search
Back to results

Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients (CORAIL)

Primary Purpose

Ovarian Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)
Topotecan
Sponsored by
PharmaMar
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >/= 18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of unresectable epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.
  • Platinum-resistant disease (PFI: 1-6 months after last platinum-containing chemotherapy).
  • Evaluable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 criteria
  • No more than three prior systemic chemotherapy regimens
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS) ≤ 2
  • Adequate hematological, renal, metabolic and hepatic function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant diseases/conditions: cardiac disease, immunodeficiency, chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis, uncontrolled infection, bowel obstruction, any other major illness
  • Prior treatment with PM01183, trabectedin, or with both PLD and topotecan.
  • Requirement of permanent or frequent (i.e., once per week) external drainages within two weeks prior to randomization

Sites / Locations

  • 1112
  • 1102
  • 1103
  • 1116
  • 1120
  • 1113
  • 1111
  • 1122
  • 1123
  • 1109
  • 1104
  • 1110
  • 1124
  • 1121
  • 1127
  • 1105
  • 1117
  • 1101
  • 1125
  • 1108
  • 1107
  • 1118
  • 1119
  • 1115
  • 1129
  • 1131
  • 1128
  • 1106

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm A

Arm B

Arm Description

lurbinectedin (PM01183)

pegylated liposomal doxorubicin OR topotecan

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival by Independent Review Committee
The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival by Investigator's Assessment
The primary endpoint was PFS by Investigator's Assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.
Overall Survival (OS)
Calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact (in this case, survival was censored on that date).
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee
Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Overall Response Rate by Investigator's Assessment
Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Duration of Response by Independent Review Committee
Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response. Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Duration of Response by Investigator's Assessment
Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response. Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Best Response According to Tumor Marker Evaluation (CA-125)
Best response according to tumor marker evaluation (CA-125): defined as the best response obtained according to GCIG criteria. Tumor marker assessments were performed at baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Progression based on serum CA-125 levels was defined on the basis of a progressive serial elevation of serum CA-125 according to: A. Patients with elevated CA-125 pretreatment and normalization of CA-125 must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or B. Patients with elevated CA-125 before treatment, which never normalizes, must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the nadir value on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or C. Patients with CA-125 in the reference range before treatment must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart.

Full Information

First Posted
April 10, 2015
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Sponsor
PharmaMar
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02421588
Brief Title
Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients
Acronym
CORAIL
Official Title
Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) Versus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin or Topotecan in Patients With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer (CORAIL Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 12, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 12, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
PharmaMar

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the activity and safety of PM01183 versus PLD or topotecan as control arm in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PM01183 will be explored as single agent in the experimental arm (Arm A) versus PLD or topotecan in the control arm (Arm B).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ovarian Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
442 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
lurbinectedin (PM01183)
Arm Title
Arm B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
pegylated liposomal doxorubicin OR topotecan
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lurbinectedin (PM01183)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Topotecan
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival by Independent Review Committee
Description
The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.
Time Frame
Time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival by Investigator's Assessment
Description
The primary endpoint was PFS by Investigator's Assessment, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient received further antitumor therapy or was lost to follow-up before PD, PFS was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor treatment.
Time Frame
Time from the date of randomization to the date of PD, death (of any cause), or last tumor evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact (in this case, survival was censored on that date).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of death or last contact, up to 12 months after last patient inclusion, for a maximum of up to 3 years
Title
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee
Description
Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Time Frame
At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, assessed up to 3 years
Title
Overall Response Rate by Investigator's Assessment
Description
Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Time Frame
At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, assessed up to 3 years
Title
Duration of Response by Independent Review Committee
Description
Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response. Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Time Frame
The time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented, up to 3 years
Title
Duration of Response by Investigator's Assessment
Description
Duration of response (DR): calculated from the date of first documentation of response per RECIST v.1.1 (CR or PR, whichever came first) to the date of documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for duration of response. Best antitumor response defined as the best response obtained according to RECIST v.1.1. Tumor assessment were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Patients who discontinued treatment without PD continued with assessments. Antitumor activity was assessed using the RECIST v.1.1 by the appropriate method [computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging]: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Time Frame
The time from the date when the response criteria (PR or CR, whichever was reached first) were fulfilled, to the first date when PD, recurrence or death was documented, up to 3 years
Title
Best Response According to Tumor Marker Evaluation (CA-125)
Description
Best response according to tumor marker evaluation (CA-125): defined as the best response obtained according to GCIG criteria. Tumor marker assessments were performed at baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD. Progression based on serum CA-125 levels was defined on the basis of a progressive serial elevation of serum CA-125 according to: A. Patients with elevated CA-125 pretreatment and normalization of CA-125 must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or B. Patients with elevated CA-125 before treatment, which never normalizes, must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the nadir value on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart or C. Patients with CA-125 in the reference range before treatment must show evidence of CA-125 greater than, or equal to, 2 times the upper limit of the reference range on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart.
Time Frame
At baseline and every eight weeks from randomization until evidence of PD, up to 3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age >/= 18 years Confirmed diagnosis of unresectable epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Platinum-resistant disease (PFI: 1-6 months after last platinum-containing chemotherapy). Evaluable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 criteria No more than three prior systemic chemotherapy regimens Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (ECOG PS) ≤ 2 Adequate hematological, renal, metabolic and hepatic function Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant diseases/conditions: cardiac disease, immunodeficiency, chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis, uncontrolled infection, bowel obstruction, any other major illness Prior treatment with PM01183, trabectedin, or with both PLD and topotecan. Requirement of permanent or frequent (i.e., once per week) external drainages within two weeks prior to randomization
Facility Information:
Facility Name
1112
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
1102
City
Greenbrae
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1103
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1116
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1120
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1113
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1111
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1122
City
Santa Maria
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1123
City
West Hills
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1109
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
1104
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
1110
City
Covington
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
1124
City
Scarborough
State/Province
Maine
Country
United States
Facility Name
1121
City
Brick
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
Facility Name
1127
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
1105
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
1117
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1101
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1125
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1108
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1107
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
1118
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
1119
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
1115
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1129
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
1131
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1128
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1106
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34521554
Citation
Gaillard S, Oaknin A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, Scambia G, Colombo N, Fernandez C, Alfaro V, Kahatt C, Nieto A, Zeaiter A, Aracil M, Vidal L, Pardo-Burdalo B, Papai Z, Kristeleit R, O'Malley DM, Benjamin I, Pautier P, Lorusso D. Lurbinectedin versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 study (CORAIL). Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183) in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs