search
Back to results

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A

Primary Purpose

Influenza A Virus Infection

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
High-titer anti-influenza plasma
Low-titer anti-influenza plasma
Sponsored by
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Influenza A Virus Infection focused on measuring Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma

Eligibility Criteria

2 Weeks - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for Enrollment (Screening):

  • Subjects must be aged 2 weeks or older.
  • Hospitalization due to signs and symptoms of influenza.

    * Note: The decision for hospitalization will be made by the treating clinician. To be considered eligible, the hospitalization may either be an initial hospitalization, or a prolongation of a hospitalization due to a respiratory illness that was found to be from influenza. Influenza could be a component of a larger respiratory syndrome (i.e. COPD exacerbation thought to be triggered by influenza). However, respiratory syndromes that are not likely due to the virus should not be included (i.e. a subject that had mild influenza then developed pulmonary embolism and respiratory distress from the embolism).

  • Study plasma available on-site or available within 24 hours after randomization.
  • Not previously screened nor randomized in this study.
  • Willingness to have blood and respiratory samples obtained and stored.
  • Willingness to return for all required study visits and participate in study follow up.

Inclusion Criteria for Randomization:

  • Locally determined positive test for influenza A (by polymerase chain reaction [PCR], other nucleic acid testing, or by rapid Ag) from a specimen obtained less than or equal to 48 hours prior to randomization.
  • Onset of illness less than or equal to 6 days before randomization, defined as when the subject first experienced at least one respiratory symptom or fever.
  • Note: For subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms (chronic cough, or COPD with baseline dyspnea), the onset of symptoms is defined as the point when the symptoms changed during this illness). Hospitalized due to influenza, with anticipated hospitalization for more than 24 hours after randomization. Criteria for hospitalization will be up to the individual treating clinician.
  • National Early Warning (NEW) or Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) score greater than or equal to 3 within 12 hours prior to randomization.
  • ABO-compatible plasma available on-site or available within 24 hours after randomization.

Exclusion Criteria for Randomization:

  • Strong clinical evidence in the judgment of the site investigator that the etiology of illness is primarily bacterial super-infection in origin. Co-infection would be allowed, as there may be benefit to resolving influenza illness faster. Super-infection, where influenza illness occurred and is resolving, and new bacterial illness causing deterioration should be excluded (e.g., if the subject's respiratory infection is thought unlikely to benefit from additional antiviral therapy, this exclusion criteria would be met).
  • Prior treatment with any anti-influenza investigational drug, anti-influenza investigational intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), or anti-influenza investigational plasma therapy within 30 days prior to screening. Other investigational drug therapies (non-influenza) and administration of plasma and/or IVIG for non-influenza reasons are allowed.
  • History of allergic reaction to blood or plasma products (as judged by the site investigator).
  • A pre-existing condition or use of a medication that, in the opinion of the site investigator, may place the individual at a substantially increased risk of thrombosis (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, severe refractory hypertriglyceridemia, or clinically significant monoclonal gammopathy). Prior IVIG use alone would not meet exclusion criteria, but the investigator should consider the potential for a hyper-coagulable state.
  • Subjects who, in the judgment of the site investigator, will be unlikely to comply with the requirements of this protocol, including being not contactable following discharge from hospital.
  • Medical conditions for which receipt of 500-600 mL (or pediatric equivalent) of intravenous fluid may be dangerous to the subject (e.g., decompensated congestive heart failure).

Sites / Locations

  • University of Arizona Health Sciences Center
  • UCLA Pediatrics Infectious Diseases
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD)
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
  • University of Colorado Denver
  • Bridgeport Hospital
  • University of Florida
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • University of Michigan
  • Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
  • Beaumont Hospital, Troy
  • Mayo Clinic Campus Saint Mary's
  • St. Louis Children's Hospital at Washington University
  • Creighton University Medical Center
  • New York University/Bellevue Hospital
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • Duke University
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Vermont
  • Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

High-titer anti-influenza plasma

Low-titer anti-influenza plasma

Arm Description

Participants received two intravenous infusions of high-titer anti-influenza plasma on Study Day 0.

Participants received two intravenous infusions of low-titer anti-influenza plasma on Study Day 0.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Clinical Status at Day 7
The clinical status at Day 7 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical Status at Day 1
The clinical status at Day 1 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Clinical Status at Day 2
The clinical status at Day 2 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Clinical Status at Day 3
The clinical status at Day 3 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Clinical Status at Day 14
The clinical status at Day 14 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Clinical Status at Day 28
The clinical status at Day 28 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Duration of Initial Hospitalization
Duration (in days) of initial hospitalization, restricted to duration between randomization and last visit
28-day Mortality
Number of deaths during study follow-up
In-hospital Mortality During Initial Hospitalization
Number of deaths in the hospital during initial hospitalization
Composite of Mortality and Hospitalization at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28
Two categories were considered for the composite of mortality and hospitalization: Dead or hospitalized Alive and not hospitalized
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in National Early Warning (NEW) Score
The National Early Warning (NEW) score was only measured for the adult participants. The range of the NEW score is from 0 to 20, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) Score
The Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) score was only measured for the pediatric participants. The range is from 0 to 26, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Duration of Supplemental Oxygen
Duration (in days) of total supplemental oxygen use among those participants who required new or increased oxygen at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Incidence of New Oxygen Use During the Study
Incidence of new oxygen use during the study among those participants who did not require oxygen at randomization
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Duration (in days) of ICU stay among those participants who were in ICU at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Incidence of New ICU Admission Use During the Study
Incidence of new ICU admission during the study among those participants who were not in ICU at randomization
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Use
Duration (in days) of mechanical ventilation use among those participants who were on mechanical ventilation at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Incidence of New Mechanical Ventilation Use Stay Use During the Study
Incidence of new mechanical ventilation use during the study among those participants who were not on mechanical ventilation at randomization
Duration of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Duration (in days) of ARDS use among those participants with ARDS at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Incidence of New ARDS During the Study
Incidence of new ARDS during the study among those participants without ARDS at randomization
Duration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
Duration (in days) of ECMO use among those participants on ECMO at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Incidence of New ECMO Use During the Study
Incidence of new ECMO use during the study among those participants not on ECMO at randomization
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was only measured for the adult participants. The range is from 0 to 24, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) Score
The Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score was only measured for the pediatric participants. The range is from 0 to 71, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Disposition After Initial Hospitalization
Disposition at discharge after initial hospitalization was categorized as follows: Death, Ongoing at 28 days, Chronic nursing facility, Rehabilitation, Home with home health care, Home without assistance. The number of deaths at discharge after initial hospitalization do not necessarily match the overall number of deaths.
Detectable Influenza Virus at Day 3
Detectable influenza virus at Day 3 in oropharyngeal samples
Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Titers at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/H1N1
Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers as measured by serial dilutions at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/H1N1. HAI for A/H1N1 was tested in all influenza seasons while the study was ongoing.
Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Titers at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2
Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers as measured by serial dilutions at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2. HAI for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2 was tested in all influenza seasons while the study was ongoing.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs).
Number of participants with reported grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) throughout the study duration. In cases where participants had multiple reports of grade 3 and 4 AEs, they were only counted once.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Number of participants with reported serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study duration.

Full Information

First Posted
October 7, 2015
Last Updated
June 14, 2019
Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02572817
Brief Title
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Official Title
A Randomized Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 26, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 18, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of anti-influenza immune plasma, as an addition to standard of care antivirals, in participants hospitalized with severe influenza A infection.
Detailed Description
Despite antivirals and vaccines, influenza is responsible for thousands of hospitalizations and deaths each year worldwide. Because of this, additional treatments for influenza are needed. One potential treatment may be the use of high-titer anti-influenza immune plasma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with high-titer versus low-titer anti-influenza immune plasma, in addition to standard care, in participants hospitalized with severe influenza A infection. This study enrolled people aged 2 weeks or older who are hospitalized with severe influenza A infection. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either high-titer anti-influenza plasma or low-titer (control) anti-influenza plasma on Day 0. In addition, all participants received standard care antivirals. Participants were assessed on Day 0 (baseline) and on Days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 28. For participants who were not hospitalized on Days 2, 14, and 28, researchers could contact participants by telephone. Study procedures included clinical assessments, blood collection, and oropharyngeal swabs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Influenza A Virus Infection
Keywords
Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
138 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
High-titer anti-influenza plasma
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received two intravenous infusions of high-titer anti-influenza plasma on Study Day 0.
Arm Title
Low-titer anti-influenza plasma
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received two intravenous infusions of low-titer anti-influenza plasma on Study Day 0.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
High-titer anti-influenza plasma
Intervention Description
Human plasma (FFP or FP24, 225-350 mL per unit or pediatric equivalent) with both an influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 HAI titer of at least 1:80
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Low-titer anti-influenza plasma
Intervention Description
Human plasma (FFP or FP24, 225-350 mL per unit or pediatric equivalent) with both an influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 HAI titer of 1:10 or less
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical Status at Day 7
Description
The clinical status at Day 7 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 7
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical Status at Day 1
Description
The clinical status at Day 1 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Clinical Status at Day 2
Description
The clinical status at Day 2 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 2
Title
Clinical Status at Day 3
Description
The clinical status at Day 3 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 3
Title
Clinical Status at Day 14
Description
The clinical status at Day 14 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 14
Title
Clinical Status at Day 28
Description
The clinical status at Day 28 was based on a 6-point ordinal scale: Death In ICU Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2) Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen Not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities Not hospitalized with full resumption of normal activities A higher score corresponds to a better health outcome
Time Frame
Day 28
Title
Duration of Initial Hospitalization
Description
Duration (in days) of initial hospitalization, restricted to duration between randomization and last visit
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
28-day Mortality
Description
Number of deaths during study follow-up
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
In-hospital Mortality During Initial Hospitalization
Description
Number of deaths in the hospital during initial hospitalization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Composite of Mortality and Hospitalization at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28
Description
Two categories were considered for the composite of mortality and hospitalization: Dead or hospitalized Alive and not hospitalized
Time Frame
Day 7, Day 14, Day 28
Title
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in National Early Warning (NEW) Score
Description
The National Early Warning (NEW) score was only measured for the adult participants. The range of the NEW score is from 0 to 20, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) Score
Description
The Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) score was only measured for the pediatric participants. The range is from 0 to 26, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Duration of Supplemental Oxygen
Description
Duration (in days) of total supplemental oxygen use among those participants who required new or increased oxygen at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28 visit. The window of the Day 28 visit was 28-32 days from study entry.
Title
Incidence of New Oxygen Use During the Study
Description
Incidence of new oxygen use during the study among those participants who did not require oxygen at randomization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Description
Duration (in days) of ICU stay among those participants who were in ICU at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Incidence of New ICU Admission Use During the Study
Description
Incidence of new ICU admission during the study among those participants who were not in ICU at randomization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Use
Description
Duration (in days) of mechanical ventilation use among those participants who were on mechanical ventilation at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28 visit. The window of the Day 28 visit was 28-32 days from study entry
Title
Incidence of New Mechanical Ventilation Use Stay Use During the Study
Description
Incidence of new mechanical ventilation use during the study among those participants who were not on mechanical ventilation at randomization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Duration of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Description
Duration (in days) of ARDS use among those participants with ARDS at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Incidence of New ARDS During the Study
Description
Incidence of new ARDS during the study among those participants without ARDS at randomization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Duration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
Description
Duration (in days) of ECMO use among those participants on ECMO at randomization. The duration is restricted to duration between randomization and last visit.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Incidence of New ECMO Use During the Study
Description
Incidence of new ECMO use during the study among those participants not on ECMO at randomization
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Description
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was only measured for the adult participants. The range is from 0 to 24, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Change From Baseline to Day 3 and Day 7 in Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) Score
Description
The Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score was only measured for the pediatric participants. The range is from 0 to 71, with lower values representing a better outcome. Baseline is defined as the Day 0. Change was defined as the value at Day 3 or Day 7 minus the value at baseline.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Disposition After Initial Hospitalization
Description
Disposition at discharge after initial hospitalization was categorized as follows: Death, Ongoing at 28 days, Chronic nursing facility, Rehabilitation, Home with home health care, Home without assistance. The number of deaths at discharge after initial hospitalization do not necessarily match the overall number of deaths.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Detectable Influenza Virus at Day 3
Description
Detectable influenza virus at Day 3 in oropharyngeal samples
Time Frame
Day 3
Title
Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Titers at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/H1N1
Description
Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers as measured by serial dilutions at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/H1N1. HAI for A/H1N1 was tested in all influenza seasons while the study was ongoing.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Titers at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2
Description
Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers as measured by serial dilutions at Days 1, 3, 7 for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2. HAI for A/HongKong/4801/2014 H3N2 was tested in all influenza seasons while the study was ongoing.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 3, Day 7
Title
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs).
Description
Number of participants with reported grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) throughout the study duration. In cases where participants had multiple reports of grade 3 and 4 AEs, they were only counted once.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28
Title
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Description
Number of participants with reported serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study duration.
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 28

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Weeks
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Enrollment (Screening): Subjects must be aged 2 weeks or older. Hospitalization due to signs and symptoms of influenza. * Note: The decision for hospitalization will be made by the treating clinician. To be considered eligible, the hospitalization may either be an initial hospitalization, or a prolongation of a hospitalization due to a respiratory illness that was found to be from influenza. Influenza could be a component of a larger respiratory syndrome (i.e. COPD exacerbation thought to be triggered by influenza). However, respiratory syndromes that are not likely due to the virus should not be included (i.e. a subject that had mild influenza then developed pulmonary embolism and respiratory distress from the embolism). Study plasma available on-site or available within 24 hours after randomization. Not previously screened nor randomized in this study. Willingness to have blood and respiratory samples obtained and stored. Willingness to return for all required study visits and participate in study follow up. Inclusion Criteria for Randomization: Locally determined positive test for influenza A (by polymerase chain reaction [PCR], other nucleic acid testing, or by rapid Ag) from a specimen obtained less than or equal to 48 hours prior to randomization. Onset of illness less than or equal to 6 days before randomization, defined as when the subject first experienced at least one respiratory symptom or fever. Note: For subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms (chronic cough, or COPD with baseline dyspnea), the onset of symptoms is defined as the point when the symptoms changed during this illness). Hospitalized due to influenza, with anticipated hospitalization for more than 24 hours after randomization. Criteria for hospitalization will be up to the individual treating clinician. National Early Warning (NEW) or Pediatric Early Warning (PEW) score greater than or equal to 3 within 12 hours prior to randomization. ABO-compatible plasma available on-site or available within 24 hours after randomization. Exclusion Criteria for Randomization: Strong clinical evidence in the judgment of the site investigator that the etiology of illness is primarily bacterial super-infection in origin. Co-infection would be allowed, as there may be benefit to resolving influenza illness faster. Super-infection, where influenza illness occurred and is resolving, and new bacterial illness causing deterioration should be excluded (e.g., if the subject's respiratory infection is thought unlikely to benefit from additional antiviral therapy, this exclusion criteria would be met). Prior treatment with any anti-influenza investigational drug, anti-influenza investigational intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), or anti-influenza investigational plasma therapy within 30 days prior to screening. Other investigational drug therapies (non-influenza) and administration of plasma and/or IVIG for non-influenza reasons are allowed. History of allergic reaction to blood or plasma products (as judged by the site investigator). A pre-existing condition or use of a medication that, in the opinion of the site investigator, may place the individual at a substantially increased risk of thrombosis (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, severe refractory hypertriglyceridemia, or clinically significant monoclonal gammopathy). Prior IVIG use alone would not meet exclusion criteria, but the investigator should consider the potential for a hyper-coagulable state. Subjects who, in the judgment of the site investigator, will be unlikely to comply with the requirements of this protocol, including being not contactable following discharge from hospital. Medical conditions for which receipt of 500-600 mL (or pediatric equivalent) of intravenous fluid may be dangerous to the subject (e.g., decompensated congestive heart failure).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Beigel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. in support of Clinical Research Section, LIR, NIAID, National Institutes of Health
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Pediatrics Infectious Diseases
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095-1752
Country
United States
Facility Name
Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD)
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92134
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Denver
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bridgeport Hospital
City
Bridgeport
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06610
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
021141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Children's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Massachusetts Medical School
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01655
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beaumont Hospital, Troy
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48085
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Campus Saint Mary's
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis Children's Hospital at Washington University
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Creighton University Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68124
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York University/Bellevue Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Cincinnati
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45267
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
UT Southwestern Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Vermont
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC)
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98431
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9824069
Citation
Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8844239
Citation
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16546531
Citation
Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Grandbastien B, Lacroix J, Leclerc F. Paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):897; author reply 900-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68371-2. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12885479
Citation
Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A, Proulx F, Grandbastien B, Cotting J, Gottesman R, Joffe A, Pfenninger J, Hubert P, Lacroix J, Leclerc F. Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet. 2003 Jul 19;362(9379):192-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13908-6. Erratum In: Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):902. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):897; author reply 900-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23295778
Citation
Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22379384
Citation
Parshuram CS, Bayliss A, Reimer J, Middaugh K, Blanchard N. Implementing the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System in a community hospital: A prospective observational study. Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Mar;16(3):e18-22. doi: 10.1093/pch/16.3.e18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31582360
Citation
Beigel JH, Aga E, Elie-Turenne MC, Cho J, Tebas P, Clark CL, Metcalf JP, Ozment C, Raviprakash K, Beeler J, Holley HP Jr, Warner S, Chorley C, Lane HC, Hughes MD, Davey RT Jr; IRC005 Study Team. Anti-influenza immune plasma for the treatment of patients with severe influenza A: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Nov;7(11):941-950. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30199-7. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Titer Versus Low-Titer Anti-Influenza Immune Plasma for the Treatment of Severe Influenza A

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs