search
Back to results

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of CinnaGen Beta Erythropoietin (CinnaPoietin®) Versus Eprex® on the Treatment of Anemia in ESRD Hemodialysis Patients

Primary Purpose

Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CinnaPoietin®
Eprex®
Nephrovit
Vitamin B12 Injection
Sponsored by
Cinnagen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease focused on measuring End-Stage Renal Disease, Anemia, Erythropoietin, Hemoglobin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 70
  • ESRD patients who are on hemodialysis for ≥3 months.
  • Hb level 8- 11.5 g/dl
  • Patients are on adequate hemodialysis: the minimally adequate dose of hemodialysis given 3 times per week should be a spKt/V (single-pool delivered Kt/V; clearance of urea x dialysis time/volume of distribution) of 1.2 per dialysis. For treatment periods of less than 5 hours, an alternative minimum dose is a urea reduction rate (URR) of 65%. All types of hemodialysis systems and hemodiafiltration, including high-flux membranes are allowed as long as there is no plan to change the patient's regimen during the study.
  • Sufficient iron stores, defined as serum ferritin ≥ 200 ng/ml and transferrin saturation ≥20%. (Patients not meeting these criteria may receive iron supplementation therapy during the Screening and stabilization period to appropriately correct their iron store deficiency to meet the criterion required for randomization);
  • Ability to comply with study medication use, study visits, and study procedures as judged by the investigator;
  • Females of childbearing potential agree to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., abstinence, hormonal or barrier methods, partner sterilization, or IUD) for the duration of the study.
  • Qualified and willing to sign the informed consent form with the commitment of complying with all the scheduled visits, and study procedures as judged by the investigator;
  • In any circumstances that potential participants are not able to give consent, it may be given by responsible parents or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg);
  • Anemia secondary to other causes different to the CKD (e.g. multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia, leukemia;….)
  • Decompensated liver failure;
  • Clinical evidence of concurrent uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (defined as serum parathyroid hormone (iPTH) > 800 pg/ml);
  • Heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV];
  • Unstable angina pectoris, active cardiac disease, stroke and/or cardiac infarction within the last 6 months;
  • History of or active blood coagulation disorders including DVT, PTE, native access Thrombosis during last 6 months.
  • Thrombocytosis (platelet count > 500,000/µl);
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/µl);
  • White blood cell count < 3,000/µl);
  • White blood cell count >15,000/µl)
  • Recent Bleeding (acute or chronic bleeding within three months prior to screening);
  • Suspicion of or confirmed occult bleeding (increased reticulocyte count);
  • Clinical evidence of concurrent systemic infection, or inflammatory disease (e.g; diabetic foot, bed sore, access infection, CRP> 30 mg/l,…)
  • Currently receiving treatment for epilepsy;
  • Major surgery within 3 months prior to randomization and during the conduct of the trial (except vascular access surgery);
  • Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy; patients on a short course of steroids (up to 7 days), topical or intranasal steroids are allowed in the study;
  • History of any malignant disease within the last 5 years (except excised non-melanoma skin cancer);
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Known history of severe drug-related allergies;
  • Known history of drug related allergy to Erythropoietin or one of the ingredients of the test or the reference products or hypersensitivity to mammalian-derived products;
  • Transplant received within one year prior to the start of the study;
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or having received an Investigational Medicinal Product within three months before randomization in this study.
  • Psychiatric, addictive (drugs or alcohol) or any other disorder that compromises the ability to give an informed consent;
  • Any red blood cell transfusion during the last 3 months (measured at the time of eligibility verification);
  • Primary hematological disorder (e.g. myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloma, sickle cell anemia, hematological malignancy, multiple myeloma hemolytic anemia);
  • known resistance to the rHuEPO defined by a requirement > 450 IU/kg/week by IV or 300 IU/kg/week by SC, equivalent to approximately 20.000 IU/week SC and in absence of iron deficiency;
  • who have suffered an event of active bleeding in the 30 days prior to the beginning of the study;
  • Morbid obesity, defined by a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 37 kg/m2 in women and > 40 kg/m2 in men.

Sites / Locations

  • Javad-al-Aemeh clinic
  • SHAFA Hospital
  • Haj Ebrahimi dialysis center
  • Ghiasi hospital
  • Hashemi Nezhad Hospital
  • Imam Hussein Hospital
  • Madar dialysis center
  • Milad Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

CinnaPoietin®

Eprex®

Arm Description

The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response. In addition to main intervention, Nephrovit tablet/day and vitamine B12 100 mcg/month will be prescribed for patients.

The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response. In addition to main intervention, Nephrovit tablet/day and vitamine B12 100 mcg/month will be prescribed for patients.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Hb Change Level During the Last Four Weeks of Treatment
The primary endpoints of this study is to assess mean Hb change level during the last four weeks of treatment.
Mean Weekly Epoetin Dosage Per kg Body Weight During the Last Four Weeks of Treatment
The mean weekly epoetin dosage per kg body weight during the last four weeks of treatment necessary to maintain the Hb level within 10-12 g/dl during the last four weeks of treatment is considered as the second primary endpoint.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The Proportion of Patients With Any Permanent or Transient Dose Change
The proportion of patients with any permanent or transient dose change during 26 weeks.
The Proportion of Patients With Any Hb Measurement Outside the Target Range (10-12 g/dl)
The proportion of patients with any Hb measurement outside the target range (10-12 g/dl) during 26 weeks.
The Proportion of Patients Needed Blood Transfusions
The proportion of patients needed blood transfusions during 26 weeks.
The Proportion of Patients With Treatment Success
Treatment success is considered as Hb concentration equal to or more than 11.0 g/dl and two consecutive weeks without any blood transfusion within the preceding three months
The Proportion of Patients With Maintenance Success
Maintenance success is considered as maintenance success is considered as maintenance of mean Hb concentration of 11.0 ± 1.0 g/dl for at least four consecutive weeks
The Percentage of Patients With Hb Measurements More Than 10.0 g/dl
The percentage of patients with Hb measurements more than 10.0 g/dl from week 22 to week 26.
The Percentage of Patients With Hematocrit Measurements More Than 30%
The percentage of patients with hematocrit measurements more than 30% from week 22 to week 26.
The Incidence of Hb Levels Above 13 g/dl
The first safety endpoint is the proportion of patients with at least one Hb measurement above 13 g/dL.
The Proportion of Patients With an Increase in Hb Concentration of > 1.0 g/dl for Four Consecutive Weeks
The proportion of patients with an increase in Hb concentration of > 1.0 g/dl for four consecutive weeks during 26 weeks.
The Incidence of Adverse Events
The incidence of adverse events during 26 weeks.

Full Information

First Posted
December 12, 2017
Last Updated
December 8, 2019
Sponsor
Cinnagen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03408639
Brief Title
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of CinnaGen Beta Erythropoietin (CinnaPoietin®) Versus Eprex® on the Treatment of Anemia in ESRD Hemodialysis Patients
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomized, Two Armed, Parallel, Double Blind (Patient and Assessor Blinded), Active Controlled Non Inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non Inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between CinnaPoietin® (Beta Erythropoietin) and Eprex® (Epoetin Alpha) on the Treatment of Anemia in ESRD Hemodialysis Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 22, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 19, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 19, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cinnagen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Phase III, randomized, two-armed, parallel, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial is designed to compare efficacy and safety of CinnaPoietin® (Beta erythropoietin) and Eprex® (epoetin alpha) on the treatment of anemia in 156 End-Stage Renal Disease hemodialysis patients. 156 patients have been planned to randomize and assign to receive CinnaPoietin® or Eprex® for a 26-week period. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is the similar dose of the previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be made based on patients' response. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of CinnaPoietin® with Eprex®. The secondary objectives of this study are further comparison and evaluation of efficacy along with safety between CinnaPoietin® and Eprex®.
Detailed Description
This study is a phase III, randomized, two-armed, parallel, double-blind (patient and assessor blinded), active-controlled noninferiority clinical trial to determine the non-inferior therapeutic efficacy and safety between CinnaPoietin® (Beta erythropoietin) and Eprex® (epoetin alpha) on the treatment of anemia in ESRD patient under hemodialysis. After signing the written informed consents, 156 patients have been planned to randomize and assign to receive CinnaPoietin® or Eprex® for a 26-weeks period. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is the similar dose of the previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be made based on patients' response. In addition to main intervention, Nephrovit tablet/day and B12 100 mcg/month were prescribed for patients. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of CinnaPoietin® with Eprex®. The secondary objectives of this study are further comparison and evaluation of efficacy and safety. The clinical trial will be conducted according to the GCP considerations. A comprehensive validation check program is used to verify the data, and discrepancy reports are generated accordingly for resolution by the investigator. In order to ensure the use of standard and unified procedure of each test, monitoring of each site and laboratory site are going to be applied by sponsor monitoring team and CRO as external monitoring team. The same prefilled syringe is used for CinnaPoietin® to be sure that there is no difference between CinnaPoietin® and Eprex® as brand drug. The drugs will be relabeled, and the same label is used for both prefilled syringe. So neither investigators nor subjects are able to notice any differences between them and are blind to the assignment. Determination of sample size 156 patients will be equally (1:1) divided into intervention arms (78 in each group considering drop out) for achieving 80% power in order to determine non-inferiority using a one-sided, independent sample t-test. The margin of non-inferiority is -1.00. The true difference between the means is assumed to be -0.500. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The data are drawn from populations with standard deviations of 1.200 and 1.200.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease
Keywords
End-Stage Renal Disease, Anemia, Erythropoietin, Hemoglobin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
156 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CinnaPoietin®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response. In addition to main intervention, Nephrovit tablet/day and vitamine B12 100 mcg/month will be prescribed for patients.
Arm Title
Eprex®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response. In addition to main intervention, Nephrovit tablet/day and vitamine B12 100 mcg/month will be prescribed for patients.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CinnaPoietin®
Other Intervention Name(s)
Beta erythropoietin
Intervention Description
The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Eprex®
Other Intervention Name(s)
Epoetin alpha
Intervention Description
The starting dose of Erythropoietin is 60 (50-100) IU/kg body weight/week for naïve patients. Administration dose for patients who are treated with erythropoietin is similar dose of previously administered amount (IV or SC without any change). After then, dose adjustment will be done based on patients' response.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nephrovit
Intervention Description
Nephrovit tablet is daily administered to all the patients.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin B12 Injection
Intervention Description
Vitamin B12 is monthly injected to all the patients.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Hb Change Level During the Last Four Weeks of Treatment
Description
The primary endpoints of this study is to assess mean Hb change level during the last four weeks of treatment.
Time Frame
Week 22 to week 26
Title
Mean Weekly Epoetin Dosage Per kg Body Weight During the Last Four Weeks of Treatment
Description
The mean weekly epoetin dosage per kg body weight during the last four weeks of treatment necessary to maintain the Hb level within 10-12 g/dl during the last four weeks of treatment is considered as the second primary endpoint.
Time Frame
Week 22 to week 26
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Proportion of Patients With Any Permanent or Transient Dose Change
Description
The proportion of patients with any permanent or transient dose change during 26 weeks.
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Proportion of Patients With Any Hb Measurement Outside the Target Range (10-12 g/dl)
Description
The proportion of patients with any Hb measurement outside the target range (10-12 g/dl) during 26 weeks.
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Proportion of Patients Needed Blood Transfusions
Description
The proportion of patients needed blood transfusions during 26 weeks.
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Proportion of Patients With Treatment Success
Description
Treatment success is considered as Hb concentration equal to or more than 11.0 g/dl and two consecutive weeks without any blood transfusion within the preceding three months
Time Frame
Week 12 to week 26
Title
The Proportion of Patients With Maintenance Success
Description
Maintenance success is considered as maintenance success is considered as maintenance of mean Hb concentration of 11.0 ± 1.0 g/dl for at least four consecutive weeks
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Percentage of Patients With Hb Measurements More Than 10.0 g/dl
Description
The percentage of patients with Hb measurements more than 10.0 g/dl from week 22 to week 26.
Time Frame
Week 22 to week 26
Title
The Percentage of Patients With Hematocrit Measurements More Than 30%
Description
The percentage of patients with hematocrit measurements more than 30% from week 22 to week 26.
Time Frame
Week 22 to week 26
Title
The Incidence of Hb Levels Above 13 g/dl
Description
The first safety endpoint is the proportion of patients with at least one Hb measurement above 13 g/dL.
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Proportion of Patients With an Increase in Hb Concentration of > 1.0 g/dl for Four Consecutive Weeks
Description
The proportion of patients with an increase in Hb concentration of > 1.0 g/dl for four consecutive weeks during 26 weeks.
Time Frame
26 weeks
Title
The Incidence of Adverse Events
Description
The incidence of adverse events during 26 weeks.
Time Frame
26 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged between 18 and 70 ESRD patients who are on hemodialysis for ≥3 months. Hb level 8- 11.5 g/dl Patients are on adequate hemodialysis: the minimally adequate dose of hemodialysis given 3 times per week should be a spKt/V (single-pool delivered Kt/V; clearance of urea x dialysis time/volume of distribution) of 1.2 per dialysis. For treatment periods of less than 5 hours, an alternative minimum dose is a urea reduction rate (URR) of 65%. All types of hemodialysis systems and hemodiafiltration, including high-flux membranes are allowed as long as there is no plan to change the patient's regimen during the study. Sufficient iron stores, defined as serum ferritin ≥ 200 ng/ml and transferrin saturation ≥20%. (Patients not meeting these criteria may receive iron supplementation therapy during the Screening and stabilization period to appropriately correct their iron store deficiency to meet the criterion required for randomization); Ability to comply with study medication use, study visits, and study procedures as judged by the investigator; Females of childbearing potential agree to use an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., abstinence, hormonal or barrier methods, partner sterilization, or IUD) for the duration of the study. Qualified and willing to sign the informed consent form with the commitment of complying with all the scheduled visits, and study procedures as judged by the investigator; In any circumstances that potential participants are not able to give consent, it may be given by responsible parents or guardian. Exclusion Criteria: Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg); Anemia secondary to other causes different to the CKD (e.g. multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia, leukemia;….) Decompensated liver failure; Clinical evidence of concurrent uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (defined as serum parathyroid hormone (iPTH) > 800 pg/ml); Heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV]; Unstable angina pectoris, active cardiac disease, stroke and/or cardiac infarction within the last 6 months; History of or active blood coagulation disorders including DVT, PTE, native access Thrombosis during last 6 months. Thrombocytosis (platelet count > 500,000/µl); Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/µl); White blood cell count < 3,000/µl); White blood cell count >15,000/µl) Recent Bleeding (acute or chronic bleeding within three months prior to screening); Suspicion of or confirmed occult bleeding (increased reticulocyte count); Clinical evidence of concurrent systemic infection, or inflammatory disease (e.g; diabetic foot, bed sore, access infection, CRP> 30 mg/l,…) Currently receiving treatment for epilepsy; Major surgery within 3 months prior to randomization and during the conduct of the trial (except vascular access surgery); Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy; patients on a short course of steroids (up to 7 days), topical or intranasal steroids are allowed in the study; History of any malignant disease within the last 5 years (except excised non-melanoma skin cancer); Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding; Known history of severe drug-related allergies; Known history of drug related allergy to Erythropoietin or one of the ingredients of the test or the reference products or hypersensitivity to mammalian-derived products; Transplant received within one year prior to the start of the study; Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or having received an Investigational Medicinal Product within three months before randomization in this study. Psychiatric, addictive (drugs or alcohol) or any other disorder that compromises the ability to give an informed consent; Any red blood cell transfusion during the last 3 months (measured at the time of eligibility verification); Primary hematological disorder (e.g. myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloma, sickle cell anemia, hematological malignancy, multiple myeloma hemolytic anemia); known resistance to the rHuEPO defined by a requirement > 450 IU/kg/week by IV or 300 IU/kg/week by SC, equivalent to approximately 20.000 IU/week SC and in absence of iron deficiency; who have suffered an event of active bleeding in the 30 days prior to the beginning of the study; Morbid obesity, defined by a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 37 kg/m2 in women and > 40 kg/m2 in men.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Javad-al-Aemeh clinic
City
Kerman
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
SHAFA Hospital
City
Kerman
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Haj Ebrahimi dialysis center
City
Shiraz
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Ghiasi hospital
City
Tehran
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Hashemi Nezhad Hospital
City
Tehran
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Imam Hussein Hospital
City
Tehran
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Madar dialysis center
City
Tehran
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Facility Name
Milad Hospital
City
Tehran
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12076240
Citation
Astor BC, Muntner P, Levin A, Eustace JA, Coresh J. Association of kidney function with anemia: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 24;162(12):1401-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.12.1401.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18498676
Citation
McLean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993-2005. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Apr;12(4):444-54. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008002401. Epub 2008 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4982112
Citation
Brittin GM, Brecher G, Johnson CA, Elashoff RM. Stability of blood in commonly used anticoagulants. Use of refrigerated blood for quality control of the Coulter Counter Model S. Am J Clin Pathol. 1969 Dec;52(6):690-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/52.6.690. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15206425
Citation
Locatelli F, Aljama P, Barany P, Canaud B, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Horl WH, Macdougal IC, Macleod A, Wiecek A, Cameron S; European Best Practice Guidelines Working Group. Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 May;19 Suppl 2:ii1-47. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh1032. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15758012
Citation
Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):1011-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041809. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15327419
Citation
Fehr T, Ammann P, Garzoni D, Korte W, Fierz W, Rickli H, Wuthrich RP. Interpretation of erythropoietin levels in patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency and anemia. Kidney Int. 2004 Sep;66(3):1206-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00880.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8555638
Citation
Ross RP, McCrea JB, Besarab A. Erythropoietin response to blood loss in hemodialysis patients in blunted but preserved. ASAIO J. 1994 Jul-Sep;40(3):M880-5. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00122.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4825851
Citation
Lipschitz DA, Cook JD, Finch CA. A clinical evaluation of serum ferritin as an index of iron stores. N Engl J Med. 1974 May 30;290(22):1213-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197405302902201. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18922994
Citation
Rambod M, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Combined high serum ferritin and low iron saturation in hemodialysis patients: the role of inflammation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1691-701. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01070308. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10469862
Citation
Fernandez-Rodriguez AM, Guindeo-Casasus MC, Molero-Labarta T, Dominguez-Cabrera C, Hortal-Casc n L, Perez-Borges P, Vega-Diaz N, Saavedra-Santana P, Palop-Cubillo L. Diagnosis of iron deficiency in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Sep;34(3):508-13. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70079-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7645533
Citation
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Hoffken B, Wunsch H, Fink H, Kleiner M, Luft FC. Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in renal failure patients during the post-erythropoietin era. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Aug;26(2):292-9. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90649-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
699405
Citation
Aljama P, Ward MK, Pierides AM, Eastham EJ, Ellis HA, Feest TG, Conceicao S, Kerr DN. Serum ferritin concentration: a reliable guide to iron overload in uremic and hemodialyzed patients. Clin Nephrol. 1978 Sep;10(3):101-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9387132
Citation
Barany P, Eriksson LC, Hultcrantz R, Pettersson E, Bergstrom J. Serum ferritin and tissue iron in anemic dialysis patients. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1997;23(3-6):273-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6645029
Citation
Blumberg AB, Marti HR, Graber CG. Serum ferritin and bone marrow iron in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. JAMA. 1983 Dec 23-30;250(24):3317-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
49205
Citation
Hussein S, Prieto J, O'Shea M, Hoffbrand AV, Baillod RA, Moorhead JF. Serum ferritin assay and iron status in chronic renal failure and haemodialysis. Br Med J. 1975 Mar 8;1(5957):546-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5957.546.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
577960
Citation
Mirahmadi KS, Paul WL, Winer RL, Dabir-Vaziri N, Byer B, Gorman JT, Rosen SM. Serum ferritin level. Determinant of iron requirement in hemodialysis patients. JAMA. 1977 Aug 15;238(7):601-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.238.7.601.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18525001
Citation
Spinowitz BS, Kausz AT, Baptista J, Noble SD, Sothinathan R, Bernardo MV, Brenner L, Pereira BJ. Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Aug;19(8):1599-605. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007101156. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11316241
Citation
Silverberg DS, Blum M, Agbaria Z, Deutsch V, Irony M, Schwartz D, Baruch R, Yachnin T, Steinbruch S, Iaina A. The effect of i.v. iron alone or in combination with low-dose erythropoietin in the rapid correction of anemia of chronic renal failure in the predialysis period. Clin Nephrol. 2001 Mar;55(3):212-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20019121
Citation
Stancu S, Barsan L, Stanciu A, Mircescu G. Can the response to iron therapy be predicted in anemic nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Mar;5(3):409-16. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04280609. Epub 2009 Dec 17. Erratum In: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Nov;5(11):2137-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7611266
Citation
Fishbane S, Frei GL, Maesaka J. Reduction in recombinant human erythropoietin doses by the use of chronic intravenous iron supplementation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Jul;26(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90151-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8643170
Citation
Sunder-Plassmann G, Horl WH. Importance of iron supply for erythropoietin therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995 Nov;10(11):2070-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8914038
Citation
Macdougall IC, Tucker B, Thompson J, Tomson CR, Baker LR, Raine AE. A randomized controlled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin. Kidney Int. 1996 Nov;50(5):1694-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.487.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11863124
Citation
Chang CH, Chang CC, Chiang SS. Reduction in erythropoietin doses by the use of chronic intravenous iron supplementation in iron-replete hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2002 Feb;57(2):136-41. doi: 10.5414/cnp57136.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14640239
Citation
DeVita MV, Frumkin D, Mittal S, Kamran A, Fishbane S, Michelis MF. Targeting higher ferritin concentrations with intravenous iron dextran lowers erythropoietin requirement in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2003 Nov;60(5):335-40. doi: 10.5414/cnp60335.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18845368
Citation
Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A, Paul M, Leibovici L, Shpilberg O, Gafter U. Intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of anemia in CKD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):897-906. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.033. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8716991
Citation
Senger JM, Weiss RJ. Hematologic and erythropoietin responses to iron dextran in the hemodialysis environment. ANNA J. 1996 Jun;23(3):319-23; discussion 324-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8739277
Citation
Navarro JF, Teruel JL, Liano F, Marcen R, Ortuno J. Effectiveness of intravenous administration of Fe-gluconate-Na complex to maintain adequate body iron stores in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 1996;16(4):268-72. doi: 10.1159/000169008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11427634
Citation
Tessitore N, Solero GP, Lippi G, Bassi A, Faccini GB, Bedogna V, Gammaro L, Brocco G, Restivo G, Bernich P, Lupo A, Maschio G. The role of iron status markers in predicting response to intravenous iron in haemodialysis patients on maintenance erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Jul;16(7):1416-23. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.7.1416.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16316362
Citation
Van Wyck DB, Roppolo M, Martinez CO, Mazey RM, McMurray S; United States Iron Sucrose (Venofer) Clinical Trials Group. A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Kidney Int. 2005 Dec;68(6):2846-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00758.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1902285
Citation
Allegra V, Mengozzi G, Vasile A. Iron deficiency in maintenance hemodialysis patients: assessment of diagnosis criteria and of three different iron treatments. Nephron. 1991;57(2):175-82. doi: 10.1159/000186246.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18212498
Citation
Li H, Wang SX. Intravenous iron sucrose in Chinese hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. Blood Purif. 2008;26(2):151-6. doi: 10.1159/000113529. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20439566
Citation
Palmer SC, Navaneethan SD, Craig JC, Johnson DW, Tonelli M, Garg AX, Pellegrini F, Ravani P, Jardine M, Perkovic V, Graziano G, McGee R, Nicolucci A, Tognoni G, Strippoli GF. Meta-analysis: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 6;153(1):23-33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-1-201007060-00252. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20189050
Citation
Parfrey PS, Wish T. Quality of life in CKD patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Mar;55(3):423-5. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.014. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20031287
Citation
Gandra SR, Finkelstein FO, Bennett AV, Lewis EF, Brazg T, Martin ML. Impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on energy and physical function in nondialysis CKD patients with anemia: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Mar;55(3):519-34. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.019. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20133033
Citation
Johansen KL, Finkelstein FO, Revicki DA, Gitlin M, Evans C, Mayne TJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise tolerance and physical functioning in dialysis patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Mar;55(3):535-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20843249
Citation
Solomon SD, Uno H, Lewis EF, Eckardt KU, Lin J, Burdmann EA, de Zeeuw D, Ivanovich P, Levey AS, Parfrey P, Remuzzi G, Singh AK, Toto R, Huang F, Rossert J, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA; Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT) Investigators. Erythropoietic response and outcomes in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1146-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005109.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30253403
Citation
Azmandian J, Abbasi MR, Pourfarziani V, Nasiri AA, Ossareh S, Ezzatzadegan Jahromi S, Sanadgol H, Amini S, Shahvaroughi Farahani A. Comparing Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Epoetin Beta and Epoetin Alfa in the Treatment of Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease Hemodialysis Patients. Am J Nephrol. 2018;48(4):251-259. doi: 10.1159/000493097. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of CinnaGen Beta Erythropoietin (CinnaPoietin®) Versus Eprex® on the Treatment of Anemia in ESRD Hemodialysis Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs