Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures
Primary Purpose
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Technological Methods
Regular Fluoroscopy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal focused on measuring endovascular, aortic, repair, navigation, DynaCT, position, sensor
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: AAA with diameter > 5,0 cm suitable for endovascular technique Normal creatinine > 60 years of age Exclusion Criteria: Known heart failure or unstable coronary disease Other morbidity than normally contraindicates endovascular treatment
Sites / Locations
- St Olavs Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Measure time (s) for defining renal branch
Measure time (s) for inserting guidewire into "second limb"
Number of attempts for inserting guidewire into "second limb"
Measure total time (min) for entire procedure
Measure the total of x-ray dose (mGy/m2)
Measure the total of contrast fluid used (ml)
Define type I leak between stent graft and aortic wall
Measure distance (mm) between stent graft and renal arteries
Measure difference (mm) in actual position and position in 3D image when pointing at the femoral division with an optic pointer
Measure difference (mm) of the position of the renal arteries defined by optical pointer and angiography (both marked extracorporal with a needle)
Secondary Outcome Measures
1 questionnaire: "Can 3D image and navigation technology simplify and secure endovascular procedures?"
2 questionnaire: "Do you believe in further development of this technology?"
3 questionnaire: "Have both renal arteries unaltered flow?"
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00355940
First Posted
July 24, 2006
Last Updated
April 26, 2013
Sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
SINTEF Health Research, St. Olavs Hospital, The Research Council of Norway
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00355940
Brief Title
Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures
Official Title
Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures Traditional Fluoroscopy Navigation Based on Preoperative CT and Intraoperative DynaCT
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
SINTEF Health Research, St. Olavs Hospital, The Research Council of Norway
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators want to test a navigation system for guidance during insertion of stent graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms. The navigation system consists of software developed by SINTEF Health, a custom made catheter with a micro position sensor in the tip and an emitter than induces an electromagnetic field around the patient. Preoperative CT- and intraoperative DynaCT- data are reconstructed into 3 dimensional images. The 3 dimensional images are loaded into the navigation system. Then the magnetic field, in which the patient finds himself, is calibrated with the 3 dimensional images. When the catheter is inserted into the iliac artery and aorta, the position sensor (in the tip of the catheter) is displayed in real time at the exact anatomic location in the 3 dimensional image.
Null hypothesis (H0):
Insertion of stent graft is performed equally satisfactorily with fluoroscopy alone as with both fluoroscopy and new navigation technology
Alternative hypothesis (H2):
Insertion of stent graft is NOT performed equally satisfactorily with fluoroscopy alone as with both fluoroscopy and new navigation technology
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Keywords
endovascular, aortic, repair, navigation, DynaCT, position, sensor
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Technological Methods
Other Intervention Name(s)
Custom made devices in addition to Siemens angiography suite
Intervention Description
Usage of technological methods and devices to improve intravascular navigation during endovascular aortic repair.
In this arm we first use an optical pointer to allocate the femoral artery ramification (point of incision) and the lower renal artery (upper confinement of stent graft). Later we use an electromagnetically tracked catheter to find and enter the opening in the main stent graft before placing the second limb. For both optical and electromagnetic tracking we use a custom made navigation system based on 3 dimensional CT images
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Regular Fluoroscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Siemens angiography suite
Intervention Description
Usage of conventional fluoroscopy and angiography for intravascular navigation. In this arm standard endovascular aortic repair is performed. The only means of navigation are fluoroscopy and angiography with overlay function (standard).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Measure time (s) for defining renal branch
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure time (s) for inserting guidewire into "second limb"
Time Frame
900 sec
Title
Number of attempts for inserting guidewire into "second limb"
Time Frame
900 sec
Title
Measure total time (min) for entire procedure
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure the total of x-ray dose (mGy/m2)
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure the total of contrast fluid used (ml)
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Define type I leak between stent graft and aortic wall
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure distance (mm) between stent graft and renal arteries
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure difference (mm) in actual position and position in 3D image when pointing at the femoral division with an optic pointer
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
Measure difference (mm) of the position of the renal arteries defined by optical pointer and angiography (both marked extracorporal with a needle)
Time Frame
No time frame
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
1 questionnaire: "Can 3D image and navigation technology simplify and secure endovascular procedures?"
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
2 questionnaire: "Do you believe in further development of this technology?"
Time Frame
No time frame
Title
3 questionnaire: "Have both renal arteries unaltered flow?"
Time Frame
No time frame
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
AAA with diameter > 5,0 cm suitable for endovascular technique
Normal creatinine
> 60 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
Known heart failure or unstable coronary disease
Other morbidity than normally contraindicates endovascular treatment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frode Manstad-Hulaas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Petter Aadahl, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Toril N Hernes, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
SINTEF Health Research
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St Olavs Hospital
City
Trondheim
ZIP/Postal Code
7006
Country
Norway
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22313205
Citation
Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Dahl T, Hernes TA, Aadahl P. Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb;19(1):70-8. doi: 10.1583/11-3557.1.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs