search
Back to results

Clinical Study of the BARD® COVERA™ Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in AV Graft Patients (AVeVA) (AVeVA)

Primary Purpose

Stenosis, Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent
Sponsored by
C. R. Bard
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stenosis focused on measuring ESRD, Stenosis, Restenosis, Hemodialysis, AV Graft

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Clinical Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must voluntarily sign and date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to collection of study data or performance of study procedures.
  • Subject must be either a male or non-pregnant female ≥ 21 years of age with an expected lifespan sufficient to allow for completion of all study procedures.
  • Subject must be willing to comply with the protocol requirements, including clinical and telephone follow-up.
  • Subject must have a synthetic AV access graft located in an arm that has been implanted for ≥ 30 days and must have undergone at least one successful dialysis session prior to the index procedure.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject must have angiographic evidence of a stenosis ≥ 50% (by visual estimation) located at the graft-vein anastomosis of the subject's synthetic AV access graft and present with clinical evidence of graft dysfunction at the synthetic AV graft-vein anastomosis.
  • The target lesion must be ≤ 9cm in length. Note: multiple stenoses may exist within the target lesion.
  • The reference vessel diameter of the adjacent non-stenotic vessel must be between 5.0 and 9.0mm.

Clinical Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is dialyzing with an AV fistula.
  • The hemodialysis access is located in the lower extremity.
  • The subject has an infected AV access graft or uncontrolled systemic infection.
  • The subject has a known uncontrolled blood coagulation/bleeding disorder.
  • The subject has a known allergy or hypersensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
  • The subject has a known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium (Nitinol) or tantalum.
  • The subject has another medical condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may cause him/her to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy insufficient to allow for the completion of study procedures and follow-up.
  • The subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the study treatment or that clinically interferes with the study endpoints. Note: Studies requiring extended follow-up visits for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational studies.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  • Additional stenotic lesions (≥ 50%) in the venous outflow that are > 3cm from the edge of the target lesion and are not successfully treated (defined as < 30% residual stenosis) prior to treating the target lesion.
  • An aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm is present within the target lesion.
  • The location of the target lesion would require the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent be deployed across the elbow joint.
  • The target lesion is located within a stent or stent graft.
  • The location of the target lesion would require that the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent be placed in the central veins (subclavian, brachiocephalic, Superior Vena Cava (SVC)) or under the clavicle at the thoracic outlet.
  • There is incomplete expansion of an appropriately-sized angioplasty balloon to its expected profile, in the operator's judgment, during primary angioplasty at the target lesion prior to implantation of the study device.

Sites / Locations

  • Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center
  • Southwest Vascular Center
  • Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center Medical Research Services, LLC
  • St. Joseph Hospital
  • Capital Nephrology Access Center
  • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
  • Ocala Kidney Group
  • Chicago Access Care
  • Renal and Transplant Associates of New England, P.C.
  • The Cardiovascular Care Group
  • Surgical Specialists of Charlotte
  • NC Heart and Vascular Research
  • NC Nephrology
  • Providence Access Care
  • Tarrant Vascular Clinic
  • Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent

Arm Description

Placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Freedom From AV Access Circuit Localized or Systemic Serious Adverse Events
Safety is defined as freedom from any adverse event(s) (AEs), localized or systemic, that reasonably suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit (not including stenosis or thrombosis) that require or result in any of the following alone or in combination: additional interventions (including surgery); in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; or death.
Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency
Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The primary effectiveness endpoint is evaluated against a performance goal (PG) of 40%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP)
TLPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP)
ACPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit. Vessel rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Device and Procedure Related AEs Involving the AV Access Circuit
Number of Participants with device and procedure related Adverse Events involving the AV access circuit. The access circuit is the area from the arterial inflow to the SVC-right atrial junction. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Arteriovenous (AV) Access Circuit Reinterventions
Total Number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to the AV access circuit until access abandonment or through study completion. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions
Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to maintain target lesion patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function (IPF)
IPF is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF is representative of the number of days between interventions to maintain access circuit patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion (IPF-T)
IPF-T (Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion) is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or complete access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed at the target lesion in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF for target lesion patency is representative of the approximate (mean) number of days between interventions to maintain target lesion patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Post-intervention Secondary Patency
Secondary Patency is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the access is abandoned. Multiple repetitive treatments can be included in post-intervention secondary patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Technical Success (for Stent Graft Placement)
Technical Success is defined as successful deployment, based on the operator's opinion, of the implant to the intended location assessed at the time of the index procedure.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Procedure Success
Procedure Success is defined as anatomic success and resolution of the pre-procedural clinical indicator(s) (clinical success) of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.

Full Information

First Posted
May 25, 2016
Last Updated
April 10, 2020
Sponsor
C. R. Bard
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02790606
Brief Title
Clinical Study of the BARD® COVERA™ Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in AV Graft Patients (AVeVA)
Acronym
AVeVA
Official Title
Prospective, Multi-Center Clinical Study of the Bard® COVERA™ Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in the Treatment of Stenosis at the Graft-Vein Anastomosis of AV Graft Circuits (AVeVA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 16, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
C. R. Bard

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the Arteriovenous (AV) access circuit.
Detailed Description
This study will compare the use of the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent (following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)) to safety and effectiveness performance goals (PGs) for the treatment of stenotic lesions in the upper extremity venous outflow of the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit of subjects dialyzing with an AV graft.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stenosis, Restenosis
Keywords
ESRD, Stenosis, Restenosis, Hemodialysis, AV Graft

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Covera(TM) Vascular Covered Stent
Intervention Description
Treatment of stenoses with primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and placement of the Covera Vascular Covered Stent.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Freedom From AV Access Circuit Localized or Systemic Serious Adverse Events
Description
Safety is defined as freedom from any adverse event(s) (AEs), localized or systemic, that reasonably suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit (not including stenosis or thrombosis) that require or result in any of the following alone or in combination: additional interventions (including surgery); in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; or death.
Time Frame
30 days post index procedure
Title
Effectiveness Endpoint: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency
Description
Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The primary effectiveness endpoint is evaluated against a performance goal (PG) of 40%.
Time Frame
6 months post index procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP)
Description
TLPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site or until the extremity is abandoned for permanent access. Primary patency ends when any of the following occurs: a) clinically driven reintervention in the treatment area; b) thrombotic occlusion within the treatment area; c) surgical intervention that excludes the original treatment area from the AV circuit, and/or d) abandonment of the AV access graft due to inability to treat the original treatment area. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP)
Description
ACPP is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention. ACPP ends with a reintervention anywhere within the access circuit. Vessel rupture caused by PTA is not an ACPP failure unless achieving hemostasis also causes thrombosis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Device and Procedure Related AEs Involving the AV Access Circuit
Description
Number of Participants with device and procedure related Adverse Events involving the AV access circuit. The access circuit is the area from the arterial inflow to the SVC-right atrial junction. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure,
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Arteriovenous (AV) Access Circuit Reinterventions
Description
Total Number of AV Access Circuit Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to the AV access circuit until access abandonment or through study completion. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure.
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions
Description
Total Number of Target Lesion Reinterventions defined as the number of reinterventions to maintain target lesion patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function (IPF)
Description
IPF is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF is representative of the number of days between interventions to maintain access circuit patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion (IPF-T)
Description
IPF-T (Index of Patency Function - Target Lesion) is defined as the time from the index study procedure to study completion or complete access abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed at the target lesion in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below. The IPF for target lesion patency is representative of the approximate (mean) number of days between interventions to maintain target lesion patency. The minimum and maximum ranges for the Index of Patency Function are as follows: 1 month (6.3 - 30.0); 3 months (6.3 - 90.0); 6 months (6.3 - 180.0); 12 months (6.3 - 365.0); 18 months (6.3 - 545.0); and 24 months (6.3 - 730.0). Higher values represent a better outcome, that is, more time elapsed between the Index study procedure and reinterventions.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Post-intervention Secondary Patency
Description
Secondary Patency is defined as the interval after the index intervention until the access is abandoned. Multiple repetitive treatments can be included in post-intervention secondary patency. The 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months final results are reported below.
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Technical Success (for Stent Graft Placement)
Description
Technical Success is defined as successful deployment, based on the operator's opinion, of the implant to the intended location assessed at the time of the index procedure.
Time Frame
At time of index procedure
Title
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Procedure Success
Description
Procedure Success is defined as anatomic success and resolution of the pre-procedural clinical indicator(s) (clinical success) of a hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Time Frame
At time of index procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Clinical Inclusion Criteria: Subject must voluntarily sign and date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to collection of study data or performance of study procedures. Subject must be either a male or non-pregnant female ≥ 21 years of age with an expected lifespan sufficient to allow for completion of all study procedures. Subject must be willing to comply with the protocol requirements, including clinical and telephone follow-up. Subject must have a synthetic AV access graft located in an arm that has been implanted for ≥ 30 days and must have undergone at least one successful dialysis session prior to the index procedure. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria Subject must have angiographic evidence of a stenosis ≥ 50% (by visual estimation) located at the graft-vein anastomosis of the subject's synthetic AV access graft and present with clinical evidence of graft dysfunction at the synthetic AV graft-vein anastomosis. The target lesion must be ≤ 9cm in length. Note: multiple stenoses may exist within the target lesion. The reference vessel diameter of the adjacent non-stenotic vessel must be between 5.0 and 9.0mm. Clinical Exclusion Criteria: The subject is dialyzing with an AV fistula. The hemodialysis access is located in the lower extremity. The subject has an infected AV access graft or uncontrolled systemic infection. The subject has a known uncontrolled blood coagulation/bleeding disorder. The subject has a known allergy or hypersensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. The subject has a known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium (Nitinol) or tantalum. The subject has another medical condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may cause him/her to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy insufficient to allow for the completion of study procedures and follow-up. The subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the study treatment or that clinically interferes with the study endpoints. Note: Studies requiring extended follow-up visits for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational studies. Angiographic Exclusion Criteria: Additional stenotic lesions (≥ 50%) in the venous outflow that are > 3cm from the edge of the target lesion and are not successfully treated (defined as < 30% residual stenosis) prior to treating the target lesion. An aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm is present within the target lesion. The location of the target lesion would require the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent be deployed across the elbow joint. The target lesion is located within a stent or stent graft. The location of the target lesion would require that the COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent be placed in the central veins (subclavian, brachiocephalic, Superior Vena Cava (SVC)) or under the clavicle at the thoracic outlet. There is incomplete expansion of an appropriately-sized angioplasty balloon to its expected profile, in the operator's judgment, during primary angioplasty at the target lesion prior to implantation of the study device.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bart Dolmatch, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
The Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Vascular Center
City
Tempe
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85281
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center Medical Research Services, LLC
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Joseph Hospital
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Capital Nephrology Access Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95815
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ocala Kidney Group
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chicago Access Care
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60521
Country
United States
Facility Name
Renal and Transplant Associates of New England, P.C.
City
West Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01089
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Cardiovascular Care Group
City
Westfield
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Surgical Specialists of Charlotte
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28207
Country
United States
Facility Name
NC Heart and Vascular Research
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
NC Nephrology
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Access Care
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tarrant Vascular Clinic
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78215
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Study of the BARD® COVERA™ Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in AV Graft Patients (AVeVA)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs