Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
Primary Purpose
Dental Caries
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients in need of Class I and Class II restorations in premolars and molars.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with fewer than 20 teeth
- Patients exhibiting poor oral hygiene or uncontrolled periodontal disease
- Pregnant women or lactating mothers
- Patients with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials
- Patients with medical conditions that would contraindicate dental treatment
- Patients with xerostomia
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Adhesive without acid pretreatment
Adhesive with acid pretreatment
Arm Description
Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Color Match
The color match will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for matching with adjacent teeth and stability of color matching over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
Alpha= Restoration matches adjacent tooth structure in shade and/or translucency.
Bravo= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is within normal range of tooth shades.
Charlie= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is outside normal range of tooth shades.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Marginal Discoloration
Marginal discoloration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
Alpha= No visual evidence of marginal discoloration. Bravo= Marginal discoloration present but has not penetrated in a pulpal direction.
Charlie= Marginal discoloration has penetrated in a pulpal direction.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Marginal Integrity
Change in marginal integrity will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Explorer does not catch or slight catch with no visible crevice. B= Explorer catches and crevice is visible but no exposure of dentin or base. C= Explorer penetrates crevice and defect extended to amelo-dentinal junction. D= Restoration is fractured, mobile, or missing in part or in toto.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)
Change in presence of secondary dental caries will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= No caries present. D= Caries present associated with the restoration.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Note: Secondary caries is a categorical, dichotomous variable, i.e. there is caries or not. This was assessed clinically and radiographically by a trained professional (dentist).
Presence of Restoration Fractures (Localized or Bulk)
The restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for presence of fractures over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Smooth restoration surface with no irregularities. B= Slightly rough or pitted restoration surface. Can be refinished. C= Deeply pitted or grooved (not related to anatomy) restoration finish. Can not be refinished.
D= Restoration surface is fractured or flaking.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Post-operative Sensitivity
Patient will be interviewed to assess post-operative sensitivity according to the following criteria:
A= No sensitivity. B= Mild sensitivity. C= Moderate sensitivity with no restoration replacement required. D= Sever sensitivity. Replacement of restoration is required.
Tooth sensitivity will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up appointment using cold thermal test (Endo-Ice, Hygienic) and Electric Pulp Test (EPT) when indicated.
Surface Condition of Restoration
The change in surface condition of restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Restoration is continuous with existing anatomic form. B= Restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form but missing material is not sufficient to expose dentin or lining.
C= Sufficient restorative material is lost to expose dentin.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Gingival Inflammation Index
Patient's gingiva will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
0 = Normal gingiva.
= Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding upon probing.
= Moderate inflammation, redness; edema and glazing; bleeding upon palpation.
= Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Note: At 6 months data was not reported. At Baseline, all patients presented a score of 0. Any patient with a score greater than zero would have been excluded at baseline.
Patients who received Class I restorations were not assessed as these restorations are limited to the chewing surface and not related to the health of gums.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02071953
First Posted
February 21, 2014
Last Updated
November 2, 2022
Sponsor
Dentsply International
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02071953
Brief Title
Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of an Experimental Universal Adhesive Used With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment in Posterior Composite Resin Restorations
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Dentsply International
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.
Detailed Description
The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent (adhesive) for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Caries
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
37 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Adhesive without acid pretreatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Arm Title
Adhesive with acid pretreatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Intervention Description
Experimental adhesive without phosphoric acid in posterior restorations
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Intervention Description
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in posterior restorations
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Color Match
Description
The color match will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for matching with adjacent teeth and stability of color matching over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
Alpha= Restoration matches adjacent tooth structure in shade and/or translucency.
Bravo= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is within normal range of tooth shades.
Charlie= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is outside normal range of tooth shades.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Marginal Discoloration
Description
Marginal discoloration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
Alpha= No visual evidence of marginal discoloration. Bravo= Marginal discoloration present but has not penetrated in a pulpal direction.
Charlie= Marginal discoloration has penetrated in a pulpal direction.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Marginal Integrity
Description
Change in marginal integrity will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Explorer does not catch or slight catch with no visible crevice. B= Explorer catches and crevice is visible but no exposure of dentin or base. C= Explorer penetrates crevice and defect extended to amelo-dentinal junction. D= Restoration is fractured, mobile, or missing in part or in toto.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)
Description
Change in presence of secondary dental caries will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= No caries present. D= Caries present associated with the restoration.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Note: Secondary caries is a categorical, dichotomous variable, i.e. there is caries or not. This was assessed clinically and radiographically by a trained professional (dentist).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Presence of Restoration Fractures (Localized or Bulk)
Description
The restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for presence of fractures over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Smooth restoration surface with no irregularities. B= Slightly rough or pitted restoration surface. Can be refinished. C= Deeply pitted or grooved (not related to anatomy) restoration finish. Can not be refinished.
D= Restoration surface is fractured or flaking.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Post-operative Sensitivity
Description
Patient will be interviewed to assess post-operative sensitivity according to the following criteria:
A= No sensitivity. B= Mild sensitivity. C= Moderate sensitivity with no restoration replacement required. D= Sever sensitivity. Replacement of restoration is required.
Tooth sensitivity will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up appointment using cold thermal test (Endo-Ice, Hygienic) and Electric Pulp Test (EPT) when indicated.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Surface Condition of Restoration
Description
The change in surface condition of restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
A= Restoration is continuous with existing anatomic form. B= Restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form but missing material is not sufficient to expose dentin or lining.
C= Sufficient restorative material is lost to expose dentin.
*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
Title
Gingival Inflammation Index
Description
Patient's gingiva will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time.
Assessments will be done to the following criteria:
0 = Normal gingiva.
= Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding upon probing.
= Moderate inflammation, redness; edema and glazing; bleeding upon palpation.
= Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding.
As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
Note: At 6 months data was not reported. At Baseline, all patients presented a score of 0. Any patient with a score greater than zero would have been excluded at baseline.
Patients who received Class I restorations were not assessed as these restorations are limited to the chewing surface and not related to the health of gums.
Time Frame
18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients in need of Class I and Class II restorations in premolars and molars.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with fewer than 20 teeth
Patients exhibiting poor oral hygiene or uncontrolled periodontal disease
Pregnant women or lactating mothers
Patients with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials
Patients with medical conditions that would contraindicate dental treatment
Patients with xerostomia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ricardo Walter, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alan M. Atlas, DMD
Organizational Affiliation
Academy House of Professional Offices
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs