search
Back to results

Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
Sponsored by
General Therapeutics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
  2. Have a body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 35Kg/m2
  3. Be willing and capable of giving written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after thorough explanation of the subject's participation has been provided
  4. Be willing and capable of subjective evaluation, reading and understanding written questionnaires, and reading, understanding and signing the written informed consent
  5. Has been diagnosed with Mild to Moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) in one knee only, with a Grade 2 or 3 on the Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grading scale
  6. Has an average knee pain intensity ≥ 6 of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); Scale 0 to 10
  7. Be willing to not take any knee symptom modifying drugs from baseline through the End of Study
  8. Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
  9. If female, sexually active, and of childbearing age, subject must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout the duration of the study. If Male, sexually active with partners of childbearing age, must be willing to use contraceptive measures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has taken any pain medications, including NSAIDs, within 15 days prior to the study injection date
  2. Current use of anticoagulants or history of regular use of anticoagulants
  3. History of addiction to dependency producing medications or history of a substance abuse (including alcohol and illicit drugs)
  4. Has mechanical knee symptoms consistent with extensive intraarticular pathology not amenable to injection therapy alone, including clinical or imaging evidence indicative of ACL, MCL, LCL, or meniscal pathology
  5. Has undergone intraarticular injection of any drug including but not limited to corticosteroids or viscosupplementation in the index knee in the last 3 months
  6. History of any type of surgery on the index knee
  7. History of traumatic injury to the index knee within the last 3 months
  8. Has planned elective knee surgery during the course of the study
  9. History of organ or hematologic transplantation
  10. History of rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disorders
  11. History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years
  12. Current knee infection or history of using antibiotics for knee infection within the last 3 months
  13. Has participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
  14. Is pregnant as determined by urine testing unless female subject is surgically sterile or post-menopausal
  15. Currently breastfeeding or desires to be pregnant during the course of the study
  16. Has contraindications to X-ray or MRI imaging
  17. Has a diagnosis of progressive neurological disease
  18. Has a diagnosis of an active psychological or psychiatric disorder
  19. Has pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, and/or confound evaluation of the study
  20. Has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (e.g., social, financial, or legal (e.g., worker's compensation claim)

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Cell-free Stem cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)

    Arm Description

    Intraarticular administration of CCM

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Cartilage Formation
    To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Cartilage Formation
    To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 20, 2021
    Last Updated
    July 20, 2022
    Sponsor
    General Therapeutics
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04971798
    Brief Title
    Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis
    Official Title
    A Non-randomized, Open-label, Multi-center, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intraarticular Injection of Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    January 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    General Therapeutics

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of intraarticular injection of Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms.
    Detailed Description
    Osteoarthritis and other orthopaedic acute and degenerative conditions affect millions of people each year, resulting in significant pain and disability. Conservative modalities are limited, as they may not reverse the underlying pathology and may only provide minimal relief. To address the limitations of traditional conservative modalities, there has been substantial interest in biologics for musculoskeletal regenerative medicine applications. The efficacy of these biologics is attributed to the presence of stem cells, growth factors (GFs), cytokines (CKs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes. However, first generation biologics, specifically whole stem cell products, are not without their own inherent limitations, including establishing a reliable source with a stable phenotype, genetic instability and chromosomal aberrations, intravenous administration related toxicities caused by the physical trapping of the cells in the lung microvasculature, rejection by the host, formation of ectopic tissue, and tumorigenicity. When considering how to harness the value of current biologics into a next generation product that can address existing limitations, it is important to consider current foundational knowledge regarding the mechanism of action of stem cell products. Recent literature regarding the beneficial effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) postulates that the mechanism of action is not due to their ability to grow and differentiate. Rather, it is secondary to their secretion of bioactive molecules such as growth factors, cytokines, and exosomes. GFs, secreted from stem cells, induce signal transduction pathways that initiate cell migration, proliferation, growth, and differentiation. CKs, similarly, can regulate inflammation, immune response, cellular differentiation, and tissue remodeling. Exosomes also are secreted by mesenchymal stem cells and act as a paracrine mediator to target cells, providing a regenerative microenvironment for damaged tissues. As existing literature establishes that these aforementioned components of stem cells lead to regenerative responses, we have accordingly sought to establish if a sub-cellular approach to biologics can provide similar benefits while avoiding the risk profile, including immunogenicity, infection, and the potential for tumorgenicity, associated with whole stem cell products. In support of this hypothesis, recent studies have demonstrated that MSCs-derived exosomes can act as a cell-free therapeutic alternative to whole cell therapy with great regenerative potential. In addition, to the benefits by means of risk elimination, there may be further therapeutic benefits of a cellular derived therapeutic approach. For example, exosomes due to their smaller size, have the potential to migrate to target organs efficiently after, without getting trapped in the lung microvasculature. Additionally, a higher concentration of "active ingredients" can be administered directly to the patient, which may induce a larger healing response than is possible with whole stem cell therapies. To meet these goals of improving the risk profile and therapeutic benefit of regenerative medicine, we have formulated a novel cell-free stem cell-derived extract, CCM, from human progenitor endothelial stem cells (hPESCs). Our preliminary results demonstrated presence of several GFs, anti-inflammatory CKs and EVs including exosomes in this formulation. Functionally, this formulation also significantly enhanced cell proliferation and induced stem cell migration. The goal of this proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular injection of this cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms. We hypothesize that intraarticular administration of this cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation is safe. We also hypothesize that patients receiving intraarticular injection of this formulation will show an improvement in their overall satisfaction, Numeric Pain rating Scale (NPRS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS Jr.) over a period of 2-years compared to the baseline visit. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference between baseline and follow-up visits for any outcome measures.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Osteoarthritis, Knee

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Early Phase 1
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    12 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Cell-free Stem cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Intraarticular administration of CCM
    Intervention Type
    Biological
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
    Intervention Description
    Intraarticular injection
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Time Frame
    1 week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Time Frame
    1 Week
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Time Frame
    3 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Time Frame
    6 Months
    Title
    Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Description
    To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
    Time Frame
    12 Months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to immediately after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 hours after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 48 hours after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
    Title
    Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
    Description
    To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    1 Week after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    6 Weeks after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    3 Months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    6 Months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    12 Months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    18 Months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    24 Months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
    Title
    Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
    Description
    To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
    Title
    Cartilage Formation
    Description
    To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
    Title
    Cartilage Formation
    Description
    To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline to 24 months after injection

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment Have a body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 35Kg/m2 Be willing and capable of giving written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after thorough explanation of the subject's participation has been provided Be willing and capable of subjective evaluation, reading and understanding written questionnaires, and reading, understanding and signing the written informed consent Has been diagnosed with Mild to Moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) in one knee only, with a Grade 2 or 3 on the Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grading scale Has an average knee pain intensity ≥ 6 of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); Scale 0 to 10 Be willing to not take any knee symptom modifying drugs from baseline through the End of Study Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits If female, sexually active, and of childbearing age, subject must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout the duration of the study. If Male, sexually active with partners of childbearing age, must be willing to use contraceptive measures Exclusion Criteria: Has taken any pain medications, including NSAIDs, within 15 days prior to the study injection date Current use of anticoagulants or history of regular use of anticoagulants History of addiction to dependency producing medications or history of a substance abuse (including alcohol and illicit drugs) Has mechanical knee symptoms consistent with extensive intraarticular pathology not amenable to injection therapy alone, including clinical or imaging evidence indicative of ACL, MCL, LCL, or meniscal pathology Has undergone intraarticular injection of any drug including but not limited to corticosteroids or viscosupplementation in the index knee in the last 3 months History of any type of surgery on the index knee History of traumatic injury to the index knee within the last 3 months Has planned elective knee surgery during the course of the study History of organ or hematologic transplantation History of rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disorders History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years Current knee infection or history of using antibiotics for knee infection within the last 3 months Has participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days of enrollment Is pregnant as determined by urine testing unless female subject is surgically sterile or post-menopausal Currently breastfeeding or desires to be pregnant during the course of the study Has contraindications to X-ray or MRI imaging Has a diagnosis of progressive neurological disease Has a diagnosis of an active psychological or psychiatric disorder Has pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, and/or confound evaluation of the study Has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (e.g., social, financial, or legal (e.g., worker's compensation claim)
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Craig Cady, PhD
    Phone
    2174161497
    Email
    cjcady@icloud.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Craig Cady, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    General Therapeutics
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    34416898
    Citation
    Gupta A, Maffulli N, Rodriguez HC, Mistovich RJ, Delfino K, Cady C, Fauser AM, Cundiff ED, Martinez MA, Potty AG. Cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a preliminary non-randomized, open-label, multi-center feasibility and safety study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 20;16(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02672-3.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs