Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
- Have a body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 35Kg/m2
- Be willing and capable of giving written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after thorough explanation of the subject's participation has been provided
- Be willing and capable of subjective evaluation, reading and understanding written questionnaires, and reading, understanding and signing the written informed consent
- Has been diagnosed with Mild to Moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) in one knee only, with a Grade 2 or 3 on the Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grading scale
- Has an average knee pain intensity ≥ 6 of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); Scale 0 to 10
- Be willing to not take any knee symptom modifying drugs from baseline through the End of Study
- Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
- If female, sexually active, and of childbearing age, subject must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout the duration of the study. If Male, sexually active with partners of childbearing age, must be willing to use contraceptive measures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has taken any pain medications, including NSAIDs, within 15 days prior to the study injection date
- Current use of anticoagulants or history of regular use of anticoagulants
- History of addiction to dependency producing medications or history of a substance abuse (including alcohol and illicit drugs)
- Has mechanical knee symptoms consistent with extensive intraarticular pathology not amenable to injection therapy alone, including clinical or imaging evidence indicative of ACL, MCL, LCL, or meniscal pathology
- Has undergone intraarticular injection of any drug including but not limited to corticosteroids or viscosupplementation in the index knee in the last 3 months
- History of any type of surgery on the index knee
- History of traumatic injury to the index knee within the last 3 months
- Has planned elective knee surgery during the course of the study
- History of organ or hematologic transplantation
- History of rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disorders
- History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years
- Current knee infection or history of using antibiotics for knee infection within the last 3 months
- Has participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
- Is pregnant as determined by urine testing unless female subject is surgically sterile or post-menopausal
- Currently breastfeeding or desires to be pregnant during the course of the study
- Has contraindications to X-ray or MRI imaging
- Has a diagnosis of progressive neurological disease
- Has a diagnosis of an active psychological or psychiatric disorder
- Has pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, and/or confound evaluation of the study
- Has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (e.g., social, financial, or legal (e.g., worker's compensation claim)
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Cell-free Stem cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
Arm Description
Intraarticular administration of CCM
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Cartilage Formation
To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Cartilage Formation
To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04971798
Brief Title
Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis
Official Title
A Non-randomized, Open-label, Multi-center, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intraarticular Injection of Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
January 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
General Therapeutics
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of intraarticular injection of Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms.
Detailed Description
Osteoarthritis and other orthopaedic acute and degenerative conditions affect millions of people each year, resulting in significant pain and disability. Conservative modalities are limited, as they may not reverse the underlying pathology and may only provide minimal relief.
To address the limitations of traditional conservative modalities, there has been substantial interest in biologics for musculoskeletal regenerative medicine applications. The efficacy of these biologics is attributed to the presence of stem cells, growth factors (GFs), cytokines (CKs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes.
However, first generation biologics, specifically whole stem cell products, are not without their own inherent limitations, including establishing a reliable source with a stable phenotype, genetic instability and chromosomal aberrations, intravenous administration related toxicities caused by the physical trapping of the cells in the lung microvasculature, rejection by the host, formation of ectopic tissue, and tumorigenicity.
When considering how to harness the value of current biologics into a next generation product that can address existing limitations, it is important to consider current foundational knowledge regarding the mechanism of action of stem cell products. Recent literature regarding the beneficial effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) postulates that the mechanism of action is not due to their ability to grow and differentiate. Rather, it is secondary to their secretion of bioactive molecules such as growth factors, cytokines, and exosomes. GFs, secreted from stem cells, induce signal transduction pathways that initiate cell migration, proliferation, growth, and differentiation. CKs, similarly, can regulate inflammation, immune response, cellular differentiation, and tissue remodeling. Exosomes also are secreted by mesenchymal stem cells and act as a paracrine mediator to target cells, providing a regenerative microenvironment for damaged tissues.
As existing literature establishes that these aforementioned components of stem cells lead to regenerative responses, we have accordingly sought to establish if a sub-cellular approach to biologics can provide similar benefits while avoiding the risk profile, including immunogenicity, infection, and the potential for tumorgenicity, associated with whole stem cell products. In support of this hypothesis, recent studies have demonstrated that MSCs-derived exosomes can act as a cell-free therapeutic alternative to whole cell therapy with great regenerative potential. In addition, to the benefits by means of risk elimination, there may be further therapeutic benefits of a cellular derived therapeutic approach. For example, exosomes due to their smaller size, have the potential to migrate to target organs efficiently after, without getting trapped in the lung microvasculature. Additionally, a higher concentration of "active ingredients" can be administered directly to the patient, which may induce a larger healing response than is possible with whole stem cell therapies.
To meet these goals of improving the risk profile and therapeutic benefit of regenerative medicine, we have formulated a novel cell-free stem cell-derived extract, CCM, from human progenitor endothelial stem cells (hPESCs). Our preliminary results demonstrated presence of several GFs, anti-inflammatory CKs and EVs including exosomes in this formulation. Functionally, this formulation also significantly enhanced cell proliferation and induced stem cell migration.
The goal of this proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular injection of this cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms. We hypothesize that intraarticular administration of this cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation is safe. We also hypothesize that patients receiving intraarticular injection of this formulation will show an improvement in their overall satisfaction, Numeric Pain rating Scale (NPRS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS Jr.) over a period of 2-years compared to the baseline visit. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference between baseline and follow-up visits for any outcome measures.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
12 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cell-free Stem cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intraarticular administration of CCM
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation (CCM)
Intervention Description
Intraarticular injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Comprehensive Metabolic Profile
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Comprehensive metabolic profile
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Creatinine levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Creatinine levels
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Liver Function Test
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Liver Function Test
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Complete Blood Count
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by C-reactive protein
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by C-reactive protein
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by T, B and NK Cell Lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame
12 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Time Frame
1 Week
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Time Frame
6 Weeks
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment-emergent adverse effects as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Description
To determine safety i.e. adverse events associated with intraarticular administration of CCM as assessed by Serum IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE levels
Time Frame
12 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to immediately after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 hours after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 48 hours after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr. (KOOS Jr.). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
Title
Change in patient reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score.
Description
To determine change in patient reported outcome measure, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
1 Week after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
6 Weeks after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
3 Months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
6 Months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
12 Months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
18 Months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 5-point Likert Scale. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
24 Months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 1 week after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 weeks after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 3 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 18 months after injection
Title
Patient Satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36)
Description
To determine patient satisfaction via 36-item short form survey (SF36). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
Title
Cartilage Formation
Description
To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 12 months after injection
Title
Cartilage Formation
Description
To assess cartilage formation via MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue). An increase in score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months after injection
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
Have a body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 35Kg/m2
Be willing and capable of giving written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after thorough explanation of the subject's participation has been provided
Be willing and capable of subjective evaluation, reading and understanding written questionnaires, and reading, understanding and signing the written informed consent
Has been diagnosed with Mild to Moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) in one knee only, with a Grade 2 or 3 on the Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grading scale
Has an average knee pain intensity ≥ 6 of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); Scale 0 to 10
Be willing to not take any knee symptom modifying drugs from baseline through the End of Study
Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
If female, sexually active, and of childbearing age, subject must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control throughout the duration of the study. If Male, sexually active with partners of childbearing age, must be willing to use contraceptive measures
Exclusion Criteria:
Has taken any pain medications, including NSAIDs, within 15 days prior to the study injection date
Current use of anticoagulants or history of regular use of anticoagulants
History of addiction to dependency producing medications or history of a substance abuse (including alcohol and illicit drugs)
Has mechanical knee symptoms consistent with extensive intraarticular pathology not amenable to injection therapy alone, including clinical or imaging evidence indicative of ACL, MCL, LCL, or meniscal pathology
Has undergone intraarticular injection of any drug including but not limited to corticosteroids or viscosupplementation in the index knee in the last 3 months
History of any type of surgery on the index knee
History of traumatic injury to the index knee within the last 3 months
Has planned elective knee surgery during the course of the study
History of organ or hematologic transplantation
History of rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disorders
History of immunosuppressive medication/treatment or cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years
Current knee infection or history of using antibiotics for knee infection within the last 3 months
Has participated in another clinical study or received treatment with any investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
Is pregnant as determined by urine testing unless female subject is surgically sterile or post-menopausal
Currently breastfeeding or desires to be pregnant during the course of the study
Has contraindications to X-ray or MRI imaging
Has a diagnosis of progressive neurological disease
Has a diagnosis of an active psychological or psychiatric disorder
Has pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition(s) that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, study procedures, and/or confound evaluation of the study
Has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (e.g., social, financial, or legal (e.g., worker's compensation claim)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Craig Cady, PhD
Phone
2174161497
Email
cjcady@icloud.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Craig Cady, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
General Therapeutics
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34416898
Citation
Gupta A, Maffulli N, Rodriguez HC, Mistovich RJ, Delfino K, Cady C, Fauser AM, Cundiff ED, Martinez MA, Potty AG. Cell-free stem cell-derived extract formulation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a preliminary non-randomized, open-label, multi-center feasibility and safety study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 20;16(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02672-3.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Cell-free Stem Cell-derived Extract Formulation for Knee Osteoarthritis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs