search
Back to results

Busulfan & Melphalan Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Lenalidomide Maintenance (BuMelMCRN001)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Busulfan
Melphalan
Lenalidomide
Sponsored by
University Health Network, Toronto
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Myeloma focused on measuring Newly Diagnosed multiple myeloma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 75 years, inclusive.
  2. Study participants must have a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma requiring systemic therapy and are eligible for the planned ASCT.
  3. Untreated bone marrow sample was shipped to Princess Margaret Hospital for MRD assay.
  4. Must have been treated with a velcade-based induction regimen. No limit to the number of cycles of induction.
  5. Study participants in whom the minimum stem cell dose of 2.0 x 106 cluster of differentiation (CD)34+ cells/kg has been collected.
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2.
  7. Negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test in all females of child-bearing potential (FOCBP).
  8. Ability to provide written informed consent prior to initiation of any study-related procedures, and ability, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, to comply with all requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Myeloma progression at any time since starting initial induction therapy for multiple myeloma. Changes to or additions to the existing induction therapy are allowed as long as disease progression has not been confirmed.
  2. Prior treatment history of ASCT for any medical reason.
  3. Prior treatment history of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for any medical reason, not limited to myeloma treatment.
  4. Prior treatment with busulfan or gemtuzumab ozogamicin for any reason.
  5. Systemic amyloidosis.
  6. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% as measured by either multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO) performed within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose. If cyclophosphamide was used for stem cell harvest, an ECHO or MUGA must be done after the stem cell collection and prior to enrollment to confirm adequate cardiac function.
  7. Uncontrolled arrhythmia or symptomatic cardiac disease at the time of screening.
  8. Symptomatic pulmonary disease, based on Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) < 50% of predicted (corrected for hemoglobin) measured within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose.
  9. Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN).
  10. History of elevated total serum bilirubin >2 mg/dL that had been caused by previous chemotherapy at any point, or total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL at the time of screening with the exception of Gilbert's disease.
  11. Hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time as International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0 at the time of screening.
  12. Any previous history of fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, and symptomatic biliary disease.
  13. Prior total body irradiation therapy, or radiation therapy directly applied to the liver.
  14. Patients with a known history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C should be on appropriate anti-viral therapy. Even so, these cases must be discussed with the sponsor and approval obtained prior to screening.
  15. Known history of or current HIV infection, or active hepatitis B or c infection or any uncontrolled active infection of any kind at the time busulfan administration.
  16. Serum creatinine >177 umol/L at the time of screening.
  17. Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  18. Current or history of drug and/or alcohol abuse.
  19. Use of other investigational therapies within 30 days of enrollment in this study. Use of investigational therapies, other than the ones given as part of this protocol therapy, is not allowed during the study participation.
  20. Clinically significant abnormality in medical history or upon examination that might interfere with the outcomes of the study in the opinion of the investigator.
  21. Any patient, who in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Ave
  • Vancouver General Hospital, Centennial Pavilion, 6th Floor
  • Saint John Regional Hospital, 5DN Research Department, 400 University Ave
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
  • London Regional Cancer Program 790 Commissioners Road East
  • The Ottawa Hospital
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boul. de l'Assomption
  • Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC Glen Site, Cedars Cancer Centre
  • Saskatoon Cancer Centre 20 Campus Drive

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

BuMel + lenalidomide Maintenance

Arm Description

I.V. Busulfan + I.V. Melphalan for conditioning prior ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide maintenance at day 100 after ASCT.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

• Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity at day 100 post ASCT
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice.

Secondary Outcome Measures

• To determine the pattern, positivity (in terms of percentages) or negativity of MRD analysis during lenalidomide maintenance.
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD negativity analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice.
• To determine the response rate using conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance.
The response rate (Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, Partial Response, Minimal Response and Stable Disease) will be assessed by using the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation modified response criteria,with conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance.
• To determine the effectiveness of using the HevyLite Chain assay to assess anti-tumour response at day 100 post ASCT and during lenalidomide maintenance
Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig)A lambda, Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) A lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Lambda,Immunoglobulin (Ig) G kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) G lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Lambda and Immunoglobulin (Ig) M kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) M lambda ratio will be measured. These results will be correlated to standard Free Lite Chain assays performed at the same time points listed above.
• To determine the toxicity of busulfan and melphalan when used as a high-dose conditioning therapy for ASCT.
Toxicity of busulfan and melphalan will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects(CTCAE) version 3.0
• To determine the toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance post busulfan and melphalan conditioning ASCT.
Toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 3.0
• To determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of this program.
These endpoints will be analyzed as time to event variables, which is defined as the time from transplant to death for OS and the time from transplant to the first occurrence of death or disease progression for PFS. The event free probabilities for these endpoints will be estimated by the product limit Kaplan Meier method. Subjects without events will be censored at the last followup for OS and at the last disease evaluation for PFS.
• Identification of the type and frequencies of somatic abnormalities (point mutations, indels, and copy number abnormalities) and their evolution overtime.
Whole genome sequencing will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame.
• Assessment of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood to monitor and correlate response assessments in multiple myeloma.
cell free DNA (cfDNA) will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame AND only for study participants for whom genomics whole exome sequencing) samples have been collected.

Full Information

First Posted
August 29, 2012
Last Updated
September 20, 2022
Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Collaborators
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Celgene Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01702831
Brief Title
Busulfan & Melphalan Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Lenalidomide Maintenance
Acronym
BuMelMCRN001
Official Title
A Phase II Study of Busulfan & Melphalan as Conditioning Regimen for ASCT in Patients Who Received Bortezomib Based Induction for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance Until Progression.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Collaborators
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Celgene Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of ASCT. The three main strategies are to incorporate novel agents into the induction regimen, using maintenance therapy following ASCT and the final strategy is to enhance conditioning regimens. Investigators would like to explore all these three strategies in this study: Investigators propose to take patients who have had standard novel agent (bortezomib) based induction regimens into this study and then use a dose-adjusted combination of busulfan and melphalan as conditioning regimen and finally Investigators would like to incorporate lenalidomide maintenance post ASCT until disease progression.
Detailed Description
STUDY RATIONALE AND PURPOSE: A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of ASCT. The three main strategies are to incorporate novel agents into the induction regimen, using maintenance therapy following ASCT and the final strategy is to enhance conditioning regimens. Investigators would like to explore all these three strategies in this study: Investigators propose to take patients who have had standard novel agent (bortezomib) based induction regimens into this study and then use a dose-adjusted combination of busulfan and melphalan as conditioning regimen and finally Investigators would like to incorporate lenalidomide maintenance post ASCT until disease progression. The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay and to explore the feasibility of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) to detect and monitor response assessments in multiple myeloma, - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of these assays in clinical practice. INTERVENTIONS: Conditioning Regimen IV Busulfan 3.2mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose once daily as a 3-hour infusion on days -5, -4 and -3 (option 1) or on days -6, -5, -4 (option 2).IV Melphalan 140mg/m2 once on day -2 (for option 1) or day -3 ( for option 2) Maintenance Regimen Oral Lenalidomide 10 mg once daily for 28 days of a 28 days cycle for first three cycles and then dose escalation to 15 mg daily if clinically appropriate to do so. STUDY ENDPOINTS Primary: • MRD negativity at day 100 post ASCT Secondary: To determine the pattern of MRD analysis during lenalidomide maintenance. To determine the response rate using conventional immunoglobulin-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance. To determine the effectiveness of using the Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay to assess anti-tumour response at day 100 post ASCT and during lenalidomide maintenance. To determine the toxicity of busulfan and melphalan when used as a high-dose conditioning therapy for ASCT. To determine the toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance post busulfan and melphalan conditioning ASCT. To determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of this program. To determine, through whole exome sequencing in individual Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, the type and frequencies of somatic abnormalities (point mutations, indels, and copy number abnormalities) and their evolution overtime as the clinical disease progresses. To explore the feasibility of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) to detect and monitor response assessments in multiple myeloma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Myeloma
Keywords
Newly Diagnosed multiple myeloma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
78 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BuMel + lenalidomide Maintenance
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
I.V. Busulfan + I.V. Melphalan for conditioning prior ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide maintenance at day 100 after ASCT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Busulfan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Busulfex
Intervention Description
Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2 mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -5 to -3), option 1 OR Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -6 to -4), option 2.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Melphalan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Alkeran
Intervention Description
I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -2, followed by an autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (day -1 will be a rest day) - this is referred to as "Option 1" dosing schema OR I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -3 followed by autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (days -2 and -1 will be rest days). This is referred to as "Option 2"
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenalidomide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Revlimid
Intervention Description
Oral lenalidomide 10mg per day (on all 28 days of a 28 day cycle) for the first three cycles and then escalated to 15 mg daily if clinically appropriate to do so. The lenalidomide maintenance will start on day 100 post ASCT and continue till disease progression.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
• Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity at day 100 post ASCT
Description
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice.
Time Frame
day 100 post ASCT
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
• To determine the pattern, positivity (in terms of percentages) or negativity of MRD analysis during lenalidomide maintenance.
Description
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD negativity analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice.
Time Frame
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
Title
• To determine the response rate using conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance.
Description
The response rate (Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, Partial Response, Minimal Response and Stable Disease) will be assessed by using the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation modified response criteria,with conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance.
Time Frame
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
Title
• To determine the effectiveness of using the HevyLite Chain assay to assess anti-tumour response at day 100 post ASCT and during lenalidomide maintenance
Description
Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig)A lambda, Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) A lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Lambda,Immunoglobulin (Ig) G kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) G lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Lambda and Immunoglobulin (Ig) M kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) M lambda ratio will be measured. These results will be correlated to standard Free Lite Chain assays performed at the same time points listed above.
Time Frame
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
Title
• To determine the toxicity of busulfan and melphalan when used as a high-dose conditioning therapy for ASCT.
Description
Toxicity of busulfan and melphalan will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects(CTCAE) version 3.0
Time Frame
During conditioning therapy for ASCT. For schema option 1 this will be assessed at days -6, -5, -4, -3 and -2 prior ASCT. For schema option 2 this will be assessed at days -7, -6, -5, -4 and -3 prior ASCT.
Title
• To determine the toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance post busulfan and melphalan conditioning ASCT.
Description
Toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 3.0
Time Frame
After day 100 post ASCT, during the maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
Title
• To determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of this program.
Description
These endpoints will be analyzed as time to event variables, which is defined as the time from transplant to death for OS and the time from transplant to the first occurrence of death or disease progression for PFS. The event free probabilities for these endpoints will be estimated by the product limit Kaplan Meier method. Subjects without events will be censored at the last followup for OS and at the last disease evaluation for PFS.
Time Frame
From randomization patients will be followed for PFS every 3 months for the first year after ASCT and then every 6 months until disease progression. After they will be followed every year for O/S until death.
Title
• Identification of the type and frequencies of somatic abnormalities (point mutations, indels, and copy number abnormalities) and their evolution overtime.
Description
Whole genome sequencing will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame.
Time Frame
After ASCT at day 100, during maint. therapy q 3 months at month 6 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
Title
• Assessment of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood to monitor and correlate response assessments in multiple myeloma.
Description
cell free DNA (cfDNA) will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame AND only for study participants for whom genomics whole exome sequencing) samples have been collected.
Time Frame
After ASCT at day 100, during maint. therapy q 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 to 75 years, inclusive. Study participants must have a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma requiring systemic therapy and are eligible for the planned ASCT. Untreated bone marrow sample was shipped to Princess Margaret Hospital for MRD assay. Must have been treated with a velcade-based induction regimen. No limit to the number of cycles of induction. Study participants in whom the minimum stem cell dose of 2.0 x 106 cluster of differentiation (CD)34+ cells/kg has been collected. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2. Negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test in all females of child-bearing potential (FOCBP). Ability to provide written informed consent prior to initiation of any study-related procedures, and ability, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, to comply with all requirements of the study. Exclusion Criteria: Myeloma progression at any time since starting initial induction therapy for multiple myeloma. Changes to or additions to the existing induction therapy are allowed as long as disease progression has not been confirmed. Prior treatment history of ASCT for any medical reason. Prior treatment history of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for any medical reason, not limited to myeloma treatment. Prior treatment with busulfan or gemtuzumab ozogamicin for any reason. Systemic amyloidosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% as measured by either multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO) performed within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose. If cyclophosphamide was used for stem cell harvest, an ECHO or MUGA must be done after the stem cell collection and prior to enrollment to confirm adequate cardiac function. Uncontrolled arrhythmia or symptomatic cardiac disease at the time of screening. Symptomatic pulmonary disease, based on Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) < 50% of predicted (corrected for hemoglobin) measured within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose. Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN). History of elevated total serum bilirubin >2 mg/dL that had been caused by previous chemotherapy at any point, or total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL at the time of screening with the exception of Gilbert's disease. Hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time as International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0 at the time of screening. Any previous history of fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, and symptomatic biliary disease. Prior total body irradiation therapy, or radiation therapy directly applied to the liver. Patients with a known history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C should be on appropriate anti-viral therapy. Even so, these cases must be discussed with the sponsor and approval obtained prior to screening. Known history of or current HIV infection, or active hepatitis B or c infection or any uncontrolled active infection of any kind at the time busulfan administration. Serum creatinine >177 umol/L at the time of screening. Women who are pregnant or lactating. Current or history of drug and/or alcohol abuse. Use of other investigational therapies within 30 days of enrollment in this study. Use of investigational therapies, other than the ones given as part of this protocol therapy, is not allowed during the study participation. Clinically significant abnormality in medical history or upon examination that might interfere with the outcomes of the study in the opinion of the investigator. Any patient, who in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in this study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donna E Reece, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Ave
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G-1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Vancouver General Hospital, Centennial Pavilion, 6th Floor
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Saint John Regional Hospital, 5DN Research Department, 400 University Ave
City
Saint John
State/Province
New Brunswick
ZIP/Postal Code
E2L 4L2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H 2Y9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Regional Cancer Program 790 Commissioners Road East
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boul. de l'Assomption
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC Glen Site, Cedars Cancer Centre
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Saskatoon Cancer Centre 20 Campus Drive
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7N 4H4
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Un-identified IPD, pertaining to Serious Adverse Events, will be submitted to the DSMB for review. DSMB letters will be provided to the participating sites. Un-identified IPD could also be shared with Sub-investigators conducting correlative studies for this trial; that will be Dr. Suzanne Trudel and Dr. Rodger Tiedemann.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Current Study Protocol Amendment # 4 (v. date February 13, 21018), ICF(s), interim CSR have been submitted to the DSMB since the activation of this trial. DSMB meetings occur every 6 months. DSMB letters are provided to participating sites every 6 months after the DSMB meetings have occurred. IPD for correlative studies is provided ad-hoc on individual request for data analysis (i.e. submission of abstracts to conferences).
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
No additional information will be shared

Learn more about this trial

Busulfan & Melphalan Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Lenalidomide Maintenance

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs