search
Back to results

Capability of Tofacitinib or Etanercept to Accelerate Tapering of NSAID and Treat-to-target Guided De-escalation of Corticosteroids in RA Patients (AcceleRAte)

Primary Purpose

Rheumatic Arthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tofacitinib
Etanercept
Sponsored by
Dr. Frank Behrens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatic Arthritis focused on measuring treat-to-target, pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to up to two previous conventional synthetic Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatments (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF),sulfasalazine (SSZ)) with or without ongoing csDMARD therapy
  • RA according to ACR classification criteria
  • Age 18 - 65 years
  • Active RA is defined as

    • DAS28 > 3.2 and
    • TJC ≥ 3 and SJC ≥ 3
  • VAS-pain ≥ 60 mm (0-100 mm)
  • Accompanying CS treatment for RA with a stable dosage of ≥ 2mg/d and ≤ 10 mg/d 2 weeks prior to BL (not more than 30% of patients without CS)
  • Accompanying need of NSAID or analgesic treatment due to arthritis and in dosages not exceeding the maximum dose according to Summary of Product characteristics (SmPC)
  • If ongoing csDMARD treatment, stable treatment will be defined as either

    • MTX treatment with a dosage of ≥ 10 mg/week and ≤ 25 mg/week, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to Screening (SCR) with a stable dose of MTX for at least 2 weeks prior to BL or
    • LEF treatment with a dosage between 10 to 20 mg/day, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to SCR with a stable dose of LEF for at least 2 weeks prior to BL or
    • SSZ treatment with dosage between 1 to 3 g/day, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to SCR with a stable dose of SSZ for at least 2 weeks prior to BL
  • Presence of documented negative results for testing of Hepatitis B and C
  • Completed SARS-CoV-2-immunisation as currently recommended by the Standing Committee of Vaccination
  • Written informed consent obtained prior to the initiation of any protocol-required procedures
  • Willingness to comply to study procedures and study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous use of Tofacitinib or other Janus-Kinase (JAK)-inhibitors
  • Previous use of Etanercept
  • Previous use of any biological agent for RA

    • which was stopped due to lack of efficacy
    • one previous use of biological stopped due to intolerance will be allowed
  • CS treatment with dosages >10 mg at BL
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication (TOFA, ETA, Celecoxib)
  • Previous use of Celecoxib as analgesic therapy which was stopped due to lack of efficacy or intolerance
  • Concomitant diseases with chronic pain syndrome or need of extended dosages or long-term treatment with the maximum dosages of NSAID/analgesics (according to SmPC) due to other concomitant diseases/pain symptoms in discretion of the treating physician Exclusion criteria related to general health
  • Patients with other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic autoimmune disease
  • Patients with active Tuberculosis (Tb) (evaluation of Tb according to local standards in clinical care)
  • Patients with latent Tb, that are not pre-treated for at least 1 month and planned to be treated 9 months in total with Isozid once a day
  • Any active infection, a history of recurrent clinically significant infections (e.g. human immune deficiency virus (HIV)), or a history of recurrent bacterial infections with encapsulated organisms
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency
  • Current malignancy or history of malignancies except adequately treated or excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ.
  • Patients of 50 years and older, if they have one or more cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) defined as:

    • Current cigarette smoking,
    • Known diagnosis of hypertension,
    • HDL <40 mg/dl,
    • Diabetes mellitus,
    • History of coronary artery disease: history of revascularization procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome or
    • History of premature coronary heart disease or sudden death documented in first degree relatives (male relative before 55 years, female relative before 65 years)
  • Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant diseases or serious and/or uncontrolled diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and with the study outcome
  • History of a severe psychological illness or condition
  • Known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides
  • Active peptic ulceration or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
  • Patients who have experienced asthma, acute rhinitis, nasal polyps, angioneurotic oedema, urticaria or other allergic-type reactions after taking acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) or other NSAIDs including Cyclooxigenase (COX)-2 inhibitors
  • Risk for or history of thrombotic events (e.g. pulmonary embolism or thrombosis) Severe hepatic dysfunction (serum albumin < 25 g/L or Child-Pugh score ≥ 10)
  • Patients with estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV)
  • Established ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease and/or cerebrovascular disease
  • Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test
  • Males or females of reproductive potential not willing to use effective contraception (e.g. contraceptive pill, intrauterine device (IUD), physical barrier)
  • Alcohol, drug or chemical abuse Exclusion criteria related to prior treatments
  • Current participation in another interventional clinical trial or participation within the last 90 days Exclusion criteria related to formal aspects
  • Underage or incapable patients

Sites / Locations

  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische ImmunologieRecruiting
  • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis im Ärztehaus am Walter-Schreiber-PlatzRecruiting
  • CIRI - Centrum für innovative Diagnostik & Therapie, Rheumatologie/ Immunologie GmbH
  • Katholische Kliniken Rhein-Ruhr, St. Elisabeth Gruppe GmbH, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
  • Praxis Prof. Dr. KellnerRecruiting
  • Rheumazentrum RatingenRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tofacitinib

Etanercept

Arm Description

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz®; 5 mg twice daily, p.o.)

Etanercept (Enbrel®; 50 mg once per week, s.c.)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Discontinuation of Celecoxib treatment and clinically relevant improvement in pain
Proportion of patients who can discontinue Celecoxib treatment and in whom clinically relevant improvement in pain levels are measured, defined as reduction in VAS pain of ≥ 30%

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean dosage of Celecoxib in patients
Mean dosage of Celecoxib in patients
discontinuation of CS-treatment
Proportion of patients with discontinuation of CS-treatment at week 24
rescue treatment
Proportion of patients who require rescue treatment at week 12
Mean dosage of Corticosteroids (CS) in the patients who achieve Low Disease activity (LDA) in the two treatment groups
Mean dosage of CS in the patients who achieve LDA at week 24 in the two treatment groups
Mean dosage of Corticosteroids (CS)
Mean dosage of CS at week 24 (W24)
NSAID treatment
Number of patients with NSAID treatment at W24
re-started NSAID treatment
Proportion of patients who re-started NSAID treatment after week 12 (W12) until W24
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Absolute pain levels
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
relative (percent) pain levels
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Change in pain levels
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Determination of flares
Determination of flares (measured by FLARE questionnaire) between week 12 and week 24
Proportion of LDA
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Proportion of LDA
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Proportion of LDA
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Proportion of LDA
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Proportion of LDA
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Proportion of DAS remission
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Proportion of DAS remission
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Proportion of DAS remission
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Proportion of DAS remission
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Proportion of DAS remission
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Proportion of ACR20 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Proportion of ACR20 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Proportion of ACR20 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Proportion of ACR20 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Proportion of ACR20 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set
Changes in ACR core set change
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
DAS28 (ESR)
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
SJC (66),
Swollen joint count (SJC) (66 joints) change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
TJC (68)
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores.SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Change in Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores.The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Correlation of SF36 and HAQ-DI results
Correlation of SF36 and HAQ-DI results. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Patient's expectation on treatment
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Patient's expectation on treatment
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Patient's expectation on treatment
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Correlation of TSQM-14 results and patient's expectation on treatment
Correlation of TSQM-14 results and patient's expectation on treatment
drug accountability
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
drug accountability
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
drug accountability
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
drug accountability
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
drug accountability
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR value
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR value
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR change to BL
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR value
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR change to BL
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR change to BL
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR value
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR change to BL
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR value
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
eGFR change to BL
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
adverse events (AEs)
Documentation of type, frequency and seriousness of adverse events (AEs)
Infections
Incidence rates of serious infection events (SIEs),
Documentation of all lab abnormalities
incidence rates of lab abnormalities
Cardiovascular events
incidence rates of cardio vascular events
Malignencies
incidence rates of malignancies

Full Information

First Posted
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
March 1, 2022
Sponsor
Dr. Frank Behrens
Collaborators
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04485325
Brief Title
Capability of Tofacitinib or Etanercept to Accelerate Tapering of NSAID and Treat-to-target Guided De-escalation of Corticosteroids in RA Patients
Acronym
AcceleRAte
Official Title
Capability of Tofacitinib or Etanercept to Accelerate Clinical Relevant Tapering of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) and Treat-to-target Guided De-escalation of Corticosteroids in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and an Inadequate Response to Previous csDMARD Therapy (AcceleRAte)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 4, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dr. Frank Behrens
Collaborators
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients with active rheumatic arthritis (RA) and lack of efficacy of at least one csDMARD (Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug) treatment will be randomized to receive either Tofacitinib (TOFA) or etanercept (ETA). The study will be separated into two parts: The capability to decrease and discontinue pain-reducing treatment with a NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) over the first 12 weeks of treatment will be measured for primary outcome measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at week 12 compared to baseline between the two treatment groups. Starting at week 12, the capability to taper corticosteroid (CS) treatment using a treat-to-target strategy, i.e. when at least low disease activity (LDA-DAS28) is achieved, will be measured in both groups.
Detailed Description
In this clinical study, a design was chosen to reflect European standards recommended by EULAR for treatment of active RA by comparison of a Treat-to- target (T2T) approach in two treatment groups: Patients with active RA and lack of efficacy of at least one csDMARD treatment will be randomized to receive either TOFA or ETA. The study will be separated into two parts: The capability to decrease and discontinue pain-reducing treatment with a NSAID (Celecoxib, two times 200 mg as maximum standard dosage for RA) over the first 12 weeks of treatment will be measured for primary outcome. The proportion of patients with successful discontinuation of Celecoxib and significant and clinical relevant decrease of pain-levels measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a reduction of at least 30% at week 12 compared to baseline will be compared between the two treatment groups. Starting at week 12, the capability to taper CS treatment using a treat-to-target strategy, i.e. when at least low disease activity (LDA-DAS28) is achieved, will be measured in both groups. In addition to efficacy assessments (DAS28, ACR-response, SJC, TJC), patient reported outcomes, Quality of Life (QoL) measurements and patient satisfaction will be evaluated. Safety (severity and frequency of adverse events) will be evaluated over the 24-week treatment period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatic Arthritis
Keywords
treat-to-target, pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
two arm, randomized, open-label, parallel group
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
192 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tofacitinib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Tofacitinib (Xeljanz®; 5 mg twice daily, p.o.)
Arm Title
Etanercept
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Etanercept (Enbrel®; 50 mg once per week, s.c.)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
TOFA, Xeljanz
Intervention Description
5 mg twice daily, p.o.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Etanercept
Other Intervention Name(s)
Enbrel, ETA
Intervention Description
50 mg once per week, s.c.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Discontinuation of Celecoxib treatment and clinically relevant improvement in pain
Description
Proportion of patients who can discontinue Celecoxib treatment and in whom clinically relevant improvement in pain levels are measured, defined as reduction in VAS pain of ≥ 30%
Time Frame
Baseline to week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean dosage of Celecoxib in patients
Description
Mean dosage of Celecoxib in patients
Time Frame
at 12 weeks
Title
discontinuation of CS-treatment
Description
Proportion of patients with discontinuation of CS-treatment at week 24
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
rescue treatment
Description
Proportion of patients who require rescue treatment at week 12
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Mean dosage of Corticosteroids (CS) in the patients who achieve Low Disease activity (LDA) in the two treatment groups
Description
Mean dosage of CS in the patients who achieve LDA at week 24 in the two treatment groups
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Mean dosage of Corticosteroids (CS)
Description
Mean dosage of CS at week 24 (W24)
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
NSAID treatment
Description
Number of patients with NSAID treatment at W24
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
re-started NSAID treatment
Description
Proportion of patients who re-started NSAID treatment after week 12 (W12) until W24
Time Frame
week 12 to week 24
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 2
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 8
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Absolute pain levels
Description
Absolute pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 2
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 8
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
relative (percent) pain levels
Description
relative (percent) pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 2
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 8
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Change in pain levels
Description
Change in pain levels visual analogue scale (VAS) compared to BL. minimum is 0 mm, maximum is 100 mm whereas 0 is no pain and 100 is worst
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Determination of flares
Description
Determination of flares (measured by FLARE questionnaire) between week 12 and week 24
Time Frame
between week 12 and week 24
Title
Proportion of LDA
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Proportion of LDA
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Proportion of LDA
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Proportion of LDA
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Proportion of LDA
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve LDA (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) (DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 3.2)
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Proportion of DAS remission
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Proportion of DAS remission
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Proportion of DAS remission
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Proportion of DAS remission
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Proportion of DAS remission
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve DASremission (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) calculated by Erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR) DAS28 (ESR) ≤ 2.6)
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Proportion of ACR20 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Proportion of ACR20 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Proportion of ACR20 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Proportion of ACR20 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Proportion of ACR20 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR20 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 20%
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Proportion of ACR 50 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR50 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 50%
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Proportion of ACR 70 response
Description
Proportion of patients who achieve ACR70 response - measure based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria improvement of at least 70%
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Changes in ACR core set
Description
Changes in ACR core set change
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
DAS28 (ESR)
Description
DAS28 (ESR) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
SJC (66),
Description
Swollen joint count (SJC) (66 joints) change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
TJC (68)
Description
tender joint count (TJC) - 68 joints change compared to BL
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores.SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 scores. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Change in Quality of Life: SF36 (36 items short form health survey)
Description
Quality of Life: SF36 change to BL. SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Change in Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores.The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI scores. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Change of Quality of Life HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire - disability index)
Description
Quality of Life HAQ-DI change to BL. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Correlation of SF36 and HAQ-DI results
Description
Correlation of SF36 and HAQ-DI results. The HAQ-DI is a health assessment questionnaire - disability index that consists of 8 subcategories. For each the single scales range from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). SF36 is a 36 items short form health survey and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Description
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Description
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Description
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
Treatment satisfaction: TSQM-14 scores
Description
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) scores. The TSQM items are answered on 5- or 7-point Likert type scale and cover four domains: effectiveness; side effects; convenience and global satisfaction. A score can be obtained for each domain by summing of the corresponding items transformed on a 0-100 scale; higher values indicate higher satisfaction, better perceived effectiveness, lower burden associated to side-effects, better convenience.
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Patient's expectation on treatment
Description
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Patient's expectation on treatment
Description
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
Patient's expectation on treatment
Description
Patient's expectation on treatment asked and documented as free text
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
Correlation of TSQM-14 results and patient's expectation on treatment
Description
Correlation of TSQM-14 results and patient's expectation on treatment
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
drug accountability
Description
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
drug accountability
Description
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
drug accountability
Description
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
drug accountability
Description
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
drug accountability
Description
Evaluation of results of treatment adherence (drug accountability) using patient diary
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR value
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR value
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR change to BL
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR value
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR change to BL
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR change to BL
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR value
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR change to BL
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR value
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
change in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)
Description
eGFR change to BL
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
Time Frame
at week 16
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
Time Frame
at week 20
Title
blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
change in blood pressure (mmHg)
Description
blood pressure (mmHg) Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure change to BL
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Description
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
Time Frame
at Baseline
Title
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Description
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Description
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
Time Frame
at week 8
Title
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Description
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
Time Frame
at week 12
Title
pain characteristics measured by QST (quantitative sensory testing)
Description
Correlation of pain characteristics measured by QST, VAS pain and pain relief
Time Frame
at week 24
Title
adverse events (AEs)
Description
Documentation of type, frequency and seriousness of adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
Infections
Description
Incidence rates of serious infection events (SIEs),
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
Documentation of all lab abnormalities
Description
incidence rates of lab abnormalities
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
Cardiovascular events
Description
incidence rates of cardio vascular events
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Title
Malignencies
Description
incidence rates of malignancies
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to up to two previous conventional synthetic Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatments (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF),sulfasalazine (SSZ)) with or without ongoing csDMARD therapy RA according to ACR classification criteria Age 18 - 65 years Active RA is defined as DAS28 > 3.2 and TJC ≥ 3 and SJC ≥ 3 VAS-pain ≥ 60 mm (0-100 mm) Accompanying CS treatment for RA with a stable dosage of ≥ 2mg/d and ≤ 10 mg/d 2 weeks prior to BL (not more than 30% of patients without CS) Accompanying need of NSAID or analgesic treatment due to arthritis and in dosages not exceeding the maximum dose according to Summary of Product characteristics (SmPC) If ongoing csDMARD treatment, stable treatment will be defined as either MTX treatment with a dosage of ≥ 10 mg/week and ≤ 25 mg/week, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to Screening (SCR) with a stable dose of MTX for at least 2 weeks prior to BL or LEF treatment with a dosage between 10 to 20 mg/day, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to SCR with a stable dose of LEF for at least 2 weeks prior to BL or SSZ treatment with dosage between 1 to 3 g/day, continuously for at least 12 weeks prior to SCR with a stable dose of SSZ for at least 2 weeks prior to BL Presence of documented negative results for testing of Hepatitis B and C Completed SARS-CoV-2-immunisation as currently recommended by the Standing Committee of Vaccination Written informed consent obtained prior to the initiation of any protocol-required procedures Willingness to comply to study procedures and study protocol Exclusion Criteria: Previous use of Tofacitinib or other Janus-Kinase (JAK)-inhibitors Previous use of Etanercept Previous use of any biological agent for RA which was stopped due to lack of efficacy one previous use of biological stopped due to intolerance will be allowed CS treatment with dosages >10 mg at BL Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication (TOFA, ETA, Celecoxib) Previous use of Celecoxib as analgesic therapy which was stopped due to lack of efficacy or intolerance Concomitant diseases with chronic pain syndrome or need of extended dosages or long-term treatment with the maximum dosages of NSAID/analgesics (according to SmPC) due to other concomitant diseases/pain symptoms in discretion of the treating physician Exclusion criteria related to general health Patients with other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic autoimmune disease Patients with active Tuberculosis (Tb) (evaluation of Tb according to local standards in clinical care) Patients with latent Tb, that are not pre-treated for at least 1 month and planned to be treated 9 months in total with Isozid once a day Any active infection, a history of recurrent clinically significant infections (e.g. human immune deficiency virus (HIV)), or a history of recurrent bacterial infections with encapsulated organisms Primary or secondary immunodeficiency Current malignancy or history of malignancies except adequately treated or excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ. Patients of 50 years and older, if they have one or more cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) defined as: Current cigarette smoking, Known diagnosis of hypertension, HDL <40 mg/dl, Diabetes mellitus, History of coronary artery disease: history of revascularization procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome or History of premature coronary heart disease or sudden death documented in first degree relatives (male relative before 55 years, female relative before 65 years) Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant diseases or serious and/or uncontrolled diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and with the study outcome History of a severe psychological illness or condition Known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides Active peptic ulceration or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding Patients who have experienced asthma, acute rhinitis, nasal polyps, angioneurotic oedema, urticaria or other allergic-type reactions after taking acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) or other NSAIDs including Cyclooxigenase (COX)-2 inhibitors Risk for or history of thrombotic events (e.g. pulmonary embolism or thrombosis) Severe hepatic dysfunction (serum albumin < 25 g/L or Child-Pugh score ≥ 10) Patients with estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min Inflammatory bowel disease Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV) Established ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease and/or cerebrovascular disease Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test Males or females of reproductive potential not willing to use effective contraception (e.g. contraceptive pill, intrauterine device (IUD), physical barrier) Alcohol, drug or chemical abuse Exclusion criteria related to prior treatments Current participation in another interventional clinical trial or participation within the last 90 days Exclusion criteria related to formal aspects Underage or incapable patients
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anja Kuehne
Phone
00 49 69 6301
Ext
80225
Email
anja.kuehne@ime.fraunhofer.de
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tanja Rossmanith, PhD
Email
tanja.rossmanith@ime.fraunhofer.de
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Harald Burkhardt, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Fraunhofer IME
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Med. Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerd Burmester, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerd Burmester, MD
Facility Name
Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis im Ärztehaus am Walter-Schreiber-Platz
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Brandt-Jürgens, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Brandt-Jürgens, MD
Facility Name
CIRI - Centrum für innovative Diagnostik & Therapie, Rheumatologie/ Immunologie GmbH
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Katholische Kliniken Rhein-Ruhr, St. Elisabeth Gruppe GmbH, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
City
Herne
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Praxis Prof. Dr. Kellner
City
München
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Herbert Kellner, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Herbert Kellner, MD
Facility Name
Rheumazentrum Ratingen
City
Ratingen
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siegfried Wassenberg, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siegfried Wassenberg, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Capability of Tofacitinib or Etanercept to Accelerate Tapering of NSAID and Treat-to-target Guided De-escalation of Corticosteroids in RA Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs