search
Back to results

Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Alpha-Stim AID CES

Primary Purpose

Anxiety

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation
Pregnancy test
Anxiety questionnaire
Quality of life questionnaire
Work and social questionnaire
Sleep questionnaire
Depression questionnaire
Quality of life and financial questionnaire
Sponsored by
Electromedical Products International, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anxiety

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary working diagnosis of moderate-to-severe GAD indicated via a GAD-7 score of 10 or more at baseline visit
  • Previous treatment within an IAPT service with step two low intensity psychological therapy intervention
  • Indicated for step three high intensity psychological therapy intervention and on the waiting list
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin dipstick pregnancy test
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential must be practising a highly effective method of contraception (failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly and agree to remain on a highly effective method throughout the 6 or 12 week treatment period. Examples of highly effective contraceptives include: barrier condoms, intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence (refraining from heterosexual intercourse), and oestrogen and progestogen containing hormonal contraception associated with ovulation.
  • 18 years of age or above at baseline visit
  • Able to understand written and verbal English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary working diagnosis of a mental disorder other than moderate-to-severe GAD (but other mental and anxiety disorders as secondary comorbidities is not an exclusion criteria)
  • No previous treatment within an IAPT service with step two low intensity psychological therapy intervention
  • Not indicated for step three high intensity psychological therapy intervention and not on the waiting list
  • Requiring urgent clinical care
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential with a positive urine human chorionic gonadotropin dipstick pregnancy test
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential not willing to practice a highly effective method of contraception during the treatment period
  • Implantation with a pace maker
  • Implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  • Incapable of giving informed consent
  • 17 years of age or less at baseline visit
  • Unable to understand written and verbal English

Sites / Locations

  • Leicestershire and Rutland Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Service

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Cranial electrotherapy stimulation

Arm Description

Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Clinical Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Measured by at Least a 5 Point Reduction in Scores on the GAD-7
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), as defined by the NHS IAPT service in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7),or recovery (total score of less than 7 and at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Compared to Current Treatment Approaches
The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of health and social care service cost, and patient cost, from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. The health and social care service cost and patient cost will be aggregated to determine the QALY (quality adjusted life year) value of the intervention. QALYs are used by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom to determine the cost effectiveness of a treatment, and to determine whether it should be made available free at point of use in the National Health Service (NHS).
Clinical Effectiveness in Depression as Measured by Reduction of at Least 6 Points in Scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The third objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for depression in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (a 6 point reduction in scores on the PHQ-9) or recovery (a score of 9 or less and at least a 6 point drop on the PHQ-9), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.
Clinical Effectiveness in Insomnia as Measured by at Least a 50% Reduction in Score on the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS)
The fourth objective of the tertiary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for insomnia in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 50% reduction in scores on the AIS), and recovery (a score of less than 4 and a reduction of at least 50% in AIS score), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.

Full Information

First Posted
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 20, 2021
Sponsor
Electromedical Products International, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02901080
Brief Title
Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Alpha-Stim AID CES
Official Title
Naturalistic Study of Alpha-Stim in Patients With a Primary Working Diagnosis of Moderate-to-severe Generalised Anxiety Disorder Who Did Not Improve With Low Intensity Psychological Therapy Intervention
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 11, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Electromedical Products International, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a single-centre research study in patients seen within an NHS Improving Access to Psychological Interventions (IAPT) service with suspected generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). The study will involve 120 patients from the Leicestershire and Rutland area in England, United Kingdom. Participants will use the Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) medical device, which is approved for use and proven to be safe and work for the treatment for anxiety, depression and insomnia. Participants will use the Alpha-Stim AID for 60 minutes every day for 6 or 12 weeks, either whilst on the waiting list for standard care treatment from IAPT, or in conjunction with standard care treatment from IAPT. The study will involve 6 study visits - one face-to-face at visit 1, followed by 5 visits via telephone at week 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24. At each visit, participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to assess anxiety, depression, sleep difficulty, quality of life and work and social functioning. The purpose of the study is to gather evidence for the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of the Alpha-Stim AID when used in an NHS setting - how well does it work, and does it's use result in cost savings for the NHS. The study may show that the Alpha-Stim AID should be available on the NHS for patients with suspected GAD.
Detailed Description
Participants will have a baseline visit (day 1, visit 1) following identification as potentially eligible. The baseline visit will be face-to-face with a member of the research team, held at routine facilities used by the IAPT service. At the baseline visit, the participant will be consented for participation, have a urine pregnancy test first (if a female of child bearing potential) and the research team will administer the GAD-7 secondly, followed by EQ-5D-5L, WASA, PHQ-9, Athens, and CSRI surveys. Participants will then be instructed on how to use the Alpha-Stim AID device, and will have their first 60 minute, self-directed treatment session at home. All further visits will be facilitated via telephone, scheduled between the research team and participant, within a 5 calendar day window of each time point. At visit 2 (week 4), visit 3 (week 6), visit 4 (week 8), visit 5 (week 12) and visit 6 (week 24), the research team will administer the GAD-7, EQ-5D-5L, WASA, PHQ-9 and Athens. The CSRI will be repeated only at visit 5 and 6. Compliance with the 60 minute daily treatment session will also be assessed during the 6 or 12 week treatment window, in addition to any adverse events. The 60-minute self-directed Alpha-Stim AID treatment sessions are undertaken at participant's home, on a daily basis for 6 weeks for all participants. During this 6-week period, participants will be on the waiting list for high intensity psychological therapy interventions. Following 6 weeks of Alpha-Stim AID CES treatment, participants have the option to receive a further 6 weeks of treatment, which is likely to coincide with start of high intensity psychological therapy interventions as clinically indicated. Following a maximum of 12 weeks' treatment with Alpha-Stim AID CES, all participants will cease to receive treatment on study. All participants will continue to receive standard care assessment, as undertaken by the NHS IAPT service, standard care high intensity psychological therapy interventions as clinically indicated and provided by the NHS IAPT service, and standard care pharmacological treatments as prescribed by the participant's GP. Participation in this study will not influence nor compromise standard care treatment - all study procedures are additional to standard care. Participation in the study will have no impact upon the duration of the waiting time for high intensity psychological therapy interventions.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anxiety

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
161 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cranial electrotherapy stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation, Pregnancy test, Anxiety questionnaire, Quality of life questionnaire, Work and social questionnaire, Sleep questionnaire, Depression questionnaire, Quality of life and financial questionnaire
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Alpha Stim AID cranial electrotherapy stimulation
Intervention Description
- 60 minutes of cranial electrotherapy stimulation via Alpha Stim AID once per day, for a minimum of 6 and maximum of 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Pregnancy test
Intervention Description
- Pregnancy test x 1 (day 1)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Anxiety questionnaire
Intervention Description
- GAD-7 questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality of life questionnaire
Intervention Description
- EQ-5D-5L questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Work and social questionnaire
Intervention Description
- WASA questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sleep questionnaire
Intervention Description
- Athens questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Depression questionnaire
Intervention Description
- PHQ-9 questionnaire x 6 (day 1, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12 and week 24)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality of life and financial questionnaire
Intervention Description
- CSRI questionnaire x 3 (day 1, week 12 and week 24)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Measured by at Least a 5 Point Reduction in Scores on the GAD-7
Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), as defined by the NHS IAPT service in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7),or recovery (total score of less than 7 and at least a 5 point improvement on the GAD-7), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost Effectiveness in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Compared to Current Treatment Approaches
Description
The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of health and social care service cost, and patient cost, from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention. The health and social care service cost and patient cost will be aggregated to determine the QALY (quality adjusted life year) value of the intervention. QALYs are used by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom to determine the cost effectiveness of a treatment, and to determine whether it should be made available free at point of use in the National Health Service (NHS).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Clinical Effectiveness in Depression as Measured by Reduction of at Least 6 Points in Scores on the Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Description
The third objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for depression in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (a 6 point reduction in scores on the PHQ-9) or recovery (a score of 9 or less and at least a 6 point drop on the PHQ-9), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Clinical Effectiveness in Insomnia as Measured by at Least a 50% Reduction in Score on the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS)
Description
The fourth objective of the tertiary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with Alpha-Stim AID Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulations (CES) for insomnia in participants with a primary working diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), in terms of reliable improvement (at least a 50% reduction in scores on the AIS), and recovery (a score of less than 4 and a reduction of at least 50% in AIS score), from baseline to week 24, following previous treatment with low intensity psychological therapy intervention.
Time Frame
24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Primary working diagnosis of moderate-to-severe GAD indicated via a GAD-7 score of 10 or more at baseline visit Previous treatment within an IAPT service with step two low intensity psychological therapy intervention Indicated for step three high intensity psychological therapy intervention and on the waiting list Capable of giving informed consent Female participants of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin dipstick pregnancy test Female participants of child-bearing potential must be practising a highly effective method of contraception (failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly and agree to remain on a highly effective method throughout the 6 or 12 week treatment period. Examples of highly effective contraceptives include: barrier condoms, intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence (refraining from heterosexual intercourse), and oestrogen and progestogen containing hormonal contraception associated with ovulation. 18 years of age or above at baseline visit Able to understand written and verbal English Exclusion Criteria: Primary working diagnosis of a mental disorder other than moderate-to-severe GAD (but other mental and anxiety disorders as secondary comorbidities is not an exclusion criteria) No previous treatment within an IAPT service with step two low intensity psychological therapy intervention Not indicated for step three high intensity psychological therapy intervention and not on the waiting list Requiring urgent clinical care Female participants of child-bearing potential with a positive urine human chorionic gonadotropin dipstick pregnancy test Female participants of child-bearing potential not willing to practice a highly effective method of contraception during the treatment period Implantation with a pace maker Implantation with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) Incapable of giving informed consent 17 years of age or less at baseline visit Unable to understand written and verbal English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Morris, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nottingham
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Leicestershire and Rutland Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Service
City
Nottingham
State/Province
Nottinghamshire
ZIP/Postal Code
NG3 6AA
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Anonymised data will form part of the final study report which will be used for submission to the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Learn more about this trial

Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Alpha-Stim AID CES

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs