Clinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study] (COLDWATER)
Primary Purpose
Colon Polyps, Polypectomy
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Greece
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy
Conventional Cold Snare Polypectomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Colon Polyps focused on measuring colon polyps, underwater polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, polypectomy, cold snare
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 20years
- Non pedunculated polyps (Paris classification Isp, Is, IIa, IIb)
- Polyp size: diameter of 5 to 10mm
- Endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal lesions - must not present malignant submucosal infiltration evidence like deepening, ulceration / ulcer, abnormal vessels, irregular surface, (NICE 1, NICE 2A, BASIC)
- Informed consent
- Patients who receive antiplatelet / anticoagulant therapy are included in the study only if their therapy has been modified according to ESGE guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <20 years old
- Pedunculated polyps
- Lesions with macroscopic elements of high-grade dysplasia or submucosal infiltration
- Sites with previous polypectomy
- Patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease
- Patients with coagulation disorders
- Patients with severe organ failure
7.Patients who during endoscopy will undergo any technique using electrocautery / electrocoagulation will not be eligible for participation in the study.
Sites / Locations
- Sismanogleio General Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Underwater cold snare polypectomy group
Conventional cold snare polypectomy group
Arm Description
Cold snare polypectomy after complete immersion of the polyp in the water
Cold snare polypectomy in colon lumen dilated with air
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen (%)
Determination of percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen. The determination of the percentage of the area containing muscularis mucosa layer will be done by measuring the length of muscularis mucosa mm / length of specimen mm x100%. Using an ocular and stage micrometer, the length of the muscularis mucosa underlining a neoplastic lesion was measured, along with the specimen's maximum diameter (mm)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Presence or absence of submucosal in the specimen and its depth (if present)
Presence or absence of submucosa
- Measurement of submucosa depth in μm (when submucosa is present in the specimen)
Percentage of R0 Resections
Vial 1 : Determination of polypectomy margin according to Residual Tumor Classification Vial 1A : Determination of horizontal margins: presence of residual damage or not In order to determine the horizontal margins, 2-4 biopsies will be taken from the resection area (2 biopsies antidiametrically in polyps of 5-7 mm size, 4 biopsies in polyps of 8-10 mm size). One cup of forceps will be placed in the defect and the second in the macroscopically normal mucosa.
The received tissue pieces will be placed in a new vial with formol (Vial 1A)
A microscopically margin-negative resection will be characterized as "R0 resection" The determination of R0 Resection Rate will be done by measuring the number of R0 resections / number of all the resections regardless R classification
Complication rate
intraprocedural bleeding, post-procedural bleeding, perforation, abdominal pain not due to perforation. These complications will be evaluated by a study physician of the Gastroenterology Department with a phone call and clinical examination if needed
Recurrence lesion rate during repeat colonoscopy in 6-12months
A subgroup of the sample size will undergo a follow up colonoscopy in 6-12 months in order to identify lesion recurrence
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05273697
First Posted
February 9, 2022
Last Updated
December 11, 2022
Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05273697
Brief Title
Clinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study]
Acronym
COLDWATER
Official Title
Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy (UCSP) to Conventional Cold Snare Polypectomy (CCSP) for Non Pedunculated Colon Polyps of Size 5-10mm [COLDWATER Study]
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
March 21, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 11, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Colon cancer is internationally the third cause of deaths from a malignant disease. Screening colonoscopy in adults >45 years of age aims at the early diagnosis and treatment colon polyps that are precancerous lesions. Endoscopic polyp removal (polypectomy) can be done with various techniques depending on the size, morphology, location of the polyp etc. According to updated guidelines, non-pedunculated polyps of small size are treated with a cold snare in air dilated intestinal lumen (conventional cold snare polypectomy - CCSP).In recent years, several studies have described the benefits of water aided colonoscopy, as well as safety and efficacy of underwater polypectomy in large colon polyps. However, there is not enough data on small polyps which are the most commonly diagnosed.This is a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of CCSP to underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP)for non-pedunculated polyps of size of 5-10 mm. A total of 398 polyps will be randomized and randomization will be performed via random numbers method of Microsoft Excel 2016. Primary outcome of this study is to determine muscularis mucosa resection rate. Secondary outcomes are the depth and percentage of R0 excisions and possible complications.
The investigators expect UCSP to ensure a higher muscularis mucosa resection rate and they attempt to examine the resection depth in the submucosal layer.These results will provide useful data for the development of guidelines in polypectomy techniques for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10mm.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colon Polyps, Polypectomy
Keywords
colon polyps, underwater polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, polypectomy, cold snare
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
396 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Underwater cold snare polypectomy group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Cold snare polypectomy after complete immersion of the polyp in the water
Arm Title
Conventional cold snare polypectomy group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Cold snare polypectomy in colon lumen dilated with air
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy
Intervention Description
The procedure of Underwater Cold Snare Polypectomy (UP) will be as follows:
Complete suction of air from the intestinal tract
Partial opening of the intestinal lumen by using sterile room temperature water via a water pump
Complete immersion of the lesion in water
Snaring of the lesion and a small amount of surrounding healthy tissue (1-2mm)
Excision The objective will be the en bloc resection of the lesion including healthy tissue (about 2mm). If the en bloc resection fails, a piecemeal will be performed on as few specimens as possible
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional Cold Snare Polypectomy
Intervention Description
The procedure of Conventional Cold Snare Polypectomy (CCSP) will be as follows:
If the entry during the endoscopy has been made with water, the water will be aspirated, and the intestinal lumen will be re-stretched using air / CO2
Snaring of the lesion and a small amount of surrounding healthy tissue (1-2mm)
Excision The objective will be the en bloc resection of the lesion including healthy tissue (about 2mm). If the en bloc resection fails, a piecemeal will be performed on as few specimens as possible
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen (%)
Description
Determination of percentage of muscularis mucosa included in specimen. The determination of the percentage of the area containing muscularis mucosa layer will be done by measuring the length of muscularis mucosa mm / length of specimen mm x100%. Using an ocular and stage micrometer, the length of the muscularis mucosa underlining a neoplastic lesion was measured, along with the specimen's maximum diameter (mm)
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Presence or absence of submucosal in the specimen and its depth (if present)
Description
Presence or absence of submucosa
- Measurement of submucosa depth in μm (when submucosa is present in the specimen)
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Percentage of R0 Resections
Description
Vial 1 : Determination of polypectomy margin according to Residual Tumor Classification Vial 1A : Determination of horizontal margins: presence of residual damage or not In order to determine the horizontal margins, 2-4 biopsies will be taken from the resection area (2 biopsies antidiametrically in polyps of 5-7 mm size, 4 biopsies in polyps of 8-10 mm size). One cup of forceps will be placed in the defect and the second in the macroscopically normal mucosa.
The received tissue pieces will be placed in a new vial with formol (Vial 1A)
A microscopically margin-negative resection will be characterized as "R0 resection" The determination of R0 Resection Rate will be done by measuring the number of R0 resections / number of all the resections regardless R classification
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Complication rate
Description
intraprocedural bleeding, post-procedural bleeding, perforation, abdominal pain not due to perforation. These complications will be evaluated by a study physician of the Gastroenterology Department with a phone call and clinical examination if needed
Time Frame
30 days after the polypectomy (treatment procedure)
Title
Recurrence lesion rate during repeat colonoscopy in 6-12months
Description
A subgroup of the sample size will undergo a follow up colonoscopy in 6-12 months in order to identify lesion recurrence
Time Frame
6-12 months after polypectomy (treatment procedure)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age > 20years
Non pedunculated polyps (Paris classification Isp, Is, IIa, IIb)
Polyp size: diameter of 5 to 10mm
Endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal lesions - must not present malignant submucosal infiltration evidence like deepening, ulceration / ulcer, abnormal vessels, irregular surface, (NICE 1, NICE 2A, BASIC)
Informed consent
Patients who receive antiplatelet / anticoagulant therapy are included in the study only if their therapy has been modified according to ESGE guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
Age <20 years old
Pedunculated polyps
Lesions with macroscopic elements of high-grade dysplasia or submucosal infiltration
Sites with previous polypectomy
Patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease
Patients with coagulation disorders
Patients with severe organ failure
7.Patients who during endoscopy will undergo any technique using electrocautery / electrocoagulation will not be eligible for participation in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Zachou, MD,Msc
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens Sismanogleio, Greece
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stylianos Kykalos, Assist.Prof
Organizational Affiliation
2nd Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital Laiko, Athens, Greece
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Assist.Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stavros Sougioultzis
Organizational Affiliation
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University Athens, Greece
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sismanogleio General Hospital
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
15126
Country
Greece
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36399201
Citation
Zachou M, Varytimiadis K, Androutsakos T, Katsaras G, Zoumpouli C, Lalla E, Nifora M, Karantanos P, Nikiteas N, Sougioultzis S, Kalaitzakis E, Kykalos S. Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study). Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study]
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs