search
Back to results

Build Better Bones With Exercise (B3E)

Primary Purpose

Osteoporotic Fractures, Spinal Fractures

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise and behaviour change strategies
Sponsored by
University of Waterloo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Osteoporotic Fractures focused on measuring Osteoporosis, Spine fracture, Vertebral fracture, Exercise Interventions, Exercise

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has a) a known or suspected vertebral fracture of non-traumatic etiology OR b) one of the following:

    • documented height loss of ≥2cm
    • historical height loss of ≥6cm
    • visible hyperkyphosis
  • age greater than or equal to 65 years of age
  • able to understand instructions in english
  • able to give informed consent (no cognitive impairment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior cancer
  • On dialysis, known liver, kidney or malabsorption disease
  • Progressive neurological disorder, unable to stand or walk for 10 metres, with/without gait aid or progressive disorder likely to prevent study completion, palliative care.
  • Current participation in muscle strengthening or similar exercise program ≥ 3 times per week
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or other contraindications to exercise

Sites / Locations

  • University of Waterloo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Exercise and behaviour change strategies

General health or social discussion

Arm Description

The exercise program will include strength training, balance training and cardiovascular exercise that is individually tailored to the participants' abilities. The physical therapist will also implement strategies to assist with behaviour change, such as documenting progress in a log, participating in action planning and coping planning, and using techniques in the spirit of motivational interviewing.

Participants in the control group will receive equal attention, but will not be prescribed exercise, or participate in counselling about exercise. The physical therapist will discuss topics related to general health.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of Recruitment and Retention
Number of participants recruited and retained. Criteria for success = 20 recruited per site and at least 75% retained.
Adherence
Number of exercise sessions completed relative to prescribed. We will use a diary for participants to self-report adherence.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Fractures.
Incident fracture will be a composite outcome of a vertebral fracture or fragility fracture (excluding fractures due to trauma or cancer). A fracture questionnaire will be used to ascertain the occurrence of fractures, the approximate timing and the cause with fracture occurrence, location and severity verified through health record data. Lateral thoracic and lumbar spine x-rays will be performed on participants at baseline (to confirm prevalent vertebral fractures) and follow-up (to identify new fractures). Vertebral fractures will be defined as radiographic presence of ≥25% reduction in anterior, middle or posterior height of a vertebra using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method.
Number of Fallers
Diary for participants to self-report falls.
Occiput to Wall Distance
Scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
The SPPB consists of balance tests (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem standing), gait speed during 4-meter walk test, and the average time taken to rise from a chair with arms folded across chest and sit back down (Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand test), sub-scores of which are added to determine a composite score (0-12), with higher scores indicative of better performance.
Scores on Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER).
Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER) includes the step test, the Timed Up and Go, the Functional Reach test and the timed static stance feet together eyes closed test. The sub-scores of which are added to create a composite score (0-16), with higher scores indicating better performance.
Quality of Life (QoL) and Pain Scores Measured Through the EuroQOL Instrument (EQ5D5L) and the Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
OQLQ scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicate greater quality of life. EQ5D5L VAS scores range 0-100, with higher scores indicating better overall health. VAS pain scores range 0-10, with lower scores indicating less pain.
Scores on Exercise Self-efficacy Scales.
To assess self-efficacy related to engaging in exercise, participants will be asked "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on most days of the week?" and "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on 3 days of the week?." To assess implementation intentions, participants are asked "Do you already have concrete plans regarding exercise?". Patients will rate their answers on a scale from 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater exercise self-efficacy.
Score on Short-form Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).
Questionnaire about how concerned the participant is about the possibility of falling during common daily activities. Scores range from 7 (no concern about falling) to 28 (severe concern about falling.
Productivity
Questionnaire regarding much did the participant's spine fracture(s) or osteoporosis affect their productivity while working? The scale is 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more effect on their work.
Physical Activity
A modified version of the Short-Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) will be completed. A subset of participants at the University of Waterloo (St. Mary's General Hospital) will wear an accelerometer for 7 days.
Number of Serious Adverse Events.
Defined as death or event that is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or results in disability.
Number of Individuals Screened and Eligible Per Collection Site.
Number of participants randomized out of all participants screened
Number of Potentially Eligible Males
Number of Participants With Multiple Falls
Total Number of Falls
Value of Direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Value of Non-direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Participant Height
Activities of Daily Living
0-10 scale about ability to do activities of daily living. Higher scores indicate more difficulty.
Timed Loaded Standing Test
A physical performance measure of combined trunk and arm endurance.
Location of Vertebral Fractures
Any vertebral fracture (Genant Grade 1 or higher) found on x-ray, divided into location groupings of T1-T3, T4-T8, T9-L1, and L2-L5.
Participant Weight

Full Information

First Posted
January 2, 2013
Last Updated
November 12, 2019
Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Western Ontario, Canada, University Health Network, Toronto, McMaster University, University of Melbourne, University of British Columbia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01761084
Brief Title
Build Better Bones With Exercise
Acronym
B3E
Official Title
Build Better Bones With Exercise: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise in Women With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Western Ontario, Canada, University Health Network, Toronto, McMaster University, University of Melbourne, University of British Columbia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The long-term goal of our research team is to conduct a large multicentre study to evaluate whether tailored home exercise can prevent fractures in high-risk individuals. The proposed project will address the feasibility of such a trial, but will also evaluate the effect of exercise on quality of life, posture and many other outcomes important to individuals with vertebral fractures. Physiotherapists will conduct 6 home visits with participants to deliver the intervention (or social visit for controls) using a similar model to previous work by our team and others. The purpose of this pilot study is determining the feasibility of recruitment, retention and adherence of an international multicentre randomized controlled study evaluating the efficacy of thrice-weekly home exercise for one year among women with vertebral fracture. As secondary objectives, the investigators will examine the effects of exercise on function, balance, quality of life, pain, falls and fractures. The primary hypothesis is that the investigators will successfully recruit and retain the target sample, and achieve an adherence rate of 60%.
Detailed Description
There is limited data available from which to develop guidelines for safe and effective exercise prescription among individuals with hip or vertebral fractures. The long-term goal of our research team is to conduct a large multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether participating in a thrice-weekly home exercise program for one year can reduce incident fragility fractures among women aged 65 years or older with a history of vertebral fracture compared to no intervention. The current study is a pilot study with the principal objective of determining the feasibility of recruitment, retention and adherence of an international multicentre RCT evaluating the efficacy of thrice-weekly home exercise for one year among women with vertebral fracture. The intervention was developed by experts in exercise prescription based on a rigorous literature review and Cochrane meta-analysis we have conducted. Physiotherapists will conduct 6 home visits with participants to deliver the intervention (or social visit for controls) using a similar model to previous work by our team and others. Secondary outcomes of the pilot study are those hypothesized to be among the causal pathway linking exercise to fracture risk, including lower extremity strength, posture, balance, as well as falls and fractures. Additional secondary outcomes include quality of life, pain, exercise self-efficacy, the cost of the intervention, and the risk of adverse events associated with exercise. The recruitment and retention process will be summarized using a CONSORT flow diagram, and the reporting of results will be in accordance with the CONSORT criteria. Analyses of feasibility objectives will be descriptive or based on estimates with 95% confidence intervals, where feasibility will be assessed relative to criteria defined a priori. Differences in secondary outcomes will be evaluated in intention to treat analyses via independent student T-tests, Chi Square or logistic regression. The Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the level of significance for secondary outcomes so the overall level is alpha=0.05. Even if the larger trial proves not to be feasible, the current trial will be one of the largest exercise studies among a representative group of women with vertebral fracture to date, and will evaluate the feasibility and costs of a comprehensive home exercise program, and its effect on important secondary outcomes. Osteoporosis Canada has defined a need to develop patient resources on exercise and recently announced a shift in priority to individuals with existing fractures; the proposed pilot study is timely and will directly inform these knowledge translation initiatives.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporotic Fractures, Spinal Fractures
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Spine fracture, Vertebral fracture, Exercise Interventions, Exercise

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
141 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exercise and behaviour change strategies
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The exercise program will include strength training, balance training and cardiovascular exercise that is individually tailored to the participants' abilities. The physical therapist will also implement strategies to assist with behaviour change, such as documenting progress in a log, participating in action planning and coping planning, and using techniques in the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Arm Title
General health or social discussion
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants in the control group will receive equal attention, but will not be prescribed exercise, or participate in counselling about exercise. The physical therapist will discuss topics related to general health.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise and behaviour change strategies
Intervention Description
cardiovascular exercise (e.g., marching, walking) for ≥10 minutes per day postural retraining and balance exercises ≥3 days a week (will be encouraged to do these daily) perform muscle strengthening and balance training exercises ≥ 3 days a week the exercise intervention was developed using the Bone Fit program as a framework (http://www.bonefit.ca/). The physical therapist will tailor exercises and work with participant to integrate them into their day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of Recruitment and Retention
Description
Number of participants recruited and retained. Criteria for success = 20 recruited per site and at least 75% retained.
Time Frame
Monthly records up to 12 months.
Title
Adherence
Description
Number of exercise sessions completed relative to prescribed. We will use a diary for participants to self-report adherence.
Time Frame
Monthly records over 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Fractures.
Description
Incident fracture will be a composite outcome of a vertebral fracture or fragility fracture (excluding fractures due to trauma or cancer). A fracture questionnaire will be used to ascertain the occurrence of fractures, the approximate timing and the cause with fracture occurrence, location and severity verified through health record data. Lateral thoracic and lumbar spine x-rays will be performed on participants at baseline (to confirm prevalent vertebral fractures) and follow-up (to identify new fractures). Vertebral fractures will be defined as radiographic presence of ≥25% reduction in anterior, middle or posterior height of a vertebra using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method.
Time Frame
Baseline, one year and at report of fracture (monitored monthly for reports).
Title
Number of Fallers
Description
Diary for participants to self-report falls.
Time Frame
Monthly up to one year.
Title
Occiput to Wall Distance
Time Frame
Baseline and one year.
Title
Scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Description
The SPPB consists of balance tests (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem standing), gait speed during 4-meter walk test, and the average time taken to rise from a chair with arms folded across chest and sit back down (Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand test), sub-scores of which are added to determine a composite score (0-12), with higher scores indicative of better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline and one year.
Title
Scores on Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER).
Description
Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER) includes the step test, the Timed Up and Go, the Functional Reach test and the timed static stance feet together eyes closed test. The sub-scores of which are added to create a composite score (0-16), with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline and one year.
Title
Quality of Life (QoL) and Pain Scores Measured Through the EuroQOL Instrument (EQ5D5L) and the Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Description
OQLQ scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicate greater quality of life. EQ5D5L VAS scores range 0-100, with higher scores indicating better overall health. VAS pain scores range 0-10, with lower scores indicating less pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
Title
Scores on Exercise Self-efficacy Scales.
Description
To assess self-efficacy related to engaging in exercise, participants will be asked "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on most days of the week?" and "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on 3 days of the week?." To assess implementation intentions, participants are asked "Do you already have concrete plans regarding exercise?". Patients will rate their answers on a scale from 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater exercise self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
Title
Score on Short-form Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).
Description
Questionnaire about how concerned the participant is about the possibility of falling during common daily activities. Scores range from 7 (no concern about falling) to 28 (severe concern about falling.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
Title
Productivity
Description
Questionnaire regarding much did the participant's spine fracture(s) or osteoporosis affect their productivity while working? The scale is 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more effect on their work.
Time Frame
Monthly up to one year.
Title
Physical Activity
Description
A modified version of the Short-Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) will be completed. A subset of participants at the University of Waterloo (St. Mary's General Hospital) will wear an accelerometer for 7 days.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Number of Serious Adverse Events.
Description
Defined as death or event that is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or results in disability.
Time Frame
Monthly up to one year.
Title
Number of Individuals Screened and Eligible Per Collection Site.
Description
Number of participants randomized out of all participants screened
Time Frame
over the course of the study (2.29 years)
Title
Number of Potentially Eligible Males
Time Frame
over recruitment period
Title
Number of Participants With Multiple Falls
Time Frame
Monthly up to 12 months.
Title
Total Number of Falls
Time Frame
Monthly up to 12 months.
Title
Value of Direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Time Frame
Accrued costs over 12 months
Title
Value of Non-direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Time Frame
Accrued costs over 12 months
Title
Participant Height
Time Frame
Baseline and one year
Title
Activities of Daily Living
Description
0-10 scale about ability to do activities of daily living. Higher scores indicate more difficulty.
Time Frame
Monthly up to one year
Title
Timed Loaded Standing Test
Description
A physical performance measure of combined trunk and arm endurance.
Time Frame
Baseline and one year
Title
Location of Vertebral Fractures
Description
Any vertebral fracture (Genant Grade 1 or higher) found on x-ray, divided into location groupings of T1-T3, T4-T8, T9-L1, and L2-L5.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Participant Weight
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Has a) a known or suspected vertebral fracture of non-traumatic etiology OR b) one of the following: documented height loss of ≥2cm historical height loss of ≥6cm visible hyperkyphosis age greater than or equal to 65 years of age able to understand instructions in english able to give informed consent (no cognitive impairment) Exclusion Criteria: Current or prior cancer On dialysis, known liver, kidney or malabsorption disease Progressive neurological disorder, unable to stand or walk for 10 metres, with/without gait aid or progressive disorder likely to prevent study completion, palliative care. Current participation in muscle strengthening or similar exercise program ≥ 3 times per week Uncontrolled hypertension or other contraindications to exercise
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lora Giangregorio, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Waterloo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Waterloo
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2L 3G1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31899499
Citation
Gibbs JC, McArthur C, Wark JD, Thabane L, Scherer SC, Prasad S, Papaioannou A, Mittmann N, Laprade J, Kim S, Khan A, Kendler DL, Hill KD, Cheung AM, Bleakney R, Ashe MC, Adachi JD, Giangregorio LM. The Effects of Home Exercise in Older Women With Vertebral Fractures: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):662-676. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz188.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24786946
Citation
Giangregorio LM, Thabane L, Adachi JD, Ashe MC, Bleakney RR, Braun EA, Cheung AM, Fraser LA, Gibbs JC, Hill KD, Hodsman AB, Kendler DL, Mittmann N, Prasad S, Scherer SC, Wark JD, Papaioannou A. Build better bones with exercise: protocol for a feasibility study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 12 months of home exercise in women with a vertebral fracture. Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1337-52. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130625. Epub 2014 May 1.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://uwaterloo.ca/kinesiology/people-profiles/lora-giangregorio
Description
Principal Investigator

Learn more about this trial

Build Better Bones With Exercise

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs