Combivent Respimat 1-year Safety Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Primary Purpose
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Combivent CFC-MDI
Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg
Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial.
- Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
- Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of 10 pack-years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded) Pack Years = Number of cigarettes/day x years of smoking 20 cigarettes/pack
- All patients must have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (P95-4381), and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1:Relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 80% of predicted normal and FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol. Predicted normal values will be calculated according to European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS), (R94-1408). For Height measured in inches Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.029 x age (yrs) - 2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.025 x age (yrs) - 2.60 For Height measured in meters Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (meters)] - 0.029 x age (years) -2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (meters)] - 0.025 x age (years) - 2.60
- Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures and maintain study records during the study period as required in the protocol.
- Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the RESPIMAT inhaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI).
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
- Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year.
- Patients with clinically unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy within the past year.
- Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with fully cured squamous cell or treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed).
- Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis.
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of a thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion No. 1.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of asthma.
- Patients with a history of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
- Patients with known active tuberculosis.
- Patients using beta blocker medications are excluded. Cardioselective beta blockers are allowed with caution. Beta blocker eye medications for treatment of non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
- Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP for sleep apnea is allowed).
- Patients using oral corticosteroid medication at a dose in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day, except as required for treatment of exacerbation during the study.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or transdermal hormonal patches). Abstinence will not be accepted as a medically approved means of contraception. Female patients will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or post-menopausal for at least two years.
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide/albuterol RESPIMAT solution including Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or the ipratropium bromide/albuterol Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) MDI or Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) components.
- Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.)
- Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.
- Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or 6 half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening.
- Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period.
Sites / Locations
- 1012.62.153 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.156 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.141 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.155 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.146 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.157 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.159 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.148 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.158 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.147 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.149 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.150 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.154 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.151 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.161 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.140 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.152 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
- 1012.62.101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Combivent Respimat 20/100 microgram(mcg)
Combivent CFC-MDI 36/206 microgram-mcg
Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA
Arm Description
patient to take 1 inhalation 4 times a day
patient to take 2 inhalations 4 times a day
patient to take 2 inhalations of each 4 times a day
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 0
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 0
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 0
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 0
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 0
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 3
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 12
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 24
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 36
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 48
Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations
Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01019694
First Posted
November 16, 2009
Last Updated
October 14, 2014
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01019694
Brief Title
Combivent Respimat 1-year Safety Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Official Title
Patient Acceptability of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuteroll Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and patient acceptability of COMBIVENT RESPIMAT Inhalation Spray as compared to the COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Chlorofluorocarbon-Metered Dose Inhaler (CFC-MDI) and the free combination of ATROVENT Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalation aerosols.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
470 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Combivent Respimat 20/100 microgram(mcg)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
patient to take 1 inhalation 4 times a day
Arm Title
Combivent CFC-MDI 36/206 microgram-mcg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
patient to take 2 inhalations 4 times a day
Arm Title
Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
patient to take 2 inhalations of each 4 times a day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Combivent CFC-MDI
Intervention Description
36/206 mcg Four times a day (QID)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg
Intervention Description
Open label randomized parallel
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg
Intervention Description
Open label randomized parallel
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
Description
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
48 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
Description
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
Description
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
Description
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
Description
Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
36 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 0
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
0 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
36 weeks
Title
Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48
Description
Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 0
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
0 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
36 weeks
Title
Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48
Description
CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 0
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
0 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
36 weeks
Title
Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48
Description
Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Time Frame
baseline, day 1
Title
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Time Frame
baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Time Frame
baseline, 48 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
Time Frame
baseline, day 1
Title
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
Time Frame
baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48
Description
Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
Time Frame
baseline, 48 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 0
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 0
Time Frame
0 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 3
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 12
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 24
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 36
Time Frame
36 weeks
Title
Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48
Description
Mean number of puffs of daily rescue medication use (albuterol use per 24 hour period) in two weeks prior to week 48
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization
Time Frame
48 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial.
Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of 10 pack-years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded) Pack Years = Number of cigarettes/day x years of smoking 20 cigarettes/pack
All patients must have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (P95-4381), and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1:Relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 80% of predicted normal and FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol. Predicted normal values will be calculated according to European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS), (R94-1408). For Height measured in inches Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.029 x age (yrs) - 2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.025 x age (yrs) - 2.60 For Height measured in meters Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (meters)] - 0.029 x age (years) -2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (meters)] - 0.025 x age (years) - 2.60
Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures and maintain study records during the study period as required in the protocol.
Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the RESPIMAT inhaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI).
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year.
Patients with clinically unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy within the past year.
Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with fully cured squamous cell or treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed).
Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis.
Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of a thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion No. 1.
Patients with a current diagnosis of asthma.
Patients with a history of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
Patients with known active tuberculosis.
Patients using beta blocker medications are excluded. Cardioselective beta blockers are allowed with caution. Beta blocker eye medications for treatment of non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP for sleep apnea is allowed).
Patients using oral corticosteroid medication at a dose in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day, except as required for treatment of exacerbation during the study.
Pregnant or nursing women.
Women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or transdermal hormonal patches). Abstinence will not be accepted as a medically approved means of contraception. Female patients will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or post-menopausal for at least two years.
Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide/albuterol RESPIMAT solution including Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or the ipratropium bromide/albuterol Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) MDI or Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) components.
Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.)
Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.
Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or 6 half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening.
Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boehringer Ingelheim
Organizational Affiliation
Boehringer Ingelheim
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
1012.62.153 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Jasper
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.156 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.135 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Berkeley
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.141 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.155 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.126 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Fort Collins
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.131 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Wheat Ridge
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.123 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Waterbury
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.114 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.124 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Deland
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.139 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Pensacola
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.134 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.115 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Winter Park
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.146 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.113 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Coeur d'Alene
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.157 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Dubuque
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.159 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Lafayette
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.148 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.137 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
North Dartmouth
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.132 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Livonia
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.158 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.127 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.129 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.147 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Cherry Hill
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.149 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Summit
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.112 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.111 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.107 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.150 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.154 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
East Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.128 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.130 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Easley
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.151 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.161 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.109 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.118 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.125 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.140 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.152 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Killeen
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.122 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Danville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.133 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
1012.62.101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23658479
Citation
Ferguson GT, Ghafouri M, Dai L, Dunn LJ. COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139-50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S38577. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/content/dam/internet/opu/clinicaltrial/com_EN/results/1012/1012.62_U11-3386-01.pdf
Description
Related Info
URL
http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/content/dam/internet/opu/clinicaltrial/com_EN/results/1012/1012.62_Literature.pdf
Description
Related Info
Learn more about this trial
Combivent Respimat 1-year Safety Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs