search
Back to results

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept
1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab
0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
Sponsored by
Jaeb Center for Health Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Macular Edema focused on measuring Diabetic Macular Edema, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Individuals <18 years old are not being included because DME is so rare in this age group that the diagnosis of DME may be questionable.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  • Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
  • Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
  • Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
  • Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or World Health Organization criteria (see Procedures Manual for definitions)
  • At least one eye meets the following study eye criteria:

    • Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity letter score ≤ 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and ≥ 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within eight days of randomization.
    • On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula.
    • Diabetic macular edema present on optical coherence tomography (OCT) (central subfield thickness on OCT >250 µm on Zeiss Stratus or the equivalent on spectral domain OCTs based on gender specific cutoffs), within eight days of randomization.
    • Investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality (for Zeiss Stratus, standard deviation of center point thickness should be ≤ 10% of the center point thickness and signal strength should be ≥ 6)
    • Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
  • A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).

    •Individuals in poor glycemic control who, within the last four months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next four months should not be enrolled.

  • Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied at the time of study entry.

    • Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.

  • Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
  • Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).

    • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.

  • Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization.
  • Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within four months prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study.

    • These drugs cannot be used during the study.

  • For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 24 months.
  • Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
  • Individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study.

The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the nonstudy eye):

  • Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  • An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are the primary cause of the macular edema.
  • An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  • An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.).
  • Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  • History of an anti-VEGF treatment for DME in the past 12 months or history of any other treatment for DME at any time in the past four months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids).
  • Enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 25% of the planned sample size with any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME. Once this number of eyes has been enrolled, any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME will be an exclusion criterion.
  • History of pan-retinal photocoagulation within four months prior to randomization or anticipated need for pan-retinal photocoagulation in the six months following randomization.
  • History of anti-VEGF treatment for a disease other than DME in the past 12 months.
  • History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior four months or anticipated within the next six months following randomization.
  • History of YAG capsulotomy performed within two months prior to randomization.
  • Aphakia.
  • Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.

Sites / Locations

  • Retina Associates
  • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
  • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
  • California Retina Consultants
  • Bay Area Retina Associates
  • Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
  • New England Retina Associates
  • Gulf Coast Retina Center
  • Retina Group of Florida
  • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
  • Central Florida Retina Institute
  • Ocala Eye Retina Consultants
  • Magruder Eye Institute
  • Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
  • Sarasota Retina Institute
  • Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
  • Emory Eye Center
  • Georgia Retina, P.C.
  • Thomas Eye Group
  • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
  • Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
  • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
  • University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
  • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
  • Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
  • Wolfe Eye Clinic
  • Retina Associates, P.A.
  • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
  • Paducah Retinal Center
  • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
  • Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC
  • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
  • Retina Vitrous Center
  • Retina Specialists of Michigan
  • Vitreo-Retinal Associates
  • Retina Center, PA
  • Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
  • Barnes Retina Institute
  • Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
  • The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS)
  • Eye Associates of New Mexico
  • University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
  • Montefiore Medical Center
  • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
  • MaculaCare
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Retina Associates of Western New York
  • University of Rochester
  • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
  • Western Carolina Retinal Associates, PA
  • University of North Carolina
  • Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
  • Wake Forest University Eye Center
  • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
  • Retina Vitreous Center
  • Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
  • Retina Northwest, PC
  • Casey Eye Institute
  • Family Eye Group
  • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
  • Retina Vitrous Consultants
  • Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina
  • Palmetto Retina Center
  • Carolina Retina Center
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
  • Southwest Retina Specialists
  • Austin Retina Associates
  • Retina Research Center
  • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
  • Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons
  • Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • Valley Retina Institute
  • Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
  • Retina Associates of Utah, P.C.
  • Virginia Retina Center
  • Retina Institute of Virginia
  • University of Washington Medical Center
  • Spokane Eye Clinic
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
  • Medical College of Wiconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Ranibizumab

Aflibercept

Bevacizumab

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Overall Change in Retinal Volume
Baseline volume values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 459 scans. One-year volume values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 472 scans. When calculating change in volume, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, because the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in volume was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 17 eyes.
Total Number of Injections Prior to 1 Year
Only includes participants that completed the 1 year visit
Total Number of Laser Treatments
Only includes participants that completed the 1 year visit.
Eyes Receiving 1 or More Alternative Treatments for DME Other Than Laser

Full Information

First Posted
June 21, 2012
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Genentech, Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01627249
Brief Title
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema
Acronym
Protocol T
Official Title
A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 18, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Genentech, Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although multiple studies have suggested that treatment with ranibizumab is safe and efficacious and superior to focal/grid laser alone for patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME), there may be barriers in place to widespread adoption of ranibizumab use given its high cost per dose and the need for multiple treatments over time. Prioritizing resources from a public health policy perspective could be easier if more precise estimates regarding the risks and benefits of other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies were available, especially when the difference in costs could be billions of dollars over just a few years. Thus, there is a clear rationale at this time to explore potential anti-VEGF alternatives to ranibizumab that might prove to be as or more efficacious, might deliver equally lasting or longer-lasting treatment effects, and cost substantially less. Of the potentially available alternative anti-VEGF agents for this trial, bevacizumab and aflibercept are the best candidates for a direct comparison study. Bevacizumab shares the most similar molecular structure, costs far less, and is widely available. Furthermore, there is already preliminary evidence to suggest that it may be efficacious in the treatment of DME and it is already being widely used for this indication. Although aflibercept has a similar cost per unit dose to ranibizumab, it has the potential to decrease treatment burden and associated cost. If results from a comparative trial demonstrate improved efficacy or suggest similar efficacy of bevacizumab or aflibercept over ranibizumab, this information might give clinicians scientific rationale to substitute either one of these drugs for ranibizumab in the treatment of DME, and might thereby have substantial implications for public policy in terms of future estimates of health care dollars and possibly number of treatments necessary for anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular disease. Because of its availability and lower cost, bevacizumab is already currently in widespread clinical use for treatment of DME despite the lack of FDA approval for this indication. Thus, a clinical trial that suggested whether bevacizumab could be used as a safe and efficacious alternative to ranibizumab could substantially impact nationwide practice patterns for treatment of DME by either validating the current use of bevacizumab or by demonstrating improved outcomes with ranibizumab or aflibercept treatment for DME. Study Objective The primary objective of the proposed research is to compare the efficacy and safety of (1) intravitreal aflibercept, (2) intravitreal bevacizumab, and (3) intravitreal ranibizumab when given to treat central-involved DME in eyes with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320.
Detailed Description
A five year follow-up visit is being conducted to gather information on long term outcomes

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Macular Edema
Keywords
Diabetic Macular Edema, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
660 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ranibizumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Aflibercept
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Bevacizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept
Intervention Description
Intravitreal injection of 2.0 mg aflibercept at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab
Intervention Description
Intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
Intervention Description
Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis™) at baseline and up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year
Description
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year
Title
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69
Description
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year
Title
Change in Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline to 1-year: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69
Description
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness
Description
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Time Frame
baseline to 1-year
Title
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score <69
Description
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Time Frame
baseline to 1-year
Title
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness: Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score 78-69
Description
All baseline and 1-year optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were graded by Duke Reading Center. In addition, a random sample of OCT images from other visits and images for which the investigator believed central grading was needed also were graded by Duke Reading Center. Baseline CSF values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 583 scans. One-year CSF values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 604 scans. When calculating change in CSF thickness, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, since the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in CSF thickness was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up thickness value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 26 eyes.
Time Frame
baseline to 1-year
Title
Overall Change in Retinal Volume
Description
Baseline volume values were converted from the thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 459 scans. One-year volume values were converted from a thickness value measured on a Spectralis or Cirrus OCT machine to a Stratus equivalent value for 472 scans. When calculating change in volume, measurements taken on the same machine at both visits were not converted, because the conversion equation slope is nearly 1 and the constant difference does not affect the change calculation. Therefore, change in volume was calculated after converting either the baseline and/or follow-up value from Spectralis or Cirrus to a Stratus equivalent value in 17 eyes.
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year
Title
Total Number of Injections Prior to 1 Year
Description
Only includes participants that completed the 1 year visit
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year
Title
Total Number of Laser Treatments
Description
Only includes participants that completed the 1 year visit.
Time Frame
between 24 weeks and 1 year
Title
Eyes Receiving 1 or More Alternative Treatments for DME Other Than Laser
Time Frame
Baseline to 1-year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Individuals <18 years old are not being included because DME is so rare in this age group that the diagnosis of DME may be questionable. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present: Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or World Health Organization criteria (see Procedures Manual for definitions) At least one eye meets the following study eye criteria: Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity letter score ≤ 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and ≥ 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within eight days of randomization. On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula. Diabetic macular edema present on optical coherence tomography (OCT) (central subfield thickness on OCT >250 µm on Zeiss Stratus or the equivalent on spectral domain OCTs based on gender specific cutoffs), within eight days of randomization. Investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality (for Zeiss Stratus, standard deviation of center point thickness should be ≤ 10% of the center point thickness and signal strength should be ≥ 6) Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs Able and willing to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control). •Individuals in poor glycemic control who, within the last four months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next four months should not be enrolled. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied at the time of study entry. • Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study. Known allergy to any component of the study drug. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible. Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization. Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within four months prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study. • These drugs cannot be used during the study. For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 24 months. Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed. Individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study. The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the nonstudy eye): Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema. An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are the primary cause of the macular edema. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition). An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.). Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal). History of an anti-VEGF treatment for DME in the past 12 months or history of any other treatment for DME at any time in the past four months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids). Enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 25% of the planned sample size with any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME. Once this number of eyes has been enrolled, any history of anti-VEGF treatment for DME will be an exclusion criterion. History of pan-retinal photocoagulation within four months prior to randomization or anticipated need for pan-retinal photocoagulation in the six months following randomization. History of anti-VEGF treatment for a disease other than DME in the past 12 months. History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior four months or anticipated within the next six months following randomization. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within two months prior to randomization. Aphakia. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John A Wells, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Palmetto Retina Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Retina Associates
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
City
Palm Desert
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92211
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Retina Consultants
City
Santa Barbara
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay Area Retina Associates
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
City
Westlake Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91361
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Retina Associates
City
Norwich
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Coast Retina Center
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Group of Florida
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Florida Retina Institute
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ocala Eye Retina Consultants
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34474
Country
United States
Facility Name
Magruder Eye Institute
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Retina Institute
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory Eye Center
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Retina, P.C.
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Thomas Eye Group
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore University HealthSystem
City
Glenview
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60026
Country
United States
Facility Name
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46280
Country
United States
Facility Name
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
City
Dubuque
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52002
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wolfe Eye Clinic
City
West Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50266
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates, P.A.
City
Shawnee Mission
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40509-1802
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paducah Retinal Center
City
Paducah
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21237
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287-9277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joslin Diabetes Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Vitrous Center
City
Grand Blanc
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48439
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Specialists of Michigan
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49525
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vitreo-Retinal Associates
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49525
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Center, PA
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Barnes Retina Institute
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
City
Portsmouth
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03801
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS)
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eye Associates of New Mexico
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
871310001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467-2401
Country
United States
Facility Name
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
MaculaCare
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Western New York
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14618
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Western Carolina Retinal Associates, PA
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28803
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599-7040
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Eye Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
City
Beachwood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Case Western Reserve University
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Vitreous Center
City
Edmond
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Northwest, PC
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Casey Eye Institute
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Family Eye Group
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17601-2644
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Vitrous Consultants
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29169
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29223
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Retina Specialists
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Retina Associates
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Research Center
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79424
Country
United States
Facility Name
Valley Retina Institute
City
McAllen
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78240
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Utah, P.C.
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Retina Center
City
Leesburg
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
20176
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Institute of Virginia
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23235
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spokane Eye Clinic
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99204
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wiconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26605836
Citation
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Connor CG, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Association of Baseline Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness With 1-Year Efficacy of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):127-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4599. Erratum In: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;134(4):469.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26935357
Citation
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Brucker AJ, Ferris FL, Hampton GR, Jhaveri C, Melia M, Beck RW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26087135
Citation
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Bressler NM. Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Three Comparisons for the Price of 1 Study From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;133(9):983-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1880. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27711918
Citation
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Bressler NM, Wells JA, Ayala AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Additional Efficacy Post Hoc Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3698.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27280850
Citation
Ross EL, Hutton DW, Stein JD, Bressler NM, Jampol LM, Glassman AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26222565
Citation
Wells JA 3rd, Glassman AR, Jampol LM. Targeting the Effect of VEGF in Diabetic Macular Edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):481-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505684. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28152135
Citation
Bressler NM, Glassman AR, Hutton DW. Controversies in Using Off-Label Intravitreous Bevacizumab for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema-Reply. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 1;135(3):291-292. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5686. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28448655
Citation
Bressler SB, Liu D, Glassman AR, Blodi BA, Castellarin AA, Jampol LM, Kaufman PL, Melia M, Singh H, Wells JA; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Change in Diabetic Retinopathy Through 2 Years: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):558-568. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0821.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29392288
Citation
Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Glassman AR, Blinder KJ, Bressler SB, Jampol LM, Melia M, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):257-269. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565. Erratum In: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):601.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29625440
Citation
Glassman AR, Liu D, Jampol LM, Sun JK; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Changes in Blood Pressure and Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio in a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1199-1205. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22853.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29525602
Citation
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, Liu D, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Duh EJ, Quaggin S, Wells JA, Wykoff CC; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Plasma Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentrations after Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1054-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30077569
Citation
Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Maguire MG, Glassman AR, Blinder KJ, Bressler SB, Gonzalez VH, Jampol LM, Melia M, Sun JK, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Early Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Two-Year Outcomes Among Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema in Protocol T. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;195:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30676635
Citation
Bressler SB, Odia I, Maguire MG, Dhoot DS, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Marcus DM, Solomon SD, Sun JK; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Factors Associated With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Changes When Treating Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 1;137(4):382-389. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6786. Erratum In: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 1;140(10):1030.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31246237
Citation
Bressler NM, Odia I, Maguire M, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, MacCumber MW, Shah C, Rosberger D, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Association Between Change in Visual Acuity and Change in Central Subfield Thickness During Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Participants Randomized to Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 1;137(9):977-985. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1963.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27993277
Citation
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):e5-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.032. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28219510
Citation
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Ayala A, Bressler NM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Mar;124(3):e26-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.001. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28335949
Citation
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Bressler NM, Ayala AR, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2017 Apr;124(4):e38-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.032. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30318048
Citation
Glassman AR, Duh EJ, Liu D, Jampol LM. Reply. Ophthalmology. 2018 Nov;125(11):e82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.004. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25692915
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Arnold-Bush B, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34934034
Citation
Pawloff M, Bogunovic H, Gruber A, Michl M, Riedl S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. SYSTEMATIC CORRELATION OF CENTRAL SUBFIELD THICKNESS WITH RETINAL FLUID VOLUMES QUANTIFIED BY DEEP LEARNING IN THE MAJOR EXUDATIVE MACULAR DISEASES. Retina. 2022 May 1;42(5):831-841. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003385.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32722799
Citation
Roberts PK, Vogl WD, Gerendas BS, Glassman AR, Bogunovic H, Jampol LM, Schmidt-Erfurth UM. Quantification of Fluid Resolution and Visual Acuity Gain in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Using Deep Learning: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 1;138(9):945-953. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2457.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs