Cognitive-motor Intervention Using Virtual Reality for Middle-aged Individuals at High Dementia Risk
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) focused on measuring Alzheimer's disease, virtual reality, cognitive training
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The participants of the study must have at least one parent with Alzheimer's disease.
- Fluency in Hebrew, in order to understand the instructions of the cognitive tests.
- Availability of an informant for the participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe neurological or psychological conditions that may affect cognitive performance.
- Substantial orthopedic limitations which prevent the use of treadmill.
- Unstable medical condition such as an active cancer.
- Incapability of adherence to the training program.
- The participant is undergoing a treatment that may interfere with the study program.
Sites / Locations
- Sheba Medical CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Experimental
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
No Intervention
VR cognitive tasks + treadmill
VR cognitive tasks - treadmill
scientific TV documentary + treadmill
Passive control
This is the primary group of interest, in which the investigators hypothesize the greatest cognitive gains since motor activity will augment cognitive activity.
This group will be an active control, receiving the VR cognitive training without treadmill walking, to examine whether the motor component augments the effect of the VR in the experimental group.
This group will watch a scientific TV documentary while walking on the treadmill. This control group will permit examination of whether the VR cognitive training, which requires an especially active cognitive effort while walking on the treadmill, is more advantageous than passively watching a scientific TV documentary while performing the same motor task as the experimental group.
This group of participants will not receive any intervention but will be assessed with the same battery of assessments as the other three groups, permitting comparisons of the cognitive and neurobiological outcomes of the intervention groups to that of the natural course of decline/deterioration of these at-risk individuals.