Clinical Investigation of MONTAGE in Adults With Spinal Deformity Undergoing Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
Primary Purpose
Fused Vertebrae, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Sagittal Deformities
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Experimental: Montage Bone Hemostat
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Fused Vertebrae
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of spinal deformity requiring a PSO at a single site level, such as for patients with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity, sagittal imbalance, and spinal global malalignment.
- Non-smokers (have proven to quit smoking for at least 6 months prior to surgery) and current smokers.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence). A pregnancy test at the Week 0 visit must be administered, and must be negative, for inclusion into the study.
- Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with required visits and the follow-up regimen.
- Subject has read and signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form before screening procedures are undertaken.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects whose spinal deformity is deemed by the investigator to be of such severity that a possible surgical intervention would be either harmful or not warranted.
- Subjects with morbid obesity (i.e. a Body Mass Index [BMI] ≥ 40).
- Subjects who have a known allergy to the components of MONTAGE.
- Subjects who are non-mobile (i.e. not ambulatory, or have significant impairment of their mobility making them completely bedridden).
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, show evidence of infection, cellulitis, and/or osteomyelitis.
- Subjects with abnormally low platelets, abnormal coagulation parameters, or with documented bleeding disorders, including a prior history of excessive bleeding during surgery.
- Subjects with a history of a malignancy, not in remission for five years or more, or a newly diagnosed malignancy, treated with cytotoxic therapies or radiation therapy.
- Subjects on any investigational drug(s) within 30 days preceding randomization (i.e. Week 0); or subject or physician anticipates use of any of these therapies by the subject during the course of the study.
Subjects with:
(i) Alcohol abuse as recorded by an average daily intake of > 4 units in females, > 5 units in males (i.e. 1 oz. of spirit, glass of wine, or can of beer per unit).
(ii) Drug abuse as evidenced by the subject's use of illegal drugs or prescription drugs that have not been prescribed for him/her.
- Subjects with one or more medical conditions, as determined by medical history, including renal, hepatic, hematologic, active auto-immune or immune diseases that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the subject an inappropriate candidate for this study.
- Subjects with a history of osteoporosis, as defined by imaging, or on medication for osteoporosis or documented fracture of fragility (Hip fracture, osteoporotic compression fracture, distal radius fracture). If there are any concerns these may be arbitrated by the study PI.
- Subject has previously participated in any MONTAGE trial.
- Subjects who are unable to understand the aims and objectives of the trial and/or unwilling to return for the follow-up examinations.
Sites / Locations
- Upstate Medical University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Montage Bone Hemostat
Standard of Care: No bone hemostat
Arm Description
Use of Montage Settable Resorbable Hemostatic bone putty on the cut surfaces of bleeding bone at the osteotomy site
Use of no bone hemostat on the cut surfaces of bleeding bone at the osteotomy site
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Hemostasis
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat), and the extent to which any transfusion is needed.
Hemostasis
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat), with blood loss is measured through drop in hematocrit (HCT).
Hemostasis
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat) as wound drain output, if utilized.
Secondary Outcome Measures
PSO Stability
The secondary objective is the stability of the construct, as measured by whether the correction has maintained stability at 1-year and 2-years post surgery. Each incidence of instability will be categorized as belonging to one of the following groups: 1) hardware malplacement, 2) loosening or dislodgement, 3) nonunion or nonfusion with hardware fracture 4) nonunion or nonfusion without hardware fracture and 5) perihardware fracture.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04125147
Brief Title
Clinical Investigation of MONTAGE in Adults With Spinal Deformity Undergoing Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
Official Title
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation of MONTAGE in Adults With Spinal Deformity Undergoing Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Low enrollment
Study Start Date
December 5, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 20, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 20, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Abyrx, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE Settable Resorbable Hemostatic Bone Putty and standard of care (no bone hemostat) during pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedures.
Detailed Description
Pedicle Subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a surgical option for treating several spinal deformities. It has been utilized in alignment disorders of the fused spine, in the lumbar spine to treat large sagittal deformities and in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity.
PSO typically results in substantial loss of blood (as much as 2L) with a significant portion of the loss likely occurring at the osteotomy surfaces post-surgically. The control of peri-operative blood loss is considered a critical issue by spine surgeons. A variety of methods have been proposed for the reduction of blood loss during or immediately after spine surgery, including preoperative use of erythropoietin, autologous blood, cell salvage, intra-operative controlled hypotension, and the use of anti-fibrinolytic drugs. Bone hemostats have traditionally not been part of the standard of care to promote hemostasis probably because most traditional options (e.g., bone wax) are nonabsorbable and thus might interfere with fusion at the osteotomy site.
MONTAGE is a settable (hardening) bioabsorbable polymer and hydroxyapatite/beta tricalcium phosphate based putty, used in the control of bleeding from bone during spine, orthopedic, craniomaxillofacial, thoracic and other surgical procedures, and has been FDA cleared.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fused Vertebrae, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Sagittal Deformities, Thoracolumbar Kyphosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Montage Bone Hemostat
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of Montage Settable Resorbable Hemostatic bone putty on the cut surfaces of bleeding bone at the osteotomy site
Arm Title
Standard of Care: No bone hemostat
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Use of no bone hemostat on the cut surfaces of bleeding bone at the osteotomy site
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Experimental: Montage Bone Hemostat
Intervention Description
Use of Montage bone hemostat on the cut surfaces of bone at the osteotomy site
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hemostasis
Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat), and the extent to which any transfusion is needed.
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Hemostasis
Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat), with blood loss is measured through drop in hematocrit (HCT).
Time Frame
Week 0
Title
Hemostasis
Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference in postoperative bleeding between two study groups, FDA cleared MONTAGE and standard of care (no bone hemostat) as wound drain output, if utilized.
Time Frame
Week 0
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PSO Stability
Description
The secondary objective is the stability of the construct, as measured by whether the correction has maintained stability at 1-year and 2-years post surgery. Each incidence of instability will be categorized as belonging to one of the following groups: 1) hardware malplacement, 2) loosening or dislodgement, 3) nonunion or nonfusion with hardware fracture 4) nonunion or nonfusion without hardware fracture and 5) perihardware fracture.
Time Frame
1-year and 2-years post surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Presence of spinal deformity requiring a PSO at a single site level, such as for patients with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity, sagittal imbalance, and spinal global malalignment.
Non-smokers (have proven to quit smoking for at least 6 months prior to surgery) and current smokers.
Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence). A pregnancy test at the Week 0 visit must be administered, and must be negative, for inclusion into the study.
Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with required visits and the follow-up regimen.
Subject has read and signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form before screening procedures are undertaken.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects whose spinal deformity is deemed by the investigator to be of such severity that a possible surgical intervention would be either harmful or not warranted.
Subjects with morbid obesity (i.e. a Body Mass Index [BMI] ≥ 40).
Subjects who have a known allergy to the components of MONTAGE.
Subjects who are non-mobile (i.e. not ambulatory, or have significant impairment of their mobility making them completely bedridden).
Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, show evidence of infection, cellulitis, and/or osteomyelitis.
Subjects with abnormally low platelets, abnormal coagulation parameters, or with documented bleeding disorders, including a prior history of excessive bleeding during surgery.
Subjects with a history of a malignancy, not in remission for five years or more, or a newly diagnosed malignancy, treated with cytotoxic therapies or radiation therapy.
Subjects on any investigational drug(s) within 30 days preceding randomization (i.e. Week 0); or subject or physician anticipates use of any of these therapies by the subject during the course of the study.
Subjects with:
(i) Alcohol abuse as recorded by an average daily intake of > 4 units in females, > 5 units in males (i.e. 1 oz. of spirit, glass of wine, or can of beer per unit).
(ii) Drug abuse as evidenced by the subject's use of illegal drugs or prescription drugs that have not been prescribed for him/her.
Subjects with one or more medical conditions, as determined by medical history, including renal, hepatic, hematologic, active auto-immune or immune diseases that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the subject an inappropriate candidate for this study.
Subjects with a history of osteoporosis, as defined by imaging, or on medication for osteoporosis or documented fracture of fragility (Hip fracture, osteoporotic compression fracture, distal radius fracture). If there are any concerns these may be arbitrated by the study PI.
Subject has previously participated in any MONTAGE trial.
Subjects who are unable to understand the aims and objectives of the trial and/or unwilling to return for the follow-up examinations.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William Lavelle, MD
Organizational Affiliation
SUNY Upstate
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Upstate Medical University
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26861730
Citation
Cogniet A, Aunoble S, Rigal J, Demezon H, Sadikki R, Le Huec JC. Clinical and radiological outcomes of lumbar posterior subtraction osteotomies are correlated to pelvic incidence and FBI index : Prospective series of 63 cases. Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2657-67. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4424-5. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25868095
Citation
Liu H, Yang C, Zheng Z, Ding W, Wang J, Wang H, Li S. Comparison of Smith-Petersen osteotomy and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):570-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000815.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16946635
Citation
Bridwell KH. Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19 Suppl):S171-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12637431
Citation
Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Mar;85(3):454-63. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200303000-00009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24340276
Citation
Hyun SJ, Kim YJ, Rhim SC. Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients. World J Clin Cases. 2013 Nov 16;1(8):242-8. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i8.242.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24263391
Citation
Lee EI, Chao AH, Skoracki RJ, Yu P, DeMonte F, Hanasono MM. Outcomes of calvarial reconstruction in cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):675-682. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438061.46290.33.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19896564
Citation
Cheng L, Ye F, Yang R, Lu X, Shi Y, Li L, Fan H, Bu H. Osteoinduction of hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics in mice with a fractured fibula. Acta Biomater. 2010 Apr;6(4):1569-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.050. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27004276
Citation
Pripatnanont P, Praserttham P, Suttapreyasri S, Leepong N, Monmaturapoj N. Bone Regeneration Potential of Biphasic Nanocalcium Phosphate with High Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium Phosphate Ratios in Rabbit Calvarial Defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):294-303. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4531.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25720972
Citation
Koshiyama H, Yamazaki K. Absorbable sternal pins improve sternal closure stability within a small deviation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;63(6):331-4. doi: 10.1007/s11748-015-0533-z. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1832549
Citation
Baumgart D, Herbon G, Borowski A, de Vivie ER. Primary closure of median sternotomy with interposition of hydroxyapatite blocks. A new approach in pediatric cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5(7):383-5. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(91)90057-q.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26502842
Citation
Barbanti Brodano G, Griffoni C, Zanotti B, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Boriani S. A post-market surveillance analysis of the safety of hydroxyapatite-derived products as bone graft extenders or substitutes for spine fusion. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Oct;19(19):3548-55.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25769482
Citation
Yi S, Rim DC, Park SW, Murovic JA, Lim J, Park J. Biomechanical Comparisons of Pull Out Strengths After Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Phosphate, or Polymethylmethacrylate in the Cadaveric Spine. World Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;83(6):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.056. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Investigation of MONTAGE in Adults With Spinal Deformity Undergoing Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs