search
Back to results

Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment

Primary Purpose

Dental Caries

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
Sponsored by
Dentsply International
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in need of Class I and Class II restorations in premolars and molars.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with fewer than 20 teeth
  • Patients exhibiting poor oral hygiene or uncontrolled periodontal disease
  • Pregnant women or lactating mothers
  • Patients with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials
  • Patients with medical conditions that would contraindicate dental treatment
  • Patients with xerostomia

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Adhesive without acid pretreatment

    Adhesive with acid pretreatment

    Arm Description

    Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.

    Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Color Match
    The color match will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for matching with adjacent teeth and stability of color matching over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= Restoration matches adjacent tooth structure in shade and/or translucency. Bravo= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is within normal range of tooth shades. Charlie= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is outside normal range of tooth shades. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Marginal Discoloration
    Marginal discoloration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= No visual evidence of marginal discoloration. Bravo= Marginal discoloration present but has not penetrated in a pulpal direction. Charlie= Marginal discoloration has penetrated in a pulpal direction. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Marginal Integrity
    Change in marginal integrity will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Explorer does not catch or slight catch with no visible crevice. B= Explorer catches and crevice is visible but no exposure of dentin or base. C= Explorer penetrates crevice and defect extended to amelo-dentinal junction. D= Restoration is fractured, mobile, or missing in part or in toto. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)
    Change in presence of secondary dental caries will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= No caries present. D= Caries present associated with the restoration. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: Secondary caries is a categorical, dichotomous variable, i.e. there is caries or not. This was assessed clinically and radiographically by a trained professional (dentist).
    Presence of Restoration Fractures (Localized or Bulk)
    The restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for presence of fractures over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Smooth restoration surface with no irregularities. B= Slightly rough or pitted restoration surface. Can be refinished. C= Deeply pitted or grooved (not related to anatomy) restoration finish. Can not be refinished. D= Restoration surface is fractured or flaking. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Post-operative Sensitivity
    Patient will be interviewed to assess post-operative sensitivity according to the following criteria: A= No sensitivity. B= Mild sensitivity. C= Moderate sensitivity with no restoration replacement required. D= Sever sensitivity. Replacement of restoration is required. Tooth sensitivity will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up appointment using cold thermal test (Endo-Ice, Hygienic) and Electric Pulp Test (EPT) when indicated.
    Surface Condition of Restoration
    The change in surface condition of restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Restoration is continuous with existing anatomic form. B= Restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form but missing material is not sufficient to expose dentin or lining. C= Sufficient restorative material is lost to expose dentin. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Gingival Inflammation Index
    Patient's gingiva will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: 0 = Normal gingiva. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding upon probing. = Moderate inflammation, redness; edema and glazing; bleeding upon palpation. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: At 6 months data was not reported. At Baseline, all patients presented a score of 0. Any patient with a score greater than zero would have been excluded at baseline. Patients who received Class I restorations were not assessed as these restorations are limited to the chewing surface and not related to the health of gums.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 21, 2014
    Last Updated
    November 2, 2022
    Sponsor
    Dentsply International
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02071953
    Brief Title
    Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
    Official Title
    Clinical Evaluation of an Experimental Universal Adhesive Used With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment in Posterior Composite Resin Restorations
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    April 2012 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 2014 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    September 2014 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Dentsply International

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.
    Detailed Description
    The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent (adhesive) for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Dental Caries

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    37 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Adhesive without acid pretreatment
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
    Arm Title
    Adhesive with acid pretreatment
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Experimental adhesive w/out phosphoric acid in post. rest.
    Intervention Description
    Experimental adhesive without phosphoric acid in posterior restorations
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in post. rest.
    Intervention Description
    Experimental adhesive with phosphoric acid in posterior restorations
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Color Match
    Description
    The color match will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for matching with adjacent teeth and stability of color matching over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= Restoration matches adjacent tooth structure in shade and/or translucency. Bravo= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is within normal range of tooth shades. Charlie= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is outside normal range of tooth shades. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Marginal Discoloration
    Description
    Marginal discoloration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= No visual evidence of marginal discoloration. Bravo= Marginal discoloration present but has not penetrated in a pulpal direction. Charlie= Marginal discoloration has penetrated in a pulpal direction. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Marginal Integrity
    Description
    Change in marginal integrity will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Explorer does not catch or slight catch with no visible crevice. B= Explorer catches and crevice is visible but no exposure of dentin or base. C= Explorer penetrates crevice and defect extended to amelo-dentinal junction. D= Restoration is fractured, mobile, or missing in part or in toto. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)
    Description
    Change in presence of secondary dental caries will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= No caries present. D= Caries present associated with the restoration. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: Secondary caries is a categorical, dichotomous variable, i.e. there is caries or not. This was assessed clinically and radiographically by a trained professional (dentist).
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Presence of Restoration Fractures (Localized or Bulk)
    Description
    The restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* for presence of fractures over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Smooth restoration surface with no irregularities. B= Slightly rough or pitted restoration surface. Can be refinished. C= Deeply pitted or grooved (not related to anatomy) restoration finish. Can not be refinished. D= Restoration surface is fractured or flaking. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Post-operative Sensitivity
    Description
    Patient will be interviewed to assess post-operative sensitivity according to the following criteria: A= No sensitivity. B= Mild sensitivity. C= Moderate sensitivity with no restoration replacement required. D= Sever sensitivity. Replacement of restoration is required. Tooth sensitivity will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up appointment using cold thermal test (Endo-Ice, Hygienic) and Electric Pulp Test (EPT) when indicated.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Surface Condition of Restoration
    Description
    The change in surface condition of restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Restoration is continuous with existing anatomic form. B= Restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form but missing material is not sufficient to expose dentin or lining. C= Sufficient restorative material is lost to expose dentin. *As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.
    Title
    Gingival Inflammation Index
    Description
    Patient's gingiva will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: 0 = Normal gingiva. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding upon probing. = Moderate inflammation, redness; edema and glazing; bleeding upon palpation. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: At 6 months data was not reported. At Baseline, all patients presented a score of 0. Any patient with a score greater than zero would have been excluded at baseline. Patients who received Class I restorations were not assessed as these restorations are limited to the chewing surface and not related to the health of gums.
    Time Frame
    18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients in need of Class I and Class II restorations in premolars and molars. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with fewer than 20 teeth Patients exhibiting poor oral hygiene or uncontrolled periodontal disease Pregnant women or lactating mothers Patients with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials Patients with medical conditions that would contraindicate dental treatment Patients with xerostomia
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Ricardo Walter, DDS
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Pennsylvania
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alan M. Atlas, DMD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Academy House of Professional Offices
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs