search
Back to results

BTL Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Primary Purpose

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
BTL Emsella
Sham BTL Emsella
Sponsored by
William Beaumont Hospitals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stress Urinary Incontinence focused on measuring urinary incontinence, urine leakage

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated, informed consent prior to screening, and be likely to comply with study protocol, including independently complete study questionnaires and communicate with study personnel about AEs and other clinically important information.
  2. Females and males, 18 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at screening
  3. Positive Cough or Bladder Stress Test at screening
  4. Subject agrees not to start any new treatment (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods.

6. Subject agrees to maintain a stable dose of any medication known to affect lower urinary tract function, including but not limited to anticholinergics, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-3 adrenergic agonist, or α-adrenergic blockers, throughout the treatment and follow-up periods.

For Females Only:

  • Subject agrees to discontinue use of bladder support devices, including but not limited to vaginal pessary, during the screening, treatment, and follow-up periods.
  • If of child-bearing age and female, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral contraceptives, condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, IUD, implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s))

For Males Only:

- Subject must be ≥ 4 months post radical prostatectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pelvic floor physical therapy, including muscle training and/or electrostimulation, in a clinical setting within 30 days prior to screening
  2. Subject is morbidly obese (defined as body mass index 40 or greater)
  3. Pulmonary insufficiency, defined as difficulty breathing and fatigue, especially during exercise; chest pain, such as squeezing, pressure of tightness; the sensation of rapid or irregular heartbeat (palpitations); swelling of the legs or feet; dizziness or fainting; and/or bluish discoloration of the nails and/or lips (cyanosis)
  4. Any condition that causes a lack of normal skin sensation to the pelvis, buttocks, and lower extremities
  5. Implanted cardiac pacemaker or metal in the body, including, but not limited to drug pumps, neurostimulators, electronic implants, copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), and/or defibrillators
  6. Subject has a piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment
  7. Active urethral diverticula
  8. Known vesicoureteral reflux
  9. Currently healing from surgical procedures where muscle contraction may disrupt the healing process
  10. Treatment with urethral bulking agents within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
  11. Subject has a malignant tumor, in any location in the body
  12. Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously
  13. Subject has urinary incontinence of neurogenic etiology, such as multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy etc.
  14. Clinically confirmed urinary tract infection, requiring treatment as determined by the investigator, at the Screening Visit
  15. Currently participating in an investigational study that may impact study results or previously received an investigational drug or treatment within 30 days of the Screening Visit
  16. Current or history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation

    For Females Only:

  17. Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, at screening or anytime throughout the study period
  18. History of surgery with insertion of vaginal mesh for SUI
  19. Vaginal prolapse beyond the introitus
  20. Vaginal rejuvenation treatment, including laser treatments and radiofrequency therapy, within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit

    • Note for the sake of preserving scientific integrity, one or more of the eligibility criteria have been left off the list posted while the trial is ongoing. A full list of eligibility criteria will be posted upon completion of the trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Beaumont Hospital-Royal OakRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Emsella Chair Active Treatment

Emsella Sham Treatment

Arm Description

Active treatment subjects will be asked to sit on the center of the Emsella chair. The height of the chair will be adjusted until the participant's feet are on the floor. The Emsella chair will be turned on and the setting gradually increased to the subject's sensory threshold; the maximum sensation the subject can tolerate. The setting will then be decreased slightly and stay unchanged for the remainder of the treatment time. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.

Sham subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner as the active treatment group. The sham treatment will be provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below therapeutic level (<10% power).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair to sham by evaluating the the responder rate, where a patient is called a responder if there is ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in the number stress incontinence events.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in total number of subject-reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes.
Change in the total number of subject-reported stress incontinence (SUI) episodes over 3 days based on voiding diaries. Patients will be giving a 3-day void diary to complete.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat SUI in relation to the change in subject-reported impression of SUI severity.
Change in subject-reported impression of SUI severity as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Severity scale (PGI-S). The subject will check the box that describes how their condition is now. The available options are normal, mild, moderate, or severe.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impression of SUI improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I).
Change in subject-reported impression of SUI improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). The subject will select one of the following options, (very much better, much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, much worse, very much worse) to describe their urinary tract symptoms now versus prior to study treatment.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence related to the change in subject-reported urogenital distress.
Change in subject-reported urogenital distress as measured by the Urinary Distress Inventory questionnaire (UDI-6). The UDI-6 is a six point questionnaire, each question answered is scored as follows; 0 = no, 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit. Add all scores and divide by 6, then multiply by 25 to calculate the raw score. Higher scores = higher disability.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impact of SUI on daily life.
Change in subject-reported impact of SUI on daily life as measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) Short Form. The IIQ-7, assesses how their problem effects activities, relationships, and feelings. It is a 7 point questionnaire. Each answer is scored on the following scale 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, 3 = greatly. The higher the score the more effected they are by their condition.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impact of urinary incontinence on daily life measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL).
Change in subject-reported impact of urinary incontinence on daily life as measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL). The I-QOL is a quality of life measure specific to persons with urinary incontinence. The survey consists of 22 incontinent-specific quality of life items all having the following five-point ordinal response; 1 = extremely, 2 = quite a bit, 3 = moderately, 4 = a little, 5 = not at all. The summed total score is transformed to a 0-100 scale ranging from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life).
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in fecal incontinence as measured by the Cleveland clinic incontinence score (Wexner).
Change in subject-reported fecal incontinence as measured by the Cleveland clinic incontinence score (Wexner). The type of incontinence of stool (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle altered) are reported by the subject. Each question is measured as 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 4 = usually, 5 = always. The higher the score the more severe the condition.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire for female subjects.
The change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire (FSFI) for female subjects. The FSFI is a 19 question survey. A lower the score is equivalent a higher degree of sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 95.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory questionnaire (BSFI) for male subjects.
Change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory questionnaire (BSFI) for male subjects. The BSFI is a validated questionnaire for male sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 44. A lower score indicates a higher degree of dysfunction.
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and change in reported pain and discomfort.
Change in subject-reported pain and discomfort as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = Worst possible pain.
Durability to determine whether subjects in the Emsella Chair group continue to have a higher responder rate than the Sham group
The secondary object for durability for this study are to determine whether subjects in the Emsella Chair group continue to have a higher responder rate than the Sham group
Safety objective to determine the safety and tolerability of Emsella Chair compared to sham
Safety and tolerability of the Emsella chair compared to Sham will be assessed in relation the incidence of adverse events.

Full Information

First Posted
October 16, 2019
Last Updated
February 24, 2023
Sponsor
William Beaumont Hospitals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04133675
Brief Title
BTL Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
Official Title
A Single-Blind, Randomized Study of the BTL EmsellaTM Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 18, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
William Beaumont Hospitals

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a condition that affects both men and women. SUI is the involuntary leakage of urine caused by an increase in intra-abdominal pressure from activities such as exercise, coughing, laughing, or sneezing. It can significantly affect quality of life as patients avoid activities or behaviors that cause leakage. This clinical trial will compare the efficacy of the Emsella chair to sham and determine if electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of SUI.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, sham-controlled, observational study of subjects undergoing electromagnetic perineal stimulation for the treatment of SUI. Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive active treatment or sham in a 1:1 ratio. Eight treatments (2 treatments each week) for 4 weeks will be completed with the Emsella chair to the pelvic floor muscles. Electromagnetic stimulation of the pelvic floor is a FDA approved therapy whereby a coil generates pulsed electromagnetic fields that penetrate deep into the pelvic floor muscles inducing stimulation and providing rehabilitation of weak pelvic muscles.The Emsella Chair is a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology for the treatment of SUI, in addition to other pelvic floor related disorders. HIFEM technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercises over 28 minutes.This technology is typically not covered by insurance, is minimally invasive, and safe, but has limited data available. Currently, there is no data available from sham controlled studies evaluating efficacy of this technology. The purpose of this study is to compare the Emsella Chair to sham and to determine whether electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of SUI.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Keywords
urinary incontinence, urine leakage

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive active Emsella chair treatments or sham treatments. Study will be performed in a single-blind manner.(Participant and biostatistician)
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Randomization will be performed using a table of random numbers. A unblinded RNC will be responsible for maintaining the enrollment and randomization log. Randomization envelopes will be provided by the study's biostatistician and will be securely stored in a locked cabinet. The study coordinator(s) will solely be responsible for opening the randomization envelopes and delivering the study treatments, according to group assignment. Ultimately, they will be responsible for maintaining the confidentiality and security of the randomization envelopes. After randomization, the study coordinator(s) will complete the Subject Enrollment and Randomization Log. The log may be stored in a locked cabinet with the randomization envelopes. At study completion the log will be stored in the regulatory binder.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Emsella Chair Active Treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active treatment subjects will be asked to sit on the center of the Emsella chair. The height of the chair will be adjusted until the participant's feet are on the floor. The Emsella chair will be turned on and the setting gradually increased to the subject's sensory threshold; the maximum sensation the subject can tolerate. The setting will then be decreased slightly and stay unchanged for the remainder of the treatment time. The treatment threshold should be increased with every treatment until the subject reaches 100%.
Arm Title
Emsella Sham Treatment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner as the active treatment group. The sham treatment will be provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below therapeutic level (<10% power).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BTL Emsella
Intervention Description
The Emsella Chair is a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology for the treatment of SUI, in addition to other pelvic floor related disorders. HIFEM technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercises over 28 minutes. The treatment paradigm consists of 3 different phases. The phases consist of an intense stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM), which consists of stimlulation and relaxation. The repetition of the phases and focused electromagnetic energy delivery leads to pelvic floor stimulation, adaptation, and remodelation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham BTL Emsella
Intervention Description
Sham subjects will be positioned on the device in the same manner as the active treatment group. The sham treatment will be provide some sensation without active HIFEM technology. The programming for the sham treatment will have an amplitude limitation, with the setting below therapeutic level (<10% power).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence.
Description
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of Emsella Chair to sham by evaluating the the responder rate, where a patient is called a responder if there is ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in the number stress incontinence events.
Time Frame
4 weeks after completing all treatments
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in total number of subject-reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes.
Description
Change in the total number of subject-reported stress incontinence (SUI) episodes over 3 days based on voiding diaries. Patients will be giving a 3-day void diary to complete.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat SUI in relation to the change in subject-reported impression of SUI severity.
Description
Change in subject-reported impression of SUI severity as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Severity scale (PGI-S). The subject will check the box that describes how their condition is now. The available options are normal, mild, moderate, or severe.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impression of SUI improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I).
Description
Change in subject-reported impression of SUI improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). The subject will select one of the following options, (very much better, much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, much worse, very much worse) to describe their urinary tract symptoms now versus prior to study treatment.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence related to the change in subject-reported urogenital distress.
Description
Change in subject-reported urogenital distress as measured by the Urinary Distress Inventory questionnaire (UDI-6). The UDI-6 is a six point questionnaire, each question answered is scored as follows; 0 = no, 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit. Add all scores and divide by 6, then multiply by 25 to calculate the raw score. Higher scores = higher disability.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impact of SUI on daily life.
Description
Change in subject-reported impact of SUI on daily life as measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) Short Form. The IIQ-7, assesses how their problem effects activities, relationships, and feelings. It is a 7 point questionnaire. Each answer is scored on the following scale 0 = not at all, 1 = slightly, 2 = moderately, 3 = greatly. The higher the score the more effected they are by their condition.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence in relation to the change in subject-reported impact of urinary incontinence on daily life measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL).
Description
Change in subject-reported impact of urinary incontinence on daily life as measured by the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL). The I-QOL is a quality of life measure specific to persons with urinary incontinence. The survey consists of 22 incontinent-specific quality of life items all having the following five-point ordinal response; 1 = extremely, 2 = quite a bit, 3 = moderately, 4 = a little, 5 = not at all. The summed total score is transformed to a 0-100 scale ranging from 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (maximum quality of life).
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in fecal incontinence as measured by the Cleveland clinic incontinence score (Wexner).
Description
Change in subject-reported fecal incontinence as measured by the Cleveland clinic incontinence score (Wexner). The type of incontinence of stool (solid, liquid, gas, wears pad, lifestyle altered) are reported by the subject. Each question is measured as 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 4 = usually, 5 = always. The higher the score the more severe the condition.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire for female subjects.
Description
The change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire (FSFI) for female subjects. The FSFI is a 19 question survey. A lower the score is equivalent a higher degree of sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 95.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and the change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory questionnaire (BSFI) for male subjects.
Description
Change in subject-reported sexual function as measured by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory questionnaire (BSFI) for male subjects. The BSFI is a validated questionnaire for male sexual function. Scores range from 0 to 44. A lower score indicates a higher degree of dysfunction.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
The efficacy of the Emsella chair versus sham to treat stress urinary incontinence and change in reported pain and discomfort.
Description
Change in subject-reported pain and discomfort as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated questionnaire that assesses pain on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = Worst possible pain.
Time Frame
8 weeks after completing all treatments
Title
Durability to determine whether subjects in the Emsella Chair group continue to have a higher responder rate than the Sham group
Description
The secondary object for durability for this study are to determine whether subjects in the Emsella Chair group continue to have a higher responder rate than the Sham group
Time Frame
8 weeks after primary efficacy endpoint
Title
Safety objective to determine the safety and tolerability of Emsella Chair compared to sham
Description
Safety and tolerability of the Emsella chair compared to Sham will be assessed in relation the incidence of adverse events.
Time Frame
4 weeks after primary efficacy endpoint

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated, informed consent prior to screening, and be likely to comply with study protocol, including independently complete study questionnaires and communicate with study personnel about AEs and other clinically important information. Females and males, 18 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at screening Positive Cough or Bladder Stress Test at screening Subject agrees not to start any new treatment (medication or otherwise) during the treatment and follow-up periods. 6. Subject agrees to maintain a stable dose of any medication known to affect lower urinary tract function, including but not limited to anticholinergics, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-3 adrenergic agonist, or α-adrenergic blockers, throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. For Females Only: Subject agrees to discontinue use of bladder support devices, including but not limited to vaginal pessary, during the screening, treatment, and follow-up periods. If of child-bearing age and female, agree to practice approved birth-control methods (oral contraceptives, condom barrier, injection, diaphragm or cervical cap, vaginal contraceptive ring, IUD, implantable contraceptive, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner(s)) For Males Only: - Subject must be ≥ 4 months post radical prostatectomy Exclusion Criteria: Pelvic floor physical therapy, including muscle training and/or electrostimulation, in a clinical setting within 30 days prior to screening Subject is morbidly obese (defined as body mass index 40 or greater) Pulmonary insufficiency, defined as difficulty breathing and fatigue, especially during exercise; chest pain, such as squeezing, pressure of tightness; the sensation of rapid or irregular heartbeat (palpitations); swelling of the legs or feet; dizziness or fainting; and/or bluish discoloration of the nails and/or lips (cyanosis) Any condition that causes a lack of normal skin sensation to the pelvis, buttocks, and lower extremities Implanted cardiac pacemaker or metal in the body, including, but not limited to drug pumps, neurostimulators, electronic implants, copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), and/or defibrillators Subject has a piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment Active urethral diverticula Known vesicoureteral reflux Currently healing from surgical procedures where muscle contraction may disrupt the healing process Treatment with urethral bulking agents within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit Subject is currently receiving treatment for a malignant tumor that would interfere with study participation. Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously Subject has urinary incontinence of neurogenic etiology, such as multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy etc. Clinically confirmed urinary tract infection, requiring treatment as determined by the investigator, at the Screening Visit Currently participating in an investigational study that may impact study results or previously received an investigational drug or treatment within 30 days of the Screening Visit Current or history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation For Females Only: Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, at screening or anytime throughout the study period History of surgery with insertion of vaginal mesh for SUI Vaginal prolapse beyond the introitus Vaginal rejuvenation treatment, including laser treatments and radiofrequency therapy, within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit Note for the sake of preserving scientific integrity, one or more of the eligibility criteria have been left off the list posted while the trial is ongoing. A full list of eligibility criteria will be posted upon completion of the trial.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Erica Zagaja, RN
Phone
248-551-0642
Email
Erica.Zagaja@beaumont.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jennifer Giordano, RN
Phone
248-551-3517
Email
Jennifer.Giordano@beaumont.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Peters, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erica Zagaja, RN
Phone
248-551-0642
Email
Erica.Zagaja@beaumont.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Giordano, RN
Phone
248-551-3517
Email
Jennifer.Giordano@Beaumont.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Peters, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Larry Sirls, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauren Tennyson, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10367836
Citation
Galloway NT, El-Galley RE, Sand PK, Appell RA, Russell HW, Carlan SJ. Extracorporeal magnetic innervation therapy for stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 1999 Jun;53(6):1108-11. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00037-0.
Results Reference
background
Citation
HIFEM technology in treatment of urinary incontinence mechanism of action. https://www.avantemedicalcenter.com/images/documents/Emsella_study.pdf. Published November 2017. Accessed June 20, 2019.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

BTL Emsella Chair Versus Sham for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs