search
Back to results

Comparing G6PD Tests Using Capillary Blood Versus Venous Blood

Primary Purpose

Glucose-6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Thailand
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
G6PD Test
Sponsored by
PATH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Glucose-6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency focused on measuring Glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, capillary, venous, genotype phenotype correlation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous G6PD test at SMRU clinic
  • Patient willing to participate and sign informed consent form
  • Patient willing to allow donated sample to be used in future research
  • Subjects 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with severe malaria or other severe illness
  • Patients who received a blood transfusion in the last 3 months
  • Patients who received primaquine in the past 1 month (this is to ensure that previous characterization of phenotype in the healthy subject has not been influenced by a recent hemolytic reaction)

Sites / Locations

  • Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

No Intervention

Arm Label

G6PD Testing

Arm Description

All subjects receive G6PD test

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Correlation of capillary and venous blood results using Trinity quantitative G6PD test
Comparison of the performance of the Trinity quantitative test using capillary blood, vs the performance of the same test using venous blood.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Concordance between a flow cytometry-based G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standard
Percent agreement between the quantitative results of the flow cytometry assay and the quantitative results of the spectrophotometric assay.
Categorical accuracy of a flow cytometry-based G6PD test against the spectrophotometric gold standard and genotyping
Using a predefined cutoff to categorize values from each quantitative test, determine percent agreement within each category between the two tests.
Concordance between a qualitative G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standard
Compare sensitivity & specificity of qualitative results of the G6PD test and the categorical results of the quantitative spectrophotometric assay.
Categorical accuracy of qualitative G6PD test against spectrophotometric gold standard
Percent agreement between the qualitative G6PD test and the categorical results of the spectrophotometric gold standard
Association between flow cytometry-based test and sample genotype
Determine accuracy of phenotypic results of flow cytometry assay against genetic profile.

Full Information

First Posted
February 14, 2014
Last Updated
August 18, 2015
Sponsor
PATH
Collaborators
Mahidol University, University of Oxford
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02069236
Brief Title
Comparing G6PD Tests Using Capillary Blood Versus Venous Blood
Official Title
Correlation of G6PD Activity Across Different Sample Sources, and Different G6PD Testing Platforms
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
PATH
Collaborators
Mahidol University, University of Oxford

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In this study we propose to determine the correlation in glucose-6phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in capillary blood obtained from a finger stick versus a venous blood specimen. As secondary endpoints we will seek to correlate phenotype as determined by quantitative and qualitative G6PD test, genotype as determined by PCR and DNA sequencing with flow cytometry. The secondary endpoints are critical for the design of G6PD diagnostic test evaluation studies.
Detailed Description
In this study we propose to determine the correlation in glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in capillary blood obtained from a finger stick versus a venous blood specimen. We will also compare results of different G6PD tests with known G6PD genetic profiles. The results of the study will inform design of future G6PD diagnostic development & evaluations. This research will be conducted in MaeSot Thailand, where G6PD deficiency has a high prevalence. Study participants will be recruited into three groups of 50 volunteers per group: 50 G6PD-deficient individuals, 50 G6PD-normal individuals, and 50 G6PD-intermediate individuals. Following a written informed consent, participants will donate about 3 ml of venous blood and about 4 drops of capillary blood (fingerstick). There will be no direct benefit to research participants.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Glucose-6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency
Keywords
Glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, capillary, venous, genotype phenotype correlation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
150 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
G6PD Testing
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
All subjects receive G6PD test
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
G6PD Test
Other Intervention Name(s)
Trinity spectrophotometric assay, Flow cytometry, CareStart, Florescent Spot Test
Intervention Description
All subjects are tested by multiple G6PD tests
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Correlation of capillary and venous blood results using Trinity quantitative G6PD test
Description
Comparison of the performance of the Trinity quantitative test using capillary blood, vs the performance of the same test using venous blood.
Time Frame
Six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Concordance between a flow cytometry-based G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standard
Description
Percent agreement between the quantitative results of the flow cytometry assay and the quantitative results of the spectrophotometric assay.
Time Frame
six months
Title
Categorical accuracy of a flow cytometry-based G6PD test against the spectrophotometric gold standard and genotyping
Description
Using a predefined cutoff to categorize values from each quantitative test, determine percent agreement within each category between the two tests.
Time Frame
six months
Title
Concordance between a qualitative G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standard
Description
Compare sensitivity & specificity of qualitative results of the G6PD test and the categorical results of the quantitative spectrophotometric assay.
Time Frame
Six months
Title
Categorical accuracy of qualitative G6PD test against spectrophotometric gold standard
Description
Percent agreement between the qualitative G6PD test and the categorical results of the spectrophotometric gold standard
Time Frame
six months
Title
Association between flow cytometry-based test and sample genotype
Description
Determine accuracy of phenotypic results of flow cytometry assay against genetic profile.
Time Frame
Six months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Previous G6PD test at SMRU clinic Patient willing to participate and sign informed consent form Patient willing to allow donated sample to be used in future research Subjects 18 years of age or older Exclusion Criteria: patients with severe malaria or other severe illness Patients who received a blood transfusion in the last 3 months Patients who received primaquine in the past 1 month (this is to ensure that previous characterization of phenotype in the healthy subject has not been influenced by a recent hemolytic reaction)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Francois Nosten, MD/PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol Oxford Research unit
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gonzalo Domingo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
PATH
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Germana Bancone, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol Oxford Research unit
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah McGray, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
PATH
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU)
City
Mae Sot
Country
Thailand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparing G6PD Tests Using Capillary Blood Versus Venous Blood

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs