Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses
Primary Purpose
Refractive Error
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
galyfilcon A
comfilcon A
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Refractive Error
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject must be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in both eyes.
- The subject must require a lens power between -1.00 to -6.00D and have no more than 1.00D of corneal cylinder.
- The subject, based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health.
- The subject must be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluations.
- Subject must be a current adapted daily wearer of soft contact lenses with at least 6 months of CL wear.
- Subject must agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study.
- Subject must be willing and able to use only the care systems and lubricating drops provided for the study during the 4 week period.
- The subject must read, indicate understanding of and sign the Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable lens wearer.
- The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids or associated structures.
- The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjogren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc.)
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- pathological dry eye or associated findings
- pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis
- neovascularization equal to or greater than 1mm in from the limbus
- history of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than grade 2
- anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- seborrhoeic eczema
- seborrhoeic conjunctivitis
- A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections.
- A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity).
- Contact lens snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 20/30.
- Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
- Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge)
- Any active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
galyfilcon A/comfilcon A
comfilcon A/galyfilcon A
Arm Description
galyfilcon A first, comfilcon A second
comfilcon A first, galyfilcon A second
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Lens Comfort
>0 = comfortable, <0 = uncomfortable; a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes.
Comfort Symptoms
A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes. >0 = comfortable, <0 = uncomfortable
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall Corneal Staining
Measured for 5 zones of the cornea (superior, nasal, central, inferior, temporal)on a 0 to 3 grade scale (NEI 0-3 scale). Grade 0 = Normal/ grade 1 = mild, superficial stippling/ grade 2 = moderate, punctate staining including superficial abrasion of the cornea/ grade 3 = severe, abrasion or corneal erosion, deep corneal abrasion or recurrent erosion.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00762385
First Posted
September 29, 2008
Last Updated
June 18, 2018
Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Collaborators
Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc., Visioncare Research Ltd.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00762385
Brief Title
Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Collaborators
Foresight Regulatory Strategies, Inc., Visioncare Research Ltd.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Refractive Error
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
97 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
galyfilcon A/comfilcon A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
galyfilcon A first, comfilcon A second
Arm Title
comfilcon A/galyfilcon A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
comfilcon A first, galyfilcon A second
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
galyfilcon A
Intervention Description
galyfilcon A
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
comfilcon A
Intervention Description
comfilcon A
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lens Comfort
Description
>0 = comfortable, <0 = uncomfortable; a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes.
Time Frame
1-week, 2- weeks
Title
Comfort Symptoms
Description
A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes. >0 = comfortable, <0 = uncomfortable
Time Frame
1-week, 2-weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Corneal Staining
Description
Measured for 5 zones of the cornea (superior, nasal, central, inferior, temporal)on a 0 to 3 grade scale (NEI 0-3 scale). Grade 0 = Normal/ grade 1 = mild, superficial stippling/ grade 2 = moderate, punctate staining including superficial abrasion of the cornea/ grade 3 = severe, abrasion or corneal erosion, deep corneal abrasion or recurrent erosion.
Time Frame
2 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
39 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The subject must be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in both eyes.
The subject must require a lens power between -1.00 to -6.00D and have no more than 1.00D of corneal cylinder.
The subject, based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health.
The subject must be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluations.
Subject must be a current adapted daily wearer of soft contact lenses with at least 6 months of CL wear.
Subject must agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study.
Subject must be willing and able to use only the care systems and lubricating drops provided for the study during the 4 week period.
The subject must read, indicate understanding of and sign the Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria:
The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable lens wearer.
The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids or associated structures.
The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjogren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc.)
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
pathological dry eye or associated findings
pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis
neovascularization equal to or greater than 1mm in from the limbus
history of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than grade 2
anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
seborrhoeic eczema
seborrhoeic conjunctivitis
A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections.
A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity).
Contact lens snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 20/30.
Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge)
Any active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs