search
Back to results

Comparing Two Types of Needle for Oocytes Retrieval (NEEDLE)

Primary Purpose

Infertility, Female, ART

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system "SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)"
Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system "DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)"
Sponsored by
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility, Female

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 42 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IVF/ intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ovarian Endometriomas;
  • Severe previous pelvic inflammatory disease with frozen pelvis

Sites / Locations

  • Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)

DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)

Arm Description

Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system

Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of retrieved oocytes per procedure
Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes per procedure among the two arms

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time for single oocyte retrieval (minutes)
comparison between the recovery time for single oocyte in days among the two arms
Percentage of MII oocytes retrieved
A comparison between the percentage of MII oocytes retrieved among the two arms
Oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles
Comparison between the oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles among the two arms
number of punctured follicles
Comparison of the number of punctured follicles among the two arms
number of follicles at the trigger day
Comparison of the number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms
the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day
Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms
time of the single procedure
Comparison of the time of the single procedure among the two arms
Complication rate
Comparison of the complication rate among the two arms

Full Information

First Posted
June 26, 2018
Last Updated
September 24, 2022
Sponsor
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03611907
Brief Title
Comparing Two Types of Needle for Oocytes Retrieval
Acronym
NEEDLE
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Needles for Oocyte's Retrieval.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 6, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 20, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Istituto Clinico Humanitas

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In the early stages of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), oocyte retrieval was performed via laparoscopy, a cumbersome and expensive process requiring general anesthesia. Today, transvaginal oocyte retrieval for ART is a routine procedure performed under ultrasound guidance. Double-lumen retrieval needles, which are capable of flushing ovarian follicles, were developed to overcome the possibility of oocyte retention within the ovarian follicles and retrieval collection system. Single lumen needles have been introduced and are routinely used by most groups due to their supposed ability to retrieve the same number of oocytes in a shorter operation time.
Detailed Description
After a long period in which Humanitas department used double lumen needles for oocytes retrieval in the last four years the choice of the needle is an operator choice, usually influenced by the number of follicles present at human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) trigger. This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to highlight differences between Double Lumen Aspiration Needle and Single Lumen Needle commonly used in Humanitas' clinical practice primarly in terms of number of retrived oocytes per procedure (A). Secondary outcomes are the number of punctured follicles (B), the retrieval rate (%) (A/B), the number of follicles at the last ultrasound performed prior to the ovulation trigger (C), the number of retrieved oocytes / number of follicles at trigger-day (A/C), retrieval procedure time (D), single oocyte retrieval time (D/A), the number of mature oocytes (and MII) and complications rate. Number of transferred embryos, number of frozen embryos and oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval and per transfer (considering the number of pregnancies diagnosed by US visualization of one or more gestational sacs or definitive clinical signs of pregnancy per 100 cycles) and total number of clinical pregnancies with fetal heart beat (confirmed by visualization of one or more embryos with heartbeat at early dating ultrasound), are also evaluated. Standard protocols will be used for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation. Trans vaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours ± 2 after hCG injection with the patient under deep sedation. One hundred patients per each needle will be enrolled in this trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infertility, Female, ART

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to highlight differences between Double Lumen Aspiration Needle and Single Lumen Needle commonly used in clinical practice primarly in terms of number of retrieved oocytes per procedure.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system
Arm Title
DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system "SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)"
Intervention Description
In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate the follicles
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system "DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)"
Intervention Description
In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate follicle, and consequently a 1 mL flush is injected and aspirated twice for each punctured follicle
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of retrieved oocytes per procedure
Description
Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes per procedure among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time for single oocyte retrieval (minutes)
Description
comparison between the recovery time for single oocyte in days among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
Percentage of MII oocytes retrieved
Description
A comparison between the percentage of MII oocytes retrieved among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
Oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles
Description
Comparison between the oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
number of punctured follicles
Description
Comparison of the number of punctured follicles among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
number of follicles at the trigger day
Description
Comparison of the number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day
Description
Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
time of the single procedure
Description
Comparison of the time of the single procedure among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months
Title
Complication rate
Description
Comparison of the complication rate among the two arms
Time Frame
through study completion, 9 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
42 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: IVF/ intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles; Exclusion Criteria: Ovarian Endometriomas; Severe previous pelvic inflammatory disease with frozen pelvis
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
City
Rozzano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20089
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparing Two Types of Needle for Oocytes Retrieval

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs