search
Back to results

Can Sciatica Patients Avoid Surgery? (CASPAS)

Primary Purpose

Sciatic Nerve Compression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
McKenzie Method
Advice to saty active
Sponsored by
Central Finland Hospital District
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sciatic Nerve Compression

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: The participants are 18 - 60-year-old Finnish speaking sciatica patients for whom magnetic resonance imaging confirmed disc herniation compressing a nerve root canal, and who have related symptoms radiating to the lower limb +/- neurological disorders. Their sciatica has lasted at least 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy, previous surgery or treated by using MDT- method, fibromyalgia, signs of serious diseases or "red-flags" symptoms. Symptoms indicating the Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) or lower limb palsy that hinders normal functioning, previous injury from a car accident or a high fall, or osteoporotic fractures for the elderly, cancer anamnesis, tumor, or inflammation, general symptoms such as fever, chills, or losing weight for an unknown reason, back problems complicated by other serious diseases such as polyneuropathy, neurological diseases, circulatory brain diseases, central spinal stenosis, myelopathy, syringomyelia, and long-term neuropathic pain not related to sciatica, unwillingness to undergo surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Central Finland Central Hospital,

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

McKenzie - method group

Advice to stay active group

Arm Description

Participants will be sent to an experienced MDT therapist for therapy. They are 1) assessed clinically, 2) treated according the MDT-approach which includes home exercise program, consisting i) an educational component, and ii) an active therapy component with directional preference exercises, several times a day with sustained end range positions according to symptom response, and with avoiding aggravating positions. Participants have a maximum of 7 treatment visits. They will also have physiotherapy counselling at study entry about the good prognosis of sciatica.

Participants enrolled into this group will receive physiotherapist's counselling at study entry for at least 60 minutes time about the good prognosis of sciatica, the spontaneous regression of the intervertebral disc herniation and pain tolerance ("natural healing"). In addition, they will get ergonomic advice and advice to stay normally active. The participants are also told to avoid bed rest and advised to continue their normal routines as actively as possible including exercise activities with limits permitted by their signs and symptoms. A two-page summary booklet related to these items will be given to them.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of patients who avoided surgery
Number of patients who avoided surgery treated by using the McKenzie- method or by advice to stay active

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Intensity
Low back and leg pain intensity reported with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 - 100mm scales, 0 mm = no pain, 100mm = worst possible pain).
Disability
Disability is reported with Oswestry disability index Finnish version 2.0 total score (scale 0-100%): 0= minimal disability, 100 = bed-bound or exaggeration of symptoms.
Health-Related Quality of Life
Quality of life is assessed with the SF-36.These eight scale scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores equals more disability, higher scores equals less disability. Physical and mental components will be calculated separately.

Full Information

First Posted
June 19, 2018
Last Updated
September 1, 2021
Sponsor
Central Finland Hospital District
Collaborators
Seinajoki Central Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03572452
Brief Title
Can Sciatica Patients Avoid Surgery?
Acronym
CASPAS
Official Title
Can Sciatica Patients Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation Avoid Surgery by Treatment Using the McKenzie Method or by Advice to Stay Active?
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Central Finland Hospital District
Collaborators
Seinajoki Central Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Sciatica pain is associated with a disc disorder in 85% of cases. Sciatica is shown to resolve without treatments in the majority of cases. Spontaneous regression of the intervertebral disc herniation occurs where the herniation loses its volume partly or totally without surgical interventions. It has estimated that only 5 to 20% of patients with symptomatic intervertebral disc herniation require surgery. Most trials comparing surgical trials and conservative treatments of sciatica due to intervertebral disc herniation favor surgery, because it results in earlier relief of pain. However, one year after surgery, there were only a few differences in pain and disability between surgery and conservative treatment groups. It has shown that the number of surgeries (discectomies) decreased among patients with sciatica when treated by using a mechanical diagnosis and therapy approach (MDT) also called the McKenzie method. In addition, by using the MDT method it has also been shown that sciatica patient who were clinically classified as "centralizers" had good to excellent non-surgical outcomes and many of them avoided surgery, whereas non-centralizing pain has shown to predict worse treatment outcomes, chronic low back disorder and disability. Further, patients who do not have centralization will be 6 times more likely to undergo surgery.The primary aim of this multicenter randomized clinical trial is to find out how many patients with sciatica due to intervertebral disc herniation with radicular symptoms for at least 6 weeks, and who are on the waiting list for surgery, avoid surgery by treatment using the McKenzie method compared to advice to stay active. Secondary aims are to compare the patients' self-reported outcomes such as low back and leg pain intensity, disability, work ability, sick-leave days, fear avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, depression and quality of life. The outcomes are measured at baseline, two and three months in the non-surgical patients. In addition, in the patients who have surgery the outcomes are measured at baseline and the day before and one month after surgery. Follow-up measurements are at 12 and 24 months
Detailed Description
One hundred seventy two (N=172) patients with sciatica for at least six weeks with radicular pain below the knee will be involved this study. The patients with non-urgent referrals due to sciatica symptoms will be directed to specialized medical care hospitals (the district central hospitals of Central Finland and South Ostrobothnia and the University hospital of Kuopio, Finland) to the physiatrists and orthopedic outpatient clinics for further investigations for possible surgery. The patient will be seen for a doctor's examination within a week. If the clinical examination reveals that a patient needs spinal disc herniation surgery, and the patient is willing to undergo surgery, they will be referred for X-ray imaging if it has not already been done in basic health care, in accordance with the regular treatment procedure, and to an MRI scan. While patients are waiting for their MRI scan, they will undergo a clinical McKenzie-based mechanical assessment and be put into sub-groups of "centralizers"or "non-centralizers". These will be randomly assigned into a McKenzie group and into an advice to stay active group. Based on their MRI findings and clinical signs and symptoms they will be assigned to surgery or continue their non-surgical treatments. If the MRI scan does not reveal a spinal disc herniation finding that fulfills the criteria of the study, the patient is removed from the study in accordance with the selection criteria, regardless of whether they belong to the MDT or advice to stay active group, and their treatment will continue according to the hospital's normal procedures.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sciatic Nerve Compression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
162 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
McKenzie - method group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be sent to an experienced MDT therapist for therapy. They are 1) assessed clinically, 2) treated according the MDT-approach which includes home exercise program, consisting i) an educational component, and ii) an active therapy component with directional preference exercises, several times a day with sustained end range positions according to symptom response, and with avoiding aggravating positions. Participants have a maximum of 7 treatment visits. They will also have physiotherapy counselling at study entry about the good prognosis of sciatica.
Arm Title
Advice to stay active group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants enrolled into this group will receive physiotherapist's counselling at study entry for at least 60 minutes time about the good prognosis of sciatica, the spontaneous regression of the intervertebral disc herniation and pain tolerance ("natural healing"). In addition, they will get ergonomic advice and advice to stay normally active. The participants are also told to avoid bed rest and advised to continue their normal routines as actively as possible including exercise activities with limits permitted by their signs and symptoms. A two-page summary booklet related to these items will be given to them.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
McKenzie Method
Intervention Description
Treatment according to the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Approach
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Advice to saty active
Intervention Description
Physiotherapy councelling advicing to stay normally active
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients who avoided surgery
Description
Number of patients who avoided surgery treated by using the McKenzie- method or by advice to stay active
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Intensity
Description
Low back and leg pain intensity reported with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 - 100mm scales, 0 mm = no pain, 100mm = worst possible pain).
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Title
Disability
Description
Disability is reported with Oswestry disability index Finnish version 2.0 total score (scale 0-100%): 0= minimal disability, 100 = bed-bound or exaggeration of symptoms.
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life
Description
Quality of life is assessed with the SF-36.These eight scale scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores equals more disability, higher scores equals less disability. Physical and mental components will be calculated separately.
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Fear Avoidance
Description
Fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work was measures with the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 questions, for each statement has a 7-point Likert scale with scoring alternatives ranging from "0 = completely disagree" to "6 = completely agree".
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups
Title
Kinesiophobia
Description
The fear to move was assessed with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophopia (TSK) questionnaire. It comprises 17 items assessing the subjective rating of kinesiophopia. Each item has a 4-point Likert scale with scoring alternatives ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Title
Depression
Description
Depression during last month is measured with the Depression Scale (DEPS) questionnaire.This self-rating depression scale in Finnish consists of 10 items. Each item has a 4-point scale with alternatives ranging from "0 = not at all" to "3 = very much".
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Title
Work ability
Description
Work ability is measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100mm scales (0 mm = completely able to work and 100mm = unable to work).
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.
Title
Sick leave
Description
Number of sick leave days
Time Frame
Changes are reported from baseline to short term (3 months), longer term (12months) and in long term (24months) follow-ups.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The participants are 18 - 60-year-old Finnish speaking sciatica patients for whom magnetic resonance imaging confirmed disc herniation compressing a nerve root canal, and who have related symptoms radiating to the lower limb +/- neurological disorders. Their sciatica has lasted at least 6 weeks. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy, previous surgery or treated by using MDT- method, fibromyalgia, signs of serious diseases or "red-flags" symptoms. Symptoms indicating the Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) or lower limb palsy that hinders normal functioning, previous injury from a car accident or a high fall, or osteoporotic fractures for the elderly, cancer anamnesis, tumor, or inflammation, general symptoms such as fever, chills, or losing weight for an unknown reason, back problems complicated by other serious diseases such as polyneuropathy, neurological diseases, circulatory brain diseases, central spinal stenosis, myelopathy, syringomyelia, and long-term neuropathic pain not related to sciatica, unwillingness to undergo surgery.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jari Ylinen, MD,PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Central Finland HD
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Central Finland Central Hospital,
City
Jyväskylä
State/Province
Central Finland
ZIP/Postal Code
40620
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Can Sciatica Patients Avoid Surgery?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs