search
Back to results

Cochlear Promontory Stimulation for Treatment of Tinnitus

Primary Purpose

Tinnitus

Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cochlear promontory stimulation
Sponsored by
Mayo Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Normal to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (based on pure tone audiometry (PTA) of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz) and a word recognition score greater than 75%
  2. Asymmetric subjective tonal tinnitus
  3. Tinnitus that is disruptive

    1. Determined by THI score (in the severe range i.e. >56/100)
    2. TFI (in the severe range i.e. >52/100)
    3. VAS (> 5/10 )
  4. Tinnitus that is intractable, and has not been ameliorated by conventional measures such as a hearing aid or masking
  5. Normal contrast-enhanced MRI of the head

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tinnitus present less than 6 months or longer than 3 years
  2. History of brain or major ear surgery
  3. Prior major head trauma
  4. History of depression or anxiety

    1. Determined by screening using the GAD 7, PHQ8, and HAI-S

      • GAD7 > 9 (indicates clinically significant anxiety)
      • PHQ > 9 (indicates clinically significant depression)
      • HAI-S > 25 (hypochondriacal level illness anxiety)
    2. Inability to assess, continue or complete trial
  5. Currently on antidepressants, anxiolytics or antipsychotics
  6. Active use of other tinnitus treatments
  7. MRI Incompatible Devices
  8. Known pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Testing Arm

Arm Description

There will only be one arm. The patient and investigator will initially be blinded to the "on-off" status of the electrode. The patient will thus serve as an internal control for testing. Once device integrity and possible benefit is confirmed, the patients will undergo non-tactile electrical stimulation to the bone of the inner ear (cochlear promontory) for short term relief of tinnitus via Cochlear promontory stimulation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) has 25 questions with possible answers of Yes (4 points), Sometimes (2 points), and No (0 points). Scores categories are (1-16: Slight or no handicap - Grade 1), (18-36: Mild handicap - Grade 2), (38-56: Moderate handicap - Grade 3), (58-76: Severe handicap - Grade 4), (78-100: Catastrophic handicap - Grade 5).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Optimal Location of Tinnitus Relief
Location on the cochlear promontory where highest perceived benefit from electrical stimulation
Auditory Feedback
Perception of hearing the electrical stimulus (if at all)
Tactile Feedback
Perception of hearing the electrical stimulus (if at all)
Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) contains eight subscales (domains), of which seven contain 3 items and one contains 4. The possible responses for each item range from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered). The total score is transformed to a scale ranging from 0 (no interference) to 100 (completely interfered with activities).
Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Numeric Pain Distress was used for this outcome. The VAS has pre-set marks between the extremes of 0 (no pain) and 10 (unbearable pain).

Full Information

First Posted
November 30, 2017
Last Updated
July 12, 2023
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03759834
Brief Title
Cochlear Promontory Stimulation for Treatment of Tinnitus
Official Title
Cochlear Promontory Stimulation for Treatment of Tinnitus: Towards Developing an Implantable Device
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Enrollment for study is currently on hold pending additional funding and resources.
Study Start Date
January 4, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tinnitus is the perception of sound when no external noise is present. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates over 50 million - nearly 15% of the general public -experience some form of tinnitus. Roughly 20 million people struggle with burdensome chronic tinnitus, with 2 million experiencing extreme and debilitating symptoms. The 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline on tinnitus from the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery summarized the existing state of tinnitus management by stating "A cure for primary tinnitus does not yet exist, and despite claims to the contrary, no method has been proven to provide long-term suppression of tinnitus." The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and efficacy of cochlear promontory stimulation in the short term relief of tinnitus. The secondary goal of the study is to determine the optimum region(s) of the cochlear promontory in planning for an implantable electrical device for long term tinnitus suppression.
Detailed Description
Candidate subjects will undergo a temporal bone Computed Tomography (CT) scan, contrast enhanced head Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), audiogram with immittance testing, pitch and level matching of tinnitus, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing prior to promontory stimulation. Head MRI, DPOAE, audiogram and immittance testing are considered clinically routine for assessment of asymmetric tinnitus. Temporal bone CT, ABR, tinnitus pitch, level matching, masking levels and residual inhibition testing are not standard clinical assessments for asymmetric tinnitus. In addition, subjects will complete the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaires three separate times within the week prior to promontory stimulation testing. Additional testing for comorbid anxiety and depressive conditions will be a screening Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ8), and short Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI-S). The NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI) will be administered to provide baseline information. The initial session of promontory stimulation will define optimal stimulation parameters (i.e., location, current level, pulse-width, phase polarity), where maximal tinnitus suppression occurs with minimal or no auditory percept. After these parameters are established, the patient will complete the THI, TFI, and VAS immediately prior to stimulation, during stimulation, and following completion of stimulation at 10-minutes, 1-hour, 24-hours, 48-hours, and 1-week following completion of stimulation. In addition, pitch and level matching of tinnitus will be completed immediately upon completion of each promontory stimulation session. Each patient will undergo three successive treatments separated by 1-week. Prior to each treatment, the patient will receive an audiogram and DPOAE testing to document interval safety. At the conclusion of the study, subjects will be asked about their willingness to undergo surgical implantation of a device capable of long-term scheduled or on-demand electrical stimulation for tinnitus suppression

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
The electrode will be placed in the middle ear. The patient and investigator will be blinded to the "on-off" status of the device. The patient will report if they have improvement of their tinnitus while both the patient and investigator are blinded to the "on-off" status.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
21 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Testing Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
There will only be one arm. The patient and investigator will initially be blinded to the "on-off" status of the electrode. The patient will thus serve as an internal control for testing. Once device integrity and possible benefit is confirmed, the patients will undergo non-tactile electrical stimulation to the bone of the inner ear (cochlear promontory) for short term relief of tinnitus via Cochlear promontory stimulation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cochlear promontory stimulation
Intervention Description
Promontory stimulation is an established otologic procedure that was initially developed as a diagnostic tool to assess patient candidacy for cochlear implantation. Promontory stimulation is most commonly performed in the outpatient setting on an awake patient by placing a single insulated probe through a topically anesthetized tympanic membrane and applying monopolar current for several seconds to minutes. The initial session of promontory stimulation will define optimal stimulation parameters (i.e., location, current level, pulse-width, phase polarity), where maximal tinnitus suppression occurs with minimal or no auditory percept. Additional stimulation testing visits will confirm these findings.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Description
The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) has 25 questions with possible answers of Yes (4 points), Sometimes (2 points), and No (0 points). Scores categories are (1-16: Slight or no handicap - Grade 1), (18-36: Mild handicap - Grade 2), (38-56: Moderate handicap - Grade 3), (58-76: Severe handicap - Grade 4), (78-100: Catastrophic handicap - Grade 5).
Time Frame
7 days after electrical stimulation procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Optimal Location of Tinnitus Relief
Description
Location on the cochlear promontory where highest perceived benefit from electrical stimulation
Time Frame
Immediately after electrical stimulation procedure (approximately 1 min after stimulation)
Title
Auditory Feedback
Description
Perception of hearing the electrical stimulus (if at all)
Time Frame
Immediately after electrical stimulation procedure (approximately 1 min after stimulation)
Title
Tactile Feedback
Description
Perception of hearing the electrical stimulus (if at all)
Time Frame
Immediately after electrical stimulation procedure (approximately 1 min after stimulation)
Title
Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index
Description
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) contains eight subscales (domains), of which seven contain 3 items and one contains 4. The possible responses for each item range from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered). The total score is transformed to a scale ranging from 0 (no interference) to 100 (completely interfered with activities).
Time Frame
7 days after electrical stimulation procedure
Title
Short Term Relief of Tinnitus as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale
Description
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Numeric Pain Distress was used for this outcome. The VAS has pre-set marks between the extremes of 0 (no pain) and 10 (unbearable pain).
Time Frame
7 days after electrical stimulation procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Normal to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (based on pure tone audiometry (PTA) of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz) and a word recognition score greater than 75% Asymmetric subjective tonal tinnitus Tinnitus that is disruptive Determined by THI score (in the severe range i.e. >56/100) TFI (in the severe range i.e. >52/100) VAS (> 5/10 ) Tinnitus that is intractable, and has not been ameliorated by conventional measures such as a hearing aid or masking Normal contrast-enhanced MRI of the head Exclusion Criteria: Tinnitus present less than 6 months or longer than 3 years History of brain or major ear surgery Prior major head trauma History of depression or anxiety Determined by screening using the GAD 7, PHQ8, and HAI-S GAD7 > 9 (indicates clinically significant anxiety) PHQ > 9 (indicates clinically significant depression) HAI-S > 25 (hypochondriacal level illness anxiety) Inability to assess, continue or complete trial Currently on antidepressants, anxiolytics or antipsychotics Active use of other tinnitus treatments MRI Incompatible Devices Known pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew L Carlson
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25273878
Citation
Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, Rosenfeld RM, Chandrasekhar SS, Cunningham ER Jr, Archer SM, Blakley BW, Carter JM, Granieri EC, Henry JA, Hollingsworth D, Khan FA, Mitchell S, Monfared A, Newman CW, Omole FS, Phillips CD, Robinson SK, Taw MB, Tyler RS, Waguespack R, Whamond EJ. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;151(2 Suppl):S1-S40. doi: 10.1177/0194599814545325.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22447577
Citation
Tsai BS, Sweetow RW, Cheung SW. Audiometric asymmetry and tinnitus laterality. Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1148-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.23242. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24691511
Citation
Perez R, Shaul C, Vardi M, Muhanna N, Kileny PR, Sichel JY. Multiple electrostimulation treatments to the promontory for tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):366-72. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000309.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12806303
Citation
Rubinstein JT, Tyler RS, Johnson A, Brown CJ. Electrical suppression of tinnitus with high-rate pulse trains. Otol Neurotol. 2003 May;24(3):478-85. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200305000-00021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9193732
Citation
Watanabe K, Okawara D, Baba S, Yagi T. Electrocochleographic analysis of the suppression of tinnitus by electrical promontory stimulation. Audiology. 1997 May-Jun;36(3):147-54. doi: 10.3109/00206099709071968.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10547461
Citation
Steenerson RL, Cronin GW. Treatment of tinnitus with electrical stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;121(5):511-3. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70048-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26433053
Citation
Mertens G, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Cochlear implantation as a long-term treatment for ipsilateral incapacitating tinnitus in subjects with unilateral hearing loss up to 10 years. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22353680
Citation
Tyler RS. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for tinnitus treatments. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):115-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22931903
Citation
Arts RA, George EL, Stokroos RJ, Vermeire K. Review: cochlear implants as a treatment of tinnitus in single-sided deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;20(5):398-403. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283577b66.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25090456
Citation
Arts RA, George EL, Chenault MN, Stokroos RJ. Optimizing intracochlear electrical stimulation to suppress tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):125-35. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000090.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21493265
Citation
Zeman F, Koller M, Figueiredo R, Aazevedo A, Rates M, Coelho C, Kleinjung T, de Ridder D, Langguth B, Landgrebe M. Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;145(2):282-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811403882.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27751619
Citation
Topf MC, Hsu DW, Adams DR, Zhan T, Pelosi S, Willcox TO, McGettigan B, Fisher KW. Rate of tympanic membrane perforation after intratympanic steroid injection. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Jan-Feb;38(1):21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35093126
Citation
Marinelli JP, Anzalone CL, Prummer CM, Poling GL, Staab JP, Tombers NM, Lohse CM, Carlson ML. Electrical stimulation of the cochlea for treatment of chronic disabling tinnitus: an open-label trial towards the development of an implantable device. J Transl Med. 2022 Jan 29;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03271-4.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Cochlear Promontory Stimulation for Treatment of Tinnitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs