search
Back to results

Combined Amplitude-integrated and Conventional EEG Monitoring in High-risk Critically Ill Neonates

Primary Purpose

Critically Ill

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EEG monitoring
Sponsored by
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Critically Ill focused on measuring Critically ill, High risk neonates

Eligibility Criteria

1 Day - 6 Months (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates admitted to our NICU
  • Neonates identified to require aEEG monitoring as per current NICU guidelines (all neonates receiving therapeutic hypothermia as well as neonates with clinical events suggestive of seizures)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates not eligible for EEG monitoring (e.g. patients with extensive cephalhematoma or subgaleal hemorrhage, interfering with the application of electrodes)

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Neonatology Tel Aviv Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

EEG monitoring

Arm Description

Neonates will receive their aEEG monitoring as soon as the indication for monitoring is established, and cEEG electrodes will be applied in parallel, as soon as an EEG technician is available, which should usually be within less than 16 hours, in many cases within 1-4 hours.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of seizures detected
Number of seizures detected via conventional, but not amplitude-integrated EEG Number of seizures detected via amplitude-integrated EEG that in fact were not seizures on interpretation via conventional EEG

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of events providing treatment-relevant information
Number of events where cEEG monitoring provide treatment-relevant information that would not have been available with aEEG monitoring alone Number of events where cEEG monitoring provide clinically relevant information that would not have been available with aEEG monitoring alone (e.g. abnormality of background activity, localization findings)

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2016
Last Updated
June 15, 2020
Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02925988
Brief Title
Combined Amplitude-integrated and Conventional EEG Monitoring in High-risk Critically Ill Neonates
Official Title
Combined Amplitude-integrated and Conventional EEG Monitoring in High-risk Critically Ill Neonates: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Study Start Date
January 5, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 22, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 22, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Over the past decade, technical advances have improved the efficiency of continuous EEG recording and remote review, leading to a steep increase in the number of continuous EEGs performed, and to an emerging change in what is considered the standard of care with regards to brain monitoring. Critically ill patients are at high risk for CNS insults, which can result in permanent neurologic disability if untreated. Non-convulsive status epilepticus and other secondary brain injuries are often unrecognized without continuous EEG monitoring. There is increasing evidence that continuous EEG monitoring facilitates early identification and management of changes in brain function, and a recent consensus statement concludes that "each center should provide critical care continuous EEG at the highest level that local resources allow". Neonatal neuro-intensive care is a rapidly developing field with a focus on monitoring of the developing brain. Without continuous EEG monitoring, neonates with paroxysmal events that are suspicious for seizures are treated with phenobarbital, often for many months, with inherent risks of side effects. Because paroxysmal events in neonates may or may not represent seizures, and electrographic seizures may have no discernable clinical correlate, this approach fails to adequately diagnose seizures and exposes neonates to possible harm, either by medication overuse for paroxysmal events that have no electrographic correlate, or by under-treatment of seizures without clinical manifestations. Amplitude-integrated EEG technology is now increasingly used as a simplified monitoring method, using fewer numbers of electrodes and usually being interpreted by a neonatologist or trainee. This model has been implemented at the investigators NICU. However, a recent systematic review came to the conclusion that amplitude-integrated EEG has relatively low and variable sensitivity and specificity, and therefore should not be the mainstay for diagnosis and management of neonatal seizures. Continuous video EEG monitoring is recommended as the gold standard for critically ill neonates, but is a very expensive and resource-intense method. An approach combining both techniques in a standardized algorithm may provide improved patient care in a resource-restricted environment. The investigators are planning to test this hypothesis in a pilot project.
Detailed Description
HYPOTHESIS An algorithm combining conventional and amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring will increase specificity and sensitivity of seizure detection in critically ill high-risk neonates in a resource-restricted environment. OBJECTIVES To describe the sensitivity and specificity of amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) relative to conventional EEG (cEEG) monitoring in high-risk critically ill neonates To evaluate the feasibility of an algorithm combining amplitude-integrated and conventional EEG monitoring in high-risk critically ill neonates Long-term Objectives The proposed pilot research project will provide fundamental information essential for designing a future larger scale study analyzing a standardized algorithm of combined continuous EEG monitoring for high-risk critically ill neonates at the investigators NICU, with the ultimate goal of preventing secondary brain injury in these patients. Parents of potentially eligible patients will be approached by a study team member and will receive study information. Consent will be attained after sufficient time to review the consent form and to ask questions. This is a prospective study. We are aiming to enroll 20 neonates at high risk for seizures, consecutively. Monitoring Electrode positioning: The aEEG and the cEEG consist of 3 to 5 and of 8 to 14 electrodes respectively. Neonatal EEG application and set up will follow the international standard protocol in use at the investigators NICU. The electrodes will not be replaced unless there is a signal interruption. A local skin lesions might occur, in very rare cases, when prolonged EEG ( over 2-3 days). Monitoring protocol: Neonates will receive their amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring as soon as the indication for monitoring is established, and conventional EEG electrodes will be applied in parallel, as soon as an EEG technician is available, which should usually be within less than 16 hours, in many cases within 1-4 hours. Amplitude-integrated EEGs will be read and interpreted continuously, as currently standard of care at the investigators NICU. Conventional EEGs will be interpreted by a neurologist. During the review process, the neurology conventional EEG interpretation team will be blinded to the results of the amplitude-integrated EEG read by the neonatology team, and vice versa. Electrographic seizure events or other clinically relevant findings (e.g. abnormalities of background activity) will be communicated to the NICU staff (in accordance with current practice). EEG monitoring will be performed for as long as current NICU guidelines require. Measures captured will include: Time and duration of seizures as per clinical observation Time and duration of seizure as per amplitude integrated EEG Time and duration of seizure as per conventional EEG Time and duration of background activity abnormality as per amplitude integrated EEG Time and duration of background activity abnormality as per conventional EEG Other relevant findings on amplitude integrated EEG (e.g. localization-related) Other relevant findings on conventional EEG (e.g. localization-related)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critically Ill
Keywords
Critically ill, High risk neonates

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
4 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
EEG monitoring
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Neonates will receive their aEEG monitoring as soon as the indication for monitoring is established, and cEEG electrodes will be applied in parallel, as soon as an EEG technician is available, which should usually be within less than 16 hours, in many cases within 1-4 hours.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
EEG monitoring
Intervention Description
Neonates will receive their amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring as soon as the indication for monitoring is established, and conventional EEG electrodes will be applied in parallel.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of seizures detected
Description
Number of seizures detected via conventional, but not amplitude-integrated EEG Number of seizures detected via amplitude-integrated EEG that in fact were not seizures on interpretation via conventional EEG
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of events providing treatment-relevant information
Description
Number of events where cEEG monitoring provide treatment-relevant information that would not have been available with aEEG monitoring alone Number of events where cEEG monitoring provide clinically relevant information that would not have been available with aEEG monitoring alone (e.g. abnormality of background activity, localization findings)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Day
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Neonates admitted to our NICU Neonates identified to require aEEG monitoring as per current NICU guidelines (all neonates receiving therapeutic hypothermia as well as neonates with clinical events suggestive of seizures) Exclusion Criteria: Neonates not eligible for EEG monitoring (e.g. patients with extensive cephalhematoma or subgaleal hemorrhage, interfering with the application of electrodes)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dror Mandel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Neonatology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Neonatology Tel Aviv Medical Center
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
64239
Country
Israel

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Combined Amplitude-integrated and Conventional EEG Monitoring in High-risk Critically Ill Neonates

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs