Clinical Outcomes of Laser Prostatectomy
Primary Purpose
Prostatic Hypertrophy
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laser prostatectomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostatic Hypertrophy focused on measuring thulium laser, GreenLight laser, laser therapy, resection of the prostate, prostate hyperplasia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Inclusion criteria are patient age greater than 50 years, maximum flow rate (Qmax) < 15 ml/second and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 10.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion criteria are known prostate cancer, bladder cancer, previous transurethral surgery, interstitial cystitis and neurogenic bladder confirmed after urodynamic studies.
Sites / Locations
- New Taipei City Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
GreenLight laser
Thulium laser
Arm Description
180W Greenlight laser is used for vaporesection of the prostate.
200W Thulium laser is used for enucleation of the prostate.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
IPSS at 1 year
The primary outcome measurement is International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1 year. The minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 35. The higher score means worse symptoms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Maximal flow rate (Qmax)
Maximal uroflow rate at 1 year, compared with preoperative data
Quality-of-life questionnaire
QoL score at 1 year, compared with preoperative data; The score ranges from 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03318991
First Posted
October 16, 2017
Last Updated
August 21, 2019
Sponsor
National Taiwan University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03318991
Brief Title
Clinical Outcomes of Laser Prostatectomy
Official Title
Clinical Outcomes of Laser Prostatectomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 19, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2019 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Taiwan University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Benign prostate obstruction (BPO) can be treated with a range of laser treatments using different laser systems and applications. Transurethral laser treatment is considered to be an alternative treatment to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The latest guidelines of the European Association of Urology recommend 532-nm GreenLight laser vaporisation of the prostate and thulium laser enucleation as alternatives to TURP. For further investigation of the efficacy of GreenLight and thulium laser in treating BPH, the investigators organize a prospective randomised control study. The investigators will enrol 100 patients with BPO, treated with either GreenLight laser or thulium laser prostatectomy, and compare their safety and efficacy.
Detailed Description
80 patients with symptomatic benign prostate obstruction (BPO) will be assigned under randomization to treat with GreenLight laser or thulium laser. Randomization is performed by free randomization software.
Inclusion criteria are patient age greater than 50 years, maximum flow rate (Qmax) < 15 ml/second and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 10. The data for the quality-of-life questionnaire (QoL) and transrectal ultrasound measurement of the prostate (TRUS) are obtained preoperatively.
Exclusion criteria are known prostate cancer, bladder cancer, previous transurethral surgery, interstitial cystitis and neurogenic bladder confirmed after urodynamic studies. The use of anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibition and urinary retention under catheterization is not a criterion for study exclusion. The local institutional review board committee has approved the study as well as the data analysis.
Sample size The sample size was determined based on an expected mean IPSS of 5.8 ± 2.6 at 1-year followup. The investigators considered a change of deference of IPSS ≤ 2 as an accepted equivalence between the two groups. The sample size was calculated to be at least 21 patients in each group with α=0.05, β=0.80 and a desired statistical power level of 80%. Considering the possibility of patients drop out or lost to followup, 40 patients will be enrolled in each arm. All measurement data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Statistical analysis StataCorp Stata 15 was used for statistical analysis. The Fisher's exact test was applied to compare categorical variables; and the Student's t-test was used to compare quantitative variables between the two treatment groups. A mixed model with random effect and Bonferroni correction was applied to compare IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR between two groups. A two-sided P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostatic Hypertrophy
Keywords
thulium laser, GreenLight laser, laser therapy, resection of the prostate, prostate hyperplasia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
GreenLight laser
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
180W Greenlight laser is used for vaporesection of the prostate.
Arm Title
Thulium laser
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
200W Thulium laser is used for enucleation of the prostate.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laser prostatectomy
Intervention Description
Patients with symptomatic benign prostate obstruction (BPO) will be assigned under randomisation to treat with GreenLight laser or thulium laser.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
IPSS at 1 year
Description
The primary outcome measurement is International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1 year. The minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 35. The higher score means worse symptoms.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximal flow rate (Qmax)
Description
Maximal uroflow rate at 1 year, compared with preoperative data
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Quality-of-life questionnaire
Description
QoL score at 1 year, compared with preoperative data; The score ranges from 0 (the best) to 6 (the worst).
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria are patient age greater than 50 years, maximum flow rate (Qmax) < 15 ml/second and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 10.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria are known prostate cancer, bladder cancer, previous transurethral surgery, interstitial cystitis and neurogenic bladder confirmed after urodynamic studies.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
New Taipei City Hospital
City
New Taipei
Country
Taiwan
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24972732
Citation
Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, McVary K, Novara G, Woo H, Madersbacher S. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26283011
Citation
Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyere F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitan C, Knispel H, Bachmann A. A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing GreenLight-XPS Laser Vaporization of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Two-yr Outcomes of the GOLIATH Study. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28698991
Citation
Netsch C, Becker B, Tiburtius C, Moritz C, Becci AV, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ. A prospective, randomized trial comparing thulium vapoenucleation with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: perioperative safety and efficacy. World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1913-1921. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2071-z. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27500451
Citation
Zhao C, Yang H, Chen Z, Ye Z. Thulium Laser Resection Versus Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostates in the Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Oct;26(10):789-798. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0044. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Outcomes of Laser Prostatectomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs