search
Back to results

Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Antivirals (Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir) Versus Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults at Risk for Complications (IRC003)

Primary Purpose

Influenza

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir
Oseltamivir
Sponsored by
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Influenza focused on measuring Adaptive Design, At Risk, H1N1, Synergy, TCAD

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers
  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Enrollment (Screening)

  1. Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures
  2. Presence of an underlying medical condition(s) that might increase risk of complications from influenza
  3. History of an influenza-like illness defined as:

    • One or more respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, or nasal symptoms) AND
    • Either
    • Fever (subjective or documented >38 degrees C) OR
    • 1 or more constitutional symptom (headache, malaise, myalgia, sweats/chills or fatigue)
  4. Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever
  5. Willingness to have samples stored

Randomization

  1. Signed informed consent
  2. Presence of a medical condition(s) that had been associated with increased risk of complications from influenza

    • Age 65 years of age or older
    • Asthma
    • Neurological and neuro-developmental conditions (including disorders of the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve, and muscle such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy [seizure disorders], stroke, moderate to severe developmental delay, muscular dystrophy, or spinal cord injury) [though still able to provide informed consent per inclusion criteria #1]
    • Chronic lung disease (such as COPD and cystic fibrosis)
    • Heart disease (such as congenital heart disease, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease)
    • Blood disorders (excluding genetic causes of anemia, as noted in the exclusion criteria)
    • Endocrine disorders (such as diabetes mellitus)
    • Kidney disorders
    • Liver disorders
    • Metabolic disorders (such as inherited metabolic disorders and mitochondrial disorders)
    • Weakened immune system due to disease or medication (such as people with HIV/AIDS, or cancer, chronic steroids or other medications causing immune suppression)
    • BMI ≥ 40(kg/m²)
  3. Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever
  4. Positive test for influenza (either rapid antigen or PCR)

    - Results from influenza testing obtained for clinical indications within 12 hours before screening/enrollment may be used if available. Randomization may proceed in cases of discrepant results (one positive and one negative)

  5. One of the following to avoid pregnancy:

    • Females who were able to become pregnant (i.e., are not postmenopausal, have not undergone surgical sterilization, and are sexually active with men) must agree to use at least 2 effective forms of contraception from the date of informed consent through 6 months after the last dose of study drug. At least one of the methods of contraception should be a barrier method
    • Males who had not undergone surgical sterilization and are sexually active with women must agree to use condoms plus have a partner use at least one additional effective form of contraception from the date of informed consent through 6 months after the last dose of study drug
  6. Willingness to have samples stored

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

(for Enrollment or Randomization)

  1. Women who were pregnant or breast-feeding, and men whose female partner(s) was pregnant
  2. Inability to take oral medication or a history of gastrointestinal malabsorption that would preclude the use of oral medication.
  3. Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL
  4. WBC < 1.5 times 10(9)/L
  5. Neutrophils < 0.75 x 10(9)/L
  6. Platelets < 50 x 10(9)/L
  7. History of genetic hemoglobinopathy (e.g., thalassemia major or sickle cell anemia) or autoimmune hemolytic anemia
  8. Received more than 2 doses of any antiviral influenza medications since onset of influenza symptoms
  9. Received stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), zidovudine (AZT), or azathioprine within 30 days prior to study entry
  10. Creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using serum creatinine)
  11. History of autoimmune hepatitis
  12. Uncompensated liver disease (defined as AST > 3 times site upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT > 3 times ULN, or Direct Bilirubin > 2 times ULN)
  13. Clinical signs of end-stage liver disease including jaundice, coagulopathy, portal hypertension, esophageal varices, ascites, peripheral edema, gastrointestinal bleeding, or encephalopathy
  14. Chronic liver disease categorized as Child-Pugh class C (Child-Pugh score 10-15)
  15. Known hypersensitivity to rimantadine, amantadine, ribavirin, oseltamivir, peramivir, or zanamivir
  16. Received live attenuated virus vaccine (influenza or other) within 3 weeks prior to study entry
  17. Use of any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever was longer) prior to study entry
  18. Participation in other research protocols that would require more than 100 mL of blood to be drawn in any 4-week period that overlaps with this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Simon Williamson Clinic
  • East Valley Family Physicians
  • Thomas Lenzmeier Family Practice
  • Central Phoenix Medical Center
  • WCCT Global LLC
  • Advanced Rx Clinical Research
  • Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
  • University of Southern California
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Westlake Medical Research (CA)
  • Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute
  • Empire Clinical Research
  • University of Colorado
  • Centennial - IMMUNOe International Research
  • University of Florida
  • Best Quality Research Inc.
  • San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.
  • Medical Consulting Center
  • Suncoast Research Group, LLC
  • University of Miami
  • DMI Research, Inc.
  • Northwestern University
  • Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
  • Ridge Family Practice
  • University of Iowa
  • Research Integrity, LLC
  • Horizon Research Group, of Opelousas, LLC
  • Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Seep
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • Boston Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • UMass Medical School
  • Henry Ford Health Systems
  • Bronson Methodist Hospital
  • West Florissant Internists
  • Clinical Research Advantage/ Skyline Medical Center
  • Prairie Fields Family Medicine
  • Southwest Family Physicians
  • New Jersey Medical School
  • James J. Peters, VA Medical Center
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
  • University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
  • Duke University
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Panuto
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Montgomery Medical
  • Health Concepts
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Bart
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Slandzicki
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Hoppers
  • Holston Medical Group
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Rowe
  • Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Dar
  • University of Texas Tech Amarillo
  • Family Medicine Associates of Texas
  • 3rd Coast Research Associates
  • University of Texas at Houston
  • Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Pouzar
  • Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
  • Texas Tech HSC
  • Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Garcia
  • Village Health Partners
  • Endeavor Clinical Trials
  • Bandera Family Healthcare Research
  • University of Virginia
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Instituto Medico Platense
  • Hospital Houssay
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciónes Clínicas (CEMIC)
  • Fundación del Centro de Estudios Infectológicos (FUNCEI)
  • Hospital General de Agudos J. M. Ramos Mejía
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  • Hospital Rawson
  • Instituto Centralizado de Asistencia e Investigación Clínica Integral (CAICI)
  • Holdsworth House Med Practice
  • Taylor Square Private Clinic
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Royal Brisbane
  • Northside Clinic
  • The Alfred Hospital
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición (INCMN) Salvador Zubirán
  • Hospital General y de Alta Especialidad "Dr. Manuel GEA Gonzalez"
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER)
  • Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • HIV-NAT, The Thai Red Cross AIDS
  • Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University
  • Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Combination Therapy

Oseltamivir monotherapy

Arm Description

Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir

Oseltamivir

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs
The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants by Virus Detection Status
Number of participants who had undetectable values (less than the limit of detection [LOD]), who had values between the LOD and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and who had values ≥LLOQ
qPCR Viral Shedding
Median, 25% and 75% percentile of the value of viral shedding (Results <LOD were imputed as the LOD value, and Results >= LOD, <LLOQ were imputed as the LLOQ value.)
Number of Participants Shedding Virus
Number of participants with undetectable viral load at both Day 3 and Day 7; detectable at Day 3 and undetectable at Day 7; detectable at Day 7 (irrespective of whether or not detectable at Day 3).
Time to Alleviation of Influenza Clinical Symptoms.
The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Duration of clinical symptoms is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1 (mild). A measurement is considered to be the 8AM or 8PM assessment during Days 0 to 7 (so two measurements are obtained per day) and then the daily assessment thereafter. Time will then be calculated in half-days through to Day 7. If a subject's first two assessments on (baseline assessment and first subsequent diary card assessment) satisfy this criterion, then the duration will be set to zero. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms evaluated.
Time to Absence of Fever
Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Otherwise, fever was considered not present during the period since the diary card was previously completed, except that the evaluation was considered missing if either the temperature or the antipyretic drug use entry was not completed on the diary card. The duration of fever was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive assessments (through to Day 7) or to the first assessment (Day 8 onwards) at which no fever was present according to this definition.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with fever evaluated.
Time to Resolution of All Symptoms AND Fever
The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Time to resolution of all clinical symptoms and fever is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1(mild) and no fever >=38.0 C or antipyretic drug is reported. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms and fever evaluated.
Time to Feeling as Good as Before the Onset of the Influenza Illness
Time to feeling as good as before influenza is defined as time to the first of two successive 'yes' responses to the question of 'feeling as good as you did before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered.
Time to Return to Pre-influenza Function
Time to return to pre-influenza function is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive 'Yes' answers to the global assessment question 'Are you functioning as well as you were before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered.
Time to Return of Physical Function to Pre-illness Leve
Time to return of physical function to pre-illness level was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which the physical function score equals or is better than the pre-illness score (obtained by recall at enrollment).For subjects who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with physical function evaluated.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure at Day 5
Clinical failure at Day 5 is defined as the need for continued (non-study) antiviral use after Day 5.
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Bronchitis, Pneumonia, or Other Complications of Influenza After Day 0.
Participants were assessed for the signs/symptoms suggestive of one of the following complications: Sinusitis, Otitis Media ,Bronchitis / Bronchiolitis, Pneumonia and antibiotic use for reason other than above.
Percentage of Participants Who Required New or Increased Use of Supplemental Oxygen
Percentage of participants who required new or increased use of supplemental oxygen
Percentage of Participants Who Required Hospitalization.
The percentage of participants hospitalized by 28 days was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves.
28-day Mortality
Number of deaths

Full Information

First Posted
October 22, 2010
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01227967
Brief Title
Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Antivirals (Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir) Versus Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults at Risk for Complications
Acronym
IRC003
Official Title
A Randomized Double-Blind Phase 2 Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Antivirals (Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir) Versus Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults at Risk for Complications
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Seasonal influenza is responsible for many hospitalizations and deaths each year, despite effective antiviral treatments. Some individuals have medical conditions such as heart or lung diseases that make them particularly at risk of severe influenza infections that may result in hospitalization or death. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is used most often to treat flu, but there are still many hospitalizations, complications, and deaths even with treatment. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals (amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin) compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population.
Detailed Description
Seasonal influenza is responsible for approximately 226,000 excess hospitalizations annually and despite effective antivirals causes significant morbidity and mortality (estimated 24,000-50,000 deaths each year in the United States alone). The influenza virus that emerged in 2009 (A/California/07/2009 H1N1) caused fewer deaths (12,000 flu-related deaths in the U.S) but in contrast to seasonal flu, nearly 90 percent of the deaths with the 2009 H1N1 occurred among people younger than 65 years of age. The CDC has defined an at-risk population that accounts for the majority of hospitalization and morbidity associated with influenza. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals as compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population. Subjects who met the CDC definition for being at-risk and that present with an influenza-like illness were screened for the study. Those subjects with a confirmatory test for influenza (rapid antigen or PCR) were randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive a blinded study treatment consisting of either the combination of amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin or oseltamivir alone for 5 days. Clinical, virologic, and laboratory assessments on Days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 were used for both safety and efficacy analysis. Design: Participants were screened with a physical examination and medical history, along with blood tests and throat swabs to confirm influenza infection. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to take either oseltamivir alone (the current standard treatment for influenza) or to take oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin. Participants had additional blood samples and throat swabs taken at the start of the study, and were shown how to complete a study diary at home. Participants received a study medication kit containing the medication to take at home twice a day for 5 days. Participants returned, with the medication kit, to the clinic on days 1 (the first day after the start of the study), 3, 7, 14, and 28. The first visit took 2 to 3 hours, but each subsequent visit took approximately 1 to 2 hours. Additional blood samples and throat swabs were taken at these visits. Pilot study: Due to the lack of reliable data concerning the AUC virologic endpoint, an "external" pilot study was conducted in the first 47 patients randomized to identify a primary endpoint and method of analysis, and to possibly modify the sample size. To ensure no effect on the type I error rate, data from these 47 patients were excluded from the primary and secondary efficacy analyses but were used in other analyses of secondary objectives.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Influenza
Keywords
Adaptive Design, At Risk, H1N1, Synergy, TCAD

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
881 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Combination Therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir
Arm Title
Oseltamivir monotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oseltamivir
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir
Intervention Description
Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg, three capsules of Ribavirin 200 mg for total of 600 mg, and one capsule of Amantadine 100 mg.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oseltamivir
Intervention Description
Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs
Description
The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding.
Time Frame
At Day 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants by Virus Detection Status
Description
Number of participants who had undetectable values (less than the limit of detection [LOD]), who had values between the LOD and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and who had values ≥LLOQ
Time Frame
At Day 0, 3 and 7.
Title
qPCR Viral Shedding
Description
Median, 25% and 75% percentile of the value of viral shedding (Results <LOD were imputed as the LOD value, and Results >= LOD, <LLOQ were imputed as the LLOQ value.)
Time Frame
At Day 0, 3 and 7
Title
Number of Participants Shedding Virus
Description
Number of participants with undetectable viral load at both Day 3 and Day 7; detectable at Day 3 and undetectable at Day 7; detectable at Day 7 (irrespective of whether or not detectable at Day 3).
Time Frame
At day 3 and 7.
Title
Time to Alleviation of Influenza Clinical Symptoms.
Description
The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Duration of clinical symptoms is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1 (mild). A measurement is considered to be the 8AM or 8PM assessment during Days 0 to 7 (so two measurements are obtained per day) and then the daily assessment thereafter. Time will then be calculated in half-days through to Day 7. If a subject's first two assessments on (baseline assessment and first subsequent diary card assessment) satisfy this criterion, then the duration will be set to zero. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms evaluated.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Time to Absence of Fever
Description
Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Otherwise, fever was considered not present during the period since the diary card was previously completed, except that the evaluation was considered missing if either the temperature or the antipyretic drug use entry was not completed on the diary card. The duration of fever was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive assessments (through to Day 7) or to the first assessment (Day 8 onwards) at which no fever was present according to this definition.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with fever evaluated.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Time to Resolution of All Symptoms AND Fever
Description
The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Time to resolution of all clinical symptoms and fever is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1(mild) and no fever >=38.0 C or antipyretic drug is reported. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms and fever evaluated.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Time to Feeling as Good as Before the Onset of the Influenza Illness
Description
Time to feeling as good as before influenza is defined as time to the first of two successive 'yes' responses to the question of 'feeling as good as you did before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Time to Return to Pre-influenza Function
Description
Time to return to pre-influenza function is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive 'Yes' answers to the global assessment question 'Are you functioning as well as you were before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Time to Return of Physical Function to Pre-illness Leve
Description
Time to return of physical function to pre-illness level was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which the physical function score equals or is better than the pre-illness score (obtained by recall at enrollment).For subjects who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with physical function evaluated.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure at Day 5
Description
Clinical failure at Day 5 is defined as the need for continued (non-study) antiviral use after Day 5.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Bronchitis, Pneumonia, or Other Complications of Influenza After Day 0.
Description
Participants were assessed for the signs/symptoms suggestive of one of the following complications: Sinusitis, Otitis Media ,Bronchitis / Bronchiolitis, Pneumonia and antibiotic use for reason other than above.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Required New or Increased Use of Supplemental Oxygen
Description
Percentage of participants who required new or increased use of supplemental oxygen
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Required Hospitalization.
Description
The percentage of participants hospitalized by 28 days was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves.
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28
Title
28-day Mortality
Description
Number of deaths
Time Frame
From treatment initiation to Day 28

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Enrollment (Screening) Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures Presence of an underlying medical condition(s) that might increase risk of complications from influenza History of an influenza-like illness defined as: One or more respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, or nasal symptoms) AND Either Fever (subjective or documented >38 degrees C) OR 1 or more constitutional symptom (headache, malaise, myalgia, sweats/chills or fatigue) Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever Willingness to have samples stored Randomization Signed informed consent Presence of a medical condition(s) that had been associated with increased risk of complications from influenza Age 65 years of age or older Asthma Neurological and neuro-developmental conditions (including disorders of the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve, and muscle such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy [seizure disorders], stroke, moderate to severe developmental delay, muscular dystrophy, or spinal cord injury) [though still able to provide informed consent per inclusion criteria #1] Chronic lung disease (such as COPD and cystic fibrosis) Heart disease (such as congenital heart disease, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease) Blood disorders (excluding genetic causes of anemia, as noted in the exclusion criteria) Endocrine disorders (such as diabetes mellitus) Kidney disorders Liver disorders Metabolic disorders (such as inherited metabolic disorders and mitochondrial disorders) Weakened immune system due to disease or medication (such as people with HIV/AIDS, or cancer, chronic steroids or other medications causing immune suppression) BMI ≥ 40(kg/m²) Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever Positive test for influenza (either rapid antigen or PCR) - Results from influenza testing obtained for clinical indications within 12 hours before screening/enrollment may be used if available. Randomization may proceed in cases of discrepant results (one positive and one negative) One of the following to avoid pregnancy: Females who were able to become pregnant (i.e., are not postmenopausal, have not undergone surgical sterilization, and are sexually active with men) must agree to use at least 2 effective forms of contraception from the date of informed consent through 6 months after the last dose of study drug. At least one of the methods of contraception should be a barrier method Males who had not undergone surgical sterilization and are sexually active with women must agree to use condoms plus have a partner use at least one additional effective form of contraception from the date of informed consent through 6 months after the last dose of study drug Willingness to have samples stored EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (for Enrollment or Randomization) Women who were pregnant or breast-feeding, and men whose female partner(s) was pregnant Inability to take oral medication or a history of gastrointestinal malabsorption that would preclude the use of oral medication. Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL WBC < 1.5 times 10(9)/L Neutrophils < 0.75 x 10(9)/L Platelets < 50 x 10(9)/L History of genetic hemoglobinopathy (e.g., thalassemia major or sickle cell anemia) or autoimmune hemolytic anemia Received more than 2 doses of any antiviral influenza medications since onset of influenza symptoms Received stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), zidovudine (AZT), or azathioprine within 30 days prior to study entry Creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation using serum creatinine) History of autoimmune hepatitis Uncompensated liver disease (defined as AST > 3 times site upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT > 3 times ULN, or Direct Bilirubin > 2 times ULN) Clinical signs of end-stage liver disease including jaundice, coagulopathy, portal hypertension, esophageal varices, ascites, peripheral edema, gastrointestinal bleeding, or encephalopathy Chronic liver disease categorized as Child-Pugh class C (Child-Pugh score 10-15) Known hypersensitivity to rimantadine, amantadine, ribavirin, oseltamivir, peramivir, or zanamivir Received live attenuated virus vaccine (influenza or other) within 3 weeks prior to study entry Use of any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever was longer) prior to study entry Participation in other research protocols that would require more than 100 mL of blood to be drawn in any 4-week period that overlaps with this study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Beigel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. in support of Clinical Research Section, LIR, NIAID, Natinal Institutes of Health
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Treanor, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Rochester
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Simon Williamson Clinic
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35211
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Valley Family Physicians
City
Chandler
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Thomas Lenzmeier Family Practice
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Phoenix Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85020
Country
United States
Facility Name
WCCT Global LLC
City
Costa Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92626
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Rx Clinical Research
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92843
Country
United States
Facility Name
Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
City
Lomita
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90717
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westlake Medical Research (CA)
City
Thousand Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Empire Clinical Research
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centennial - IMMUNOe International Research
City
Centennial
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80112
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Best Quality Research Inc.
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical Consulting Center
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33125
Country
United States
Facility Name
Suncoast Research Group, LLC
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33135
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
DMI Research, Inc.
City
Pinellas Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33782
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
City
Normal
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61761
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ridge Family Practice
City
Council Bluffs
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
51503
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Integrity, LLC
City
Owensboro
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Research Group, of Opelousas, LLC
City
Eunice
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70535
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Seep
City
Lake Charles
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70601
Country
United States
Facility Name
NIH Clinical Center
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20892
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
UMass Medical School
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01655
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health Systems
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bronson Methodist Hospital
City
Kalamazoo
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49007
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Florissant Internists
City
Bridgeton
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63044
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage/ Skyline Medical Center
City
Elkhorn
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Prairie Fields Family Medicine
City
Fremont
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Family Physicians
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68124
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Jersey Medical School
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07103
Country
United States
Facility Name
James J. Peters, VA Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10468
Country
United States
Facility Name
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Panuto
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montgomery Medical
City
Smithfield
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Health Concepts
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Bart
City
Columbia
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Slandzicki
City
Franklin
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37064
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Hoppers
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holston Medical Group
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Rowe
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Dar
City
Smyrna
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37167
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Tech Amarillo
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Family Medicine Associates of Texas
City
Carrollton
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
United States
Facility Name
3rd Coast Research Associates
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78413
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas at Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Pouzar
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77062
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77098
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Tech HSC
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79430
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Garcia
City
Pharr
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78577
Country
United States
Facility Name
Village Health Partners
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75024
Country
United States
Facility Name
Endeavor Clinical Trials
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bandera Family Healthcare Research
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78249
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23298
Country
United States
Facility Name
Instituto Medico Platense
City
La Plata
State/Province
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Hospital Houssay
City
Vicente Lopez
State/Province
Provincia De Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciónes Clínicas (CEMIC)
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Fundación del Centro de Estudios Infectológicos (FUNCEI)
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Hospital General de Agudos J. M. Ramos Mejía
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Hospital Rawson
City
Cordoba
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto Centralizado de Asistencia e Investigación Clínica Integral (CAICI)
City
Santa Fe
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Holdsworth House Med Practice
City
Darlinghurst
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2010
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Taylor Square Private Clinic
City
Darlinghurst
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2010
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Westmead Hospital
City
Westmead
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Brisbane
City
Herston
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4029
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Northside Clinic
City
Fitzroy North
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3068
Country
Australia
Facility Name
The Alfred Hospital
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3004
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
City
Parkville
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3052
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición (INCMN) Salvador Zubirán
City
México City
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Hospital General y de Alta Especialidad "Dr. Manuel GEA Gonzalez"
City
Tlalpan
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER)
City
Tlalpan
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
City
Bangkoknoi
State/Province
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10700
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
HIV-NAT, The Thai Red Cross AIDS
City
Patumwan
State/Province
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10330
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University
City
Muang
State/Province
Khon Kaen
ZIP/Postal Code
40002
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute
City
Muang
State/Province
Nonthaburi
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Thailand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12517228
Citation
Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.179.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16494718
Citation
Monto AS. Vaccines and antiviral drugs in pandemic preparedness. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):55-60. doi: 10.3201/eid1201.051068.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16371626
Citation
Moscona A. Oseltamivir resistance--disabling our influenza defenses. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2633-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058291. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28958678
Citation
Beigel JH, Bao Y, Beeler J, Manosuthi W, Slandzicki A, Dar SM, Panuto J, Beasley RL, Perez-Patrigeon S, Suwanpimolkul G, Losso MH, McClure N, Bozzolo DR, Myers C, Holley HP Jr, Hoopes J, Lane HC, Hughes MD, Davey RT; IRC003 Study Team. Oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin combination antiviral therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy for the treatment of influenza: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):1255-1265. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30476-0. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://clinicalstudies.info.nih.gov/cgi/detail.cgi?A_2010-I-0210.html
Description
NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page
URL
https://rsc.tech-res.com/clinical-research-sites/safety-reporting/daids-grading-tables
Description
The DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009).

Learn more about this trial

Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Antivirals (Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir) Versus Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults at Risk for Complications

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs