search
Back to results

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Modafinil, or Both for Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue (COMBO-MS)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Telephone-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Modafinil
Sponsored by
University of Michigan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Sclerosis focused on measuring cognitive behavioral therapy, modafinil, Provigil, fatigue, MS

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS, all MS subtypes);
  2. Age 18 years or older;
  3. Presence of chronic, problematic fatigue that, in the opinion of the patient, has interfered with their daily activities for ≥ 3 months;
  4. Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) score greater or equal to 4 at screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current shift work sleep disorder, or narcolepsy diagnosed with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test
  2. History of MS relapse within the last 30 days prior to screening (participants will be considered eligible after the 30-day window);
  3. Current stimulant or wake-promoting agent use (such as amantadine, modafinil, methylphenidate, or amphetamine) within 30 days of screening;
  4. Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  5. Reliance on hormonal contraception AND concomitant unwillingness to use alternative non-hormonal means of birth control (spermicide or condoms) during the course of the study;
  6. Current suicidal ideation (SI) with intent or plan;
  7. Known hypersensitivity to modafinil or armodafinil or its inactive ingredients;
  8. History of the following cardiovascular conditions: recent myocardial infarction (last 6 months prior to screening), unstable angina, left ventricular hypertrophy, mitral valve prolapse, NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure;
  9. History of prescription or illicit stimulant abuse (such as cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine);
  10. Any other medical, neurological, or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, could affect participant safety or eligibility.

Sites / Locations

  • The University of Michigan
  • The University of Washington

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Modafinil

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy + Modafinil

Arm Description

8 weekly telephone-based sessions and 2 booster sessions

50-400 mg per day (oral)

Telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (8 weekly therapy sessions and 2 booster sessions) + Modafinil 50-400 mg per day (oral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a 21-item self-report survey. Each item is rated 0-4, Total scores range from 0-84. . Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue on a person's activities. The primary outcome measure will be the mean within-subject difference between baseline and 12-week Modified Fatigue Impact Scale values (delta-MFIS), compared between the 3 treatment groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Fatigue Intensity as Assessed by Self-reported Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score.
Fatigue intensity was assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. Using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, participants entered fatigue intensity ratings into the user-interface on the PRO-Diary 4 times each day, for 7 days, at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 12 weeks post-intervention. All scores over the 7 days were averaged to produce an aggregate fatigue intensity score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue intensity. Change in fatigue intensity between baseline and 12 weeks was compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Change in Fatigue Interference as Assessed by Self-reported Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Fatigue interference will be assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. Using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, participants entered fatigue interference ratings into the user-interface on the PRO-Diary 4 times each day, for 7 days, at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 12 weeks post-intervention. All scores over the 7 days were averaged to produce an aggregate fatigue impact score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue impact. Change in fatigue interference between baseline and 12 weeks will be compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Change in Fatigability as Assessed by the Self-reported Fatigue Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score and Physical Activity Level
Fatigability will be assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. The fatigability score will be calculated as the ratio of the self-reported fatigue intensity rating (using a 0-10 numerical rating score) divided by the participant's concurrent physical activity level (measured as the average number of activity counts per minute via actigraphy). All fatigability scores will be averaged over the 7 days to create an aggregate fatigability score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigability. Change in fatigability between baseline and 12 weeks will be compared between the 3 treatment groups.

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2018
Last Updated
December 5, 2022
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
University of Washington, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Multiple Sclerosis Society
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03621761
Brief Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Modafinil, or Both for Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue
Acronym
COMBO-MS
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Telephone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral-therapy, Modafinil, and Combination Therapy of Both Interventions for Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 15, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 24, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
University of Washington, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Multiple Sclerosis Society

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of 3 treatments for fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: 1) a commonly used behavioral treatment strategy (telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy), 2) a commonly used medication (modafinil), and 3) a combination of both therapies. Each participant will receive one of these 3 treatments for a total of 12 weeks. Hypotheses are that, at 12 weeks, treatment with combination therapy will overall lead to greater reductions in fatigue impact, fatigue severity, and fatigability compared to monotherapy, and that comorbid depression, sleep disturbances, and baseline disability level will be important effect modifiers that influence treatment effect and adherence.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, modafinil, Provigil, fatigue, MS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Rater blinded
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
343 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
8 weekly telephone-based sessions and 2 booster sessions
Arm Title
Modafinil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
50-400 mg per day (oral)
Arm Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy + Modafinil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (8 weekly therapy sessions and 2 booster sessions) + Modafinil 50-400 mg per day (oral)
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Telephone-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Intervention Description
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a behavioral-based treatment that promotes effective self-management skills, including adaptive thought processes and behaviors (i.e. "coping skills"). CBT also commonly teaches goal-setting and behavioral activation strategies for engaging in physical, social, and other valued activities in the context of fatigue.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Modafinil
Other Intervention Name(s)
Provigil
Intervention Description
Modafinil is a safe, well-tolerated and effective wake-promoting agent (oral medication) that is FDA-approved for the treatment of fatigue related to sleep disorders. Modafinil is also one of the most commonly used medications for multiple sclerosis related fatigue in clinical practice, with doses ranging from 50 - 400 mg per day, in divided doses (once to twice daily).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score
Description
The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a 21-item self-report survey. Each item is rated 0-4, Total scores range from 0-84. . Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue on a person's activities. The primary outcome measure will be the mean within-subject difference between baseline and 12-week Modified Fatigue Impact Scale values (delta-MFIS), compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Time Frame
Baseline-12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Fatigue Intensity as Assessed by Self-reported Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score.
Description
Fatigue intensity was assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. Using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, participants entered fatigue intensity ratings into the user-interface on the PRO-Diary 4 times each day, for 7 days, at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 12 weeks post-intervention. All scores over the 7 days were averaged to produce an aggregate fatigue intensity score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue intensity. Change in fatigue intensity between baseline and 12 weeks was compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Time Frame
Baseline-12 weeks
Title
Change in Fatigue Interference as Assessed by Self-reported Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Description
Fatigue interference will be assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. Using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, participants entered fatigue interference ratings into the user-interface on the PRO-Diary 4 times each day, for 7 days, at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 12 weeks post-intervention. All scores over the 7 days were averaged to produce an aggregate fatigue impact score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue impact. Change in fatigue interference between baseline and 12 weeks will be compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Time Frame
Baseline-12 weeks
Title
Change in Fatigability as Assessed by the Self-reported Fatigue Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score and Physical Activity Level
Description
Fatigability will be assessed using a wearable monitor, the PRO-Diary (CamNtech) - a wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitor which also contains a self-report user interface. The fatigability score will be calculated as the ratio of the self-reported fatigue intensity rating (using a 0-10 numerical rating score) divided by the participant's concurrent physical activity level (measured as the average number of activity counts per minute via actigraphy). All fatigability scores will be averaged over the 7 days to create an aggregate fatigability score. Higher scores indicate greater fatigability. Change in fatigability between baseline and 12 weeks will be compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Time Frame
Baseline-12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS, all MS subtypes); Age 18 years or older; Presence of chronic, problematic fatigue that, in the opinion of the patient, has interfered with their daily activities for ≥ 3 months; Average Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) score greater or equal to 4 at screening. Exclusion Criteria: Current shift work sleep disorder, or narcolepsy diagnosed with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test History of MS relapse within the last 30 days prior to screening (participants will be considered eligible after the 30-day window); Current stimulant or wake-promoting agent use (such as amantadine, modafinil, methylphenidate, or amphetamine) within 30 days of screening; Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Reliance on hormonal contraception AND concomitant unwillingness to use alternative non-hormonal means of birth control (spermicide or condoms) during the course of the study; Current suicidal ideation (SI) with intent or plan; Known hypersensitivity to modafinil or armodafinil or its inactive ingredients; History of the following cardiovascular conditions: recent myocardial infarction (last 6 months prior to screening), unstable angina, left ventricular hypertrophy, mitral valve prolapse, NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure; History of prescription or illicit stimulant abuse (such as cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine); Any other medical, neurological, or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, could affect participant safety or eligibility.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tiffany J Braley, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Washington
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16900749
Citation
Krupp L. Fatigue is intrinsic to multiple sclerosis (MS) and is the most commonly reported symptom of the disease. Mult Scler. 2006 Aug;12(4):367-8. doi: 10.1191/135248506ms1373ed. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17903208
Citation
Lerdal A, Celius EG, Krupp L, Dahl AA. A prospective study of patterns of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1338-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01974.x. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12409184
Citation
Janardhan V, Bakshi R. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the impact of fatigue and depression. J Neurol Sci. 2002 Dec 15;205(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00312-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3355400
Citation
Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988 Apr;45(4):435-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520280085020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16193900
Citation
Smith MM, Arnett PA. Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005 Oct;11(5):602-9. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1204oa.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8180914
Citation
Fisk JD, Pontefract A, Ritvo PG, Archibald CJ, Murray TJ. The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1994 Feb;21(1):9-14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8148458
Citation
Fisk JD, Ritvo PG, Ross L, Haase DA, Marrie TJ, Schlech WF. Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S79-83. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.supplement_1.s79.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2803071
Citation
Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14583691
Citation
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11556941
Citation
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Modafinil, or Both for Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs