search
Back to results

Cavity Boost Radiation Therapy vs. Observation in Cerebral Metastases After Complete Surgical Resection (C-O-MET)

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Metastases, Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cavity boost radiation
Sponsored by
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Metastases focused on measuring cerebrale metastases, radiotherapy, surgery, complete surgical resection, resection, cavity boost radiation therapy, observation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically confirmed metastasis of carcinoma (except small cell carcinoma) or malignant melanoma
  • 1-3 metastases in the preoperative MRI
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70
  • Age > / = 18 years
  • Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) 1-2
  • life expectation ≥ 6 months
  • no previous irradiation of the brain
  • MRI examinations possible
  • start of the radiation therapy possible within 6 weeks after surgery
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • confirmation of residual tumor in the postoperative MRI
  • dementia or disease of central nervous system with a higher risk or radiogenic toxicity
  • contraindication for MRIs or lack of acceptance for a MRI
  • Glasgow Coma Scale < 12
  • Severe concomitant disease: severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal diseases with an increased risk of surgery and radiation
  • previous therapeutic irradiation of the brain
  • no histological confirmation of carcinoma metastases or malignant melanoma metastases
  • cerebral metastases of small cell cancer, undifferentiate neuro-endocrine carcinoma, lymphoma, leucemia, sarcoma or germ cell tumor
  • leptomeningeal carcinosis
  • distance of the cerebral metastasis to the optic system or radiation sensible brain parts < 10 mm
  • metastases of the brain stem, Di- or Mesencephalons, Pons oder Medulla oblongata
  • bone marrow dysfunction
  • contrast agent allergy
  • pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Heinrich-Heine-UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

observation

cavity boost radiation therapy

Arm Description

patients in the observation arm receive no adjuvant local radiation therapy after complete surgical resection of a cerebral metastasis

patients in the intervention arm receive an adjuvant local radiation therapy (cavity boost radiation therapy: 10 x 3 Gy ad 30 Gy; clinical target volume (CTV): resection cavity plus surrounding 5 mm; planning target volume (PTV): CTV + 1mm)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Local tumor control of resected metastases at 6 month
Primary outcome measure is the local tumor control of resected metastases after local cavity boost radiation therapy or observation at 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Local tumor control of resected metastases at 12 and 18 month
Secondary outcome measure is the local tumor control of resected metastases after local cavity boost radiation therapy or observation at 12 and 18 month
Distant tumor control of resected metastases at 6, 12 and 18 month
Secondary outcome measure is the distant tumor control at 6, 12 and 18 month
Incidence of leptomeningeal carcinosis
Secondary outcome measure is the incidence of a leptomeningeal carcinosis at 6, 12 and 18 month
Eortc qlq bn20 questionaire
Secondary outcome measure is the patients quality of life at 3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month as assessed by the Eortc qlq bn20 questionaire
Eortc qlq c30 questionaire
Secondary outcome measure is the patients quality of life at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Eortc qlq c30 questionaire
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the MMSE
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT),
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Test and Trail-Making Test (TMT) A & B
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Test and Trail-Making Test (TMT) A & B

Full Information

First Posted
July 14, 2016
Last Updated
March 21, 2022
Sponsor
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02887651
Brief Title
Cavity Boost Radiation Therapy vs. Observation in Cerebral Metastases After Complete Surgical Resection
Acronym
C-O-MET
Official Title
Cavity Boost Radiation Therapy vs. Observation in Cerebral Metastases After Complete Surgical Resection
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 14, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a local fractionated radiation therapy achieves a better local tumor control after complete surgical metastases resection at 6 month as compared to observation alone. Further it should be evaluated if cognitive functioning and quality of life is similar in both groups.
Detailed Description
The surgical resection of cerebral metastases as a key element in a multimodal therapeutic concept of brain metastatic patients is included in the common recommendations and international guidelines (level I evidence). These recommendations are based on a series of prospective, randomized and controlled studies which addressed the impact of the surgical metastases resection combined with a whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in comparison to WBRT alone. Achieving local tumor control is the major goal of surgery and local tumor control rate after surgery alone has been addressed in few studies: A prospective, randomized American multicenter study revealed a local recurrence rate of 46% by median follow-up of 43 weeks for patients who underwent surgery alone without an adjuvant radiation therapy. Similarly, the 2-year local recurrence rate after metastases resection alone was 53.1% in a retrospective Korean study and 59% in the prospective, randomized and controlled EORTC 22952-26001 study. In conclusion, standard surgery alone is not sufficient to achieve local control in about 50% of patients (evidence level I). Therefore, surgery of cerebral metastases is often followed by an adjuvant radiation therapy, which is an important part of a multi-modal therapy. Evidence for an additional adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after surgical resection was gained from a first prospective, randomized study in 1998: Patients treated by surgery followed by adjuvant WBRT had a significant lower local in-brain progression rate as compared to patients randomized to surgery alone (46% with a median follow-up of 48 weeks in the observation group vs. 10% with a median follow-up of 43 weeks). This result was recently confirmed by the EORTC 22952-26001 study: The 2-year local in-brain progression rate after surgical resection was reduced by a WBRT from 59% to 27%. But despite the lower local and also lower distant in-brain progression rate, the WBRT had no significant influence on the overall survival. The additional analysis of the quality of life data of the EORTC 22952-26001 study showed, that a WBRT negatively impacts the health-related quality of life with a statistically relevant and clinically significant impairment of the physical functioning (at 8 weeks), cognitive functioning and of the global health status. In conclusion, WBRT after surgery of cerebral metastases significantly reduces the incidence of local recurrences but has no impact on the overall survival and has a significant negative impact on the patient´s quality of life and cognitive function. Therefore, WBRT is not mandatory as adjuvant concept after surgical metastases resection and does not have an additional oncological impact in comparison to observation. A local fractionated radiation therapy in analogy to the WBRT might achieve a similar local tumor control than observation alone but might be associated with an improved cognitive functioning as compared to WBRT. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a local fractionated radiation therapy achieves a better local tumor control after complete surgical metastases resection at 6 month as compared to observation alone. Further it should be evaluated if cognitive functioning and quality of life is similar in both groups.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Metastases, Surgery
Keywords
cerebrale metastases, radiotherapy, surgery, complete surgical resection, resection, cavity boost radiation therapy, observation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
108 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
observation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
patients in the observation arm receive no adjuvant local radiation therapy after complete surgical resection of a cerebral metastasis
Arm Title
cavity boost radiation therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
patients in the intervention arm receive an adjuvant local radiation therapy (cavity boost radiation therapy: 10 x 3 Gy ad 30 Gy; clinical target volume (CTV): resection cavity plus surrounding 5 mm; planning target volume (PTV): CTV + 1mm)
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Cavity boost radiation
Intervention Description
Cavity boost radiation therapy with 10 x 3 Gy for patients suffering from complete resected cerebral metastases
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Local tumor control of resected metastases at 6 month
Description
Primary outcome measure is the local tumor control of resected metastases after local cavity boost radiation therapy or observation at 6 month
Time Frame
6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Local tumor control of resected metastases at 12 and 18 month
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the local tumor control of resected metastases after local cavity boost radiation therapy or observation at 12 and 18 month
Time Frame
12, 18 month
Title
Distant tumor control of resected metastases at 6, 12 and 18 month
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the distant tumor control at 6, 12 and 18 month
Time Frame
6, 12 and 18 month
Title
Incidence of leptomeningeal carcinosis
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the incidence of a leptomeningeal carcinosis at 6, 12 and 18 month
Time Frame
6, 12 and 18 month
Title
Eortc qlq bn20 questionaire
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients quality of life at 3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month as assessed by the Eortc qlq bn20 questionaire
Time Frame
3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month
Title
Eortc qlq c30 questionaire
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients quality of life at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Eortc qlq c30 questionaire
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 month
Title
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the MMSE
Time Frame
3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month
Title
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT),
Time Frame
3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month
Title
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Time Frame
3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month
Title
Test and Trail-Making Test (TMT) A & B
Description
Secondary outcome measure is the patients neurocognitive functioning at 3, 6, 9 12, 15 and 18 month as assessed by the Test and Trail-Making Test (TMT) A & B
Time Frame
3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: histologically confirmed metastasis of carcinoma (except small cell carcinoma) or malignant melanoma 1-3 metastases in the preoperative MRI Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70 Age > / = 18 years Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) 1-2 life expectation ≥ 6 months no previous irradiation of the brain MRI examinations possible start of the radiation therapy possible within 6 weeks after surgery informed consent Exclusion Criteria: confirmation of residual tumor in the postoperative MRI dementia or disease of central nervous system with a higher risk or radiogenic toxicity contraindication for MRIs or lack of acceptance for a MRI Glasgow Coma Scale < 12 Severe concomitant disease: severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal diseases with an increased risk of surgery and radiation previous therapeutic irradiation of the brain no histological confirmation of carcinoma metastases or malignant melanoma metastases cerebral metastases of small cell cancer, undifferentiate neuro-endocrine carcinoma, lymphoma, leucemia, sarcoma or germ cell tumor leptomeningeal carcinosis distance of the cerebral metastasis to the optic system or radiation sensible brain parts < 10 mm metastases of the brain stem, Di- or Mesencephalons, Pons oder Medulla oblongata bone marrow dysfunction contrast agent allergy pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marcel A. Kamp, MD
Phone
0049 - 211 - 81 - 07461
Email
marcelalexander.kamp@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Sabel, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wilfried Budach, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
department of radiation oncology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Heinrich-Heine-University
City
Düsseldorf
State/Province
NRW
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marcel A. Kamp, MD
Phone
0049-211-81-07461
Email
marcelalexander.kamp@med.uni-duesseldorf.de

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Cavity Boost Radiation Therapy vs. Observation in Cerebral Metastases After Complete Surgical Resection

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs