Clinical Evaluation of Hylo-Dual Versus Patanol in Children With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
Primary Purpose
Conjunctivitis, Allergic, Conjunctivitis, Vernal
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hyaluronic acid 0.05% & Ectoine 2.0%
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Conjunctivitis, Allergic
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children of either sex and any race aged 6 to 18 years
- History of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis lasting at least 1 allergy season (including patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis)
- Current complaint of itching and conjunctival redness in both eyes
- Positive skin reaction to at least one common local grass pollen, including Gramineae, at screening or in the 12 months before the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Another previous or ongoing ocular disorder
- Presence of significant corneal involvement
- Sensitivity to any component of the study medications
- Use of medication between 1 week before the study and study completion that could confound the interpretation of results (i.e. antihistamines, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mast cell stabilizers, topical ocular vasoconstrictors)
- Participation in other pharmacologic studies during the month before the study
- Poor baseline visual acuity (not correctable to ≥ 0.6 logMAR in both eyes)
- Autoimmune disease associated with dry eye syndrome (eg, rheumatoid arthritis)
- Inability to discontinue wearing contact lenses during the study
- Inability to discontinue the use of concomitant medication: immunosuppressive drugs, sulfa- or neomycin-containing antibiotics, antibiotics causing allergic reaction
Sites / Locations
- CHU Sainte-Justine HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Hylo-Dual
Patanol
Arm Description
Hyaluronic acid 0.05% & Ectoine 2.0% (Hylo-Dual) 1 drop in both eyes 3 times/day for 8 weeks
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1% (Olopatadine) 1 drop in both eyes 2 times/day for 8 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Signs of conjunctival erythema
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement). Scale based on the Efron scale.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Signs of conjunctival erythema
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement). Scale based on the Efron scale.
Signs of conjunctival chemosis
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement).
Signs of eyelid swelling
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement).
Symptoms of itching, self-rated
Response to the question, "How often during the last 3 days did your eyes itch enough that you wanted to rub them?" Rated on a 5-point scale.
Symptoms of redness, self-rated
Rated by patient or parents on an 11-point scale (VAS - Visual Analog Scale) where 0 = no redness and 10 = the most intense redness imaginable.
Physician's Impression Scale ratings (change scores)
Rated on a 6-point scale: 0 = clinical cure, 1 = satisfactory clinical response, 2 = slight clinical improvement, 3 = clinically unchanged, 4 = slightly clinically worse, and 5 = significantly clinically worse.
Listing of adverse effects potentially related to the ophthalmic treatment
Based on visual acuity, pupil diameter, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp examination and a dilated fundus examination by an ophthalmologist.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03186755
First Posted
June 11, 2017
Last Updated
October 24, 2022
Sponsor
Michael Marchand, MD
Collaborators
Université de Montréal
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03186755
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of Hylo-Dual Versus Patanol in Children With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Olopatadine 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution With Hylo-Dual Ophthalmic Preparation in Children With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 11, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Michael Marchand, MD
Collaborators
Université de Montréal
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study compares the efficacy of Hylo-Dual (Hyaluronic acid 0.05% & Ectoine 2.0%) and Olopatadine (Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) in the control of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis in the pediatric population. Half of participants will receive Hylo-Dual, while the other half will receive Olopatadine treatment for 2 months.
Detailed Description
Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) is an inflammatory response of the conjunctiva triggered by exposure to seasonal allergens. SAC is the most common form of ocular allergy, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 15 to 20%. The distressing signs (redness, chemosis, eyelid swelling) and symptoms (itching, tearing, redness) of SAC may cause extreme discomfort, with a burden due to the frequency and duration of the disease more than to its seriousness.
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1% is a topical antiallergic agent that is both an antihistamine with high affinity and selectivity for the histamine H1 receptor and a mast cell stabilizer that inhibits the release of histamine and other proinflammatory mediators from human conjunctival mast cells. The efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine has been demonstrated by several comparative studies in adults and children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Hylo-Dual eye drops is an approved treatment in Canada for children 6 years and older, containing 0.5mg/ml Sodium Hyaluronate, 20mg/ml Ectoine, a borate buffer and water. Ectoine is a natural substance formed by microorganisms to protect themselves from extreme environments (e.g.: salt lakes or hot geysers). They adapt to these conditions by so-called extremolytes, like ectoine, which are osmoprotective substances stabilizing biological membranes. Ectoine has a strong water-binding capacity, forming a physiologic barrier protecting cell membranes from contact with allergenic substances and against inflammatory responses to environmental stress (such as dehydration, e.g. by hyperosmolar tears, UV radiation or airborne allergens). Additionally, ectoine has a stabilizing effect on the lipid phase of the tear film by increasing its elasticity, which causes it to spread evenly over the eye surface and protects against the excessive evaporation of tears.
To the knowledge of the investigators, no systematic interventional prospective study exists comparing the efficacy of Olopatadine and Hylo-Dual for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis in the pediatric population. The research question is to determine if both treatment options are equally effective in this population, therefore providing further clinical pharmacologic data relevant to children.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Conjunctivitis, Allergic, Conjunctivitis, Vernal
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, Monocentric, Randomized Controlled Trial, Parallel-group, Single-masked for assessors
Masking
Care ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Hylo-Dual
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Hyaluronic acid 0.05% & Ectoine 2.0% (Hylo-Dual) 1 drop in both eyes 3 times/day for 8 weeks
Arm Title
Patanol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1% (Olopatadine) 1 drop in both eyes 2 times/day for 8 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Hyaluronic acid 0.05% & Ectoine 2.0%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hylo-Dual
Intervention Description
Treatment of 1 drop three times a day in both eyes for 8 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Patanol
Intervention Description
Treatment of 1 drop two times a day in both eyes for 8 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Signs of conjunctival erythema
Description
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement). Scale based on the Efron scale.
Time Frame
56 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Signs of conjunctival erythema
Description
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement). Scale based on the Efron scale.
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days
Title
Signs of conjunctival chemosis
Description
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement).
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
Title
Signs of eyelid swelling
Description
Assessed by an ophthalmologist on slit-lamp examination. 9-point scale consisting of 0.5-unit increments from 0 (normal) to 4 (total involvement).
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
Title
Symptoms of itching, self-rated
Description
Response to the question, "How often during the last 3 days did your eyes itch enough that you wanted to rub them?" Rated on a 5-point scale.
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
Title
Symptoms of redness, self-rated
Description
Rated by patient or parents on an 11-point scale (VAS - Visual Analog Scale) where 0 = no redness and 10 = the most intense redness imaginable.
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
Title
Physician's Impression Scale ratings (change scores)
Description
Rated on a 6-point scale: 0 = clinical cure, 1 = satisfactory clinical response, 2 = slight clinical improvement, 3 = clinically unchanged, 4 = slightly clinically worse, and 5 = significantly clinically worse.
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
Title
Listing of adverse effects potentially related to the ophthalmic treatment
Description
Based on visual acuity, pupil diameter, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp examination and a dilated fundus examination by an ophthalmologist.
Time Frame
7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 42 days, 56 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Children of either sex and any race aged 6 to 18 years
History of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis lasting at least 1 allergy season (including patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis)
Current complaint of itching and conjunctival redness in both eyes
Positive skin reaction to at least one common local grass pollen, including Gramineae, at screening or in the 12 months before the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Another previous or ongoing ocular disorder
Presence of significant corneal involvement
Sensitivity to any component of the study medications
Use of medication between 1 week before the study and study completion that could confound the interpretation of results (i.e. antihistamines, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mast cell stabilizers, topical ocular vasoconstrictors)
Participation in other pharmacologic studies during the month before the study
Poor baseline visual acuity (not correctable to ≥ 0.6 logMAR in both eyes)
Autoimmune disease associated with dry eye syndrome (eg, rheumatoid arthritis)
Inability to discontinue wearing contact lenses during the study
Inability to discontinue the use of concomitant medication: immunosuppressive drugs, sulfa- or neomycin-containing antibiotics, antibiotics causing allergic reaction
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Michael Marchand, MD
Phone
514-805-1247
Email
mic9@sympatico.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Emilie Goodyear, MD
Phone
514-243-0224
Email
emiliegoodyear@hotmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilie Goodyear, MD
Organizational Affiliation
St. Justine's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1C5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Marchand, MD
Phone
514-805-1247
Email
mic9@sympatico.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilie Goodyear, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Marchand, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16083326
Citation
Leonardi A. Emerging drugs for ocular allergy. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2005 Aug;10(3):505-20. doi: 10.1517/14728214.10.3.505.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10337426
Citation
Leonardi A. Pathophysiology of allergic conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1999;(228):21-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1999.tb01167.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24388379
Citation
Mortemousque B, Bourcier T, Khairallah M, Messaoud R, Brignole-Baudouin F, Renault D, Rebika H, Bremond-Gignac D; Ketotifen Study Group. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Jan;37(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24764588
Citation
Ciprandi G, Turner D, Gross RD. Double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study comparing olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution with cromolyn sodium 2% and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic preparations in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2004 Mar;65(2):186-99. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(04)90032-X.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11996633
Citation
Bielory L. Update on ocular allergy treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 May;3(5):541-53. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.5.541.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15631542
Citation
Bielory L, Lien KW, Bigelsen S. Efficacy and tolerability of newer antihistamines in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Drugs. 2005;65(2):215-28. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565020-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12462286
Citation
Katelaris CH, Ciprandi G, Missotten L, Turner FD, Bertin D, Berdeaux G; International Olopatadine Study Group. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Clin Ther. 2002 Oct;24(10):1561-75. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80060-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26266427
Citation
McLaurin E, Narvekar A, Gomes P, Adewale A, Torkildsen G. Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model. Cornea. 2015 Oct;34(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000562.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26392751
Citation
Torkildsen G, Narvekar A, Bergmann M. Efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using a conjunctival allergen-challenge model. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 14;9:1703-13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S83263. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27192186
Citation
Kam KW, Chen LJ, Wat N, Young AL. Topical Olopatadine in the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017 Oct;25(5):663-677. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2016.1158282. Epub 2016 May 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18759971
Citation
Bestvater T, Louis P, Galinski EA. Heterologous ectoine production in Escherichia coli: by-passing the metabolic bottle-neck. Saline Syst. 2008 Aug 29;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18309455
Citation
Banciu HL, Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Galinski EA, Muntyan MS, Kuenen JG, Muyzer G. Influence of salts and pH on growth and activity of a novel facultatively alkaliphilic, extremely salt-tolerant, obligately chemolithoautotrophic sufur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacterium Thioalkalibacter halophilus gen. nov., sp. nov. from South-Western Siberian soda lakes. Extremophiles. 2008 May;12(3):391-404. doi: 10.1007/s00792-008-0142-1. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27443666
Citation
Beblo-Vranesevic K, Galinski EA, Rachel R, Huber H, Rettberg P. Influence of osmotic stress on desiccation and irradiation tolerance of (hyper)-thermophilic microorganisms. Arch Microbiol. 2017 Jan;199(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1269-6. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20206435
Citation
Harishchandra RK, Wulff S, Lentzen G, Neuhaus T, Galla HJ. The effect of compatible solute ectoines on the structural organization of lipid monolayer and bilayer membranes. Biophys Chem. 2010 Aug;150(1-3):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24853656
Citation
Dwivedi M, Brinkkotter M, Harishchandra RK, Galla HJ. Biophysical investigations of the structure and function of the tear fluid lipid layers and the effect of ectoine. Part B: artificial lipid films. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Oct;1838(10):2716-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24841755
Citation
Dwivedi M, Backers H, Harishchandra RK, Galla HJ. Biophysical investigations of the structure and function of the tear fluid lipid layer and the effect of ectoine. Part A: natural meibomian lipid films. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Oct;1838(10):2708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 May 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15452409
Citation
Buenger J, Driller H. Ectoin: an effective natural substance to prevent UVA-induced premature photoaging. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):232-7. doi: 10.1159/000080216.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6508097
Citation
DeLuise VP, Peterson WS. The use of topical Healon tears in the management of refractory dry-eye syndrome. Ann Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep;16(9):823-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3873200
Citation
Stuart JC, Linn JG. Dilute sodium hyaluronate (Healon) in the treatment of ocular surface disorders. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985 Mar;17(3):190-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8534643
Citation
Shimmura S, Ono M, Shinozaki K, Toda I, Takamura E, Mashima Y, Tsubota K. Sodium hyaluronate eyedrops in the treatment of dry eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Nov;79(11):1007-11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.11.1007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4135333
Citation
Gill GW, Frost JK, Miller KA. A new formula for a half-oxidized hematoxylin solution that neither overstains nor requires differentiation. Acta Cytol. 1974 Jul-Aug;18(4):300-11. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11244343
Citation
Papa V, Aragona P, Russo S, Di Bella A, Russo P, Milazzo G. Comparison of hypotonic and isotonic solutions containing sodium hyaluronate on the symptomatic treatment of dry eye patients. Ophthalmologica. 2001 Mar-Apr;215(2):124-7. doi: 10.1159/000050842.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3338879
Citation
Wysenbeek YS, Loya N, Ben Sira I, Ophir I, Ben Shaul Y. The effect of sodium hyaluronate on the corneal epithelium. An ultrastructural study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Feb;29(2):194-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10502570
Citation
Condon PI, McEwen CG, Wright M, Mackintosh G, Prescott RJ, McDonald C. Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover, multicentre study to determine the efficacy of a 0.1% (w/v) sodium hyaluronate solution (Fermavisc) in the treatment of dry eye syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Oct;83(10):1121-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.10.1121.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11384563
Citation
Verin P, Easty DL, Secchi A, Ciprandi G, Partouche P, Nemeth-Wasmer G, Brancato R, Harrisberg CJ, Estivin-Ebrardt C, Coster DJ, Apel AJ, Coroneo MT, Knorr M, Carmichael TR, Kent-Smith BT, Abrantes P, Leonardi A, Cerqueti PM, Modorati G, Martinez M. Clinical evaluation of twice-daily emedastine 0.05% eye drops (Emadine eye drops) versus levocabastine 0.05% eye drops in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;131(6):691-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00947-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16490512
Citation
Onguchi T, Dogru M, Okada N, Kato NA, Tanaka M, Takano Y, Fukagawa K, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K, Fujishima H. The impact of the onset time of atopic keratoconjunctivitis on the tear function and ocular surface findings. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;141(3):569-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.09.032.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25694171
Citation
Dogru M, Gunay M, Celik G, Aktas A. Evaluation of the tear film instability in children with allergic diseases. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016 Mar;35(1):49-52. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2015.1010727. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24571721
Citation
Nebbioso M, Zicari AM, Celani C, Lollobrigida V, Grenga R, Duse M. Pathogenesis of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis and Associated Factors. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5-6):340-4. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.874483. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25634218
Citation
Gelardi M, Leo ME, Quaranta VN, Iannuzzi L, Tripodi S, Quaranta N, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G. Clinical characteristics associated with conjunctival inflammation in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):387-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26278858
Citation
Bremond-Gignac D, Nischal KK, Mortemousque B, Gajdosova E, Granet DB, Chiambaretta F. Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis in Children: Clinical Features and Diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):435-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 13. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26496269
Citation
Villani E, Dello Strologo M, Pichi F, Luccarelli SV, De Cilla S, Serafino M, Nucci P. Dry Eye in Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1648. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001648.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26692719
Citation
Akil H, Celik F, Ulas F, Kara IS. Dry Eye Syndrome and Allergic Conjunctivitis in the Pediatric Population. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(4):467-71. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.167814.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27226346
Citation
Chen L, Pi L, Fang J, Chen X, Ke N, Liu Q. High incidence of dry eye in young children with allergic conjunctivitis in Southwest China. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;94(8):e727-e730. doi: 10.1111/aos.13093. Epub 2016 May 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25997302
Citation
Sanchez-Hernandez MC, Montero J, Rondon C, Benitez del Castillo JM, Velazquez E, Herreras JM, Fernandez-Parra B, Merayo-Lloves J, Del Cuvillo A, Vega F, Valero A, Panizo C, Montoro J, Matheu V, Lluch-Bernal M, Gonzalez ML, Gonzalez R, Dordal MT, Davila I, Colas C, Campo P, Anton E, Navarro A; SEAIC 2010 Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee; Spanish Group Ocular Surface-GESOC. Consensus document on allergic conjunctivitis (DECA). J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(2):94-106.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7894627
Citation
Vermeulen J, Mercer M. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of topical levocabastine and sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1994 Nov;5(4):209-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1994.tb00241.x.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Evaluation of Hylo-Dual Versus Patanol in Children With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs