Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
Primary Purpose
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Cinacalcet
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary focused on measuring Secondary Hyperthyroidism, Hemodialysis, Parathyroid, PARADIGM
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years at screening
- Treated with maintenance hemodialysis 3 times a week for ≥ 3 months prior to screening
- Informed consent provided by the study candidate
- For subjects NOT receiving cinacalcet and/or vitamin D therapy for SHPT within 60 days prior to enrollment: Plasma PTH levels ≥ 450 pg/mL (50 pmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory and, Serum corrected total calcium ≥ 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L) and < 10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parathyroidectomy in the 12 weeks before the date of informed consent
- History of seizure within 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Scheduled for kidney transplant
- Parathyroidectomy anticipated within the next 6 months
- Liver function tests > than 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
- Prior use of bisphosphonates, or expected to receive bisphosphonates during the trial
- Subject has previously enrolled in this study
- General
- Other investigational procedures are excluded
- Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
- Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least one month (women) and 3 months (men) after the end of treatment
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during study or within 1 month after the end of treatment Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for at least 1 month after the end of treatment
- Subject has known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the protocol required therapies
- Subject will not be available for protocol-required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
- Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Cinacalcet
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Mean PTH during EAP is defined as the mean of values at study weeks 40, 44, 48 and 52
Secondary Outcome Measures
Treatment Comparison of >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Number of participants achieving a >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Treatment Comparison of Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Number of participants achieving Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01181531
Brief Title
Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet Versus Traditional Vitamin D Therapy for Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 17, 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 14, 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Amgen
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet to manage plasma parathyroid levels as to compared traditional vitamin D therapy, whether given orally or intravenously, among hemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism when the doses are adjusted appropriately to maintain serum calcium and phosphorous levels with currently recommended ranges.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
Keywords
Secondary Hyperthyroidism, Hemodialysis, Parathyroid, PARADIGM
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
312 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Cinacalcet
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
Intervention Description
Traditional vitamin D therapy (eg, calcitriol, paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, doxercalciferol), to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in this study will be administered according to strategies that have been used in clinical practice and that conform to current therapeutic recommendations and available clinical practice guidelines and product labeling.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cinacalcet
Intervention Description
Subjects randomized to treatment with cinacalcet will receive an initial oral dose of 30 mg once daily. Doses will be titrated incrementally to 60, 90,120, and 180 mg per day based upon periodic measurements of serum calcium and plasma PTH levels. Cinacalcet is formulated as light green tablets in 30, 60, and 90 mg free-based equivalents. Tablets will be 30, 60, and 90 mg, graduated in size, smallest to largest. Combinations of these 3 fixed dosage formulations will be used to achieve the 120 and 180 mg daily doses.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Description
Mean PTH during EAP is defined as the mean of values at study weeks 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time Frame
Baseline to week 40-52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment Comparison of >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Description
Number of participants achieving a >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Time Frame
Baseline to week 40-52
Title
Treatment Comparison of Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Description
Number of participants achieving Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Time Frame
week 40-52
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years at screening
Treated with maintenance hemodialysis 3 times a week for ≥ 3 months prior to screening
Informed consent provided by the study candidate
For subjects NOT receiving cinacalcet and/or vitamin D therapy for SHPT within 60 days prior to enrollment: Plasma PTH levels ≥ 450 pg/mL (50 pmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory and, Serum corrected total calcium ≥ 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L) and < 10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory
Exclusion Criteria:
Parathyroidectomy in the 12 weeks before the date of informed consent
History of seizure within 12 weeks prior to randomization
Scheduled for kidney transplant
Parathyroidectomy anticipated within the next 6 months
Liver function tests > than 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
Prior use of bisphosphonates, or expected to receive bisphosphonates during the trial
Subject has previously enrolled in this study
General
Other investigational procedures are excluded
Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least one month (women) and 3 months (men) after the end of treatment
Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during study or within 1 month after the end of treatment Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for at least 1 month after the end of treatment
Subject has known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the protocol required therapies
Subject will not be available for protocol-required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MD
Organizational Affiliation
Amgen
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25904755
Citation
Wetmore JB, Gurevich K, Sprague S, Da Roza G, Buerkert J, Reiner M, Goodman W, Cooper K. A Randomized Trial of Cinacalcet versus Vitamin D Analogs as Monotherapy in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (PARADIGM). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):1031-40. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07050714. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25873267
Citation
Sprague SM, Wetmore JB, Gurevich K, Da Roza G, Buerkert J, Reiner M, Goodman W, Cooper K. Effect of Cinacalcet and Vitamin D Analogs on Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 during the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):1021-30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03270314. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.amgentrials.com
Description
AmgenTrials clinical trials website
Learn more about this trial
Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs