search
Back to results

Clinical Performance of Composites in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Primary Purpose

Amelogenesis Imperfecta, Dental Caries, Dental Composite

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
dental composite
Sponsored by
Neslihan Tekçe
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 30 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the patient had to require treatment due to carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars,
  • AI diagnosis had to be made, which had to be verified clinically, and also confirmed by anamnestic family history, or clinical examination concerning Witkop's classification

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with developmental enamel defects of other origins such as fluorosis, molar incisor hypomineralization;
  • AI was associated with other oral developmental or systemic disorders, and dental abnormalities such as open-bite, deep-bite, and cross-bite;
  • patients who were unable to provide their informed consent.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Other

    Arm Label

    patients have carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars

    Arm Description

    patients received direct composite restorations using a nanohybrid and a nonofil composite restorations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of failed restorations evaluated according to the modified USPSH criteria in patients with occlusal restorations.
    In restorations, retention rate, color match, wear or loss of anatomic form, marginal discoloration, caries, marginal adaptation, and surface texture were scored success or failure according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. According to this criteria, success restorations received Alfa (A) or Bravo (B) scores. Alfa (A) represents the ideal clinical situation; Bravo (B) is the clinically acceptable. Failed restorations received Charlie (C) or Delta (D) scores. Charlie (C) is the clinically unacceptable situations where the restorations had to be replaced; Delta (D) is the situation where the restoration is fractured, mobile or missing and needed to be replaced immediately.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 18, 2021
    Last Updated
    May 18, 2021
    Sponsor
    Neslihan Tekçe
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04897724
    Brief Title
    Clinical Performance of Composites in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta
    Official Title
    The Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    September 2, 2014 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 19, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Neslihan Tekçe

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    In AI patients, adhesion still remains the first option in order to achieve an early, minimally invasive intervention, and the altered enamel still represents an acceptable substrate for bonding in some AI variants. Many cases have revealed that the direct composite restorations provide satisfactory esthetic and functionality in restoring AI-affected teeth. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of composite restorations in posterior teeth in patients afflicted with Amelogenesis Imperfecta using nanohybrid and nanofill composite materials

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Amelogenesis Imperfecta, Dental Caries, Dental Composite

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    15 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    patients have carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    patients received direct composite restorations using a nanohybrid and a nonofil composite restorations
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    dental composite
    Intervention Description
    clinical performance of composite restorations used for posterior teeth in patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of failed restorations evaluated according to the modified USPSH criteria in patients with occlusal restorations.
    Description
    In restorations, retention rate, color match, wear or loss of anatomic form, marginal discoloration, caries, marginal adaptation, and surface texture were scored success or failure according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. According to this criteria, success restorations received Alfa (A) or Bravo (B) scores. Alfa (A) represents the ideal clinical situation; Bravo (B) is the clinically acceptable. Failed restorations received Charlie (C) or Delta (D) scores. Charlie (C) is the clinically unacceptable situations where the restorations had to be replaced; Delta (D) is the situation where the restoration is fractured, mobile or missing and needed to be replaced immediately.
    Time Frame
    an average of 1 year

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    14 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    30 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: the patient had to require treatment due to carious lesions in one or more surface of molars and premolars, AI diagnosis had to be made, which had to be verified clinically, and also confirmed by anamnestic family history, or clinical examination concerning Witkop's classification Exclusion Criteria: patients with developmental enamel defects of other origins such as fluorosis, molar incisor hypomineralization; AI was associated with other oral developmental or systemic disorders, and dental abnormalities such as open-bite, deep-bite, and cross-bite; patients who were unable to provide their informed consent.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Performance of Composites in Patients With Amelogenesis Imperfecta

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs