search
Back to results

Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection

Primary Purpose

ICU Patients Requiring a Central Venous Access

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Skin disinfection
Sponsored by
Poitiers University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ICU Patients Requiring a Central Venous Access focused on measuring Central venous catheter, Skin disinfection, Antisepsis, Nosocomial infection, Catheter infection

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients over 18 yeras of age Requiring an internal jugular or sub-clavian central venous catheter for their care during at least 72 h Informed consent signed up Exclusion Criteria: Bacteriemic infection not under control extensive cutaneous infection Women with childbearing potential

Sites / Locations

  • University hospital

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Prevention of catheter colonization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prevention of catheter related bacteremia
Prevention of a positive culture of the catheter whaterver the threshold
Local and general tolerance

Full Information

First Posted
November 27, 2005
Last Updated
January 26, 2009
Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00259350
Brief Title
Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection
Official Title
Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infections : Comparison of the Efficacy of Skin Disinfection With 5% Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solution Versus 0.25% Chlorhexidine, 0.025 Benzalkonium and 4% Benzylic Alcohol
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
April 2006 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The best antiseptic solution for cateheter care remains unknown.High concentration in aquous solution or low concentration in alcoholic solution of chlorhexidine actbetter than povidone iodine in aquous solutions. No study has compare alcoholic formulations of low concentration of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine for skin disinfection prior to insertion of central venous catheters. To compare the incidence of central venous catheter colonization after skin disinfection with either an alcoholic solution of povidone iodine or a combination of 0.5% chlorhexidine, 0.025% Benzalkonium and 4% benzylic alcohol. To compare the incidence of catheter related bacteremia in the to study groups. To compare the local and general tolerance of the two antiseptic formulations

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ICU Patients Requiring a Central Venous Access
Keywords
Central venous catheter, Skin disinfection, Antisepsis, Nosocomial infection, Catheter infection

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
520 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Skin disinfection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prevention of catheter colonization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prevention of catheter related bacteremia
Title
Prevention of a positive culture of the catheter whaterver the threshold
Title
Local and general tolerance

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients over 18 yeras of age Requiring an internal jugular or sub-clavian central venous catheter for their care during at least 72 h Informed consent signed up Exclusion Criteria: Bacteriemic infection not under control extensive cutaneous infection Women with childbearing potential
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier MIMOZ, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital of Poitiers, france
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University hospital
City
Poitiers
State/Province
Vienne
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17954800
Citation
Mimoz O, Villeminey S, Ragot S, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Laksiri L, Petitpas F, Debaene B. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2066-72. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2066.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs