search
Back to results

Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus

Primary Purpose

Oral Lichen Planus

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pimecrolimus 1% cream
Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream
Sponsored by
Ain Shams University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Oral Lichen Planus

Eligibility Criteria

25 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically and histologically confirmed painful Erosive or Atrophic OLP
  • free from any systemic diseases using medical questionnaire guided by Cornell Medical Index

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of drug induced lichenoid lesions
  • potential treatment of OLP for less than 2 weeks by topical and 4 weeks systemic therapy before study start
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women,
  • smoking and
  • known hypersensitivity or severe adverse effects to the treatment drugs or to any ingredient of their preparation
  • loss of paliability or flexibility in the tissues involved by the oral lesions or histological signs of epithelial dysplasia or lichenoid lesions within the biopsied sites.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Group I

    Group II

    Arm Description

    Pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks

    Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream (Betnovate, GlaxoSmithKline, Cairo, Egypt)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    clinical scoring (CS)
    0 represented no lesion/normal mucosa; 1, mild white striae/no erythematous area; 2, white striae with atrophic area less than 1 cm²; 3, white striae with atrophic area more than 1 cm²; 4, white striae with erosive area less than 1 4 cm²; and 5, white striae with erosive area more than 1 cm²
    visual analog scale (VAS)
    Patients also ranked the severity of pain and burning sensation on 100-mm visual analog scale

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    CD4+,CD8+, CD133
    Immunohistochemical analysis

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 10, 2015
    Last Updated
    May 12, 2015
    Sponsor
    Ain Shams University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02443311
    Brief Title
    Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
    Official Title
    A Comparative Clinical and Immunohistochemical Study Between Topical Pimecrolimus and Corticosteroid in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    September 2010 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 2012 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    August 2012 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Ain Shams University

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic disease characterized by periods of remission and relapse. Therapeutic objectives for OLP should be to quickly reduce disease symptoms by targeting pathophysiological pathways, and to provide long-term management by reducing recurrences. Pimecrolimus is a novel topical selective inflammatory cytokine release inhibitor; considering its mechanism of action it is reasonable to theorize that pimecrolimus may effectively treat OLP without the potential side effects that are associated with corticosteroids.
    Detailed Description
    Lichen planus is a chronic, immunological, mucocutaneous disease, characterized by periods of remission and relapse1. Oral lichen planus (OLP) is one of the most common mucocutaneous diseases manifesting in the oral cavity, and the oral mucosa may be the only site of involvement 2, with variable incidence between 0.5% and 4% 3. Three major clinical forms of OLP (reticular, erosive/ ulcerative, and erythematous/atrophic) have been recognized, which could alternate and overlap in a dynamic state as disease progresses. Ulceration is the most severe form that it interferes with eating, speech, and swallowing. Erosive OLP lasts for years, resistance to treatment and spontaneous remissions are rare 4,5. Oral lichen planus is a T-cell-mediated chronic inflammatory oral mucosal disease. Both antigen-specific and non-specific mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of OLP. Antigen-specific mechanisms include antigen presentation by basal keratinocytes to CD4+ helper T-cells that are stimulated to secrete the T helper -1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-γ. Subsequently, CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells may be activated which then trigger basal keratinocyte apoptosis in OLP. While, non-specific mechanisms include mast cell degranulation and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activation in OLP lesions 6. The best known treatment of OLP remains high-potency topical corticosteroids7. However, corticosteroids are known to induce local atrophy, fragility, and telangiectasias, and to promote infections, including acute candidiasis. They also have theoretical risks of lowering local immunity, corticosteroids can exert their effects on the immune system by modulating transcription of genes in cells involved in immune response and other cell types; therefore this mode of action is not selective for the pathogenesis of lichen planus 8-10. A recent Cochrane review showed only little evidence for superiority of the assessed interventions over placebo for palliation of symptomatic OLP and recommended the need of randomized clinical trials on new therapies 11. Pimecrolimus a novel topical selective inflammatory cytokine release inhibitor; that binds to intra-cytoplsmic protein (macrophillin-12) subsequently inhibiting dephosphorylation of nuclear factor of activated T cells by calcineurin; this markedly reduces T-cell cytokine production. Given the T-cell-mediated pathogenesis of OLP, application of this calcineurin inhibitor seems to be a promising therapeutic option 12-14. Several case studies and open-label trials used topical pimecrolimus in treatment of OLP reported beneficial effects 12,15. Few prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies have also been conducted and proved benefit of pimecrolimus over placebo 16,10,17. And one recent prospective study compared the effect of topical pimecrolimus with topical corticosteroid in treatment of OLP 18. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of topical pimecrolimus 1% with topical corticosteroid, in the treatment of oral erosive and atrophic lichen planus as a prospective, comparative clinical trial.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Oral Lichen Planus

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    24 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Group I
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
    Arm Title
    Group II
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream (Betnovate, GlaxoSmithKline, Cairo, Egypt)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Pimecrolimus 1% cream
    Intervention Description
    Patients were instructed to apply a thin layer of mixed equal amounts (½ ml) of the study medication and the adhesive gel base per application guided by the graduation on the plastic syringe on the oral lesions, 4 times daily, for a total of 1month. The patients were asked not to eat, drink, for 30 minutes after each application.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream
    Intervention Description
    Patients were instructed to apply a thin layer of mixed equal amounts (½ ml) of the study medication and the adhesive gel base per application guided by the graduation on the plastic syringe on the oral lesions, 4 times daily, for a total of 1month. The patients were asked not to eat, drink, for 30 minutes after each application.Topical antifungal Miconazole 2% gel (Miconaz, oral Medical Union Pharmaceutical, Cairo, Egypt) was applied only in the fourth week of treatment period to avoid secondary candidiosis
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    clinical scoring (CS)
    Description
    0 represented no lesion/normal mucosa; 1, mild white striae/no erythematous area; 2, white striae with atrophic area less than 1 cm²; 3, white striae with atrophic area more than 1 cm²; 4, white striae with erosive area less than 1 4 cm²; and 5, white striae with erosive area more than 1 cm²
    Time Frame
    2 months/ once per week for one months then after 2 months
    Title
    visual analog scale (VAS)
    Description
    Patients also ranked the severity of pain and burning sensation on 100-mm visual analog scale
    Time Frame
    2 months/ once per week for one months then after 2 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    CD4+,CD8+, CD133
    Description
    Immunohistochemical analysis
    Time Frame
    baseline and after 1 month treatment

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    25 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    60 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: clinically and histologically confirmed painful Erosive or Atrophic OLP free from any systemic diseases using medical questionnaire guided by Cornell Medical Index Exclusion Criteria: history of drug induced lichenoid lesions potential treatment of OLP for less than 2 weeks by topical and 4 weeks systemic therapy before study start pregnant or breast-feeding women, smoking and known hypersensitivity or severe adverse effects to the treatment drugs or to any ingredient of their preparation loss of paliability or flexibility in the tissues involved by the oral lesions or histological signs of epithelial dysplasia or lichenoid lesions within the biopsied sites.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs