search
Back to results

Comapring Luteal Phase Support in IVF Patients Who Are at High Risk for Developing OHSS

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Decapeptyl
hCG luteal support
Sponsored by
Meir Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring Fertilization in vitro, Luteal Phase, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IVF treatment
  • GnRH antagonist protocol
  • GnRH agonist triggering of ovulation
  • High risk for OHSS as expressed by either E2 serum level >2500 pg/ml

Exclusion Criteria:

  • background maternal morbidity
  • Any protocol other than GnRH antagonist protocol
  • hCG triggering of ovulation
  • E2 serum level >4500 pg/ml
  • Aspiration of >25 ova
  • Embryo transfer prior to day 5

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Decapeptyl support

    hCG luteal support

    Arm Description

    S.C single luteal Decapeptyl 0.1 mg on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering

    S.C single luteal S.C recombinant hCG 50 micrograms on days 3 ovulation triggering

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Progesterone serum level

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    positive pregnancy test
    implantation rate
    clinical pregnancy rate
    clinical pregnancy is considered as a presence of a viable embryo (heart activity present)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 6, 2016
    Last Updated
    July 10, 2016
    Sponsor
    Meir Medical Center
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02827656
    Brief Title
    Comapring Luteal Phase Support in IVF Patients Who Are at High Risk for Developing OHSS
    Official Title
    Luteal Phase Support With Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Versus Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRh) Agonist in IVF Patients Who Are Risk for Developing OHSS
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    August 2016 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    August 2017 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2017 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Meir Medical Center

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to compare two luteal support protocols in In vitro fertilization patients (IVF) and are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We would like to determine whether luteal Decapeptyl on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering is as good as low dose hCG on day 3 post triggering..
    Detailed Description
    This is randomized clinical trial studying two luteal support protocols of In vitro fertilization patients (IVF) treated by a GnRH antagonist (GnRH ant) protocol and are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The randomization procedure will be performed by a third party in the hospital by using a randomization table: patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and giving their informed consent will be randomized into one of two arms. This study does not include any intervention affecting the ovarian stimulation and is solely intended to test the post ova pickup period. One arm will be treated by luteal Decapeptyl on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering. Second arm will be treated by low dose hCG on day 3 post triggering. All patients to be recruited are treated for acceptable IVF indications in Meir medical center (MMC) and their registry is computerized in the general system of MMC. For the purpose of the study we will use the only the data of patients recruited to the study and were giving their informed consent. Each patient recruited will have a unique study identity (ID) . The patients' information will be pooled from the computerized file into an Excel spread sheet: in this Excel file the names will be erased and only the unique study ID will appear. The information regarding the coding key will be kept as a hard copy in a locked room inside the IVF unit in a special study folder. The study was approved by MMC institutional Helsinki board. The data retrieved for each patients is not unique for the study but includes the basic variables monitored in every IVF cycle : Estradiol serum levels (E2), Progesterone serum levels (P), number of follicles as counted by trans-vaginal ultrasound, endometrial thickness as measured by trans-vaginal ultrasound, Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) dosing, number of stimulation days, number of eggs retrieved, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, number of embryos transferred, embryo quality, positive pregnancy test, implantation rate, presence of a clinical pregnancy, presence of OHSS. Since these are mandatory variables in the treatment we do not expect any missing data. In addition to these mandatory data the study patients will be performing two additional blood tests on day 3 post ovum pickup and on the transfer day itself (day 5 post ovum pickup) including Estradiol serum levels (E2) and Progesterone serum levels (P). Outcome measures: Day of transfer Progesterone serum levels, OHSS rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate. Sample size calculation based on Kol S et al 2015, regarding the day of transfer Progesterone level (pooled standard deviation: 40nmol/L), alpha of 5%, 80% power, then a non-inferiority study will require 22 patients in each group and a total of 44 patients. Once including an expected 10% chance of freeze all in this population we will include 50 patients. Statistical analysis: Analysis of data was performed using the SPSS 23.0 computer package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Normally distributed data were analyzed by student t test . χ2 or Fisher's exact test will be used for comparisons of rates and proportions. All P values were tested as two-sided and considered significant at less than 0.05.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Infertility
    Keywords
    Fertilization in vitro, Luteal Phase, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    50 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Decapeptyl support
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    S.C single luteal Decapeptyl 0.1 mg on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering
    Arm Title
    hCG luteal support
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    S.C single luteal S.C recombinant hCG 50 micrograms on days 3 ovulation triggering
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Decapeptyl
    Intervention Description
    luteal support as described and vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times a day
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    hCG luteal support
    Intervention Description
    luteal support as described and vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times a day
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Progesterone serum level
    Time Frame
    day 5 post ovum pickup
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    positive pregnancy test
    Time Frame
    9-12 days post embryo transfer
    Title
    implantation rate
    Time Frame
    30-33 days post embryo transfer
    Title
    clinical pregnancy rate
    Description
    clinical pregnancy is considered as a presence of a viable embryo (heart activity present)
    Time Frame
    30-33 days post embryo transfer

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    40 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: IVF treatment GnRH antagonist protocol GnRH agonist triggering of ovulation High risk for OHSS as expressed by either E2 serum level >2500 pg/ml Exclusion Criteria: background maternal morbidity Any protocol other than GnRH antagonist protocol hCG triggering of ovulation E2 serum level >4500 pg/ml Aspiration of >25 ova Embryo transfer prior to day 5
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Anat Klement, MD
    Email
    anat.klement@gmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Helsinki Committee MMC
    Phone
    97297471588
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Amir Wiser, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    MMC
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    21828116
    Citation
    Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2593-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der251. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25358904
    Citation
    Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, Aboulfoutouh I, van Wely M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10785212
    Citation
    Whelan JG 3rd, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000 May;73(5):883-96. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00491-x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15760966
    Citation
    Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grondahl ML, Westergaard L, Andersen CY. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1213-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh765. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21371705
    Citation
    Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a "freeze-all" strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):2029-33, 2033.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.163. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26507279
    Citation
    Kol S, Breyzman T, Segal L, Humaidan P. 'Luteal coasting' after GnRH agonist trigger - individualized, HCG-based, progesterone-free luteal support in 'high responders': a case series. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):747-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Comapring Luteal Phase Support in IVF Patients Who Are at High Risk for Developing OHSS

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs