Comparative Study of Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia
Primary Purpose
Hyperbilirubinemia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft blue LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy)
Metal halide phototherapy (Spot PT metal halide phototherapy)
LED bank phototherapy (Natus neoBlue LED bank phototherapy)
Metal halide plus LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft and Spot PT)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hyperbilirubinemia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- > 23 0/7 weeks gestation
- > 500 grams
- Non-hemolytic or presumed physiologic jaundice (within the first 14 days of life)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known congenital infection (proven bacterial or viral etiology)
- Known hemolytic diseases such as but not limited to ABO or Rh incompatibility, minor blood group incompatibility, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, or hereditary red blood cell membrane defects (Coombs or DAT positive)
- Suspected genetic, syndromic, or hepatic disorder-
Sites / Locations
- Christiana Hospital
- University of Tennessee
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
1
2
3
4
Arm Description
LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy
metal halide phototherapy
LED bank phototherapy
Combination metal halide phototherapy plus LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The LED Fiberoptic Phototherapy System and metal halide spot phototherapy are will show no difference in therapeutic treatment times compared to the LED Bank Light System.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Combination Phototherapy Systems will show a 20% shorter treatment time compared to single treatment methods alone.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00635375
Brief Title
Comparative Study of Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia
Official Title
A Comparative Study Between BiliSoft Blue LED Fiberoptic Blanket Phototherapy, Giraffe Spot PT Phototherapy, Natus Blue LED Bank Light Phototherapy, and BiliSoft + Giraffe Spot PT Combination Therapy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2008 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
GE Healthcare
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Hyperbilirubinemia is a common problem for term and preterm newborns in intensive care nurseries around the world. It is a condition in which there is too much bilirubin in the blood. Bilirubin is a substance that is naturally released when red blood cells break down. In the early newborn period, multiple factors lead to an abnormally elevated bilirubin level. Large amounts of bilirubin can circulate to tissues in the brain and may cause seizures or brain damage. About 6.1% of term newborns and a higher percentage of preterm newborns develop hyperbilirubinemia that requires treatment. Initiating treatment depends on many factors, including the cause of the hyperbilirubinemia, the level of serum indirect bilirubin, the rate of indirect bilirubin rise, and the age of the patient. The goal of treatment is to keep the level of bilirubin from rising to dangerous levels.
The bilirubin molecule absorbs light. Therefore, treatment of hyperbilirubinemia involves exposure of the baby's skin to special blue spectrum light. Phototherapy is globally recognized as the standard of care for treatment of elevated indirect hyperbilirubinemia in the neonatal period. This light exposure converts water-insoluble indirect bilirubin to a more easily excreted soluble molecule. Over the last five years, several devices have been introduced that emit high intensity light in the blue portion of the visible light spectrum. However, despite frequent use of such therapy, the effectiveness of different phototherapy devices has not been adequately compared. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of the blue LED fiberoptic phototherapy with the metal halide spot phototherapy versus blue LED bank light phototherapy versus a combination of tandem therapy on lowering to total serum bilirubin.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hyperbilirubinemia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
82 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
metal halide phototherapy
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
LED bank phototherapy
Arm Title
4
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Combination metal halide phototherapy plus LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft blue LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy)
Other Intervention Name(s)
BiliSoft blue LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy
Intervention Description
35-50 mW/cm2/nm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Metal halide phototherapy (Spot PT metal halide phototherapy)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Spot PT metal halide phototherapy
Intervention Description
29.3-57.6 mW/cm2/nm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LED bank phototherapy (Natus neoBlue LED bank phototherapy)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Natus neoBlue LED bank phototherapy
Intervention Description
12-35 mW/cm2/nm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Metal halide plus LED fiberoptic blanket phototherapy (BiliSoft and Spot PT)
Other Intervention Name(s)
BiliSoft and Spot PT
Intervention Description
29.3-57.6 mW/cm2/nm and 35-50 mW/cm2/nm
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The LED Fiberoptic Phototherapy System and metal halide spot phototherapy are will show no difference in therapeutic treatment times compared to the LED Bank Light System.
Time Frame
14 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combination Phototherapy Systems will show a 20% shorter treatment time compared to single treatment methods alone.
Time Frame
14 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Day
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
1 Month
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
> 23 0/7 weeks gestation
> 500 grams
Non-hemolytic or presumed physiologic jaundice (within the first 14 days of life)
Exclusion Criteria:
Known congenital infection (proven bacterial or viral etiology)
Known hemolytic diseases such as but not limited to ABO or Rh incompatibility, minor blood group incompatibility, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, or hereditary red blood cell membrane defects (Coombs or DAT positive)
Suspected genetic, syndromic, or hepatic disorder-
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wendy Sturtz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Christiana Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Christiana Hospital
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19718
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Tennessee
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37920
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparative Study of Phototherapy for Hyperbilirubinemia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs