Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Primary Purpose
Hay Fever
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo solution
gpASIT+TM
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hay Fever
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Allergy diagnosis:
- A medical history of moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC) for the grass pollen season during at least the two previous seasons (definition of allergy severity according to ARIA (Bousquet et al 2001))
- A positive skin prick test (SPT - wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) to grass pollen mixture, histamine wheal ≥ 3 mm, NaCl control reaction < 2 mm
- Specific IgE against grass pollen (with recombinant allergens - g213) > 0.7 kU/L
- Positive response to CPT with at least 10,000 SQ-E/mL of grass allergens
- Patients treated with anti-allergic medication for at least 2 grass pollen seasons prior to enrollment
- For asthmatic patients: confirmed diagnosis of controlled asthma according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (steps 1-3, GINA 2014)
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous immunotherapy with grass allergens within the last 5 years
- Ongoing immunotherapy with grass allergens or any other allergens
- Patients with a history of anaphylaxis, including food (e.g. peanut or marine animals) or hymenoptera venom (e.g. bee or wasp stings) or medication (e.g. penicillin)
- Patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines (GINA 2014)
- Patients with chronic asthma or emphysema, particularly with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of the predicted value (ECSC) or with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 70% of the individual optimum value
- Patients symptomatic to inhaled allergens circulating during the grass pollen season (specific to each country: e.g. birch, hazel, mugwort, ragweed, olive, Alternaria alternata)
- Patients symptomatic to perennial inhaled allergens (house dust mites, cat, dog) to which the patients are regularly exposed
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital Ghent
- Clinica dell'Azienda Opsedaliera Luigi Sacco
- Fundacion Jiménez Diaz
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Placebo
gpASIT+TM
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Symptom sub-scores (Eyes, Nose)
Well days: number of days with symptomatic score below or equal to 2 and no rescue medication
Lung Symptom Score (LLS: the average of coughing, wheezing, chest tightness and exercise induced dyspnoea scores) in asthmatic patients
Total Symptom Score (TSS: the sum of the nose, eye and lung scores) in asthmatic patients
Use of rescue medication to relief asthma symptoms in asthmatic patients
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) outcomes
Standardized Quality-of-Life Questionnaires for asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis
Number of working day lost due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms
Loss of productivity at work due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms, using a visual analog scale (VAS)
Solicited adverse events
Local reactions at the injection site (swelling and redness)
Allergic systemic reactions
Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events
Physical examinations and vital signs
Laboratory investigations (haematology, clinical biochemistry, immunological parameters)
Use of rescue medication
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02560948
First Posted
September 23, 2015
Last Updated
October 10, 2018
Sponsor
BioTech Tools S.A.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02560948
Brief Title
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Official Title
A Multicenter, International, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
BioTech Tools S.A.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous immunotherapy with gpASIT+™ in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis compared to placebo.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hay Fever
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
554 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
gpASIT+TM
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo solution
Intervention Description
4 x 2 injections over 21 days
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
gpASIT+TM
Intervention Description
4 x 2 injections over 21 days
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Time Frame
over the peak (corresponding to 14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts) of grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Time Frame
over the entire grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Symptom sub-scores (Eyes, Nose)
Time Frame
over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Well days: number of days with symptomatic score below or equal to 2 and no rescue medication
Time Frame
over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Lung Symptom Score (LLS: the average of coughing, wheezing, chest tightness and exercise induced dyspnoea scores) in asthmatic patients
Time Frame
over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Total Symptom Score (TSS: the sum of the nose, eye and lung scores) in asthmatic patients
Time Frame
over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Use of rescue medication to relief asthma symptoms in asthmatic patients
Time Frame
over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Title
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) outcomes
Time Frame
at baseline and up to 6 weeks
Title
Standardized Quality-of-Life Questionnaires for asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis
Time Frame
between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Title
Number of working day lost due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms
Time Frame
between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Title
Loss of productivity at work due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms, using a visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame
between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Title
Solicited adverse events
Description
Local reactions at the injection site (swelling and redness)
Allergic systemic reactions
Time Frame
up to 4 weeks
Title
Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Physical examinations and vital signs
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Laboratory investigations (haematology, clinical biochemistry, immunological parameters)
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Use of rescue medication
Time Frame
up to 4 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Production of grass pollen specific immunoglobulins IgE, IgG and IgG4
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Production of blocking antibodies (FAB assay)
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Reduction of Th2 response by measuring IL-4+ and IFN-gamma+ production
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Induction of regulatory T cells (Treg)
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Induction of regulatory B cells (Breg) and their phenotyping
Time Frame
up to 8 months
Title
Reduction of basophil activation measured through detection of CD63 expression marker on activated cells
Time Frame
up to 8 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Allergy diagnosis:
A medical history of moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC) for the grass pollen season during at least the two previous seasons (definition of allergy severity according to ARIA (Bousquet et al 2001))
A positive skin prick test (SPT - wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) to grass pollen mixture, histamine wheal ≥ 3 mm, NaCl control reaction < 2 mm
Specific IgE against grass pollen (with recombinant allergens - g213) > 0.7 kU/L
Positive response to CPT with at least 10,000 SQ-E/mL of grass allergens
Patients treated with anti-allergic medication for at least 2 grass pollen seasons prior to enrollment
For asthmatic patients: confirmed diagnosis of controlled asthma according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (steps 1-3, GINA 2014)
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Previous immunotherapy with grass allergens within the last 5 years
Ongoing immunotherapy with grass allergens or any other allergens
Patients with a history of anaphylaxis, including food (e.g. peanut or marine animals) or hymenoptera venom (e.g. bee or wasp stings) or medication (e.g. penicillin)
Patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines (GINA 2014)
Patients with chronic asthma or emphysema, particularly with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of the predicted value (ECSC) or with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 70% of the individual optimum value
Patients symptomatic to inhaled allergens circulating during the grass pollen season (specific to each country: e.g. birch, hazel, mugwort, ragweed, olive, Alternaria alternata)
Patients symptomatic to perennial inhaled allergens (house dust mites, cat, dog) to which the patients are regularly exposed
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ralph Mösges, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Private practice, Aachen, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claus Bachert, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Petr Panzner, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital of Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frédéric de Blay, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
CHRU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Enrico Iemoli, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinica dell'Azienda Ospedaliera Luigi Sacco Di Milano, Milano, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joachin Sastre, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid,Spain
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Ghent
City
Ghent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Clinica dell'Azienda Opsedaliera Luigi Sacco
City
Milano
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fundacion Jiménez Diaz
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30844425
Citation
Sharif H, Singh I, Kouser L, Mosges R, Bonny MA, Karamani A, Parkin RV, Bovy N, Kishore U, Robb A, Katotomichelakis M, Holtappels G, Derycke L, Corazza F, von Frenckell R, Wathelet N, Duchateau J, Legon T, Pirotton S, Durham SR, Bachert C, Shamji MH. Immunologic mechanisms of a short-course of Lolium perenne peptide immunotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep;144(3):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs