search
Back to results

Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism

Primary Purpose

Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
comfilcon A
lotrafilcon B
Sponsored by
Coopervision, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Astigmatism

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
  • Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
  • Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
  • Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
  • Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

  • Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
  • Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:

    • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
    • Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
    • Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
    • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
    • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
    • Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
    • History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
    • Poor personal hygiene
  • Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
  • Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
  • Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Sites / Locations

  • Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

comfilcon A

lotrafilcon B

Arm Description

Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
Lens Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Comfort Satisfaction
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Dryness Satisfaction
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Handling Satisfaction
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Vision Satisfaction
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Overall Satisfaction
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Visual Acuity logMAR
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Lens Surface Deposits
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Lens Surface Deposits
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Centration
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Corneal Coverage
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Post Blink Movement
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Marking Visibility
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability on Blink
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Overall Stability
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Overall Fit Acceptance
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Limbal Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Stromal Haze
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Neovascularization
Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Neovascularization
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Neovascularization
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Corneal Infiltrates
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at end of study. (Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at study end. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)

Full Information

First Posted
October 11, 2013
Last Updated
July 19, 2020
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01965288
Brief Title
Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism
Official Title
A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear.
Detailed Description
Single masked, open label, randomized, bilateral, crossover study design comparing comfilcon A against lotrafilcon B lenses over 1 month of daily wear for each study lens. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Astigmatism

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
comfilcon A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Arm Title
lotrafilcon B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
comfilcon A
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biofinity Toric
Intervention Description
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
lotrafilcon B
Other Intervention Name(s)
Air Optix
Intervention Description
test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Description
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day
Description
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day
Description
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Comfort Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Dryness Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Handling Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Overall Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription
Description
Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Visual Acuity logMAR
Description
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Centration
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Corneal Coverage
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Post Blink Movement
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Lens Marking Visibility
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Lens Stability on Blink
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Lens Overall Stability
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Overall Fit Acceptance
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Time Frame
Dispense
Title
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Description
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time
Description
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Description
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Participants Use of Rewetting Drops
Description
Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)
Time Frame
4 Weeks
Title
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Description
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night
Description
Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Description
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day
Description
Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Description
Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Comfort Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Comfort Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Dryness Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Dryness Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Handling Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Handling Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Vision Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Fit Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction
Description
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)
Description
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)
Description
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Time Frame
4 Weeks
Title
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Description
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)
Description
Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).
Time Frame
4 Weeks
Title
Visual Acuity logMAR
Description
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Visual Acuity logMAR
Description
Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA). Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)
Time Frame
4 Weeks
Title
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Orientation Primary Gaze
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Surface Deposits
Description
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Surface Deposits
Description
Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Centration
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Centration
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Corneal Coverage
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Corneal Coverage
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Post Blink Movement
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Post Blink Movement
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Marking Visibility
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Marking Visibility
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Stability on Blink
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Stability on Blink
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Stability 5-10 Min
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Overall Stability
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Stability
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Overall Fit Acceptance
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Overall Fit Acceptance
Description
Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Limbal Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Limbal Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Limbal Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Bulbar Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Corneal Stromal Haze
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Corneal Stromal Haze
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Corneal Stromal Haze
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Corneal Neovascularization
Description
Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Corneal Neovascularization
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Corneal Neovascularization
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Corneal Infiltrates
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Corneal Infiltrates
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Corneal Infiltrates
Description
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Description
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Description
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)
Description
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)
Description
Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses
Description
Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.
Description
Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues
Description
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at end of study. (Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.
Description
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at study end. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses
Description
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses
Description
Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive) Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive) Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes. Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye. Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses. Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter. Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses. Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so). Is willing to comply with the visit schedule Exclusion Criteria: A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses. Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye. Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day) Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye. Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear. Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as: Pathological dry eye or associated findings Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1 Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present) Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections Poor personal hygiene Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity) Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea. Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses. Has undergone corneal refractive surgery. Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Montés-Mico, OD MPhil PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia
City
Valencia
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs