Back to resultsClinical Study to Evaluate the Implantation of the ActiGait Drop Foot Stimulator System
Primary Purpose
Stroke, Hemiplegia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ActiGait
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- have a single sided hemiparesis persisting for more than 6 months due to a cerebro-vascular accident (CVA).
- be fully grown-up.
- have the ability to walk 20 meters in less than 2 minutes with or without walking aid but without the help of another person.
- have a reduced speed of walking.
- have the ability to stand upright with both heels touching the floor while hip and knee are in neutral position.
- have a passive range of movement of the affected ankle joint of at least 30 degrees.
- have a positive response to surface electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve - i.e. muscle contraction which results in dorsiflexion of the ankle and improved gait.
- male or female older than 18 years of age.
- have signed written Informed consent to participate in the study.
- is willing and able to follow all study procedures including attendance at clinics for scheduled study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- peripheral nerve damage of the affected leg.
- severe or uncontrolled diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement.
- poor skin condition on the affected leg.
- a thickness of subcutaneous fat exceeding 3.5 cm in the region of the implant.
- inability to walk 100 meters without stopping prior to CVA (with or without a walking aid, but without the help of another person).
- poorly controlled epilepsy.
- need of Ankle Foot Orthosis (AOF) to maintain ankle stability.
- concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would limit the success of the ActiGait® system such as: active degenerative diseases of the back and lower limbs, visuo-spatial neglect, or drug abuse, personality disorders or poor cognitive function.
- concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would compromise the safety of the patient in connection with the implantation and use of the ActiGait system, such as: severe cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension or history of malignancy within the preceding five years.
- other active implanted devices such as demand pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, as mutual electromagnetic interference may distort the efficacy of both systems and expose the patient to dangerous situations.
- history of falls greater than once a week.
- pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
- previous participation in this study
- participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
- requirement of an interpreter
- use of external FES system to assist walking four weeks prior to enrolment
- MRI of the affected thigh that is inconsistent with safe implantation of the ActiGait
- history of falls greater than once a week.
- pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
- previous participation in this study.
- participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
- requirement of an interpreter.
- anatomic situation of the common peroneal nerve identified by pre-surgical MRI that could compromise the success of ActiGait).
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
ActiGait
Arm Description
Receiving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Distance Walked in 6 Minutes
The test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity (endurance). At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Walking Speed During 10 Meter Gait Test
The test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Score
A semi-structured interview is conducted in order to identify subject's limitations with daily occupations of importance in categories self-care, productivtiy or leisure. The subject is then asked to rate the imporance of each of the occupations using a 10-point rating scale. Afterwards the subject chooses up to 5 of the most important occupations (problems) (basis for identifying intervention goals). The subject is asked to use a 10 point scale to rate level of performance and satisfaction with performance for each of the five identified problems. Average COPM performance score and satisfaction score are calculated. The scores range between 1 and 10, where 1 indicates poor performance and low satisfaction, respectively, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction.
Four Square Step Test (FSST)
It is a test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards. The patient's time to perform the test is measured which shorter time representing better performance. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 12 weeks post-implantation it was done with and without stimulation.
Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Peroneal Nerve
Measured: Nervus peroneus communis (CPN) and Nervus peroneus superficialis (SPN)
Change in MRI of Affected Leg and Implant Post-implantation
MRI will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the implant on the common peroneal nerve (e.g. positioning of the nerve cuff along the nerve, path of the lead wire and the common peroneal nerve, estimation of the cross-sectional area of the common peroneal nerve compared to the pre-operative MRI recording, etc.).
The outcome will be quantified by surgeon's judgement whether the final implant position is consistent with safe application of the ActiGait® implant as described in the manufacturer's surgical manual. Number of safe and successful implantations will be counted.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01116466
First Posted
April 23, 2010
Last Updated
August 24, 2021
Sponsor
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01116466
Brief Title
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Implantation of the ActiGait Drop Foot Stimulator System
Official Title
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Implantation of the ActiGait Drop Foot Stimulator System
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical procedure involving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator.
Detailed Description
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and other developed countries and a major source of disability. Prognosis for regaining the ability to walk is good, with 64% of those initially dependent in walking regaining independence by 3 months. However, many gait abnormalities persist. A conservative estimate suggests that 20% of stroke survivors have a drop foot. Drop foot following stroke is caused by paresis of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles. It prevents the patient from effectively swinging the leg during walking, causing an abnormal gait characterized by hip hitching and circumduction and toe catch. Walking speed in people with drop foot is often significantly reduced and the risk of stumbling or falling is high. The conventional treatment for drop foot is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). While AFOs are appropriate for many patients, in certain patient groups AFOs have significant limitations (e.g. in patients with strong spasticity, suffering from pronounced inversion, suffering from volume changes in the lower extremity, etc). An alternative way of treating drop foot is by means of functional electrical stimulation. Clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of drop foot stimulation suggest that it provides many benefits to patients, such as an improved confidence in walking, increased walking speed and endurance, less effort during walking and reduced spasticity. Implantable systems such as ActiGait are considered therapeutic alternatives specifically for those patients for whom conventional treatments have failed. ActiGait system consists of an external module (antenna and control module), a foot switch transmitting to the external module and an implanted assembly (receiver, pulse train generator, electrodes). The objective of this study is to obtain additional evidence on safety of ActiGait implantation procedure and on its efficacy. The study will enrol 5 subjects that will be implanted and followed for 12 weeks. Efficacy outcomes will be assessed at the baseline and during two follow-up visits (week 6 and 12). Subjects will be asked to walk with and without their preferred walking at the baseline and with and without stimulation at follow-up visits.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Hemiplegia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
5 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ActiGait
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receiving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ActiGait
Intervention Description
ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Distance Walked in 6 Minutes
Description
The test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity (endurance). At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Walking Speed During 10 Meter Gait Test
Description
The test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation
Title
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Score
Description
A semi-structured interview is conducted in order to identify subject's limitations with daily occupations of importance in categories self-care, productivtiy or leisure. The subject is then asked to rate the imporance of each of the occupations using a 10-point rating scale. Afterwards the subject chooses up to 5 of the most important occupations (problems) (basis for identifying intervention goals). The subject is asked to use a 10 point scale to rate level of performance and satisfaction with performance for each of the five identified problems. Average COPM performance score and satisfaction score are calculated. The scores range between 1 and 10, where 1 indicates poor performance and low satisfaction, respectively, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction.
Time Frame
Baseline,12 weeks post-implantation
Title
Four Square Step Test (FSST)
Description
It is a test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards. The patient's time to perform the test is measured which shorter time representing better performance. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 12 weeks post-implantation it was done with and without stimulation.
Time Frame
Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
Title
Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Peroneal Nerve
Description
Measured: Nervus peroneus communis (CPN) and Nervus peroneus superficialis (SPN)
Time Frame
Baseline, week 12 post-implantation
Title
Change in MRI of Affected Leg and Implant Post-implantation
Description
MRI will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the implant on the common peroneal nerve (e.g. positioning of the nerve cuff along the nerve, path of the lead wire and the common peroneal nerve, estimation of the cross-sectional area of the common peroneal nerve compared to the pre-operative MRI recording, etc.).
The outcome will be quantified by surgeon's judgement whether the final implant position is consistent with safe application of the ActiGait® implant as described in the manufacturer's surgical manual. Number of safe and successful implantations will be counted.
Time Frame
Week 2 post-implantation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
have a single sided hemiparesis persisting for more than 6 months due to a cerebro-vascular accident (CVA).
be fully grown-up.
have the ability to walk 20 meters in less than 2 minutes with or without walking aid but without the help of another person.
have a reduced speed of walking.
have the ability to stand upright with both heels touching the floor while hip and knee are in neutral position.
have a passive range of movement of the affected ankle joint of at least 30 degrees.
have a positive response to surface electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve - i.e. muscle contraction which results in dorsiflexion of the ankle and improved gait.
male or female older than 18 years of age.
have signed written Informed consent to participate in the study.
is willing and able to follow all study procedures including attendance at clinics for scheduled study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
peripheral nerve damage of the affected leg.
severe or uncontrolled diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement.
poor skin condition on the affected leg.
a thickness of subcutaneous fat exceeding 3.5 cm in the region of the implant.
inability to walk 100 meters without stopping prior to CVA (with or without a walking aid, but without the help of another person).
poorly controlled epilepsy.
need of Ankle Foot Orthosis (AOF) to maintain ankle stability.
concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would limit the success of the ActiGait® system such as: active degenerative diseases of the back and lower limbs, visuo-spatial neglect, or drug abuse, personality disorders or poor cognitive function.
concomitant medical and psychological conditions which would compromise the safety of the patient in connection with the implantation and use of the ActiGait system, such as: severe cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension or history of malignancy within the preceding five years.
other active implanted devices such as demand pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, as mutual electromagnetic interference may distort the efficacy of both systems and expose the patient to dangerous situations.
history of falls greater than once a week.
pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
previous participation in this study
participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
requirement of an interpreter
use of external FES system to assist walking four weeks prior to enrolment
MRI of the affected thigh that is inconsistent with safe implantation of the ActiGait
history of falls greater than once a week.
pregnancy and lactation. Women of childbearing potential must maintain effective contraception during the study period, as judged by the investigator.
previous participation in this study.
participation in an investigational drug trial within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
requirement of an interpreter.
anatomic situation of the common peroneal nerve identified by pre-surgical MRI that could compromise the success of ActiGait).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Liebetanz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Veit Rhode, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Implantation of the ActiGait Drop Foot Stimulator System
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs