancer (HNC). These symptoms can hinder postoperative rehabilitation and oral hygiene, activities of daily living (ADLs), and return to work after treatment. Due to the rising incidence of Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer, patients are often diagnosed in the 3rd or 4th decade of life, leaving many potential working years lost. Brief electrical stimulation (BES) is a novel technique that has been shown to enhance neuronal regeneration after injury through a brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor (BDNF)-driven molecular pathway. The aim of this study is to examine the utility of intraoperative BES in prevention of shoulder pain and dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection.
Methods: All adult patients with a new diagnosis of HNC undergoing surgery with neck dissection including Level IIb and postoperative radiotherapy will be enrolled. Patients will undergo intraoperative BES after completion of neck dissection for 60 minutes continuously at 20 Hz with an intensity of 1.5 times the motor threshold. Postoperatively, patients will be evaluated using the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, a scale that assesses shoulder pain, activities of daily living (ADLs), strength, and range of motion. Secondary outcomes measured will include scores on the Oxford Shoulder Score, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), and the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) score. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Study and placebo groups will be compared using a Mann-Whitney analysis.
Detailed Description
This study will be conducted as a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Two parallel treatment groups will be examined with a 1:1 allocation: 1) brief intraoperative electrical stimulation continuously at 20 Hz at an intensity of 1.5 times the motor threshold for 60 minutes, or 2) sham/no stimulation for 60 minutes. Individuals will be allocated to treatment groups using a block randomization sequence. Participants and researchers measuring outcomes will be blinded to treatment groups. Stimulation (BES or sham) will occur intraoperatively immediately following neck dissection for 60 minutes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Shoulder Pain, Head Neck Cancer
Keywords
nerve regeneration, spinal accessory nerve, shoulder function, head neck cancer, electrical stimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Brief intraoperative electrical stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve (ESSAN) continuously at 20 Hz, 10-15V for 60 minutes immediately following neck dissection
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
68 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Grass SD9 Stimulator
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Brief intraoperative electrical stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve (ESSAN) continuously at 20 Hz, 10-15V for 60 minutes immediately following neck dissection.
Arm Title
No Stimulation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No stimulation will be performed in this group, and patients will simply have the neck dissection as planned. No sham stimulation is required, as all outcome measures are performed by individuals not present in the operating room, and therefore, blinded to the treatment arm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Grass SD9 Stimulator
Other Intervention Name(s)
Electrical Stimulation (ES)
Intervention Description
Electrical stimulation will be applied to the nerve using the Grass SD9 Stimulator at a frequency of 20Hz, 10-15V, for 60 minutes during the surgery. This will occur after the neck dissection has been completed, and the remainder of the surgery will continue during stimulation. The stimulation will be applied using the Grass SD9 Stimulator and the current will be conducted to the nerve using a sterile wire electrode that will be encircled around the nerve at its most proximally-exposed portion (skull base). The wire will be removed after 60 minutes of stimulation has been applied.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Constant-Murley Score
Description
The Constant-Murley score is a 100-point scale composed of a number of individual parameters, detailing the level of shoulder pain and the ability to carry out normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley Score is a 100-point scale composed of a number of individual parameters, designed to determine functionality after shoulder treatment. It includes includes 4 subscales that assess pain, activities of daily living, strength, and range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, abduction, and internal rotation of the shoulder). A higher score indicates higher quality of function.
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
Description
The OSS is a 12-item, multi-dimensional, self-report questionnaire regarding shoulder-specific daily activity in the previous 4 weeks.
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively
Title
Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII)
Description
The Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), is a 10-item self-report questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale for assessment of shoulder impairment after neck dissection.
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively
Title
Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)
Description
This will include conduction velocity and amplitude as it relates to nerve injury during oncologic neck dissection.
Time Frame
6 months months postoperatively
Title
Electromyographic (EMG) studies
Description
This will pertain to electrophysiologic thresholds necessary to evoke a motor response from the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid, to evaluate nerve function.
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively
Title
University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire
Description
This instrument will be used to asses quality of life (QOL) differences between the study and placebo groups following treatment.
Time Frame
6 months postoperatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-55 years
New adult head and neck cancer patients
Undergoing major resection and reconstruction surgery including oncologic neck dissection including Level IIb
Undergoing adjuvant therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
Oncologic resection necessitating unilateral or bilateral resection of the sternocleidomastoid, SAN, partial resection of trapezius muscle, hypoglossal nerve, skin, carotid resection, or deep muscle resection
Previous surgery or radiation therapy to the head and/or neck
Recurrent head and neck cancer
Preoperative, pre-existing shoulder dysfunction or weakness, including myopathy, neuropathy, or arthropathy
Presence of existing implanted electrical device (eg. pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, vagal nerve stimulator
Previous or current neurological disease which may adversely affect shoulder dysfunction
Unable to read, write, and speak English
Lacking capacity to give consent
Unwilling to present for follow-up appointments or follow-up objective shoulder assessment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brittany Barber, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel O'Connell, MD MSc FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hadi Seikaly, MD MAL FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming Chan, MD FRCPC
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Physical Rehabilitation and Medicine, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margaret McNeely, PT PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Harris, MD MHA FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaret Olson, MD FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alberta
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 2B7
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29361981
Citation
Barber B, Seikaly H, Ming Chan K, Beaudry R, Rychlik S, Olson J, Curran M, Dziegielewski P, Biron V, Harris J, McNeely M, O'Connell D. Intraoperative Brief Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Accessory Nerve (BEST SPIN) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan 23;47(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0244-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26021563
Citation
Barber B, McNeely M, Chan KM, Beaudry R, Olson J, Harris J, Seikaly H, O'Connell D. Intraoperative brief electrical stimulation (BES) for prevention of shoulder dysfunction after oncologic neck dissection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 May 30;16:240. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0745-7.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation for Prevention of Shoulder Dysfunction After Oncologic Neck Dissection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs