search
Back to results

Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve Aortic Valve Prosthesis (18Fr-Study)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Medtronic CoreValve System
Sponsored by
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

75 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Native aortic valve disease, defined as valve stenosis with an aortic valve area <1cm² (<0.6cm2/m2) as determined by echocardiographic measure,
  • ≥ 75 years, or
  • Surgical risk calculated with logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 15 %, or
  • One or two (but not more than 2) of the following complicating factors:

    1. Cirrhosis of the liver (Child class A or B),
    2. Pulmonary insufficiency : Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 1 liter,
    3. Previous cardiac surgery (Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valvular surgery),
    4. Pulmonary hypertension > 60 mmHg and high risk of cardiac surgery other than valve replacement,
    5. Porcelain aorta
    6. Recurrent pulmonary embolus,
    7. Right ventricular insufficiency,
    8. Thoracic burning sequelae contraindicating open chest surgery,
    9. History of mediastinum radiotherapy,
    10. Severe connective tissue disease resulting in a contraindication to surgery,
    11. Cachexia (BMI ≤ 18 kg/m²),
  • Aortic valve annulus diameter is ≥ 20 mm and ≤ 27 mm as determined by echocardiographic measure,
  • Ascending aorta diameter £ 45 mm at the sino-tubular junction, and
  • Signed Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated,
  • Any sepsis, including active endocarditis,
  • Recent myocardial infarction (< 30 days),
  • Percutaneous coronary or vascular intervention within 15 days prior to the study procedure, or scheduled during or within 30 days after the study procedure,
  • Any left ventricular or atrial thrombus diagnosed by echocardiography,
  • Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (heart rate greater than 100 bpm),
  • Mitral or tricuspid valvular insufficiency ( > grade II),
  • Previous aortic valve replacement (mechanical valve OR stented bioprosthetic valve),
  • Any condition considered as contraindication for extracorporeal assistance,
  • Evolutive or recent CVA (cerebro vascular accident),
  • Poly arterial patients with either:

    1. Femoral, iliac or aortic vascular condition (e.g. stenosis, tortuosity), that make insertion and endovascular access to the aortic valve impossible, or
    2. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral arteries narrowing (> 70%) disease, or
    3. Abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm,
  • Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or patient who will refuse blood transfusion,
  • Evolutive disease with life expectancy less than one year,
  • Creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min,
  • Pregnancy, and
  • Enrolled in another investigational study.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alberta Hospital
  • Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
  • Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
  • HELIOS Heart Center Siegburg
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Erasmus MC
  • Glenfield Hospital
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

CoreValve

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Free Rate
Percentage of subjects without a composite major adverse event (MAE) at 30 (+ 7) days post-procedure. MAE included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, emergent cardiac re-intervention, cardiac tamponade, non-structural or structural valve dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, endocarditis, TIA, embolism, aortic dissection, access site vessel dissection, vessel perforation, acute vessel occlusion, major bleeding and major vascular injury.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Composite Technical Device Success
Composite technical success was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom success on all four technical measures of the "Device Functionality Assessment" was achieved and who were adjudicated as having no device failure or malfunction. The four measures of the ''Device Functionality Assessment'' were: Load the valve delivery system using the loading system Access the aortic valve with the delivery catheter Deploy the valve accurately across the native aortic valve Remove the intact delivery system

Full Information

First Posted
January 15, 2010
Last Updated
February 18, 2019
Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01051518
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve Aortic Valve Prosthesis (18Fr-Study)
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Implantation of the CoreValve Aortic Valve Prosthesis. Safety and Performance Study on Patients at High Risk for Surgical Valve Replacement (18Fr Safety and Efficacy Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic Bakken Research Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigation concerns a prospective, multicenter, single arm safety and performance study evaluating the Medtronic CoreValve system. Approximately 120 patients presenting with symptomatic aortic native valve stenosis necessitating valve replacement which are considered poor surgical candidates, with a high surgical risk, as attested to by both the surgeon and the cardiologist are recruited in the study. Safety and performance will be evaluated at discharge and at 30 days post-procedure. Valve performance and placement will be followed up at 3 and 6 months post-procedure. Further long-term patient follow-up visits will be performed at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months post-procedure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Valve Stenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
126 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CoreValve
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic CoreValve System
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic CoreValve Trancatheter Aortic Valve, Medtronic CoreValve Percutaneous Aortic Valve
Intervention Description
Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Free Rate
Description
Percentage of subjects without a composite major adverse event (MAE) at 30 (+ 7) days post-procedure. MAE included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, emergent cardiac re-intervention, cardiac tamponade, non-structural or structural valve dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, endocarditis, TIA, embolism, aortic dissection, access site vessel dissection, vessel perforation, acute vessel occlusion, major bleeding and major vascular injury.
Time Frame
30 (+7) days post procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite Technical Device Success
Description
Composite technical success was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom success on all four technical measures of the "Device Functionality Assessment" was achieved and who were adjudicated as having no device failure or malfunction. The four measures of the ''Device Functionality Assessment'' were: Load the valve delivery system using the loading system Access the aortic valve with the delivery catheter Deploy the valve accurately across the native aortic valve Remove the intact delivery system
Time Frame
Was assessed during the procedure and completed once the procedure was conlcluded

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Native aortic valve disease, defined as valve stenosis with an aortic valve area <1cm² (<0.6cm2/m2) as determined by echocardiographic measure, ≥ 75 years, or Surgical risk calculated with logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 15 %, or One or two (but not more than 2) of the following complicating factors: Cirrhosis of the liver (Child class A or B), Pulmonary insufficiency : Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 1 liter, Previous cardiac surgery (Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valvular surgery), Pulmonary hypertension > 60 mmHg and high risk of cardiac surgery other than valve replacement, Porcelain aorta Recurrent pulmonary embolus, Right ventricular insufficiency, Thoracic burning sequelae contraindicating open chest surgery, History of mediastinum radiotherapy, Severe connective tissue disease resulting in a contraindication to surgery, Cachexia (BMI ≤ 18 kg/m²), Aortic valve annulus diameter is ≥ 20 mm and ≤ 27 mm as determined by echocardiographic measure, Ascending aorta diameter £ 45 mm at the sino-tubular junction, and Signed Informed Consent. Exclusion Criteria: Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated, Any sepsis, including active endocarditis, Recent myocardial infarction (< 30 days), Percutaneous coronary or vascular intervention within 15 days prior to the study procedure, or scheduled during or within 30 days after the study procedure, Any left ventricular or atrial thrombus diagnosed by echocardiography, Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (heart rate greater than 100 bpm), Mitral or tricuspid valvular insufficiency ( > grade II), Previous aortic valve replacement (mechanical valve OR stented bioprosthetic valve), Any condition considered as contraindication for extracorporeal assistance, Evolutive or recent CVA (cerebro vascular accident), Poly arterial patients with either: Femoral, iliac or aortic vascular condition (e.g. stenosis, tortuosity), that make insertion and endovascular access to the aortic valve impossible, or Symptomatic carotid or vertebral arteries narrowing (> 70%) disease, or Abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm, Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or patient who will refuse blood transfusion, Evolutive disease with life expectancy less than one year, Creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min, Pregnancy, and Enrolled in another investigational study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
E. Grube, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Helios Heart Center Siegburg, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
G. Schuler, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Herzzentrum Universitat Leipzig, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Bonan, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal, Canada
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J. Kovac, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Glenfield Hospital Leicester, UK
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
P. Serruys, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M. Labinaz, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
P den Heijer, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Amphia Hospital Breda, Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M Mullen, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust London, UK
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
W. Tymchak, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alberta Hospital, Canada
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alberta Hospital
City
Edmonton
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal
City
Montreal
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
City
Ottawa
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
HELIOS Heart Center Siegburg
City
Siegburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Amphia Hospital
City
Breda
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus MC
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Glenfield Hospital
City
Leicester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.medtronic.com
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve Aortic Valve Prosthesis (18Fr-Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs