search
Back to results

Comparing Two Types of Endometrial Activation Prior to Embryo Transfer

Primary Purpose

Infertility, Endometrial Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endometrial scratch with Pipelle curette
Endometrial scratch with Shepard catheter
Sponsored by
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring Endometrial scratch

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing embryo transfer who are in the cycle prior to their embryo transfer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not undergoing embryo transfer
  • Known pregnancy
  • Active pelvic infection
  • Known endometrial hyperplasia or cancer
  • Inability to tolerate endometrial catheter placement
  • Severe cervical stenosis
  • Patients who will receive operative hysteroscopy in the cycle prior to embryo transfer

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Endometrial scratch with Pipelle curette

    Endometrial scratch with Shepard catheter

    Arm Description

    For patients in the Pipelle curette group, physicians inserted the Pipelle curette into the uterus and removed an adequate endometrial sample using vigorous motion.

    For patients in the Shepard catheter group, physicians performed a four-quadrant scratch technique by inserting the Shepard insemination catheter into the uterus at 12:00. The catheter was then turned one-quarter turn and withdrawn. This was repeated two more times so that four endometrial quadrants were touched by the catheter at 12:00, 3:00, 6:00, and 9:00.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of Participants With Live Births Per Transfers Performed
    Number (count) of births per number of subjects undergoing embryo transfer

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Pain Quantifcation After Endometrial Scratch
    Pain assessed by Visual analog scale (Numeric rating scale, units from 1-10 with 1 being no pain and 10 being maximum pain)
    Number (Count) of Positive Pregnancy Tests Per Number of Subjects Undergoing Embryo Transfer
    Number (Count) of Pregnancies Per Number of Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 22, 2020
    Last Updated
    October 12, 2022
    Sponsor
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04363879
    Brief Title
    Comparing Two Types of Endometrial Activation Prior to Embryo Transfer
    Official Title
    Comparing Two Types of Endometrial Activation Prior to Embryo Transfer: A Pilot Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    June 16, 2014 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 1, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    July 1, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    To determine if two types of endometrial activation (Pipelle curette or Shepard catheter) prior to embryo transfer result in similar live birth rates. Also to determine if patients experience similar pain from both types of endometrial activation.
    Detailed Description
    Assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including in vitro fertilization (IVF), are methods used to treat infertility, which affects approximately 10% reproductive aged women. Physicians at the Women's Institute perform over 300 embryo transfer procedures every year. Despite advances and improvements in ART over the past three decades, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate remain 30-40% and 20-30%. Implantation is essential for successful ART and IVF procedures, and many interventions have been studied to possibly improve implantation rates and thus pregnancy and live birth rates. Endometrial activation is one such intervention, sometimes referred to as endometrial "activation" or "scratch," and it is defined as "intentional endometrial injury, such as endometrial biopsy or curettage, in women undergoing ART". A previous study found that implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were more than twofold higher in women who underwent endometrial biopsy in the cycle before subsequent IVF treatment. Another study which examines endometrial activation prior to IVF similarly has concluded that endometrial activation prior to the embryo transfer cycle significantly improves clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in women undergoing ART. Although the type of endometrial procedure is not specified, the timing activation was found be most effective when performed in the cycle prior to the embryo transfer. The mechanism of increase endometrial receptivity is still unknown; however three proposed hypothesis exist. The first hypothesis proposes that local activation of the endometrium induces endometrial decidualization which increases the probability of embryo implantation. The second hypothesis is that endometrial healing following endometrial activation increases secreted cytokines, interleukins, growth factors, macrophages, and dendritic cells which are beneficial to embryo implantation. The final hypothesis suggests that endometrial maturation is abnormally advanced during ovarian stimulation, so endometrial activation may lead to better synchronicity between the endometrium and the embryo.. Endometrial activation has been found to have clear benefit in pregnancy and live birth rates in a previous study, however no uniform technique has been determined. The objective of this study is to compare two types of endometrial disruption - a vigorous endometrial biopsy with a Pipelle curette and a four quadrant endometrial "scratch" using a Shepard insemination catheter - to determine if the live birth rates are equivalent for the two methods. The investigators also will compare pain with the two types of endometrial activation. By comparing two distinct types of endometrial activation, the goal is to determine which method is both effective and tolerable to patients. The Shepherd catheter is a 1.8 mm malleable insemination catheter that can be curved to traverse the cervix. It is also used by some physicians in the Women's Institute to perform saline infusion sonography. When the catheter is inserted under ultrasound guidance, it is often placed in the subendometrial tissue, and causes deflection and disruption of the endometrium but is tolerated well. The Pipelle is a 3.1 mm semi-rigid catheter with an internal stylet plunger. A biopsy is performed by placing the catheter into the uterus, withdrawing the stylet to create suction, and aspirating endometrial tissue into the catheter. A study done by Leclair et al. found that the mean pain that women had when the Pipelle was used for an endometrial biopsy was 6.2±2.4 on a visual analog scale from 1-10 (5). Pain with the Shepard catheter has not been studied when it is used for endometrial biopsy.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Infertility, Endometrial Disorder
    Keywords
    Endometrial scratch

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Parallel treatment arms for two types of endometrial scratch
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    195 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Endometrial scratch with Pipelle curette
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    For patients in the Pipelle curette group, physicians inserted the Pipelle curette into the uterus and removed an adequate endometrial sample using vigorous motion.
    Arm Title
    Endometrial scratch with Shepard catheter
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    For patients in the Shepard catheter group, physicians performed a four-quadrant scratch technique by inserting the Shepard insemination catheter into the uterus at 12:00. The catheter was then turned one-quarter turn and withdrawn. This was repeated two more times so that four endometrial quadrants were touched by the catheter at 12:00, 3:00, 6:00, and 9:00.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Endometrial scratch with Pipelle curette
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Endometrial activation, endometrial injury
    Intervention Description
    For patients in the Pipelle curette group, physicians inserted the Pipelle curette into the uterus and removed an adequate endometrial sample using vigorous motion.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Endometrial scratch with Shepard catheter
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Endometrial activation, endometrial injury
    Intervention Description
    For patients in the Shepard catheter group, physicians performed a four-quadrant scratch technique by inserting the Shepard insemination catheter into the uterus at 12:00. The catheter was then turned one-quarter turn and withdrawn. This was repeated two more times so that four endometrial quadrants were touched by the catheter at 12:00, 3:00, 6:00, and 9:00.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Participants With Live Births Per Transfers Performed
    Description
    Number (count) of births per number of subjects undergoing embryo transfer
    Time Frame
    Collected up to 1 year after the last embryo transfer
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain Quantifcation After Endometrial Scratch
    Description
    Pain assessed by Visual analog scale (Numeric rating scale, units from 1-10 with 1 being no pain and 10 being maximum pain)
    Time Frame
    Immediately following endometrial scratch
    Title
    Number (Count) of Positive Pregnancy Tests Per Number of Subjects Undergoing Embryo Transfer
    Time Frame
    Collected up to 1 year after the last embryo transfer
    Title
    Number (Count) of Pregnancies Per Number of Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer
    Time Frame
    Collected up to 1 year after the last embryo transfer

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    55 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: All patients undergoing embryo transfer who are in the cycle prior to their embryo transfer Exclusion Criteria: Patients not undergoing embryo transfer Known pregnancy Active pelvic infection Known endometrial hyperplasia or cancer Inability to tolerate endometrial catheter placement Severe cervical stenosis Patients who will receive operative hysteroscopy in the cycle prior to embryo transfer
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Brad Hurst, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kathryn Goldrick, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    We do not plan to share individual patient data with other researchers.
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23754314
    Citation
    Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Endometrial scratching performed in the non-transfer cycle and outcome of assisted reproduction: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):375-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.12539. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12798877
    Citation
    Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00345-5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25803542
    Citation
    Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 22;(3):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21343767
    Citation
    Leclair CM, Zia JK, Doom CM, Morgan TK, Edelman AB. Pain experienced using two different methods of endometrial biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):636-641. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ad45b.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22786529
    Citation
    Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Maheshwari A, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub2.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparing Two Types of Endometrial Activation Prior to Embryo Transfer

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs