Building Caregiver Skills Using a Simulation-based Intervention for Care of Head and Neck Cancer
Primary Purpose
Head and Neck Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
In-person education sessions
NCI Booklet
Survey
Interview
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Head and Neck Cancer focused on measuring caregiver, simulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- family member or friend of an adult patient with a new diagnosis of Stage III - IV cancers of the tongue, gum, oral cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, or parotid who is receiving radiation therapy for curative intent
- identified by the patient as his/her primary caregiver who is providing daily assistance and/or emotional support
- cognitively intact, as evidenced by orientation to person, place, and time
- ability to speak, read, and comprehend English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Caregivers of patients who are receiving hospice care will be excluded because of the patient's poor prognosis and multiple issues associated with end-of-life care
- Caregivers who are themselves undergoing active cancer treatment will be excluded (hormonal treatment allowed)
Sites / Locations
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Intervention Group: Caregiver education
Control Group: educational booklet
Arm Description
The intervention includes caregivers who will receive an education and support program throughout radiation treatment in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses.
The control group will receive an educational booklet about caregiving in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Average efficacy of caregiving summary score
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Average anxiety summary score
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Average depression summary score
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Average Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) summary score
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Qualitative assessment of acceptability
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize responses to semi-structured interviews
Attrition rate to assess feasibility
Feasibility will be assessed via attrition and consent rates.
Consent rate to assess feasibility
Feasibility will be assessed via attrition and consent rates.
Total time for delivering intervention to assess costs
Time for delivering the intervention will be recorded to aid in assessing costs.
Average missed checklist items to assess integrity of intervention
Integrity of the intervention will be assessed through monitoring of intervention checklist.
Event rate for patient events
Describe the average incidence of all patient events that may be impacted by caregiver self-efficacy. Events may include acute care visits, admission to the hospital, visits to the emergency department, need for fluids in the radiation oncology department, and interrupted treatment course, and others
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02577237
First Posted
October 14, 2015
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02577237
Brief Title
Building Caregiver Skills Using a Simulation-based Intervention for Care of Head and Neck Cancer
Official Title
Building Family Caregiver Skills Using a Simulation-based Intervention for Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 12, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 12, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers face many challenges. These include learning about cancer and its treatment, coping with symptoms from illness and treatment side effects, making adjustments to usual activities, and managing the emotional effects of having a serious illness. This study tests whether different forms of education and support can help family caregivers feel better prepared. To find out if education about caregiving and different kinds of support are effective, this study wants to compare approaches.One group includes caregivers who will receive an education and support program throughout radiation treatment in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses. The other group receives an educational booklet about caregiving in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses. The caregiver also completes surveys about his or her emotions, distress, confidence as a care giver, and quality of life. In addition, the study asks the caregiver questions about his or her age, race, ethnicity, marital status, employment status, education, annual household income, and current living arrangements. This pilot study will only be offered at the Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Main Campus.
Detailed Description
Aim 1: Conduct a pilot test of the effects of a novel caregiver intervention, as compared to a control group, on family caregiver self-efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life.
Aim 2: Explore the acceptability of a caregiver intervention that utilizes simulation.
Aim 3: Assess the feasibility of the intervention. Aim 4: Describe the incidence of patient events that may be impacted by caregiver self-efficacy, such as acute care visits, admissions to the hospital, visits to the emergency department, need for fluids in the radiation oncology department, and interrupted treatment course.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Head and Neck Cancer
Keywords
caregiver, simulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention Group: Caregiver education
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention includes caregivers who will receive an education and support program throughout radiation treatment in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses.
Arm Title
Control Group: educational booklet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will receive an educational booklet about caregiving in addition to usual care by their doctors and nurses
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
In-person education sessions
Other Intervention Name(s)
intervention group, educational content/simulation
Intervention Description
The intervention will be delivered by a radiation oncology nurse. Each of the four in-person sessions consists of approximately 30 minutes of educational content/simulation that addresses a specific caregiving topic and any issues or concerns that the caregiver may be experiencing.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
NCI Booklet
Other Intervention Name(s)
When Someone You Love is being Treated for Cancer
Intervention Description
Radiation Oncology Nurse will hand participant the NCI booklet
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Survey
Intervention Description
written, qualitative assessments of areas including depression and anxiety, caregiver self-efficacy, care-giver self efficacy for head and neck cancer, health-related quality of life, patient performance status, demographics, and medical history.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Interview
Other Intervention Name(s)
semi-structured interview, Open ended questions
Intervention Description
A structured series of open-ended questions will be used during a telephone interview with participants at four weeks post radiation treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average efficacy of caregiving summary score
Description
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Average anxiety summary score
Description
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Average depression summary score
Description
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Average Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) summary score
Description
Summary statistics as well as observed values of longitudinally measured efficacy outcome variables (efficacy for caregiving, anxiety, depression, and HRQOL) will be presented graphically. Linear mixed models will be used to estimate within- and between-subject components of variance needed for design of a larger trial with these endpoints.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Qualitative assessment of acceptability
Description
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize responses to semi-structured interviews
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Attrition rate to assess feasibility
Description
Feasibility will be assessed via attrition and consent rates.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Consent rate to assess feasibility
Description
Feasibility will be assessed via attrition and consent rates.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Total time for delivering intervention to assess costs
Description
Time for delivering the intervention will be recorded to aid in assessing costs.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Average missed checklist items to assess integrity of intervention
Description
Integrity of the intervention will be assessed through monitoring of intervention checklist.
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
Title
Event rate for patient events
Description
Describe the average incidence of all patient events that may be impacted by caregiver self-efficacy. Events may include acute care visits, admission to the hospital, visits to the emergency department, need for fluids in the radiation oncology department, and interrupted treatment course, and others
Time Frame
Up to 5 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
family member or friend of an adult patient with a new diagnosis of Stage III - IV cancers of the tongue, gum, oral cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, or parotid who is receiving radiation therapy for curative intent
identified by the patient as his/her primary caregiver who is providing daily assistance and/or emotional support
cognitively intact, as evidenced by orientation to person, place, and time
ability to speak, read, and comprehend English
Exclusion Criteria:
Caregivers of patients who are receiving hospice care will be excluded because of the patient's poor prognosis and multiple issues associated with end-of-life care
Caregivers who are themselves undergoing active cancer treatment will be excluded (hormonal treatment allowed)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan Mazanec, PhD, RN
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Building Caregiver Skills Using a Simulation-based Intervention for Care of Head and Neck Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs