Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
Primary Purpose
Oral Lichen Planus
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pimecrolimus 1% cream
Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Oral Lichen Planus
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinically and histologically confirmed painful Erosive or Atrophic OLP
- free from any systemic diseases using medical questionnaire guided by Cornell Medical Index
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of drug induced lichenoid lesions
- potential treatment of OLP for less than 2 weeks by topical and 4 weeks systemic therapy before study start
- pregnant or breast-feeding women,
- smoking and
- known hypersensitivity or severe adverse effects to the treatment drugs or to any ingredient of their preparation
- loss of paliability or flexibility in the tissues involved by the oral lesions or histological signs of epithelial dysplasia or lichenoid lesions within the biopsied sites.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Group I
Group II
Arm Description
Pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream (Betnovate, GlaxoSmithKline, Cairo, Egypt)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
clinical scoring (CS)
0 represented no lesion/normal mucosa; 1, mild white striae/no erythematous area; 2, white striae with atrophic area less than 1 cm²; 3, white striae with atrophic area more than 1 cm²; 4, white striae with erosive area less than 1 4 cm²; and 5, white striae with erosive area more than 1 cm²
visual analog scale (VAS)
Patients also ranked the severity of pain and burning sensation on 100-mm visual analog scale
Secondary Outcome Measures
CD4+,CD8+, CD133
Immunohistochemical analysis
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02443311
Brief Title
Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
Official Title
A Comparative Clinical and Immunohistochemical Study Between Topical Pimecrolimus and Corticosteroid in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ain Shams University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic disease characterized by periods of remission and relapse. Therapeutic objectives for OLP should be to quickly reduce disease symptoms by targeting pathophysiological pathways, and to provide long-term management by reducing recurrences. Pimecrolimus is a novel topical selective inflammatory cytokine release inhibitor; considering its mechanism of action it is reasonable to theorize that pimecrolimus may effectively treat OLP without the potential side effects that are associated with corticosteroids.
Detailed Description
Lichen planus is a chronic, immunological, mucocutaneous disease, characterized by periods of remission and relapse1. Oral lichen planus (OLP) is one of the most common mucocutaneous diseases manifesting in the oral cavity, and the oral mucosa may be the only site of involvement 2, with variable incidence between 0.5% and 4% 3. Three major clinical forms of OLP (reticular, erosive/ ulcerative, and erythematous/atrophic) have been recognized, which could alternate and overlap in a dynamic state as disease progresses. Ulceration is the most severe form that it interferes with eating, speech, and swallowing. Erosive OLP lasts for years, resistance to treatment and spontaneous remissions are rare 4,5. Oral lichen planus is a T-cell-mediated chronic inflammatory oral mucosal disease. Both antigen-specific and non-specific mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of OLP. Antigen-specific mechanisms include antigen presentation by basal keratinocytes to CD4+ helper T-cells that are stimulated to secrete the T helper -1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-γ. Subsequently, CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells may be activated which then trigger basal keratinocyte apoptosis in OLP. While, non-specific mechanisms include mast cell degranulation and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activation in OLP lesions 6. The best known treatment of OLP remains high-potency topical corticosteroids7. However, corticosteroids are known to induce local atrophy, fragility, and telangiectasias, and to promote infections, including acute candidiasis. They also have theoretical risks of lowering local immunity, corticosteroids can exert their effects on the immune system by modulating transcription of genes in cells involved in immune response and other cell types; therefore this mode of action is not selective for the pathogenesis of lichen planus 8-10. A recent Cochrane review showed only little evidence for superiority of the assessed interventions over placebo for palliation of symptomatic OLP and recommended the need of randomized clinical trials on new therapies 11. Pimecrolimus a novel topical selective inflammatory cytokine release inhibitor; that binds to intra-cytoplsmic protein (macrophillin-12) subsequently inhibiting dephosphorylation of nuclear factor of activated T cells by calcineurin; this markedly reduces T-cell cytokine production. Given the T-cell-mediated pathogenesis of OLP, application of this calcineurin inhibitor seems to be a promising therapeutic option 12-14. Several case studies and open-label trials used topical pimecrolimus in treatment of OLP reported beneficial effects 12,15. Few prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies have also been conducted and proved benefit of pimecrolimus over placebo 16,10,17. And one recent prospective study compared the effect of topical pimecrolimus with topical corticosteroid in treatment of OLP 18. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of topical pimecrolimus 1% with topical corticosteroid, in the treatment of oral erosive and atrophic lichen planus as a prospective, comparative clinical trial.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Oral Lichen Planus
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group I
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pimecrolimus 1% cream (Elidel, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
Arm Title
Group II
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream (Betnovate, GlaxoSmithKline, Cairo, Egypt)+ custom made hydrophilic Adhesive gel base (Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy. Faculty of Pharmacy. Ain Shams University) 4 Times/day for 4 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pimecrolimus 1% cream
Intervention Description
Patients were instructed to apply a thin layer of mixed equal amounts (½ ml) of the study medication and the adhesive gel base per application guided by the graduation on the plastic syringe on the oral lesions, 4 times daily, for a total of 1month. The patients were asked not to eat, drink, for 30 minutes after each application.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream
Intervention Description
Patients were instructed to apply a thin layer of mixed equal amounts (½ ml) of the study medication and the adhesive gel base per application guided by the graduation on the plastic syringe on the oral lesions, 4 times daily, for a total of 1month. The patients were asked not to eat, drink, for 30 minutes after each application.Topical antifungal Miconazole 2% gel (Miconaz, oral Medical Union Pharmaceutical, Cairo, Egypt) was applied only in the fourth week of treatment period to avoid secondary candidiosis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
clinical scoring (CS)
Description
0 represented no lesion/normal mucosa; 1, mild white striae/no erythematous area; 2, white striae with atrophic area less than 1 cm²; 3, white striae with atrophic area more than 1 cm²; 4, white striae with erosive area less than 1 4 cm²; and 5, white striae with erosive area more than 1 cm²
Time Frame
2 months/ once per week for one months then after 2 months
Title
visual analog scale (VAS)
Description
Patients also ranked the severity of pain and burning sensation on 100-mm visual analog scale
Time Frame
2 months/ once per week for one months then after 2 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
CD4+,CD8+, CD133
Description
Immunohistochemical analysis
Time Frame
baseline and after 1 month treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
clinically and histologically confirmed painful Erosive or Atrophic OLP
free from any systemic diseases using medical questionnaire guided by Cornell Medical Index
Exclusion Criteria:
history of drug induced lichenoid lesions
potential treatment of OLP for less than 2 weeks by topical and 4 weeks systemic therapy before study start
pregnant or breast-feeding women,
smoking and
known hypersensitivity or severe adverse effects to the treatment drugs or to any ingredient of their preparation
loss of paliability or flexibility in the tissues involved by the oral lesions or histological signs of epithelial dysplasia or lichenoid lesions within the biopsied sites.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical and Immunohistochemical Effect of Topical Pimecrolimus in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs