Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
Primary Purpose
Dental Caries in Children
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dental restoration
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries in Children focused on measuring nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer, sub-micron hybrid resin composite, permanent molar teeth
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with two comparable occlusal carious lesions on both mandibular first permanent molars.
- Neutral occlusion with a natural antagonist tooth
- Patients that are able to come to recalls
- Patients with a good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering systemic diseases or allergies
- Patients with gastrointestinal problems
- Mandibular first molar teeth with restorations
- Patients with oral habits
- Patients receiving orthodontic treatment
- Hypomineralized or Hypoplastic first molars
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restoration
Sub-micron hybrid resin composite
Arm Description
One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material (Ketac N 100/3M ESPE, USA)
One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative material (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Caulk, USA)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Color Match
Color match of dental restorations were observed with a Vita Scale visually by two calibrated examiners. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. ( Alfa: Imperceptible in room light in one-second glance, Bravo: Perceptible mismatch with the Vita scale but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Esthetically unacceptable)
Marginal Discoloration
Marginal discoloration of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No existing marginal discoloration, Bravo:Presence of discoloration at margins between restoration and tooth structure; discoloration does not penetrate towards the pulp, Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margins of the restoration in a pulpal direction.
Anatomic Form
Anatomic form of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: The restoration is not under-contoured, Bravo: The restoration is under-contoured, but there is no dentin or base exposed, Charlie: Sufficient restorative material is missing so that dentin or base is exposed.
Marginal Integrity
Marginal integrity of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin into which an explorer will catch, Bravo: The explorer catches a crevice along the margin but there is no exposure of dentin or base, Charlie: Visible evidence of a crevice with exposure of dentin or base.)
Recurrent Decay
Recurrent decay of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No evidence of recurrent caries along the margin of the restoration, Charlie: Evidence of caries along the margin of the restoration.)
Fracture
Fracture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection with explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No fracture, Bravo: Small chip, but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Failure due to bulk restoration fracture.)
Surface Texture
Surface texture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: Enamel like surface, Bravo: Surface rougher then enamel, clinically acceptable, Charlie: Surface unacceptable rough.)
Postoperative Sensitivity
Postoperative sensitivity of patients were assessed by two calibrated examiners by cold thermal test. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No sensitivity, Charlie: Sensitivity present.)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05583682
First Posted
October 12, 2022
Last Updated
October 12, 2022
Sponsor
Hacinlioglu, Nadya Marie
Collaborators
Yeditepe University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05583682
Brief Title
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
Official Title
Clinical Performance of Nano-filled Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Sub-micron Hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Permanent Molar Teeth:18-month Randomised Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hacinlioglu, Nadya Marie
Collaborators
Yeditepe University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomised controlled double-blinded, split mouth, single-center clinical trial was to evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer and sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorations in lower first permanent teeth of pediatric patients.
Detailed Description
Occlusal carious lesions on the left and right mandibular first molar teeth of 96 pediatric patients (54 female, 42 male) were restored in a split-mouth study design. Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer (Nano-RMGIC) (Ketac N 100, 3M/ESPE, USA) was used to restore the carious lesions for patients in the treatment group while a sub-micron hybrid resin composite (SpectrumTPH3, Dentsply, USA) was used for patients in the control group. Clinical evaluation of restorations were performed at the 1st week, 6th, 12th and 18th month recalls by two calibrated examiners according to the Modified-USPHS criteria.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Caries in Children
Keywords
nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer, sub-micron hybrid resin composite, permanent molar teeth
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
One of the Nano-filled glass ionomer or sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative materials were applied to carious mandibular first molar teeth
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
96 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restoration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material (Ketac N 100/3M ESPE, USA)
Arm Title
Sub-micron hybrid resin composite
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative material (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Caulk, USA)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Dental restoration
Intervention Description
Restoration of carious mandibular first molar teeth are restored either with nano-filled resin modified glass ionomer or sub-micron resin composite restorative material
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Color Match
Description
Color match of dental restorations were observed with a Vita Scale visually by two calibrated examiners. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. ( Alfa: Imperceptible in room light in one-second glance, Bravo: Perceptible mismatch with the Vita scale but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Esthetically unacceptable)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Marginal Discoloration
Description
Marginal discoloration of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No existing marginal discoloration, Bravo:Presence of discoloration at margins between restoration and tooth structure; discoloration does not penetrate towards the pulp, Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margins of the restoration in a pulpal direction.
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Anatomic Form
Description
Anatomic form of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: The restoration is not under-contoured, Bravo: The restoration is under-contoured, but there is no dentin or base exposed, Charlie: Sufficient restorative material is missing so that dentin or base is exposed.
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Marginal Integrity
Description
Marginal integrity of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin into which an explorer will catch, Bravo: The explorer catches a crevice along the margin but there is no exposure of dentin or base, Charlie: Visible evidence of a crevice with exposure of dentin or base.)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Recurrent Decay
Description
Recurrent decay of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No evidence of recurrent caries along the margin of the restoration, Charlie: Evidence of caries along the margin of the restoration.)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Fracture
Description
Fracture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection with explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No fracture, Bravo: Small chip, but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Failure due to bulk restoration fracture.)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Surface Texture
Description
Surface texture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: Enamel like surface, Bravo: Surface rougher then enamel, clinically acceptable, Charlie: Surface unacceptable rough.)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
Title
Postoperative Sensitivity
Description
Postoperative sensitivity of patients were assessed by two calibrated examiners by cold thermal test. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No sensitivity, Charlie: Sensitivity present.)
Time Frame
Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
7 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with two comparable occlusal carious lesions on both mandibular first permanent molars.
Neutral occlusion with a natural antagonist tooth
Patients that are able to come to recalls
Patients with a good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients suffering systemic diseases or allergies
Patients with gastrointestinal problems
Mandibular first molar teeth with restorations
Patients with oral habits
Patients receiving orthodontic treatment
Hypomineralized or Hypoplastic first molars
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nadya M Hacinlioglu-Ozpar, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs